The polarization of public concern about climate change in Norway

References

• Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. The American Political Science Review, 67, 1248–1266. doi: 10.2307/1956546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 408–446. doi: 10.1086/590649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 254–266. doi: 10.1177/0263276409358729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? Journal of Political Communication, 58, 707–731.
   Google Scholar
• Bruvoll, A., Dalen, H. M., & Larsen, B. M. (2012). Political motives in climate and energy policy (Discussion Paper No. 721, December 2012). Oslo: Statistics Norway. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp721.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clements, B. (2012). Exploring public opinion on the issue of climate change in Britain. British Politics, 7, 183–202. doi: 10.1057/bp.2012.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808–822. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compston, H., & Bailey, I. (Eds.). (2008). ‘Political strategy and climate policy’, Turning down the heat: The politics of climate policy in affluent democracies (pp. 263–288). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L., & Xenias, D. (2012). Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change; biased assimilation and attitude polarization. Climatic Change, 114, 463–478. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwon, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Some psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durr, R. H. (1993). What moves policy sentiment? American Political Science Review, 87, 158–170. doi: 10.2307/2938963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2013). Poles apart?: The social construction of responsibility for climate change in Australia and Norway. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59, 382–396. doi: 10.1111/ajph.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H. (2002). Polarization in abortion attitudes in U.S. religious traditions 1972–1998. Sociological Forum, 17, 397–422. doi: 10.1023/A:1019627006778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feygina, I., John, T. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of ‘system-sanctioned change'. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338. doi: 10.1177/0146167209351435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M., & Abrams, S. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gloppen, S., Rakner, L., & Vibe, V. (2014). Stortingsklima [Climate in the Parliament]. In E. Eide, D. Elgesem, S. Gloppen, & L. Rakner (Eds.), Klima, medier og politikk [Climate, media and politics] (pp. 135–156). Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A. T., & Aakre, S. (2015). Norsk klimapolitikk: 2030-målene og tilknytningen til EU [Norway’s climate policy: The 2030 target and the relations with the EU] CICERO Policy Note 2015:01. Retrieved September 1, 2015, from http://hdl.handle.net/11250/284757.
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A. T., & Skodvin, T. (2011). Cost effectiveness and target group influence in Norwegian climate policy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 34(2), 123–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, N., Jagers, S. C., & Martinsson, J. (2011). Explaining ups and downs in the public's environmental concern in Sweden: The effects of ecological modernization, the economy, and the media. Organization & Environment, 24, 388–403. doi: 10.1177/1086026611420300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman, D. B. (2009). Mass media flow and differential distribution of politically disputed beliefs: The belief gap hypothesis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 790–808. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2011). Social psychology. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hovden, E., & Lindseth, G. (2004). Discourses in Norwegian climate policy: National action or thinking globally? Political Studies, 52, 63–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00464.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Stocker, T. F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P. M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1535 pp..
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir,  …  L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Modeling stigma: An empirical analysis of nuclear waste images of Nevada. In J. Flynn, P. Slovic, & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Risk, media, and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology (pp. 107–32). London/Sterling: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, J. (2014). Norge utaskjærs [Norway abroad]. In E. Eide, D. Elgesem, S. Gloppen, & L. Rakner (Eds.), Klima, medier og politikk [Climate, media and politics] (pp. 135–156). Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Larrimore Ouellette, L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risk. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732–735. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., & Aasen, M. (2010). The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study. Ecological Economics, 69, 2183–2190. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the USA. Risk Analysis, 28, 113–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., & Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239–260. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaløy, B., Finseraas, H., & Listhaug, O. (2012). The publics' concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries. Journal of Peace Research, 49, 11–22. doi: 10.1177/0022343311425841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krøvel, R. (2012). Setting the agenda on environmental news in Norway. Journalism Studies, 13, 259–276. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.646402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: Effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73–95. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., & Quellar, S. (2000). The impact of group membership on persuasion: Revisiting ‘'Who says what to whom with what effect? In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 135–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32, 66–87. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. H. C., & Rutjens, B. T. (2014). Affirming belief in scientific progress reduces environmentally friendly behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 487–495. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K. M. (2006). ‘We don't really want to know'. Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming. Organization and Environment, 19, 347–370. doi: 10.1177/1086026606292571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial. Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Government. (2008). Avtale om klimameldingen. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/Upload/MD/Vedlegg/Klima/avtale_klimameldingen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebæk, D. (2001). Correlates of Environmental Behaviors. Bringing Back Social Context. Environment and Behavior, 33, 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brian, K., & Wolf, J. (2010). A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Climate Change, 1, 232–242.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. F. (2012). Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, 12, S85–S106. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.702982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M. (2006). ‘Some like it hot’ – Konstruksjon av kunnskap om klimaendringer i norske aviser [Some like it hot’– Construction of knowledge about climate change in Norwegian newspapers]. Norsk Medietidsskrift [Norwegian Journal of media], 13, 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M., Sørensen, K. H., & Næss, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 778–795. doi: 10.1177/0963662510362657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457–475. doi: 10.1177/0022022105275962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Luthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655–669. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of human values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25 (pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/ benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353–362. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.203034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review, 69, 493–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogen, K. (1996). Young environmentalists: Post-modern identities or middle-class culture. Sociological Review, 44, 452–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soma, K., & Vatn, A. (2010). Is there anything like a citizen? A descriptive analysis of instituting a citizen's role to represent social values at the municipal level. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 30–43. doi: 10.1002/eet.529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soma, K., & Vatn, A. (2014). Representing the common goods – stakeholders vs. citizens. Land Use Policy, 41, 325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 25, 322–348.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2015). Demokratin och det förändrade medielandskapet. Mot ökade kunskapsklyftor och deltagande klyftor? [Democracy and the changing media landscape. Towards increased knowledge gaps and participation gaps?]. Retrieved from http://miun.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:803440/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tellmann, S. M. (2012). The constrained influence of discourses: The case of Norwegian climate policy. Environmental Politics, 21, 734–752. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.692936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjernshaugen, A., Aardal, B., & Gullberg, A. T. (2011). Det første klimavalget? Miljø– og klimaspørsmålenes plass ved valget i 2009 [The first climate election? Environmental and climate issues in the 2009 election]. In B. Aardal (Ed.), Det politiske landskap. En studie av stortingsvalget i 2009[engelsk] (pp. 291–362). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (n.d.). Status of ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/status_of_ratification/items/2613.php
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. (2009). Cooperative behavior and institutions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.011
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Issue definition. Information processing and the politics of global warming. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 552–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 114, 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21, 690–700. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 743–761. doi: 10.1177/0963662509357871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar