Strategic design of long-term climate policy instrumentations, with exemplary EU focus

References

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. M. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (pp. 385–472). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1093/reep/res016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. S., & Ekins, P. (2009). Carbon-energy taxation: lessons from Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. T., Parry, I. W., Sallee, J. M., & Fischer, C. (2011). Automobile fuel economy standards: Impacts, efficiency, and alternatives. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1), 89–108. doi: 10.1093/reep/req021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. (2015). Reframing investment signals and incentives in electricity (chap. 7). In Aligning policies for low-carbon economy. Paris: OECD/IEA/NEA/ITF.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. (1972). On taxation and control of externalities. American Economic Review, 62(3), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1776). A fragment on government: Being an examination of what is delivered, on the subject of government in general. London: Payne, Elmsly and Brooke.
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2008). Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Ejrnæs, A. (2011). The legitimacy of new modes of governance in the EU: Studying national stakeholders’ support. European Union Politics, 12(1), 107–126. doi: 10.1177/1465116510380282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannlund, R., & Persson, L. (2012). To tax, or not to tax: Preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate Policy, 12(6), 704–721. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.675732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenton, A. (2013). ‘Great powers’ in climate politics. Climate Policy, 13(5), 541–546. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.774632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsden, J., & Oliver, C. (2015). EU failed to heed emissions warnings in 2013. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, C., & Coglianese, C. (2011). The politics of regulation: From new institutionalism to new governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 107–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.032408.171344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J. (2002). Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(5), 539–559. doi: 10.1093/cje/26.5.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44. doi: 10.1086/466560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. (1999, September 17). The task of the society. Opening address to the annual conference of the international society for new institutional economics. ISNIE Newsletter 2(2).
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics and welfare: Planning and politico-economic systems, resolved into basic processes. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. J., Peters, G. P., & Caldeira, K. (2011). The supply chain of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(45), 18554–18559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107409108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetman, S., Hof, A. F., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (2015). Deep CO2 emission reductions in a global bottom-up model approach. Climate Policy, 15(2), 253–271. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.912980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-González, F., Hau, M., Sumper, A., & Gomis-Bellmunt, O. (2014). Participation of wind power plants in system frequency control: Review of grid code requirements and control methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 551–564. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Ishikawa, M., & Hagiwara, T. (2015). Economic and environmental impact analysis of carbon tariffs on Chinese exports. Energy Economics, 50, 80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droege, S. (2011). Do border measures have a role in climate policy? Climate Policy, 11(5), 1185–1190. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.600844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2013). Ownership unbundling. The commission’s practice in assessing the presence of a conflict of interest including in case of financial investors ( Commission staff working document (2013) 177 final). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EDGAR. (2016). Retrieved June 10, from http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2014. J. PBL
   Google Scholar
• ENTSOE. (2014). ENTSO-E overview of internal electricity market-related project work. Brussels: ENTSOE.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2015a). International negotiations: Towards minilateralism. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 805–806. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2767
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2015b). A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits and international legitimacy ( Working paper no. 197). London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Faure, M., & Peeters, M. (2011). Climate change liability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Finon, D. (2013). The transition of the electricity system towards decarbonization: The need for change in the market regime. Climate Policy, 13(1), 130–145. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.741832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font Vivanco, D., Kemp, R., & van der Voet, E. (2015). The relativity of eco-innovation: Environmental rebound effects from past transport innovations in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font Vivanco, D., & van der Voet, E. (2014). The rebound effect through industrial ecology’s eyes: a review of LCA-based studies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(12), 1933–1947. doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0802-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. doi: 10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P. (2012, November 29–30). Peak travel, peak car and the future of mobility. Evidence, unresolved issues, policy implications, and a research agenda. Roundtable on long-run trends in travel demand, OECD/ITF discussion paper 2012–13.
   Google Scholar
• Görlach, B. (2013). What constitutes an optimal climate policy mix? Defining the concept of optimality, including political and legal framework conditions. Choosing efficient combinations of policy instruments for low-carbon development and innovation to achieve Europe’s 2050 climate targets ( CECILIA2050). Berlin: Ecologic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., & Schein, A. (2013). Carbon taxes vs cap and trade: A critical review (Working paper series Nr 19338, NBER). Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M., Hourcade, J. C., & Neuhoff, K. (2014). Planetary economics: Energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hamamoto, M. (2011). Energy efficiency regulation and R&D activity: A study of the top runner program in Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 2(2), 91–98. doi: 10.4236/lce.2011.22012
   Google Scholar
• Hare, W., Stockwell, C., Flachsland, C., & Oberthür, S. (2010). The architecture of the global climate regime: A top-down perspective. Climate Policy, 10(6), 600–614. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirooka, M. (2006). Innovation dynamism and economic growth: A nonlinear perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2011). Summing up the parts. Combining policy instruments for least-cost climate mitigation strategies. Paris: OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381. doi: 10.1177/0095399712459725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppes, G. (1993). Macro-environmental policy: Principles and design. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Huppes, G. (2011). Instruments for effective global climate policy: The carbon deposit system. Leiden: CML, Leiden University. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/18319
   Google Scholar
• Huppes, G., Deetman, S., Huele, R., Kleijn, R., Koning, A., & Voet, E. (2015). Instrumentation strategies and instrument mixes for long term climate policy. Towards optimal short, medium and long term climate policy instrumentation G. Huppes and B. Görlach ( CECILIA2050). Leiden: CML, Leiden University. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1061.6409
   Google Scholar
• Huppes, G., & Simonis, U. E. (2009). Environmental policy instruments. In J. J. Boersema & L. Reijnders (Eds.), Principles of environmental sciences (pp. 239–280). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ICCT. (2014). Credit trading in the US corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standard. Hui-He. Beijing: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. M., & Anderson, K. M. (2008). Historical institutionalism and west European politics. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 345–369. doi: 10.1080/01402380701835165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, M., & De Coninck, H. (2007). Widening the scope of policies to address climate change: Directions for mainstreaming. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(7), 587–599. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, G. J., & Haigh, M. (2009). No quick switch to low-carbon energy. Nature, 462(7273), 568–569. doi: 10.1038/462568a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88. doi: 10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofgren, K. G., Persson, T., & Weibull, J. W. (2002). Markets with asymmetric information: The contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(2), 195–211. doi: 10.1111/1467-9442.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. J. C., Cramton, P., Ockenfels, A., & Stoft, S. (2015). Price carbon – I will if you will. Nature, 526(7573), 315–316. doi: 10.1038/526315a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013a). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013b). Why innovation needs the help of an active state. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G. E. (2008). Designing a carbon tax to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(1), 63–83. doi: 10.1093/reep/ren015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the Age of globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Min-Fin-BC. (2014). Carbon tax. Overview of the revenue-neutral carbon tax. Vancouver: Ministry of Finance, British Columbia. Retrieved from http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/tbs/tp/climate/carbon_tax.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mingardi, A. (2015). A critique of Mazzucato’s entrepreneurial state. Cato Journal, 35, 603–625.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1994a). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1994b). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, P., Tietge, U., Franco, V., German, J., Bandivadekar, A., Ligterink, N., … Riemersma, I. (2014). From laboratory tot road. A 2014 update of official and “real world” fuel consumptions and CO₂ values for passenger cars in Europe. Berlin: International Council on Clean Transportation Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. (2004). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munckaf Rosenschöld, J., Rozema, J. G., & Frye-Levine, L. A. (2014). Institutional inertia and climate change: A review of the new institutionalist literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(5), 639–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishitani, K., & Itoh, M. (2014). Product innovation in response to environmental standards and competitive advantage: A hedonic analysis of refrigerators in the Japanese retail market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 873–883. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–1370. doi: 10.1257/aer.15000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1972, May 26). Recommendation to the council on guiding principles concerning international economic aspects of environmental policies (C(72)128). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palensky, P., & Kupzog, F. (2013). Smart grids. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38(1), 201–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-031312-102947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P., Minx, J. C., Weber, C. L., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8903–8908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006388108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Vander Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauland, V., & Newman, P. (2015). Decarbonising cities: Mainstreaming low carbon urban development. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. (2010). How to eat an elephant: A bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10(6), 615–621. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revenue&Customs. (2010/2012). Carbon price floor. London: HMRC.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, A. (2013). Decentralization and local governance: comparing US and global perspectives. Administrative Culture, 14(1), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rosselló-Batle, B., Ribas, C., Moià-Pol, A., & Martínez-Moll, V. (2015). An assessment of the relationship between embodied and thermal energy demands in dwellings in a Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 109, 230–244. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1977). Reaffirming the existence of “reasonable” Bergson–Samuelson social welfare functions. Economica, 44(173), 81–88. doi: 10.2307/2553553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, H. D. (1992). The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. The Energy Journal, 13(4), 131–148. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol13-No4-7
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
   Google Scholar
• Sijm, J. (2005). The interaction between the EU emissions trading scheme and national energy policies. Climate Policy, 5(1), 79–96. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2005.9685542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, S., Huppes, G., & Seixas, J. (2015). A tangled web: Assessing overlaps between energy and environmental policy instruments along the electricity supply chain. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(6), 439–458. doi: 10.1002/eet.1691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. doi: 10.1037/h0042769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinden, G. E., Peters, G. P., Minx, J., & Weber, C. L. (2011). International flows of embodied CO2with an application to aluminium and the EU ETS. Climate Policy, 11(5), 1226–1245. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.602549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2008, July 7). The end of neo-liberalism? Project Syndicate.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. K., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Retrieved from www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Simpler: The future of government. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Tamiotti, L. (2011). The legal interface between carbon border measures and trade rules. Climate Policy, 11(5), 1202–1211. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.592672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2012). Mainstreaming climate change in national development processes and UN country programming: A guide to assist UN country teams in integrating climate change risks and opportunities. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Verzijlbergh, R., De Vries, L. J., & Z. Lukszo (2014). Renewable energy sources and responsive demand. Do we need congestion management in the distribution grid? IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29(5): 2119–2128. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2300941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, D. G. (1992). Practical aspects for implementing greenhouse taxes: Issues for OECD countries. Climate change: Designing a practical tax system. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. (2011). Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(2), 275–292. doi: 10.1093/reep/rer006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J., Edwards, T., & Luckins, K. (2013). Post carbon pathways: A meta-analysis of 18 large-scale post carbon economy transition strategies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8, 76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Yigit, M., Gungor, V. C., & Baktir, S. (2014). Cloud computing for smart grid applications. Computer Networks, 70, 312–329. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar