Exploring national decarbonization pathways and global energy trade flows: a multi-scale analysis

References

• ADEME. (2012). L’évaluation macroéconomique des visions énergétiques 2030–2050 de l'ADEME [Macroeconomic assessment of energy visions, 2030–2050, ADEME]. Retrieved from http://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/evaluation-macroeconomique-visions-energetiques-2030-2050-med00090136.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anandarajah, G., McDowall, W., & Ekins, P. (2013). Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38, 3419–3432. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anandarajah, G., Pye, S., Usher, W., Kesicki, F., & Mcglade, C. (2011). TIAM-UCL global model documentation. Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/tiam-ucl
   Google Scholar
• Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d’après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción). International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16, 159–178. doi:10.2307/3866403
   Google Scholar
• Babonneau, F. L. F., Thalmann, P., & Vielle, M. (2015, June 17–19). Defining deep decarbonization pathways for Switzerland: An economic evaluation based on the computable general equilibrium model GEMINI-E3. Paper presented at 18th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, C., Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J., & Rivers, N. (2006). Towards general equilibrium in a technology-rich model with empirically estimated behavioral parameters. The Energy Journal, 27( Special Issue 2), 98–112. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI2-5
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, C., Tu, J., & Jaccard, M. (2008). Permit sellers, permit buyers: China and Canada’s roles in a global low-carbon society. Climate Policy, 8(Suppl. 1), S93–S107. doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0494
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Wu, Z., He, J., Gao, P., & Xu, S. (2007). Carbon emission control strategies for China: A comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model. Energy, 32, 59–72. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Yin, X., & Zhang, H. (2013). Towards low carbon development in China: A comparison of national and global models. Climatic Change, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0937-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodi, A., Gargiulo, M., Rogan, F., Deane, J. P., Lavigne, D., Rout, U. K., & Ó Gallachóir, B. P. (2013). Modelling the impacts of challenging 2050 European climate mitigation targets on Ireland’s energy system. Energy Policy, 53, 169–189. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane, P., Curtis, J., Chiodi, A., Gargiulo, M., Rogan, F., Dineen, D., … Ó Gallachóir, B. (2013). Low carbon energy roadmap for Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/ClimateChange/FileDownLoad,41727,en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, P., Keppo, I., Skea, J., Strachan, N., Usher, W., & Anandarajah, G. (2013). The UK energy system in 2050: Comparing low-carbon, resilient scenarios. London: UK Energy Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Fujino, J., Hibino, G., Ehara, T., Matsuoka, Y., Masui, T., & Kainuma, M. (2008). Back-casting analysis for 70% emission reduction in Japan by 2050. Climate Policy, 8(Suppl. 1), S108–S124. doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0491
   Google Scholar
• Goettle, R. J., & Fawcett, A. A. (2009). The structural effects of cap and trade climate policy. Energy Economics, 31(Suppl. 2), S244–S253. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.016
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. M. (1977). The econometrics of joint production: Another approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, 389–397. doi:10.2307/1928703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. (2015). Energy technology perspectives 2015 – Mobilising innovation to accelerate climate action. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kejun, J., Qiang, L., Xing, Z., & Xiulian, H. (2010). Technology roadmap for low carbon society in China. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2, 31008. doi:10.1063/1.3458415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesicki, F., & Anandarajah, G. (2011). The role of energy-service demand reduction in global climate change mitigation: Combining energy modelling and decomposition analysis. Energy Policy, 39, 7224–7233. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitner, J. A., DeCanio, S. J., Koomey, J. G., & Sanstad, A. H. (2003). Room for improvement: Increasing the value of energy modeling for policy analysis. Utilities Policy, 11, 87–94. doi:10.1016/S0957-1787(03)00020-1
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., & Zhang, X.-G. (2006). The Armington model. Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper. Melbourne: Productivity Commission, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy, S., Fink, M., & Bibas, R. (2015). Rethinking the role of scenarios: Participatory scripting of low-carbon scenarios for France. Energy Policy, 77, 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, D., Yang, C., Yeh, S., & Ogden, J. (2012). Deep greenhouse gas reduction scenarios for California – Strategic implications from the CA-TIMES energy-economic systems model. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(1), 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., Bradshaw, M., Anandarajah, G., Watson, J., & Ekins, P. (2014). A bridge to a Low-carbon future? Modelling the long-term global potential of natural Gas (Report no. UKERC/RR/ESY/2014/002). London: UKERC.
   Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2014). Un-burnable oil: An examination of oil resource utilisation in a decarbonised energy system. Energy Policy, 64, 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–190. doi:10.1038/nature14016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K. L., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T. R., … van Vuuren, D. P. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122(3), 387–400. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., … Dasgupta, P. (Eds.). (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M., Jacoby, H. D., & Morris, J. F. (2009). The cost of climate policy in the United States. Energy Economics, 31 (Suppl. 2), S235–S243. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Pye, S., Sabio, N., & Strachan, N. (2015). An integrated systematic analysis of uncertainties in UK energy transition pathways. Energy Policy, 87, 673–684. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. T., Fawcett, A. A., & Clapp, C. S. (2009). U.S. Climate mitigation pathways post-2012: Transition scenarios in ADAGE. Energy Economics, 31 (Suppl. 2), S212–S222. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, E., & Knopf, B. (2012). Ambitious mitigation scenarios for Germany: A participatory approach. Energy Policy, 51, 662–672. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDSN/IDDRI. (2015). Pathways to deep decarbonization. Retrieved from http://deepdecarbonization.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DDPP_EXESUM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, P., & Chaturvedi, V. (2012). Low carbon and clean energy scenarios for India: Analysis of targets approach. Energy Economics, 34( Suppl. 3), S487–S495. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, P., Dhar, S., & Mahapatra, D. (2008). Low-carbon society scenarios for India. Climate Policy, 8(Suppl. 1), S156–S176. doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0498
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, N., Pye, S., & Hughes, N. (2008). The role of international drivers on UK scenarios of a low-carbon society. Climate Policy, 8(1), S125–S139. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0489
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, N., Pye, S., & Kannan, R. (2009). The iterative contribution and relevance of modelling to UK energy policy. Energy Policy, 37(3), 850–860. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuladhar, S. D., Yuan, M., Bernstein, P., Montgomery, W. D., & Smith, A. (2009). A top-down bottom-up modeling approach to climate change policy analysis. Energy Economics, 31(Suppl. 2), S223–S234. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Usher, W., & Strachan, N. (2012). Critical mid-term uncertainties in long-term decarbonisation pathways. Energy Policy, 41, 433–444. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. H., DeBenedictis, A., Ghanadan, R., Mahone, A., Moore, J., Morrow, W. R., … Torn, M. S. (2012). The technology path to deep greenhouse Gas emissions cuts by 2050: The pivotal role of electricity. Science, 335, 53–59. doi:10.1126/science.1208365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, H. (2007). Long term mitigation scenarios. Cape Town: Energy Research Center, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar