Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations

References

• Agarwal, A., Narain, S., Sharma, A., & Imchen, A. (Eds.). (2001). Poles apart. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., & Alexieva, A. (2012). Continuity and change in Russia's climate negotiations position and strategy. Climate Policy, 12, 614–629. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.691227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, R. J., Fielding, D. J., Marland, G., Boden, T. A., Kumar, N., & Kearney, A. T. (1999). Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel use, 1751–1950. Tellus B, 51, 759–765. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-3-00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Baer, P., Athanasiou, T., Kartha, S., & Kemp-Benedict, E. (2008). The greenhouse development rights framework: The right to development in a climate constrained world. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, EcoEquity, Christian Aid and the Stockholm Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Botzen, W. J. W., Gowdy, J. M., & Bergh, J. C. J. M. van den. (2008). Cumulative CO2 emissions: Shifting international responsibilities for climate debt. Climate Policy, 8, 569–576. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (2006). Environmental degradation, reparations, and the moral significance of history. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37, 464–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00348.x
   Google Scholar
• Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 106–116. doi: 10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116
   Google Scholar
• Cordonier Segger, M.-C., Kahlfan, A., Gehring, M., & Toering, M. (2003). Prospects for principles of international sustainable development law after the WSSD; Common but differentiated responsibilities, precaution and participation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 12, 54–68. doi: 10.1111/1467-9388.00344
   Google Scholar
• den Elzen, M., Schaeffer, M., & Lucas, P. L. (2005). Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries’ relative historical responsibility for climate change: Uncertainties in the ‘Brazilian proposal’ in the context of a policy implementation. Climatic Change, 71, 277–301. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-5382-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depledge, J. (2005). The organization of global negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, C., Höhne, N., & Müller, B. (2011). Differentiating historical responsibilities for climate change. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), China’s responsibility for climate change: Ethics, fairness and environmental policy (pp. 71–98). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fei, T. (2009). Historical responsibility: From a perspective of per capita cumulative emissions. AWG-LCA6: Technical briefing. Tsinghua: Tsinghua University. Retrieved from http://unfccc2.meta-fusion.com/kongresse/090601_SB30_Bonn/downl/090604china.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Friman, M. (2013a). Historical responsibility: Assessing the past in international climate negotiations (Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 569). Linköping: Linköping University, Unit of Water and Environmental Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Friman, M. (2013b). Building legitimacy: Consensus and conflict over historic responsibility for climate change. In C. Methmann, D. Rothe, & B. Stephan (Eds.), Interpretive approaches to global climate governance: (De-)constructing the greenhouse (pp. 217–231). London/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Friman, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2008). Technology obscuring equity: Historical responsibilities in UNFCCC negotiations. Climate Policy, 8, 339–354. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friman, M., & Strandberg, G. (2014). Historical responsibility for climate change: Science and the science–policy interface. WIREs Climate Change, 5(3), 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P. (2009). Quantifying historic differentiated responsibility: Concept and empirical results. AWG-LCA6: Technical briefing. New Delhi: The Energy & Resources Institute. Retrieved from http://unfccc2.meta-fusion.com/kongresse/090601_SB30_Bonn/downl/090604india.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gosseries, A. (2004). Historical emissions and free-riding. Ethical Perspectives, 11, 36–60. doi: 10.2143/EP.11.1.504779
   Google Scholar
• Guoquan, H., Yong, L., & Hongbin, L. (2009). Contributions of accumulative per capita emissions to global climate change. In Carbon equity: Perspectives from Chinese academic community (pp. 1–6). Tsinghua: Chinese Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Halme, P. (2007). Carbon debt and the (in) significance of history. TRAMES, 11, 346–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyward, M. (2007). Equity and international climate change negotiations: A matter of perspective. Climate Policy, 7, 518–534. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhne, N., & Blok, K. (2005). Calculating historical contributions to climate change. Climatic Change, 71, 141–173. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-5929-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honkonen, T. (2009). The common but differentiated responsibility principle in multilateral environmental agreements: Regulatory and policy aspects. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53, 379–408. doi: 10.1162/002081899550913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeme, J. (2003). Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: Incomplete approaches in climate politics. Global Environmental Change, 13, 195–206. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00047-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Duus-Otterström, G. (2007). Intergenerational responsibility: Historical emissions and climate change adaptation (QoG Working Paper Series). Göteborg: Department of Political Science, Göteborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Jiankun, H. (2012). Equitable access to sustainable development. AWG-LCA15: Workshop presentation. Tsinghua: Tsinghua University. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/files/bodies/awg-lca/application/pdf/20120514_china_1220.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M., Parker, C., & Linnér, B.-O. (2012). The legitimacy of leadership in international climate change negotiations. Ambio, 41, 46–55. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0240-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., Parker, C., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2011). Looking for leaders: Perceptions of climate change leadership among climate change negotiation participants. Global Environmental Politics, 11, 89–107. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rovere, E. L., de Macedo, L. V., & Baumert, K. A. (2002). The Brazilian proposal on relative responsibility for global warming. In K. A. Baumert (Ed.), Building on the Kyoto protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 157–174). Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5–55.
   Google Scholar
• Linnér, B.-O., & Jacob, M. (2005). From Stockholm to Kyoto: A review of the globalization of global warming policy and North–South relations. Globalizations, 2, 403–415. doi: 10.1080/14747730500368007
   Google Scholar
• Matsui, Y. (2002). Some aspects of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2, 151–170. doi: 10.1023/A:1020985925489
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. H. (2004). Compensating wrongless historical emissions of greenhouse gases. Ethical Perspectives, 11, 20–35. doi: 10.2143/EP.11.1.504778
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., & Waskow, D. (2014). A new look at climate equity in the UNFCCC. Climate Policy, 14, 17–22. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.848096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, B., Höhne, N., & Ellermann, C. (2009). Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate change: Summary report. Climate Policy, 9, 593–611. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najam, A., Huq, S., & Sokona, Y. (2003). Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: Developing countries concerns and interests. Climate Policy, 3, 221–231. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2003.0329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2014). The role of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8
   Google Scholar
• Oe, H. (2008). A shared vision for long-term cooperative action. AWG-LCA4: Workshop presentation. Tokyo: International Cooperation Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/japansharedvision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinguelli-Rosa, L., & Munasinghe, M. (Eds.). (2002). Ethics, equity and international negotiations on climate change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani, L. (2000). The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and the balance of commitments under the climate regime. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 9, 120–131. doi: 10.1111/1467-9388.00243
   Google Scholar
• Rive, N., & Fuglestvedt, J. (2008). Introducing population-adjusted historical contributions to global warming. Global Environmental Change, 18, 142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüssler, R. (2011). Climate justice: A question of historic responsibility?. Journal of Global Ethics, 7, 261–278. doi: 10.1080/17449626.2011.635682
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., Plattner, G.-K., Knutti, R., & Friedlingstein, P. (2009). Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 1704–1709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812721106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., … Midgley, P. M. (Eds.). (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. D. (2004). Common but differentiated responsibilities in international law. The American Journal of International Law, 98, 276–301. doi: 10.2307/3176729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudinger, C., & Enting, I. (2005). Comparison for formalism for attributing responsibility for climate change: Non-linearities in the Brazilian proposal approach. Climatic Change, 68, 67–99. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-6012-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (1992). The Framework Convention on Climate Change (A/AC.237/18 (Part II)/Add.1). New York: UN General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (1995). INC11: Matters relating to commitments, comments from Parties, New York 1995 (A/AC.237/Misc.43/Add.1). New York: UN General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2013). The Emissions Gap Report 2013: A UNEP synthesis report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (1997). AGBM7: Implementation of the Berlin Mandate: Additional proposals from Parties (FCCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.1/Add.3). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (1998). COP3: Report, Addendum 1 (including the Protocol), Kyoto 1997 (FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2006). CMP1: Report, Montreal 2005 (FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.1). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2008a). COP13: Report, Bali 2007 (FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2008b). SBSTA28: Report, Bonn 2008 (FCCC/SBSTA/2008/6). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2009a). CMP5: Proposal for amendments (Algeria, Benin, Brazil and 34 other states) (FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/9). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2009b). CMP5: Proposal from Bolivia on behalf of Malaysia, Paraguay and Venezuela for an amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/12). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2011). COP16: Report (addendum 1), including decision 1/CP.16, Cancún 2010 (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2012). COP-17: Report (addendum 1), Durban 2011 (FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1). Bonn: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, H., & Rajamani, L. (2014). CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all. Climate Policy, 14, 102–121. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.791184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar