Read all about it!? Public accountability, fragmented global climate governance and the media

References

• Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54, 401–419. doi: 10.1162/002081800551271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54, 421–456. doi: 10.1162/002081800551280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research Agenda. Sociology Compass, 3, 166–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13, 447–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J. (2012). US media coverage of the Cancún climate change conference. Political Science & Politics, 45, 252–258. doi: 10.1017/S104909651100206X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M., & Timmons Roberts, J. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses (Human Development Report 2007/2008) [background paper]. New York: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/boykoff_maxwell_and_roberts_j._timmons.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dirikx, A., & Gelders, D. (2010a). Ideologies overruled? An explorative study of the link between ideology and climate change reporting in Dutch and French newspapers. Environmental Communication, 4, 190–205. doi: 10.1080/17524031003760838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirikx, A., & Gelders, D. (2010b). To frame is to explain: A deductive frame-analysis of Dutch and French climate online change coverage during the annual UN Conferences of the Parties. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 732–742. doi: 10.1177/0963662509352044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R., & Strauss, A. (2001). Toward global parliament. Foreign Affairs, 80, 212–220. doi: 10.2307/20050054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhart, M. (2011). Democratic accountability in global politics: Norms, not agents. The Journal of Politics, 73, 45–60. doi: 10.1017/S002238161000085X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (1990). Political communication systems and democratic values. In J. Licthenberg (Ed.), Democracy and the mass media (pp. 24–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2004). Democratic accountability and political effectiveness from a cosmopolitan perspective. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 364–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. (2015). Paris and then? Holding states to account. Muscatine, IA: Stanley Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. (2011). Global regulation through a diversity of norms: Comparing hard and soft law. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 604–614). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., & Vihma, A. (2009). Comparing the legitimacy and effectiveness of global hard and soft law: An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 3, 400–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2006). Accountability in world politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29, 75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7–23. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710004068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 87–96. doi: 10.1177/0163443712464562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytimäki, J. (2011). Mainstreaming climate policy: The role of media coverage in Finland. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16, 649–661. doi: 10.1007/s11027-011-9286-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashaw, J. (2007). Accountability and institutional design: Some thoughts on the grammar of governance. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2004). Is there a ‘democratic deficit’ in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition, 39, 336–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravczik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51, 513–553. doi: 10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacu-Schmidt, A., Wang, X., Andrews, K., Boykoff, M., Daly, M., Gifford, L., et al. (2015). World newspaper coverage of climate change or global warming, 2004–2015. Retrieved July 3, 2015, from http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/media_coverage
   Google Scholar
• Oh, C., & Matsuoka, S. (2015). The genesis and end of institutional fragmentation in global governance on climate change from a constructivist perspective. International Environmental Agreements, Politics, Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10784-015-9309-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2010). Summoned by science: Reporting climate change at Copenhagen and beyond. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Palmujoki, E. (2013). Fragmentation and diversification of climate change governance in international society. International Relations, 27, 180–201. doi: 10.1177/0047117812473315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimlott, B. (2004). Accountability and the media: A tale of two cultures. The Political Quarterly, 75, 102–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2004.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A. (2002). Civil society and democracy in global governance. Global Governance, 8, 281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A. (2004). Civil society and democratically accountable global governance. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 211–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilde, A. K., Jansen, J. J., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Lamers, R.-J. A. N., van der Greef, J., & Timmerman, M. E. (2005). ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): A new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3043–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, C. R. (2011). Bursting the bubble: A case study of counter-framing in the editorial pages. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28, 30–49. doi: 10.1080/15295036.2010.544613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2010). Public accountability and the public sphere of international governance. Ethics & International Affairs, 24, 45–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00243.x
   Google Scholar
• Vihma, A. (2011). India and the global climate governance: Between principles and pragmatism. The Journal of Environment & Development, 20, 69–94. doi: 10.1177/1070496510394325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widerberg, O., & Pattberg, P. (2015). International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Global Policy, 6, 45–56. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelli, F. (2011). The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 255–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2004). Global governance and legitimacy problems. Government and Opposition, 39, 260–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwanenburg, G., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Westerhuis, J. A., Jansen, J. J., & Smilde, A. K. (2011). ANOVA–principal component analysis and ANOVA–simultaneous component analysis: A comparison. Journal of Chemometrics, 25, 561–567. doi: 10.1002/cem.1400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar