The effect of wall thickness distribution on mechanical reliability and strength in unidirectional porous ceramics

References

• Colombo P, Scheffer M. Cellular ceramics: structure, manufacturing, properties and application. 2005. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
   Google Scholar
• Lu C, Danzer R, Fischer F. Fracture statistics of brittle materials: Weibull or normal distribution. Phys. Rev. E. 2002;65(6):1–4;067102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doremus RH. Fracture statistics: a comparison of the normal, weibull, and type i extreme value distributions. J. App phys. 1983;54(1):193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. App. Mech. 1951(September);7.
   Google Scholar
• Bazant ZP. Size effect on structural strength: a review. Arch. of App. Mech. 1999;69:703–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange FF. Powder processing science and technology for increased reliability. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1989;72(1):3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammis CG, Ashby MF. The failure of brittle porous solids under compressive stress states. Acta metall. 1986;34(3):511–526.
   Google Scholar
• Pernot F, Etienne P, Boschet F, et al. Weibull parameters and the tensile strength of porous phosphate glass-ceramics. J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 1999;48(3):641–648.
   Google Scholar
• Nanjangud SC, Brezny R, Green DJ. Strength and Young‘s modulus behavior of a partially sintered porous alumina. J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 1995;78(1):266–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Case ED, Ren F, et al. Part I: porosity dependence of the Weibull modulus for hydroxyapatite and other brittle materials. J. mech. Behav. of Biomed. Mater. 2012;8:21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danzer R. A general strength distribution function for brittle materials. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 1992;10(6):461–472.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh AK, Boah JK, Hansen DA. Statistical modeling of pitting corrosion and pipeline reliability. Corrosion. 1990;46(3):190–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu MS, Kamaraju V. High voltage engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi FS, Sheikh AK. A probabilistic characterization of adhesive wear in metals. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 1997;46(1):38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hasan M, Nigmatullin RR. Identification of the generalized weibull distribution in wind speed data by the eigen-coordinates method. Renew. Energy. 2003;28(1):93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasumi T, Akimoto T, Aizawa Y. The weibull-log weibull distribution for interoccurrence times of earthquakes. Physica A. 2009;388(4):491–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafart P, Couvert O, Gaillard S, et al. On calculating sterility in thermal preservation methods: application of the weibull frequency distribution model. Int. J. food microbiol. 2002;72(1):107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll KJ. On the use and utility of the weibull model in the analysis of survival data. Control. clin. Trial. 2003;24(6):682–701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan X, Case ED, Gheorghita I, et al. Weibull modulus and fracture strength of highly porous hydroxyapatite. J. mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013;20:283–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Jiang D, Tan S. Preparation of silicon carbide reticulated porous ceramics. Mater. Sci. and Eng A. 2002;323(1–2):232–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber BSM, Gonzenbach UT, Gauckler LJ. Mechanical properties of highly porous alumina foams. J. Mater. Res. 2013;28(17):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabree I, Gough JE, Derby B. Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: Influence of internal dimensions. Ceramics Int. 2015;41(7):8425–8432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordell JM, Vogl ML. Wagoner Johnson AJ. The influence of micropore size on the mechanical properties of bulk hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite scaffolds. J. Mechanical Behav Biomed. Mater. 2009;2(5):560–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genet M, Houmard M, Eslava S, et al. A two-scale Weibull approach to the failure of porous ceramic structures made by robocasting: Possibilities and limits. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 2012;33(4):679–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda P, Pajares A, Saiz E, et al. Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2008;85(1):218–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville S. Freeze-Casting of Porous Ceramics: A Review of Current Achievements and Issues. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2008;10(3):155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Hong C, Zhang X, et al. Highly porous ZrO2 ceramics fabricated by a camphene-based freeze-casting route: Microstructure and properties. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 2010;30(1):53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville S, Saiz E, Nalla RK, et al. Freezing as a path to build complex composites. Science. 2006;311(5760):515–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhangdoust S, Zamanian A, Yasaei M, et al. The effect of particle size on the mechanical and microstructural properties of freeze-casted macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Mater. Sci. and Eng. C. 2013;33:453–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LF, Wang C-A. Effect of sintering temperature on compressive strength of porous yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics. Ceramics Int. 2010;36(5):1697–1701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojuva A, Järveläinen M, Bauer M, et al. Mechanical performance and CO2 uptake of ion-exchanged zeolite A structured by freeze-casting. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 2015;35(9):2607–2618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods. 2012;9(7):676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville S, Viazzi C, Guizard C. Ice-structuring mechanism for zirconium acetate. Langmuir. 2012;28(42):14892–14898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton:Taylor & Francis; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Meille S, Lombardi M, Chevalier J, Montanaro L. Mechanical properties of porous ceramics in compression: On the transition between elastic, brittle, and cellular behavior. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 2012;32(15):3959–3967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville S, Meille S, Seuba J. A meta-analysis of the mechanical properties of ice-templated ceramics and metals. Sci. and Technol. Adv. Mater. 2015;16(4):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munch E, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, et al. Architectural control of freeze-cast ceramics through additives and templating. J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 2009;92(7):1534–1539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter MM, Imperio R, Wen M, et al. Bioinspired scaffolds with varying pore architectures and mechanical properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014;24(14):1978–1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo P. Macro- and micro-cellular porous ceramics from preceramic polymers. Composites Sci. and Technol. 2003;63(16):2353–2359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezny R, Green DJ. Fracture behavior of open-cell ceramics. J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 1989;72(7):1145–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miled K, Sab K, Le Roy R. Particle size effect on EPS lightweight concrete compressive strength: Experimental investigation and modelling. Mech. Mater. 2007;39(3):222–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D-M. Influence of porosity and pore size on the compressive strength of porous hydroxyapatite ceramic. Ceramics Int. 1997;23:135–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Huec JC, Schaeverbeke T, Clement D, et al. Influence of porosity on the mechanical resistance of hydroxyapatite ceramics under compressive stress. Biomaterials. 1995;16(2):113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezny R, Green DJ. The effect of cell size on the mechanical behavior of cellular materials. Acta Metal. et Mater. 1990;38(12):2517–2526.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Porter MM, Olevsky EA, et al. Sintering of bi-porous titanium dioxide scaffolds: Experimentation, modeling and simulation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2015;636(11):148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Case ED, Ren F, Shu Y, Baumann MJ. Part II: fracture strength and elastic modulus as a function of porosity for hydroxyapatite and other brittle materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012;8:99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagoner Johnson AJ. Herschler BA. A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(1):16–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q, Saiz E, Rahaman MN, et al. Toward strong and tough glass and ceramic scaffolds for bone repair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:5461–5476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas DL, Liebhafsky HA. Fuel cells: history, operation, and applications. Physics Today. 2009;13(6):26–30.
   Google Scholar