Superhydrophobic SLA 3D printed materials modified with nanoparticles biomimicking the hierarchical structure of a rice leaf

References

• Chen C, Liu M, Zhang L, et al. Mimicking from rose petal to lotus leaf: biomimetic multiscale hierarchical particles with tunable water adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(7):7431–7440. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b21494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Wang JN, Wu SZ, et al. Three-Level biomimetic rice-leaf surfaces with controllable anisotropic sliding. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21(15):2927–2932. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201002733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixler GD, Bhushan B. Bioinspired rice leaf and butterfly wing surface structures combining shark skin and lotus effects. Soft Matter. 2012;8(44):11271–11284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari N, Sood N, Krishnan V. Beetle wing inspired fabrication of nanojunction based biomimetic SERS substrates for sensitive detection of analytes. Mater Technol. 2020;1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari N, Kumar A, Krishnan V. Ultrathin Au–Ag heterojunctions on nanoarchitectonics based biomimetic substrates for dip catalysis. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 1902;31(5):1954–1966.
   Google Scholar
• Ariga K, Yamauchi Y. Nanoarchitectonics from atom to life. Chem – Asian J. 2020;15(6):718–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TL, Huang CY, Xie YT, et al. Bioinspired durable superhydrophobic surface from a hierarchically wrinkled nanoporous polymer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(43):40875–40885. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b14325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixler GD, Bhushan B. Fluid drag reduction and efficient self-cleaning with rice leaf and butterfly wing bioinspired surfaces. Nanoscale. 2013;5(17):7685–7710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West N, Sammut K, Tang Y. Material selection and manufacturing of riblets for drag reduction: an updated review. Proce Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mat Des Appl. 2018;232:610–622.
   Google Scholar
• Bixler GD, Bhushan B. Bioinspired micro/nanostructured surfaces for oil drag reduction in closed channel flow. Soft Matter. 2013;9(5):1620–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Wu Z, Tao J, et al. Spraying preparation of eco-friendly superhydrophobic coatings with ultralow water adhesion for effective anticorrosion and antipollution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(22):25484–25493. DOI:10.1021/acsami.0c06074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, He M, Liu H, et al. One-Step fabrication of robust superhydrophobic steel surfaces with mechanical durability, thermal stability, and anti-icing function. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(28):25586–25594. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b06865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JGS, Bertolini M, Costa RC, et al. Targeting pathogenic biofilms: newly developed superhydrophobic coating favors a host-compatible microbial profile on the titanium surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(9):10118–10129. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b22741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han K, Park TY, Yong K, et al. Combinational biomimicking of lotus leaf, mussel, and sandcastle worm for robust superhydrophobic surfaces with biomedical multifunctionality: antithrombotic, antibiofouling, and tissue closure capabilities. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(10):9777–9785. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b21122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeevahan J, Chandrasekaran M, Britto Joseph G, et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces: a review on fundamentals, applications, and challenges. J Coatings Technol Res. 2018;15(2):231–250. DOI:10.1007/s11998-017-0011-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenjimbayashi M, Samitsu S, Watanabe Y, et al. Liquid marble patchwork on super-repellent surface. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung YC, Bhushan B. Biomimetic structures for fluid drag reduction in laminar and turbulent flows. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010;22(3):035104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SG, Lim HS, Lee DY, et al. Tunable anisotropic wettability of rice leaf-like wavy surfaces. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(5):547–553. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201201541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Krishnan V. Fabrication of highly sensitive biomimetic SERS substrates for detection of herbicides in trace concentration. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2018;262:710–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fresnais J, Chapel JP, Poncin-Epaillard F. Synthesis of transparent superhydrophobic polyethylene surfaces. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200(18–19):5296–5305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Liu K, Yao X, et al. Bioinspired surfaces with superwettability: new insight on theory, design, and applications. Chem Rev. 2015;115(16):8230–8293. DOI:10.1021/cr400083y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Vuckovac M, Cui W, et al. 3D printing of superhydrophobic objects with bulk nanostructure. Adv Mater. 2021;33(45):2106068. DOI:10.1002/adma.202106068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KM, Park H, Kim J, et al. Fabrication of a superhydrophobic surface using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer with poly lactic acid (PLA) filament and dip coating with silica nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;467-468:979–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milionis A, Noyes C, Loth E, et al. Superhydrophobic 3D printed surfaces by dip-coating. Tech Proc 2014 NSTI Nanotechnol Conf Expo, NSTI-Nanotech 2014. 2014;2:157–160.
   Google Scholar
• Milionis A, Noyes C, Loth E, et al. Water-repellent approaches for 3-D printed internal passages. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(9):1162–1170. DOI:10.1080/10426914.2015.1059443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wu J, Hedhili MN, et al. Inkjet printing for direct micropatterning of a superhydrophobic surface: toward biomimetic fog harvesting surfaces. J Mater Chem a. 2015;3(6):2844–2852. DOI:10.1039/C4TA05862C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Fabrication of Polydimethylsiloxane films with special surface wettability by 3D printing. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;129:58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li X, Zheng X, et al. 3D-Printed biomimetic super-hydrophobic structure for microdroplet manipulation and oil/water separation. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari R, Cloutier C, Allahdini A, et al. Recent progress and challenges with 3D printing of patterned hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;103(1–4):1225–1238. DOI:10.1007/s00170-019-03630-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Li Y, Lu Z, et al. Differential expression of microRnas during fiber development between fuzzless-lintless mutant and its wild-type allotetraploid cotton. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3–10. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-00038-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qin L, Chu Y, Zhou X, et al. Fast healable superhydrophobic material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(32):29388–29395. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b07563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Guo Y, Zhang Z, et al. Self-Cleaning superhydrophobic surface based on titanium dioxide nanowires combined with polydimethylsiloxane. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;284:319–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Sathasivam S, Song J, et al. Robust self-cleaning surfaces that function when exposed to either air or oil. Science. 2015;347(6226):1132–1134. DOI:10.1126/science.aaa0946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo KJ, Bin JS, Shin J, et al. Water-repellent TiO 2 -Organic dye-based air filters for efficient visible-light-activated photochemical inactivation against bioaerosols. Nano Lett. 2021;21(4):1576–1583. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Ye L, Sun Y, et al. Elastic superhydrophobic and photocatalytic active films used as blood repellent dressing. Adv Mater. 2020;32(11):1908008. DOI:10.1002/adma.201908008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Leng Y, Huang N, et al. Effects of microtopographic patterns on platelet adhesion and activation on titanium oxide surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res - Part a. 2013;101(3):A:622–632. DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.34361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima A, Hashimoto K, Watanabe T, et al. Transparent superhydrophobic thin films with self-cleaning properties. Langmuir. 2000;16(17):7044–7047. DOI:10.1021/la000155k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C, Jiang P, Jia X, et al. 3D printing of bioinspired textured surfaces with superamphiphobicity. Nanoscale. 2020;12(5):2924–2938. DOI:10.1039/C9NR09620E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, et al. Photo-Curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(1):110–115. DOI:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Mao H, Hu P, et al. Bioinspired functional surfaces enabled by multiscale stereolithography. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Chen K, Chen D, et al. Study on the enhancing water collection efficiency of cactus-and beetle-like biomimetic structure using UV-induced controllable diffusion method and 3D printing technology. RSC Adv. 2021;11(24):14769–14776. DOI:10.1039/D1RA00652E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidkar RA, Leblanc L, Kulkarni AJ, et al. Skin-Friction drag reduction in the turbulent regime using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids. 2014;26(8):085108. DOI:10.1063/1.4892902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh MJ. Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. Aiaa J. 1983;21(4):485–486.
   Google Scholar
• García-Mayoral R, Jiménez J. Drag reduction by riblets. Philos Trans R Soc a Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011;369(1940):1412–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravi SS, Cheng K. A review of drag reduction by riblets and micro-textures in the turbulent boundary layers. Eur Sci J. 2013;9:62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Moore AR, Lowson MV. Drag reduction in a rectangular duct using riblets. Aeronaut J. 1995;99:187–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulbari HA, Yunus RM, Abdurahman NH, et al. Going against the flow—a review of non-additive means of drag reduction. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19(1):27–36. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniello RJ, Waterhouse NE, Rothstein JP. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids. 2009;21(8):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreeFEM - An open-source PDE solver using the finite element method.
   Google Scholar
• Bathe K-J. Finite element method. Wiley Encycl Comput Sci Eng. 2008;1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy PD JN. Introduction to the finite element method. 4th ed. New York Chicago San FranciscoAthens London MadridMexico City Milan New DelhiSingapore Sydney Toronto: McGraw-Hill Education; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Formlabs. Safety data sheet Clear Resin. 2019. p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Förch R, Schönherr H, At J. Appendix C: Contact Angle Goniometry. In: Fçrch R Schçnherr H and ATAJ, editors. Surf Des Appl Biosci Nanotechnol. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.; 2009. p. 471–473.
   Google Scholar
• Song D, Daniello RJ, Rothstein JP. Drag reduction using superhydrophobic sanded Teflon surfaces. Exp Fluids. 2014;55(8):1783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung T, Choi H, Kim J. Effects of the air layer of an idealized superhydrophobic surface on the slip length and skin-friction drag. J Fluid Mech. 2016;790:R11–R112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovin KB, Gose J, Perlin M, et al. Bioinspired surfaces for turbulent drag reduction. Philos Trans R Soc a Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374:2073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou J, Rothstein JP. Direct velocity measurements of the flow past drag-reducing ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids. 2005;17(10):103606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou J, Perot B, Rothstein JP. Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids. 2004;16(12):4635–4643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui J, Li W, Lam WH. Numerical investigation on drag reduction with superhydrophobic surfaces by lattice-boltzmann method. Comput Math with Appl. 2011;61(12):3678–3689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RL, Di QF, Wang XL, et al. Numerical study of the relationship between apparent slip length and contact angle by Lattice Boltzmann Method. J Hydrodyn. 2012;24(4):535–540. DOI:10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60275-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi CH, Ulmanella U, Kim J, et al. Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids. 2006;18(8):087105. DOI:10.1063/1.2337669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Desoky MM, Morad I, Wasfy MH, et al. Synthesis, structural and electrical properties of PVA/TiO2 nanocomposite films with different TiO2 phases prepared by sol–gel technique. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2020;31(20):17574–17584. DOI:10.1007/s10854-020-04313-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra V, Warshi MK, Sati A, et al. Investigation of temperature-dependent optical properties of TiO2 using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1(3):1–8. DOI:10.1007/s42452-019-0253-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoee S, Bagheri Y, Hashemi A. Composition controlled synthesis of PCL–PEG Janus nanoparticles: magnetite nanoparticles prepared from one-pot photo-click reaction. Nanoscale. 2015;7(9):4134–4148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León A, Reuquen P, Garín C, et al. FTIR and raman characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol as carrier for 2-methoxyestradiol. Appl Sci. 2017;7(1):1–9. DOI:10.3390/app7010049
   Google Scholar
• Mugundan S, Rajamannan B, Viruthagiri G, et al. Synthesis and characterization of undoped and cobalt-doped TiO2 nanoparticles via sol–gel technique. Appl Nanosci. 2015;5(4):449–456. DOI:10.1007/s13204-014-0337-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanag A, Sienkiewicz A, Rokicka-Konieczna P, et al. Influence of modification of titanium dioxide by silane coupling agents on the photocatalytic activity and stability. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8(4):103917. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2020.103917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Wang L, Shen Y, et al. Preparation of hexadecyltrimethoxysilane-modified silica nanocomposite hydrosol and superhydrophobic cotton coating. Fibers Polym. 2015;16(5):1082–1091. DOI:10.1007/s12221-015-1082-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razmjou A, Mansouri J, Chen V. The effects of mechanical and chemical modification of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. J Memb Sci. 2011;378(1–2):73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann J, Gleis E, Fruhmann G, et al. Investigation of the temperature influence on the dual curing urethane-methacrylate resin Rigid Polyurethane 70 (RPU 70) in digital light synthesis (DLS). Addit Manuf. 2021;37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What does resolution mean in 3D printing? [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 31]. Available from: https://formlabs.com/blog/horizontal-resolution-meaning-3d-printing/.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Cai X, Guo Q, et al. I3DP, a robust 3D printing approach enabling genetic post-printing surface modification. Chem Commun. 2013;49(86):10064–10066. DOI:10.1039/c3cc45817b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricinci O, Terencio T, Mazzolai B, et al. 3D Micropatterned surface inspired by Salvinia molesta via Direct Laser Lithography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(46):25560–25567. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b07722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barahman M, Lyons AM. Ratchetlike slip angle anisotropy on printed superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir. 2011;27(16):9902–9909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürstner R, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, et al. Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir. 2005;21(3):956–961. DOI:10.1021/la0401011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel J, Vucko MJ, Blomberg SP, et al. Skin hydrophobicity as an adaptation for self-cleaning in geckos. Ecol Evol. 2020;10(11):4640–4651. DOI:10.1002/ece3.6218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalawai SP, Saad Aly MA, Latthe SS, et al. Recent advances in durability of superhydrophobic self-cleaning technology: a critical review. Prog Org Coatings. 2020;138:105381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Balaji R, Krishnan V. Fog-harvesting properties of dryopteris marginata: role of interscalar microchannels in water-channeling.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Orejon D, Takata Y, et al. Gladiolus dalenii based bioinspired structured surface via soft lithography and its application in water vapor condensation and fog harvesting. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(5):6981–6993. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Shen Y, Tao J, et al. Facile spraying fabrication of highly flexible and mechanically robust superhydrophobic F-SiO 2 @PDMS coatings for self-cleaning and drag-reduction applications. New J Chem. 2018;42(22):18208–18216. DOI:10.1039/C8NJ04275F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan K, He M, Xu B, et al. Spontaneous directional self-cleaning on the feathers of the aquatic bird anser cygnoides domesticus induced by a transient superhydrophilicity. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;2010634:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Panchanathan D, Kwon G, Qahtan TF, et al. Kinetics of photoinduced wettability switching on nanoporous titania surfaces under oil. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2017;4(21):1–10. DOI:10.1002/admi.201700462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng R, Song F, Xu C, et al. A quadruple-biomimetic surface for spontaneous and efficient fog harvesting. Chem Eng J. 2021;422:130119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi R, Tian Y, Wang L. Bioinspired fibers with controlled wettability: from spinning to application. ACS Nano. 2021;15(5):7907–7930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan B. Biomimetics. 3rd ed. Columbus, OH: Springer US; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• McHale G, Shirtcliffe NJ, Evans CR, et al. Terminal velocity and drag reduction measurements on superhydrophobic spheres. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;94(6):1–6. DOI:10.1063/1.3081420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Cheng M, Zhang Y, et al. Extraordinary drag-reducing effect of a superhydrophobic coating on a macroscopic model ship at high speed. J Mater Chem a. 2013;1(19):5886–5891. DOI:10.1039/c3ta10225d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson B, Young D, Okiishi T, et al. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. Sixth ed. Welter J Dumas S, editors. USA: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Moevius L, Xu X, et al. Pancake bouncing on superhydrophobic surfaces. Nat Phys 2014 107 [Internet]. 2014 [[cited 2022 Mar 26]];10:515–519. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2980
   Google Scholar
• Guo C, Zhao D, Sun Y, et al. Droplet impact on anisotropic superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir. 2018;34(11):3533–3540. DOI:10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio M, Weigand B. Numerical simulation of a drop impact on a superhydrophobic surface with a wire. Phys Fluids [Internet]. 2019;31(11):112107. doi:10.1063/1.5123593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar