Predicting support of climate policies by using a protection motivation model

References

• Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, C., & Matti, S. (2006). Citizen and consumer: The dual role of individuals in environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 15, 550–571. doi: 10.1080/09644010600785176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?. Public Understand of Science, 9, 205–218. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannlund, R., & Persson, L. (2012). To tax, or not to tax: Preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate Policy, 12, 704–721. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.675732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S., Grover, H., Lindquist, E., & Vedlitz, A. (2010). Examining climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviours among public sector organisations in the USA. Local Environment, 15, 591–603. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2010.490828
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2012). Energy Statistics Handbook 2011. Taipei: Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Cismaru, M., Cismaru, R., Ono, T., & Nelson, K. (2011). ‘Act on climate change’: An application of protection motivation theory. Social Marketing Quarterly, 17, 62–84. doi: 10.1080/15245004.2011.595539
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C., & Chambers, S. (2005). Psychological and situational influences on commuter transport-mode choice. Environment and Behavior, 37, 640–661. doi: 10.1177/0013916504265440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compston, H., & Bailey, I. (2008). The politics of climate policy in affluent democracies. Policy Network. Retrieved from http://www.policy-network.net/publications_detail.aspx?ID=2728
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 425–449. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, M., Chen, R. S., Deichmann, U., Lerner-Lam, A. L., Arnold, M., Agwe, J., … Yetman, G. (2005). Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 276–285. doi: 10.1002/sd.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, S. J., & Walker, I. (2013). Acceptance and support of the Australian carbon policy. Social Justice Research, 26, 343–362. doi: 10.1007/s11211-013-0191-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A, 42, 1117–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd edn). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: Drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions (Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews). Climate Change, 2, 801–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaption to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38, 101–120. doi: 10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J.-S., Hu, M.-L., Teng, C.-C., & Lin, L. (2013). Energy saving and carbon reduction behaviors in tourism – a perception study of Asian visitors from a protection motivation theory perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 26(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Hammar, H. (2009). Environmental taxation for good and for bad: On individuals’ reluctance to mitigate climate change via CO2-tax vis-à-vis alternative policy instruments. Environmental Politics, 18, 218–237. doi: 10.1080/09644010802682601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., Löfgren, Å., & Stripple, J. (2010). Attitudes to personal carbon allowances: Political trust, fairness and ideology. Climate Policy, 10, 410–431. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2009.0673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2010). Ecological citizens: Identifying values and beliefs that support individual environmental responsibility among Swedes. Sustainability, 2, 1055–1079. doi: 10.3390/su2041055
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2011). Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value–belief–norm theory. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10, 51–60. doi: 10.1002/cb.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., Van Vugt, M., Wood, A., Leest, T. V., & Lambert, C. (2001). Structural solutions to social dilemmas: A field study on commuters’ willingness to fund improvements in public transit. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 504–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02053.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S.-P. (2006). Predicting intention to save water: Theory of planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability and perceived effectiveness of alternative solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2803–2824. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, S.-P., Hsu, T-S., & Wu, M.-F. (2010, July). Factors affecting people's preparedness for typhoon: A survey of residents in Peng Hu, Taiwan. Paper presented at the Conference on Public Governance and Regional Governmental Cooperation 2010, University of Macau.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-T. (2011). Factors affecting public support for energy-saving and carbon-reduction policies (Unpublished master's thesis), National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., & Biel, A. (2008). Acceptance of climate change policy measures: Role framing and value guidance. European Environment, 18, 203–215. doi: 10.1002/eet.477
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339–347. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 455–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., Yarnal, B., & Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1–17. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Putting climate change adaptation in the development mainstream (Policy Brief). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/environment/environment-development/36324726.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patchen, M. (2010). What shapes public reactions to climate change? Overview of research and policy implications. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10, 47–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, D. (2003). Disaster preparedness: A social cognitive perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12, 210–216. doi: 10.1108/09653560310480686
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear-based attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentrater, L. D., Sælensminde, I., Ekström, F., Böhm, G., Bostrom, A., Hanss, D., & O'Connor, R. E. (2013). Efficacy trade-offs in individuals’ support for climate change policies. Environment and Behavior, 45, 935–970. doi: 10.1177/0013916512450510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., Mees, H., Wardekker, A., van der Sluijs, J., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2012). Adaptation to climate change-related risks in Dutch urban areas: Stimuli and barriers. Regional Environmental Change, 12, 777–790.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, J. C., Ploubidis, G. B., & George, L. A. (2011). Climate change and climate variability: Personal motivation for adaptation and mitigation. Environmental Health, 10. Article number 46. Retrieved from http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/46. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwom, R., Bidwell, D., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2010). Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environmental Change, 20, 472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2006). Why are energy policies acceptable and effective. Environment and Behavior, 38, 92–111. doi: 10.1177/0013916505278519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value–belief–norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J.,  … Weber, E. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges – A report by the American Psychological Association’s Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimensions of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307–318. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2000.0175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, R., & Mill, G. A. (2007). Comparing and combining theories to explain proenvironmental intentions: The case of commuting-mode choice. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 731–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. C. (2010). The Key Report for Fighting Global Warming. Taipei: Green Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 771–789. doi: 10.1080/08941920600835528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar