Reading environment(s): digital humanities meets ecocriticism

References

• Armbruster, K., and K. Wallace. 2001. “Introduction: Why Go Beyond Nature Writing, and Where To?” In Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism, edited by K. Armbruster and K. Wallace, 1–25. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. [1973] 1975. The Pleasure of the Text. Translated by Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bird Rose, D., T. van Dooren, M. Chrulew, S. Cooke, M. Kearnes, and E. O’Gorman. 2012. “Thinking through the Environment, Unsettling the Humanities.” Environmental Humanities 1 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Birkerts, S. 1994. Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. Boston, MA: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, M. 2014. “Are You Serious? A Modest Proposal for Environmental Humor.” In Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, edited by G. Garrard, 377–399. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, L. 1995. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bushell, S. 2012. “The Slipperiness of Literary Maps: Critical Cartography and Literary Cartography.” Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 47 (3): 149–160. doi:10.3138/carto.47.3.1202.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. 2008. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic, July/August. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. 2004. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carruth, A., and Marzec, R., eds. 2014. “Visualizing the Environment.” Public Culture, February 26.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrin, S. 2012. “Introduction. Ecology and a Future of Writing Studies.” In Ecology, Writing Theory, and New Media: Writing Ecology, edited by S. Dobrin, 1–23. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 1992. Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, J. 1996. Imagining the Earth: Poetry and the Vision of Nature. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glotfelty, C. 1996. “Introduction.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, edited by C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm, xv–xxxvii. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became: Human Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, U. 1997. “Science and Ecocriticism.” American Book Review 18 (5): 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, U. 2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, S. 2000. Electronic Texts in the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houellebecq, M. 2005. The Possibility of an Island. Translated by Gavin Bowd. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Kindle Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Ivakhiv, A. 2013. Ecologies of the Moving Image: Cinema, Affect, Nature. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jockers, M. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juola, P. 2009. “Guessing at the Content of a Million Books.” New Knowledge Environments 1 (1). http://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/INKE/article/view/154/160
   Google Scholar
• Love, G. 2003. Practical Ecocriticism: Literature, Biology and the Environment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. 1996. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meeker, J. 1974. The Comedy of Survival: Literary Ecology and a Play Ethic. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. 1998. Atlas of the European Novel, 1800–1900. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. 2007. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2007. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. M., and K. J. Garland. 2008. “Computer- vs. Paper-Based Tasks: Are They Equivalent?.” Ergonomics 51 (9): 1352–1375. doi:10.1080/00140130802170387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. 2003. The Truth of Ecology: Nature, Culture, and Literature in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, S., and S. Sinclair. 2003. “Ecology and Technology: ‘Dialogue de sourds’?” In Culture and the State: Landscape and Ecology, edited by J. Gifford and G. Zezulka-Maillous, 167–177. Edmonton: CRC Studio.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, S., and S. Sinclair. 2011. “L’inscription de la nature et de la technologie dans La possibilité d’une le de Michel Houellebecq.” Contemporary French & Francophone Studies 15 (3): 349–356. doi:10.1080/17409292.2011.577620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, S. 2014. “The Hermeneutics of Screwing Around; or What You Do with a Million Books.” In Pastplay: Teaching and Learning History with Technology, edited by K. Kee, 111–120. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueckert, W. 1978. “Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism.” The Iowa Review 9 (1): 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Sadun, E. 2014. “The Book and I: How the iPad Has Changed My Reading Life.” TUAW. http://www.tuaw.com/2014/01/06/the-book-and-i-how-the-ipad-has-changed-my-reading-life/
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, S., and G. Rockwell. Voyant Tools. 15 Oct. 2014 <http://voyant-tools.org/>.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, J. 2000. “Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common, and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?” Humanities Computing. http://people.brandeis.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
   Google Scholar
• Wellmon, C. 2012. “Why Google Isn’t Making Us Stupid… or Smart.” ISAC. The Hedgehog Review 14 (1). http://www.iasc-culture.org/THR/THR_article_2012_Spring_Wellmon.php
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, B. 2007. La Géocritique, Réel, fiction, espace. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, C. 2009. “How Google Is Making Us Smarter.” Discover. http://discovermagazine.com/2009/feb/15-how-google-is-making-us-smarter
   Google Scholar