Do international factors influence the passage of climate change legislation?

References

• Allison, P. D., & Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32, 247–265. doi: 10.1111/1467-9531.00117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (2007). Why cooperate. The incentives to supply global public goods. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165–176. doi: 10.1093/wber/15.1.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2010). A comparison of international and domestic sources of global governance dynamics. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 509–538. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88, 585–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F., & Berry, W. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395–415. doi: 10.2307/1963526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F., & Berry, W. (1992). Tax innovation by American states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 715–742. doi: 10.2307/2111588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, D., & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking ‘Galton's problem' seriously: Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18, 298–322. doi: 10.1177/0951629806064351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. O., Jörgens, H., & Tews, K. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory instruments: The making of a new international environmental regime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 146–167. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congleton, R. (1992). Political institutions and pollution control. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 412–421. doi: 10.2307/2109485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata (revised edition). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doda, B. (2014). Evidence on business cycles and emissions. Journal of Macroeconomics, 40, 214–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. K., Hagemann, M. Höhne, N., & Upadhyaya, P. (2013). Developments in national climate change mitigation legislation and strategy. Climate Policy, 13, 649–664. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.845409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (Ed.). (2013). The handbook of global climate and environment policy. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Gennaioli, C., & Collins, M. (2014). Domestic dynamics and international influence. What explains the passage of climate change legislation (Working Paper 156). London: Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, O. (2014). Shades of brown and green: Party effects in proportional election systems. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12, 1361–1395. doi: 10.1111/jeea.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P., & Gaston, N. (2000). Ratification of the 1992 climate change convention: What determines legislative delay? Public Choice, 104, 345–368. doi: 10.1023/A:1005129300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673–701. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R. (1990). The political economy of environmental regulation: Towards a unifying framework. Public Choice, 65, 21–47. doi: 10.1007/BF00139289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23, 715–734. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.923614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2000). Greening the European Union: What can be learned from the leaders of EU environmental policy. European Environment, 10, 109–120. doi: 10.1002/1099-0976(200005/06)10:3<109::AID-EET227>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., & Zito, A. (2000). Innovating with new environmental policy instruments: Convergence or divergence in the European Union?. Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, K., Jörgens, H., & Jänicke, M. (2001). The diffusion of environmental policy innovations: A contribution to the globalisation of environmental policy (Discussion Paper FS II 01-302). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, R. (2011). Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 45–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, S., & Shogren, J. (2008). Domestic politics and climate change: International public goods in two-level games. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21, 563–583. doi: 10.1080/09557570802452904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., Moretti, E., & Butler, M. J. (2004). Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the US House. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 807–859. doi: 10.1162/0033553041502153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2013). The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK climate change act. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1339–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoff, D., & Edwards, J. (2014). Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008). Environmental Politics, 23, 795–817. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.923639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., Fankhauser, S., Townshend, T., Collins, M. Landesman, T., Matthews, A., …  Setzer, J. (2014). The GLOBE climate legislation study: A review of climate change legislation in 66 countries (4th edn). London: GLOBE International and Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 139–164. doi: 10.1177/0022343302039002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2003). Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 45(2), 203–220. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Never, B. (2012). Who drives change? Comparing the evolution of domestic climate governance in India and South Africa. Journal of Environment and Development, 21(3), 362–387. doi: 10.1177/1070496512449821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Never, B., & Betz, J. (2014). Comparing the climate policy performance of emerging economies. World Development, 59, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W., & Portney, P. (2003). The political economy of environmental policy. In K. Mäler & J. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics (pp. 325–354). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sauquet, A. (2014). Exploring the nature of inter-country interactions in the process of ratifying international environmental agreements: The case of the Kyoto Protocol. Public Choice, 159, 141–158. doi: 10.1007/s11127-012-0033-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavins, R., & Ji, Z. 2014. International cooperation. Agreements and instruments. In Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Chapter 13). Geneva: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Townshend, T., Fankhauser, S., Aybar, R., Collins, M., Landesman, T., Nachmany, M., & Pavese, C. (2013). How national legislation can help to solve climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3, 430–432. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend, T., Fankhauser, S., Matthews, A., Feger, C., Liu, J., & Narciso, T. (2011). Legislating climate change at the national level. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(5), 5–17. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2011.604004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Stein, J. (2008). The international law and politics of climate change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 243–268. doi: 10.1177/0022002707313692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar