Manipulating mammalian cell morphologies using chemical-mechanical polished integrated circuit chips

References

• Bourget J, Guillemette M, Veres T, et al. Alignment of cells and extracellular matrix within tissue- engineered substitutes. In: Pignatello R, editor. Advances in biomaterials science and biomedical applications. 2013. p. 365–390.
   Google Scholar
• Koubassova NA, Tsaturyan AK. Molecular mechanism of actin – myosin motor in muscle. Biochem. 2011;76(13):1484–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Corneal stromal wound healing in refractive surgery: the role of myofibroblasts. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18(3):311–356. 10.1016/S1350-9462(98)00021-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Gasser CT, et al. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. Am J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H2048–H2058. 10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert L, Legeais JM, Robert AM, et al. Corneal collagens. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2001;49:353–363.10.1016/S0369-8114(01)00144-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim EKF, Darling EM, Kulangara K, et al. Biomaterials Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1299–1306. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto T, Wang X, Kawazoe N, et al. Biointerfaces Influence of micropattern width on differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells to vascular smooth muscle cells. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2014;122:316–323. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco M, Nealey PF, Campbell S, et al. Adhesion and proliferation of corneal epithelial cells on self-assembled monolayers. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:261–269. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arima Y, Iwata H. Preferential adsorption of cell adhesive proteins from complex media on self-assembled monolayers and its effect on subsequent cell adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:72–81.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez E, Engel E, Planell JA, et al. Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Ann Anat. 2009;191:126–135. 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LG, Richards RG. Staphylococci and implant surfaces: a review. Injury. May 2006;37(2):S3–S14.10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoccia D, Baldassarri L, Pirini V, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus from implant orthopaedic infections: ribotypes, agr polymorphism, leukocidal toxins and antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials. Oct 2008;29(30):4108–4116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan B, Kummer KM, Tarquinio KM, et al. Decreased Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on anodized nanotubular titanium and the effect of electrical stimulation. Acta Biomater. Jul 2011;7(7):3003–3012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue M, Jackson CJ. Comprehense invited reviews extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4(3):119–136.10.1089/wound.2013.0485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamma-lorger CS, Hayes S, Boote C, et al. Effects on collagen orientation in the cornea after trephine injury. Mol Vis. 2009;15(2009):378–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim EKF, Reano RM, Pang SW, et al. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26(26):5405–5413. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Chen L, Liu H, et al. Bio-inspired soft polystyrene nanotube substrate for rapid and highly efficient breast cancer-cell capture. NPG Asia Mater. 2013;5(9):e63.10.1038/am.2013.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wan Y, Liu Y. Effects of nanopillar array diameter and spacing on cancer cell capture and cell behaviors. Nanoscale. 2014;6(21):12482–12489.10.1039/C4NR02854F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Asghar W, Demirci U, et al. Nanostructured substrates for isolation of circulating tumor cells. Nano Today. 2013;8(4):347–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Ng JK, Kunitake ME, et al. Interfacing Silicon Nanowires with Mammalian Cells. JACS. 2007;129:7228–7229. May
   Google Scholar
• Zahor D, Radko A, Vago R, et al. Organization of mesenchymal stem cells is controlled by micropatterned silicon substrates. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27:117–121. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahed Z, Zareian R, Chau YY, et al. Differential collective- and single-cell behaviors on silicon micropillar arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:23604–23613.10.1021/acsami.6b08668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretti J-W, Randolph M, Zaporojan, MA. A bio-mechanical analysis of an engineered cell-scaffold implant for cartilage repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(5):533–537. 10.1097/00000637-200105000-00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning D, Duong B, Thomas G, et al. Mechanical and morphological analysis of cancer cells on nanostructured substrates. Langmuir. 2016;32:2718–2723. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucaro MA, Vasquez Y, Hatton BD, et al. Fine-tuning the degree of stem cell polarization and alignment on ordered arrays of high-aspect-ratio nanopillars. ACS Nano. 2012;6(7):6222–6230. 10.1021/nn301654e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford RJ, Webb HK, Truong VK, et al. Surface topographical factors influencing bacterial attachment. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. Nov. 2012;179–182:142–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Provenzano PP, Smith CL, et al. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol. 2012;197(3):351–360. 10.1083/jcb.201108062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Lipke EA, Kim P, et al. Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;107(2):565–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujie T, Shi X, Ostrovidov S, et al. Biomaterials spatial coordination of cell orientation directed by nanoribbon sheets. Biomaterials. 2015;53:86–94. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak E, Ahn S, Jaworski J. Microfabrication of custom collagen structures capable of guiding cell morphology and alignment. Biomacromol. 2015;16:1761–1770.10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong C, Yu H, Pal M, et al. Micropatterned matrix directs differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells towards myocardial lineage. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(7):1159–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudel I, Lee JS, Tan L, et al. Micropatterning – retinoic acid co-control of neuronal cell morphology and neurite outgrowth. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(1):4592–4598.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahed Z, Molladavoodi S, Seo BB, et al. Cell responses to metallic nanostructure arrays with complex geometries. Biomaterials. Aug. 2014;35(34):9363–9371.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahed Z, Lin P, Seo BB, et al. Responses of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial cells to nanocrystalline nickel nanostructures. Biomaterials. May 2014;35(14):4249–4254.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahed Z, Shahsavan H, Verma MS, et al. Bacterial Networks on Hydrophobic Micropillars. ACS Nano. 2017;11:675–683.10.1021/acsnano.6b06985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver MR. Chemical-mechanical planarization of semi-conductor materials. 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2004.10.1007/978-3-662-06234-0
   Google Scholar
• Doering R, Nishi Y. Handbook of semiconductor manufacturing technology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2007.10.1201/9781420017663
   Google Scholar
• Chen W-K. The VLSI handbook. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y. Microelectronic applications of chemical mechanical planarization. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2007. 10.1002/9780470180907
   Google Scholar
• Seo Y, Lee W. Effects of oxidant additives for exact selectivity control of W- and Ti-CMP process. Microelectron Eng. 2005;77:132–138. 10.1016/j.mee.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo Y, Lee W. Effects of different oxidizers on the W-CMP performance. Mater Sci Eng B. 2005;118:281–284. 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kranenburg H, van Corbach HD, Woerlee PH, et al. W-CMP for sub-micron inverse metallisation. Microelectron Eng. 1997;33:241–248.10.1016/S0167-9317(96)00050-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Ieee M, Xue Q, et al. Comprehensive characterization of tungsten microwires in chronic neurocortical implants. in 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS; 2012. p. 755–758.
   Google Scholar
• Weltman A, Yoo J, Meng E. Flexible, penetrating brain probes enabled by advances in polymer microfabrication. Micromachines. 2016;7(180):1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Freire MAM, Faber J, Lemos NAM, et al. Distribution and morphology of calcium-binding proteins immunoreactive neurons following chronic tungsten multielectrode implants. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0130354.10.1371/journal.pone.0130354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida T. Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7(May):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saha R, Nix WD. Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 2002;50:23–38.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sending indentation experimetns. J Mater Res. 1992;7(06):1564–1583.10.1557/JMR.1992.1564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran R, Xu Z, Radhakrishnan B, et al. Data descriptor: surface energies of elemental crystals. Sci data. 2016;3(160080):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Lin I, Zhang X. Mechanical properties of sputtered silicon oxynitride films by nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;489:294–301.10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunauer S, Kantro DL, Weise CH. The surface energies of amorphous silica. Can J Chem. 1956;34:1483–1496.10.1139/v56-190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RR, Beisky RA, Kaufman FB, et al. Wettabilily of polished silicon oxide surfaces. J Electrochem Soc. 1996;143(2):643–648.10.1149/1.1836494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih T, Twu J-C, et al. Method to remove residue in wolfram CMP, US Patent 6,153,526,” 6,153,526. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jairath R. Method and apparatus for polishing a semiconductor substrate wafer, US Patent 5,688,360,” 5,688,360. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Murayama A, Sugiyama N, Wakita T, et al. Completion of the entire hepatitis c virus life cycle in vero cells derived from monkey kidney. MBio. 2016;7(3):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumoto H, Hishima T, Hasegawa H, et al. Evaluation of vero-cell-derived simian endogenous retrovirus infection in humans by detection of viral genome in clinicopathological samples and commercialized vaccines and by serology of Japanese general population. Vaccine. 2016;34(24):2700–2706.10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich HJ, Berezuk G, Fritsch S, et al. Clinical development of a vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2012;30(29):4377–4386. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcconnell RD, Hurst AM. United States Patent 8,506,831 B2. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mcconnell RD, Hurst AM, Shi X. United States Patent 8,858,819. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mcconnell RD, Hurst AM. United States Patent 8,790,521. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zantye PB, Kumar A, Sikder AK. Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Mater Sci Eng R Reports. 2004;45:89–220. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallab NJ, Bundy KJ, O'Connor KO, et al. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(1):55–71.10.1089/107632700300003297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gentleman MM, Gentleman E. The role of surface free energy in osteoblast – biomaterial interactions. Int Mater Rev. 2014;59(8):417–429.10.1179/1743280414Y.0000000038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deligianni DD, Katsala N, Ladas S, et al. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4 V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1241–1251.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00274-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili AA, Ahmad MR. A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:18149–18184.10.3390/ijms160818149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareidoost A, Yousefpour M, Ghaseme B, et al. The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(6):1479–1488. 10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Jensen T, Kraft DC, et al. Fibronectin adsorption, cell adhesion, and proliferation on nanostructured tantalum surfaces. ACS Nano. 2010;4(5):2874–2882.10.1021/nn9017872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Pennisi CP, Skeldal S, et al. The influence of glancing angle deposited nano-rough platinum surfaces on the adsorption of fibrinogen and the proliferation of primary human fibroblasts. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:095101 (9 pp).10.1088/0957-4484/20/9/095101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, et al. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1881–1892.10.1242/jcs.00383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin H, Nichol JW, Hutson CB, et al. Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 6941–6951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo S, Yeon Kim JY, Lee E, et al. Effects of ECM protein micropatterns on the migration and differentiation of adult neural stem cells. Sci Reports. 2015;5:1433.10.1038/srep13043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita S, Ohshima M, Iwata H. Time-lapse observation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6(Suppl_3):S269–S277. 10.1098/rsif.2008.0428.focus
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin H, Nichol JW, Hutson CB, et al. Biomaterials directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(27):6941–6951. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar