Biosemiotic criticism: modelling the environment in literature

References

• Andrews, E. 2003. Conversations with Lotman: Cultural Semiotics in Language, Literature and Cognition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Augustinus, De Doctrina Christiana. 1996. = Augustine De Doctrina Christiana, edited by R. P. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. 2011. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colapietro, V. 2009. “Pointing Things Out: Exploring the Indexical Dimensions of Literary Texts.” In Redefining Literary Semiotics, edited by H. Veivo, C. Ljungberg, and J. D. Johansen, 109–133. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. 1981a. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Selected Writings III. Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry, edited by R. Jakobson, 18–51. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. 1981b. “The Dominant.” In Selected Writings III. Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry, edited by R. Jakobson, 751–756. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, J. D. 2002. Literary Discourse: A Semiotic-Pragmatic Approach to Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jüssi, F. 1986a. “Hääletu kevad.” In Jäälõhkuja, 21–22. Tallinn: Valgus.
   Google Scholar
• Jüssi, F. 1986b. “Madala taeva all.” In Jäälõhkuja, 19. Tallinn: Valgus.
   Google Scholar
• Jüssi, F. 1986c. “Ohakas.” In Jäälõhkuja, 35–36. Tallinn: Valgus.
   Google Scholar
• Jüssi, F. 2003. “The Thistle.” [Ohakas.] Translated by K. Mits. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 10 (2): 213–214. doi:10.1093/isle/10.2.213.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, K. 1998. “Semiotic Ecology: Different Natures in the Semiosphere.” Sign Systems Studies 26: 344–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, K., C. Emmeche, and D. Favareau. 2008. “Biosemiotic Questions.” Biosemiotics 1 (1): 41–55. doi:10.1007/s12304-008-9008-2.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. E. 2007. “‘To See Things for the First Time’: Before and After Ecocriticism.” Journal of Literary Studies 23 (4): 341–373. doi:10.1080/02564710701786434.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, M. 2012. Struktuur ja vabadus I. Semiootika vaatevinklist. I.I. Tartu-Moskva koolkond: tekstist semiosfäärini. Tallinn: TLÜ Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. 1967. Лотман, Юрий Михайлович. “Тезисы к проблеме “Искусство в ряду моделирующих систем”.” Труды по знаковым системам, т. 3: 130–145.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. 1977. The Structure of the Artistic Text. Michigan Slavic Contributions 7. Translated by Gail Lenhoff and Roland Vroon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. 1981. Лотман, Юрий Михайлович. “Текст в тексте”. Труды по знаковым системам, т. 14: 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. 1992. Лотман, Юрий Михайлович. “Текст и полиглотизм культуры”.—Лотман, Ю М. Избранные статьи в трех томах. т. I. Статьи по семиотике и топологии культуры, 142–147 (Таллин: Александра).
   Google Scholar
• Maran, T. 2007a. “Ökosemiootilise analüüsi perspektiivid: Loodusteksti mõiste.” Acta Semiotica Estica 4: 48–72.
   Google Scholar
• Maran, T. 2007b. “Towards an Integrated Methodology of Ecosemiotics: The Concept of Nature-Text.” Sign Systems Studies 35 (1/2): 269–294.
   Google Scholar
• Maran, T. 2014. “Biosemiotic Criticism.” In Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, edited by G. Garrard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maran, T. Forthcoming. “Semiotization of Matter. A Hybrid Zone Between Biosemiotics and Material Ecocriticism.” In Material Ecocriticism, edited by S. Iovino and S. Opperman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C. 1971. “Foundations of the Theory of Signs.” In Writings on the General Theory of Signs, 17–71. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931–1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. vol. 1–6, edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 1931–1935; vol. 7–8, edited by A. W. Burks, 1958. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Referred to as CP, followed by numerical reference to the volume and the passage.]
   Google Scholar
• Rueckert, W. 1978. “Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism.” Iowa Review 9 (1): 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok, T. A., ed. 1991. “In What Sense is Language a ‘Primary Modeling System’?” In A Sign is Just a Sign, 49–58. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siewers, A. K. 2011. “Pre-Modern Ecosemiotics: The Green World as Literary Ecology.” In The Space of Culture—The Place of Nature in Estonia and Beyond, edited by T. Peil, 39–68. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, S. 2001. Literary Semiotics: A Critical Approach. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stables, A. 1997. “The Landscape and the ‘Death of the AUTHOR’.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 2: 104–113.
   Google Scholar
• Stables, A., and K. Bishop. 2001. “Weak and Strong Conceptions of Environmental Literacy: Implications for Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 7 (1): 89–97. doi:10.1080/13504620125643.
   Google Scholar
• Striedter, J. 1989. Literary Structure, Evolution, and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Reconsidered (Harvard Studies in Comparative Literature 38). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tondl, L. 2000. “Semiotic Foundation of Models and Modelling.” In Modellierungen von Geschichte und Kultur Modelling History and Culture Akten des 9. Internationalen Symposiums der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Semiotik Universitat Graz, November 22–24, 1996 Band I. Angewandte Semiotik 16/17, edited by Jeff Bernard, Peter Grzybek, and Gloria Withalm, 81–89. Wien: OGS.
   Google Scholar
• Torop, P. 1999. “Cultural Semiotics and Culture.” Sign Systems Studies 27: 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tüür, K. 2009. “Bird Sounds in Nature Writing: Human Perspective on Animal Communication.” Sign Systems Studies 37 (3/4): 580–613.
   Google Scholar
• Veivo, H. 2007. “The New Literary Semiotics.” Semiotica 165 (1/4): 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veivo, H., and C. Ljungberg. 2009. “Introduction.” In Redefining Literary Semiotics, edited by H. Veivo, C. Ljungberg, and J. D. Johansen, 1–9. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Veivo, H., C. Ljungberg, and J. D. Johansen, eds. 2009. Redefining Literary Semiotics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, W. 2008. “Postscript on Biosemiotics: Reading Beyond Words – And Ecocriticism.” New Formations 64: 137–154.
   Google Scholar