Global trade and promotion of cleantech industry: a post-Paris agenda

References

• Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bigdeli, S. Z. (2014). Clash of rationalities: Revisiting the trade and environment debate in light of WTO disputes over Green industrial policy. Trade, Law & Development, 6(1), 177–209.
   Google Scholar
• Charnovitz, S. (2014). Green subsidies and the WTO (policy research working paper #7060). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Charnovitz, S., & Fischer, C. (2015). Canada – renewable energy: Implications for WTO law on green and not-so-green subsidies. World Trade Review, 14(2), 177–210. doi: 10.1017/S1474745615000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, A., Krishna, C., & Sagar, A. (2015). Policy making for renewable energy in India: Lessons from wind and solar power sectors. Climate Policy, 15(1), 58–87. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.941318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chufart-Finsterwald, S. (2014). Environmental technology transfer and dissemination under the UNFCCC: Achievements and new perspectives. Environmental Claims Journal, 26(3), 238–260. doi: 10.1080/10406026.2014.878562
   Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2014). A turquoise mess: Green subsidies, blue industrial policy and renewable energy: The case for redrafting the subsidies agreement of the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law, 17, 11–47. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgu003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., & Xue, L. (2015). China’s policy initiatives for the development of wind energy technology. Climate Policy, 15(1), 30–57. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.863549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esty, D. C. (2016). A proposed G20 Sustainability Package. In ICTSD, 2016. G20 Hangzhou Summit 2016: Proposals for trade, investment, and sustainable development outcomes. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable development.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, C. (2016). Tackling climate change through the elimination of trade barriers for low-carbon goods: Multilateral, plurilateral and regional approaches. In V. Mauerhofer (Ed.), Legal aspects of sustainable development. Springer International. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_22
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. (2016, June). Use trade policy to achieve the benefits of low emission development. Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS). Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Howse, R. (2010). Climate mitigation subsidies and the WTO legal framework: A policy analysis. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/l09r01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hufbauer, G., Schott, J., & Cimino, C. (2013). Local content requirements: Report on a global problem. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.fundacionicbc.edu.ar/images/b/b7/Hufbauer20131007ppt_local_content_proteccionism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, O. (2016). Promoting green industrial development through local content requirements: India’s national solar mission. Climate Policy, 16(2), 178–195. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.992296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, A., & Jha, V. (2014). Keeping up with the changing climate: The WTO’s evolutive approach in response to the trade and climate conundrum. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 15, 245–271. doi: 10.1163/22129000-01502007
   Google Scholar
• Kuntze, J.-C., & Moerenhout, T. (2014). Are feed-in tariff schemes with local content requirements consistent with WTO law? In F. Baetens & J. Caiado (Eds.), Frontiers of international economic Law: Legal tools to confront interdisciplinary challenges (pp. 151–180). Nijhoff: Brill (Society of International Economic Law). Retrieved from http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/b9789004270190_009
   Google Scholar
• Leal-Arcas, R., & Filis, A. (2015). Renewable energy disputes in the World Trade Organization. Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence, 13(3), 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. I. (2014). The rise of renewable energy protectionism: Emerging trade conflicts and implications for low carbon development. Global Environmental Politics, 14(4), 10–35. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, P., Marceau, G., & Reinaud, J. (2012). The interface between the trade and climate regimes: Scoping the issues. Journal of World Trade, 46, 485–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. A., & Tan, H. (2015). China’s renewable energy revolution. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoo, A., & Subramanian, A. (2012). Greenprint: A New approach to cooperation on climate change. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoo, A., & Subramanian, A. (2013). Four changes to trade rules to facilitate climate change action ( CGD Policy paper 021). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. (2015). How local discrimination can promote global public goods. Law School, Cornell University. Retrieved from http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/cornell-IL-IR/upload/LocalDiscrimination-10-11-2015-clean-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rubini, L. (2012). Ain’t wastin’ time no more: Subsidies for renewable energy, the SCM agreement, policy space, and law reform. Journal of International Economic Law, 15, 525–579. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgs020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2014). Trade remedies: Targeting the renewable energy sector. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditcted2014d3_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voituriez, T., & Wang, X. (2015). Real challenges behind the EU-China PV trade dispute settlement. Climate Policy, 15(5), 670–677. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1009868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, E. B. (2016). Integrating environment and trade. Journal of International Economic Law, 19, 367–369. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgw028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2011). Harnessing trade for sustainable development and a green economy. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2014). Canada: Measures relating to the feed-in tariff program, implementation notified by respondent, 15 June 2014. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds426_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (2016, February 24). India: Certain measures relating to solar cells and solar modules. Report of the Panel. WT/DS456/R.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M., & Salzman, J. (2014). The next generation of trade and environment conflicts: The rise of green industrial policy. Northwestern University Law Review, 108(2), 401–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar