Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature

References

• Abrell, J., Ndoye, F. A., & Zachmann, G. (2011). Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data (Bruegel Working Paper 2011/08). Brussels. Retrieved from http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/WP_2011_08_ETS_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abrell, J., & Weigt, H. (2008). The interaction of emissions trading and renewable energy promotion (Dresden University of Technology Working Paper No. WP-EGW-05). Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1317310
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberola, E., Afriat, M., Cail, S., Cassisa, S., Coussy, P., Dahan, L., … Vaidyula, M. (2015). Carbon pricing and carbon leakage issues in Phase IV of the EU ETS, Chapter 3. In Exploring the EU ETS beyond 2020: A first assessment of the EU Commission’s proposal for Phase IV of the EU ETS (2021-2030). Retrieved from https://www.i4ce.org/download/copec-report/?wpdmdl=11830
   Google Scholar
• Alexeeva-Talebi, V. (2010). Cost pass-through in strategic oligopoly: Sectoral evidence for the EU ETS (ZEW Discussion Paper 10-056). Mannheim. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp10056.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alexeeva-Talebi, V. (2011). Cost pass-through of the EU emissions allowances: Examining the European petroleum markets. Energy Economics, 33, S75–S83. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1093/reep/res016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., Convery, F., & Di Maria, C. (2011). Technological change and the EU ETS: The case of Ireland (IEFE Working Paper 43). Milano: IEFE – Centre for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Bocconi University.
   Google Scholar
• Anger, N., & Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy, 36(1), 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ares, E. (2014). Carbon price floor. Parliament note. House of the Commons Library. Science and Environment Section. SN/SC/5927. London. Retrieved from http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05927#fullreport
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, J. (2015). Impact of carbon prices on indicators of competitiveness: A review of empirical findings (OECD Environment Working Paper 87). Paris: OECD. doi: 10.1787/5js37p21grzq-en
   Google Scholar
• Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, R. A., & Schmidt, T. S. (2016). Transfer patterns in phase I of the EU Emissions Trading System: A first reality check based on cluster analysis. Climate Policy, 16(4), 474–495. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1028319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., & Lange, A. (2005). On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances. European Economic Review, 49(8), 2041–2055. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghesi, S., Cainelli, G., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). The European emission trading scheme and environmental innovation diffusion: Empirical analyses using CIS data for Italy. Giornale degli Economisti et Annali die Economia, 71(1), 71–97.
   Google Scholar
• Borghesi, S., Franco, C., & Marin, G. (2016). Outward foreign direct investments: Pattern of Italian firms in the EU-ETS (SEEDS Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Boutabba, M. A., & Lardic, S. (2017). EU emissions trading scheme, competitiveness and carbon leakage: New evidence from cement and steel industries. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1), 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branger, F., Quirion, P., & Chevallier, J. (2017). Carbon leakage and competitiveness of cement and steel industries under the EU ETS: Much ado about nothing. The Energy Journal, 37(3), Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aen:journl:ej37-3-branger
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmann, K. L., Heindl, P., Löschel, A., Lutz, B. J., & Schumacher, J. (2012). Kfw/ ZEW CO2 Barometer 2012, Anreizwirkung des EU-Emissionshandels auf Unternehmen gering – Klimapolitische Regulierung wenig relevant für Standortentscheidungen. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. Retrieved from https://www.kfw.de/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-CO2-Barometer/CO2-Barometer-2012-LF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278–293. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell, B. J., Chong, H., & Mansur, T. E. (2013). Profiting from regulation: Evidence from the European carbon market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 78–106. doi: 10.1257/pol.5.4.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016). Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 173–191. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon Market Watch. (2014). What’s needed to fix the EU’s carbon market? Recommendations for the market stability reserve and future ETS reform proposals (Policy Briefing). Retrieved from http://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ETS-POLICY-BRIEF-JULY-2014_final_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. S., Li, S., & Zhang, F. (2013). Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy, 63, 1056–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clò, S. (2010). Grandfathering, auctioning and carbon leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS directive. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2420–2430. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commins, N., Lyons, S., Schiffbauer, M., & Tol, R. S. J. (2011). Climate policy and corporate behavior. The Energy Journal, 32(4), 51–68. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vo132-No4-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton, P., & Kerr, S. (2002). Tradeable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather. Energy Policy, 30(4), 333–345. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00100-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyn, S., Markowska, A., de Jong, F., & Bles, M. (2010). Does the energy intensive industry obtain windfall profits through the EU ETS? In An econometric analysis for products from the refineries, iron and steel and chemical sectors. CE Delft. Retrieved from http://www.cef.nl/publicatie/does_the_energy_intensive_industry_obtain_windfall_profits_through_the_eu_ets/1038
   Google Scholar
• De Bruyn, S., Nelissen, D., & Koopman, M. (2013). Impact of recent developments in the EU ETS on the list of sectors deemed to be exposed to carbon leakage. CE DELFT. Retrieved from http://www.cedelft.eu/art/uploads/CE_Delft_7917_Carbon_leakage_future_EU_ETS_market_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., Gennaioli, C., Martin, R., & Muûls, M. (2014). Searching for carbon leaks in multinational companies (Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No.187). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. Retrieved from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/dechezle/Working-Paper-165-Dechezlepretre-et-al-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206. doi: 10.1093/reep/rex013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2008). European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Economics, 30(4), 2009–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschenes, O. (2014). Environmental regulations and labor markets: Balancing the benefits of environmental regulations for everyone and the costs to workers and firms. Bonn: IZA World of Labor. doi: 10.15185/izawol.22
   Google Scholar
• Detken, A., Löschel, A., Alexeeva-Talebi, A., Heindl, P., Lo, V., & Strunz, M. (2009). Kfw/ZEW CO2 barometer 2009, leaving the trial phase behind – preferences & strategies of German companies under the EU ETS. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2009/29/EC: Directive of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the community.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, K. B. (2007). The European Union emissions trading scheme: Origins, allocation, and early results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 66–87. doi: 10.1093/reep/rem003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, K. B. (2008). Over-allocation of abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU emissions trading scheme based on the 2005–2006 emissions data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(2), 267–287. doi: 10.1007/s10640-008-9191-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., Marcantonini, C., & Zaklan, A. (2016). The European Union Emissions Trading System: Ten years and counting. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., Valero, V., & Zaklan, A. (2015). An analysis of allowance banking in the EU ETS (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS, 29).
   Google Scholar
• Elsworth, R., Worthington, B., Buick, M., & Craston, P. (2011). Carbon fat cats 2011: The companies profiting from the EU emissions trading scheme. London: Sandbag. Retrieved from https://sandbag.org.uk/site_media/pdfs/reports/Sandbag_2011-06_fatcats.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engels, A. (2009). The European emissions trading scheme: An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3), 488–498. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2009). EU press release: Emissions trading: EU ETS emissions fall 3% in 2008. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-09-794_en.htm?locale=en
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2011). 2009–2010 report on progress in creating the internal gas and electricity market (Commission Staff Working Document). Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/20100609_internal_market_report_2009_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2014a). Impact assessment. (Staff Working Document, Brussels, 22.1.2014, SWD(2014) 17). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/reform/docs/swd_2014_17_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2014b). Energy economic developments in Europe. Part I “energy costs and competitiveness”. In European Economy 1/January 2014. Brussels. ISSN KC-AR-14-001-EN-N.
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2015a). Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council. Climate action progress report, including the report on the functioning of the European carbon market and the report on the review of Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide. Brussels, COM(2015) 576.
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2015b). EU ETS Handbook. DG Climate Action.
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2015c). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low- carbon investment. Brussels COM(2015) 337 final.
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2016). The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). ISBN 978-92-79-62396-7. doi: 10.2834/6083
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. (2017). Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council: Report on the functioning of the European carbon market. Brussels, COM/2017/048 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Competitiveness Report. (2014). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/competitiveness/reports/eu-competitiveness-report/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2015). Trends and projections in the EU ETS in 2015. The EU Emissions Trading System in numbers (European Environment Agency Technical Report No. 14). doi: 10.2800/472636
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2016). Trends and projections in the EU ETS in 2016. The EU Emissions Trading System in numbers (European Environment Agency Technical Report No. 24). doi: 10.2800/71685
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2017). Trends and projections in the EU ETS in 2017. The EU Emissions Trading System in numbers (European Environment Agency Technical Report No. 18). doi: 10.2800/425306
   Google Scholar
• Fabra, N., & Reguant, M. (2014). Pass-through of emissions costs in electricity markets. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2872–2899. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.9.2872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, S., & Hyndman, R. J. (2011). The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3709–3719. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M. (2013). Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 902–913. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini, M. (1999). Swiss residential demand for electricity. Applied Economics Letters, 6(8), 533–538. doi: 10.1080/135048599352880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini, M., & Pachauri, S. (2004). Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households. Energy Policy, 32(3), 429–436. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00314-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flues, F. S., & Thomas, A. (2015). The distributional effects of energy taxes (OECD Taxation Working Papers No. 23). Paris: OECD. doi: 10.1787/5js1qwkqqrbv-en
   Google Scholar
• Gagelmann, F., & Frondel, M. (2005). The impact of emission trading on innovation - science fiction or reality? European Environment, 15(4), 203–211. doi: 10.1002/eet.387
   Google Scholar
• Gallier, C., Heindl, P., Osberghaus, D., Brockmann, K. L., & Dieckhöner, C. (2015). Kfw/ZEW CO2 barometer 2015 – carbon edition: Ten years of emissions trading – strategies of German companies. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. Retrieved from https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-CO2-Barometer/CO2-Barometer-2015-Carbon-Edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gallier, C., Lutz, B. J., Brockmann, K. L., & Dieckhöner, C. (2014). Kfw/ZEW CO2 barometer 2014 – carbon edition, new phase, old problems. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. Retrieved from https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-CO2-Barometer/CO2-Barometer-2014-Carbon-Edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gray, W. B. (2015). Environmental regulations and business decisions: Environmental regulations impose costs on firms, affecting productivity and location but providing significant health benefits. Bonn: IZA World of Labor. Retrieved from http://wol.iza.org/articles/environmental-regulations-and-business-decisions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M., Azar, C., & Persson, U. M. (2005). Allowance allocation in the European Emissions Trading System: A commentary. Climate Policy, 5(1), 127–136. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2005.9685545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haita, C. (2013). The state of the EU carbon market (ICCG Reflection No. 14/2013). Retrieved from http://www.iccgov.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/14_Reflection_February_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(4), 299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanoteau, J. (2014). Lobbying for carbon permits in Europe. Recherches économiques de Louvain, 80(1), 61–87. ISBN: 978280418893. doi: 10.3917/rel.801.0061
   Google Scholar
• Heindl, P. (2017). The impact of administrative transaction costs in the EU Emissions Trading System. Climate Policy, 17(3), 314–329. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1110108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C., Grubb, M., Neuhoff, K., Matthes, F., & Tse, M. (2006). Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: How and why? Climate Policy, 6(1), 137–160. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619. doi: 10.1162/003465397557196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaraite, J., Convery, F., & Di Maria, C. (2010). Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: Lessons from Ireland. Climate Policy, 10, 190–215. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2009.0659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaraite, J., & Di Maria, C. (2016). Did the EU ETS make a difference? An empirical assessment using Lithuanian firm-level data. The Energy Journal, 37(1), 1–23. doi: 10.5547/01956574.37.2.jjar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegou, I., & Rubini, L. (2011). The allocation of emission allowances free of charge: Legal and economic considerations (ICTSD Global Platform on Climate Change, Trade Policies and Sustainable Energy, Issue Paper No.14). Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1914997
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, C., Köppl, A., Schleicher, S. P., & Thenius, G. (2008). Stringency and distribution in the EU emissions trading scheme: First evidence. Climate Policy, 8(1), 41–61. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P. (2008). Permit auction will not affect prices. Letters. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cdc05514-35bc-11dd-998d-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz4H0kNwx2f
   Google Scholar
• Koch, N., & Basse Mama, H. (2016). European climate policy and industrial relocation: Evidence from German multinational firms. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2868283
   Google Scholar
• Kozluk, T., & Timiliotis, C. (2016). Do environmental policies affect global value chains? A new perspective on the pollution haven hypothesis (OECD Economics Department Working Papers). ISSN: 1815-1973 (online). doi: 10.1787/18151973
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., Oates, W. E., & Pizer, W. A. (2007). Decentralization in the EU emissions trading scheme and lessons for global policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1, 112–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, T., Sato, M., Grubb, M., & Comberti, C. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System (Working Paper 126). Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.6508&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, Å, Wråke, M., Hagberg, T., & Roth, S. (2014). Why the EU ETS needs reforming: An empirical analysis of the impact on company investments. Climate Policy, 14(5), 537–558. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.864800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löschel, A., Brockmann, K. L., Heindl, P., Lutz, B. J., & Schumacher, J. (2011). Kfw/ZEW CO2 barometer 2011, Hoher Anpassungsbedarf im EU-Emissionshandel ab 2013 – deutliche Defizite bei der Vorbereitung in den Unternehmen. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. Retrieved from https://www.kfw.de/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-CO2-Barometer/CO2-Barometer-2011-LF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Löschel, A., Gallier, C., Lutz, B. J., Brockmann, K. L., & Dieckhöner, C. (2013). Kfw/ZEW CO2 barometer 2013 – carbon edition, The EU emission trading scheme: Firm behavior during the crisis. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. Retrieved from http://www.zew.de/de/publikationen/kfwzew-co2-barometer-2013-carbon-edition/
   Google Scholar
• Löschel, A., Kiehl, K., Heindl, P., Lo, V., Koschel, H., & Koesler, S. (2010). Kfw/ZEW CO2 barometer 2010, Effizienzpotenziale des Emissionshandels noch nicht ausgeschöpft – Strategien und Management deutscher Unternehmen. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe, ZEW. Retrieved from https://www.kfw.de/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-CO2-Barometer/CO2-Barometer-2011-LF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., De Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014a). Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU emissions trading scheme. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2482–2508. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.8.2482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., de Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014b). On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Ecological Economics, 105, 78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. (2013). Carbon markets, carbon prices and innovation: Evidence from interviews with managers. Annual meetings of the American economic association, San Diego. Retrieved from https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2013/retrieve.php?pdfid=372
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). The impact of the European Union emissions trading scheme on regulated firms: What is the evidence after ten years? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 129–148. doi: 10.1093/reep/rev016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliman, S. R., & Prince, R. (1989). Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 247–265. doi: 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90019-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliman, S. R., & Prince, R. (1992). Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(3), 292–296. doi: 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90035-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millimet, D. L., & Roy, J. (2011). Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(4), 652–677. doi: 10.1002/jae.2451
   Google Scholar
• Mokinski, F., & Wölfing, N. M. (2014). The effect of regulatory scrutiny: Asymmetric cost pass-through in power wholesale and its end. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 45(2), 175–193. doi: 10.1007/s11149-013-9233-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monjon, S., & Quirion, P. (2011). Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1957–1971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D., & Worthington, B. (2010). Carbon fat cats 2009: Company analysis of the EU ETS. London: Sandbag. Retrieved from https://sandbag.org.uk/site_media/pdfs/reports/fatcats2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Naegele, H., & Zaklan, A. (2017). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? (DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1689). Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3050323
   Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., Åhman, M., Betz, R., Cludius, J., Ferrario, F., Holmgren, K., & Sato, M. (2006). Implications of announced phase II national allocation plans for the EU ETS. Climate Policy, 6(4), 411–422. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer, U. (2009). EU emission allowances and the stock market: Evidence from the electricity industry. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1116–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer, U., Alexeeva-Talebi, V., & Löschel, A. (2010). Understanding the competitiveness implications of future phases of EU ETS on the industrial sectors (ZEW Discussion Paper 10-044). Mannheim. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp10044.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer, U., & Rennings, K. (2006). The impacts of the European Union emissions trading scheme on competitiveness in Europe ZEW (Discussion Paper 06-051). Mannheim. Retrieved from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp06051.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osberghaus, D., Heindl, P., Sommerfeld, K., & Höfling, H. (2016). Kfw/ZEW CO₂ barometer 2016 – carbon edition. How the EU ETS can contribute to meeting the ambitious targets of the Paris agreement. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe, ZEW. Retrieved from http://www.zew.de/fileadmin/FTP/co2panel/CO2Barometer2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2017). EU-ETS Phase IV: Allowance prices, design choices and the market stability reserve. Climate Policy, 17(7), 936–946. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1360173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrick, S., & Wagner, U. J. (2014). The impact of carbon trading on industry: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2389800
   Google Scholar
• Petsonk, A., & Cozijnsen, J. (2007). Harvesting the low-carbon cornucopia: How the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) is spurring innovation and scoring results. Environmental Defense. Retrieved from http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/harvesting-the-low-carbon-cornucopia-march2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pintos, P., & Linares, P. (2018). Assessing the EU ETS with a bottom-up, multi-sector model. Climate Policy, 18(4), 413–424. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1294045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizer, W. A., & Popp, D. (2008). Endogenizing technological change: Matching empirical evidence to modeling needs. Energy Economics, 30(6), 2754–2770. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontoglio, S. (2010). An early assessment of the influence on eco-innovation of the EU emissions trading scheme. In Environmental efficiency, innovation and economic performances (pp. 81–91). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review, 92(1), 160–180. doi: 10.1257/000282802760015658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, D. (2010). Innovation and climate policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2, 275–298. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264, 168–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. doi: 10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requate, T., & Unold, W. (2003). Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology: Will the true ranking please stand up? European Economic Review, 47, 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., Schneider, M., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). The innovation impact of the EU emission trading system — findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecological Economics, 70(3), 513–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. P. (2012). The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. Econometrica, 80(3), 1019–1061. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartor, O. (2012). Carbon Leakage in the Primary Aluminium Sector: What evidence after 6 1⁄2 years of the EU ETS? (CDC Climat Research, WP N° 2012-12).
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, J., & Betz, R. (2005). Incentives for energy efficiency and innovation in the European emission trading system. Proceedings of the 2005 ECEEE summer study – what works and who delivers. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joachim_Schleich/publication/228358298_Incentives_for_energy_efficiency_and_innovation_in_the_European_Emission_Trading_System/links/0c96052ff3652b7dcf000000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, J., Rogge, K., & Betz, R. (2009). Incentives for energy efficiency in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Energy Efficiency, 2(1), 37–67. doi: 10.1007/s12053-008-9029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijm, J. S., Chen, Y., & Hobbs, B. F. (2012). The impact of power market structure on CO2 cost pass-through to electricity prices under quantity competition – A theoretical approach. Energy Economics, 34(4), 1143–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S., & Sijm, J. (2003). Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), 420–437. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/19.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenqvist, C., & Åhman, M. (2016). Free allocation in the 3rd EU ETS period: Assessing two manufacturing sectors. Climate Policy, 16(2), 125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vailles, C., Alberola, E., Cassisa, C., Bonnefous, J., Coussy, P., Marion, P., & Escagues, S. (2017). EU ETS: Last call before the doors close on the negotiations for the post-2020 reform (I4CE Climate Brief No. 49). Retrieved from https://www.enerdata.net/about-us/company-news/i4ce-enerdata-ifpen-eu-ets-post-2020-reform-last-call-policy-brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veith, S., Werner, J. R., & Zimmermann, J. (2009). Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector. Energy Economics, 31(4), 605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venmans, F. (2012). A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 5493–5510. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, U. J., Muûls, M., Martin, R., & Colmer, J. (2014). The causal effects of the European Union emissions trading scheme: Evidence from French manufacturing plants. Fifth world congress of environmental and resources economists. Retrieved from http://www.iza.org/conference_files/EnvEmpl2014/martin_r7617.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, U. J., & Timmins, C. D. (2008). Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43(2), 231–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Zhou, P. (2017). Does emission permit allocation affect CO2 cost pass-through? A theoretical analysis. Energy Economics, 66, 140–146. ISSN 0140-9883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woerdman, E. (2015). ‘The EU greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme’ (chapter 3). In E. Woerdman, M. M. Roggenkamp, & M. Holwerda (Eds.), Essential EU climate law (pp. 43–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. (2005). Implications of the EU emissions trading scheme for the UK power generation sector. Retrieved from http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/ipareport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H., & Heshmati, A. (2017). Do environmental regulations effect FDI decisions? The pollution haven hypothesis revisited (IZA DP No. 10897).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. (2013). The EU ETS and firm profits: An ex-post analysis for Swedish energy firms. Environmental Economics, 4(3), 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Zachmann, G., & Von Hirschhausen, C. (2008). First evidence of asymmetric cost pass-through of EU emissions allowances: Examining wholesale electricity prices in Germany. Economics Letters, 99(3), 465–469. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar