Assessing progress in MRV capacity development: experience with a scorecard approach

References

• 2GC. (2005). Balanced scorecard and results- based management. In 3rd Annual Conference on Performance Measurement and Management Control (Vol. 44, p. 17). Nice: The European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management.
   Google Scholar
• Braatz, B., & Doorn, M. (2005). Managing the national greenhouse gas inventory process (pp. 60). New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Brötz, J., Brunschön, C., Dragna, I., Dunger, K., Federici, S., Mertens, E.,  … Somogyi, Z. (2013). Advancing on capacity development for national GHG inventory systems (2nd ed., p. 22). Rome: The CD-REDD Project Partners.
   Google Scholar
• The CD-REDD Project Partners. (2014). The CD-REDD project. Retrieved from http://www.cdredd.org
   Google Scholar
• CGE. (n.d.). GHG Inventories – non Annex I training package. Consultative Group of Experts (CGE). Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/cd_roms/na1/start.htm
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2012). Enhancing FAO's practices for supporting capacity development of member countries. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• GEF. (n.d.). Monitoring guidelines of capacity development in GEF operations. Washington, DC: Global Environment Fund.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (1996). Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karsenty, A., & Ongolo, S. (2012). Can ‘fragile states’ decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism. Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B., Boileau, P., Bonduki, Y., van Amstel, A. R., Janssen, L. H. J. M., Olivier, J. G. J., & Kroeze, C. (1999). Improving the quality of national greenhouse gas inventories. Environmental Science & Policy, 2, 335–346. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00023-4
   Google Scholar
• Mora, B., Herold, M., de Sy, V., Wijaya, A., Verchot, L., & Penman, J. (2012). Capacity development in national forest monitoring (p. 115). Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Neeff, T., & Ascui, F. (2009). Lessons from carbon markets for designing an effective REDD architecture. Climate Policy, 9, 306–315. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeff, T., Göhler, D., & Ascui, F. (2014). Finding a path for REDD+ between ODA and the CDM. Climate Policy, 14, 149–166. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.831289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODI. (2005). An introduction to gender audit methodology: Its design and implementation in DFID Malawi (p. 44). London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Olander, L., Wollenberg, E., Tubiello, F., & Herold, M. (2013). Advancing agricultural greenhouse gas quantification. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1) , article no. 011002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/011002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindranath, N. H., Lasco, R., & Sudha, P. (2001). Assessment of GHG inventories from the LUCF sector of Annex-I countries. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 6(1), 25–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1011393308785
   Google Scholar
• Romijn, E., Herold, M., Kooistra, L., Murdiyarso, D., & Verchot, L. (2012). Assessing capacities of non-Annex I countries for national forest monitoring in the context of REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 19–20, 33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNC, WWF, University of Queensland, & IUCN-WCPA. (2010). Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas – a global study (2nd ed., p. 101). Brisbane: The Nature Conservancy, World Wide Fund for Nature, The University of Queensland, International Union for Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Rossi, S., Ferrara, A., Fitton, N., & Smith, P. (2013). The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1) , article no. 015009. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulyasuwan, N., Henry, M., Secrieru, M., Jonckheere, I., & Federici, S. (2012). Issues and challenges for the national system for greenhouse gas inventory in the context of REDD+. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 2(2–3), 73–83. doi: 10.1080/20430779.2012.716298
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2007). Financial sustainability scorecard for national system of protected areas. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy (p. 627). Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (1992). Article 4. UNFCCC. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2005). Decision 19/CMP.1. Guidelines for national systems under Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2007). Decision 1/CP.13. Bali Action Plan. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD. (2013). National forest monitoring systems: Monitoring and measurement, reporting and verification (M & MRV) in the context of REDD+ Activities (p. 34). Rome: The United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. (n.d.). The inventory project progress indicator. Washington, DC: The United States Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar