Governance of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): accounting, rewarding, and the Paris agreement

References

• Armstrong, K., & Styring, P. (2015). Assessing the potential of utilization and storage strategies for post-combustion CO2 emissions reduction. Frontiers in Energy Research, 3(March), 335. Article 8. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2015.00008
   Google Scholar
• Azar, C., Lindgren, K., Obersteiner, M., Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., den Elzen, K. M. G. J., … Larson, E. D. (2010). The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Climatic Change, 100(1), 195–202. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9832-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik, E., Sanchez, D. L., Turner, P. A., Mach, K. J., Field, C. B., & Benson, S. M. (2018). Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States. PNAS, 115(13), 3290–3295. https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1720338115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., & Aalbers, R. (2017). Biomass-Energy with Carbon capture and storage should be used immediately, CPB Netherlands bureau for economic policy analysis, Policy Brief no. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, H. J. (2016). Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: Social barriers and social implications. Climatic Change, 139(2), 155–167. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Carbon Removal. (2017). Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54a2e4c1e4b043bf83114773/t/56e5f312ab48de1dc3c58a0d/1457910556936/BECCS+Fact+Sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Coninck, H., & Benson, S. M. (2014). Carbon dioxide capture and storage: Issues and prospects. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 39(October), 243–270. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032112-095222
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T., McCoy, S. T., & Havercroft, I. (2015). Legal and regulatory developments on CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40(Special issue), 431–448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.024
   Google Scholar
• Energy Futures Initiative. (2018). Advancing large scale carbon management: Expansion of the 45Q tax credit, policy paper, May, Washington, D.C. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58ec123cb3db2bd94e057628/t/5b0604f30e2e7287abb8f3c1/1527121150675/45Q_EFI_5.23.18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2009a). Directive 2009/31/EC of the European parliament and of the council on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, 23 April. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0031&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2009b). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European parliament and of the council of 9 September 2015 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardy, M., & Mac Dowell, N. (2018). The energy return on investment of BECCS: Is BECCS a threat to energy security? Energy and Environmental Science, April. doi:10.1039/c7ee03610h
   Google Scholar
• Fridahl, M. (2017). Socio-political prioritization of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 104(May), 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.050
   Google Scholar
• Fridahl, M., & Lehtveer, M. (2018). Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers. Energy Research & Social Science, 42(March), 155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., … Yamagata, Y. (2014). Betting on negative emissions, commentary. Nature Climate Change, 4, 850–853. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., Peters, G. P., Smith, P., Tavoni, M., … Yamagata, Y. (2016). Research priorities for negative emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 11(November), 115007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007
   Google Scholar
• Geden, O., Scott, V., & Palmer, J. (2018). Integrating carbon dioxide removal into EU climate policy: Prospects for a paradigm shift. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(May), e521. doi: 10.1002/wcc.521
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, P. H., & Palaniappan, M. (2010). Peak water limits to freshwater withdrawal and use. PNAS, 107(25), 11155–11162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004812107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global CCS Institute (2017). The global status of CCS 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, C. H., Huntley, M. E., Archibald, I., Gerber, L. N., Sills, D. L., Granados, J., … Walsh, M. J. (2017). Geoengineering, marine microalgae, and climate stabilization in the 21st century. Earth’s Future, 5, 278–284. doi: 10.1002/2016EF000486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberl, H., Sprinz, D., Bonazountas, M., Cocco, P., Desaubier, Y., Henze, M., … Searchinger, T. (2012). Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy, 45(June), 18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.051
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinimö, J., & Junginger, M. (2009). Production and trading of biomass for energy – An overview of the global status. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33(9), 1310–1320. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honegger, M., & Reiner, D. (2018). The political economy of negative emissions technologies: Consequences for international policy design. Climate Policy, 18(3), 306–321. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1413322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufty, M. (2011). Investigating policy processes: The governance analytical framework (GAF). In U. Wiesmann & H. Hurni et al. (Eds.), Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives (pp. 403–424). Bern: Geographica Bernensia.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2011). Combining bioenergy with CCS – Reporting and accounting for negative emissions under UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, Working Paper, OECD/IEA, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/bioenergy_ccs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IEA GHG. (2012). CO2 capture at gas-fired power plants, Report No. 8. Retrieved from http://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/103211/co2-capture-gas-fired-power-plants.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006). ISO14064-2:2006, Greenhouse gases -- Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/38382.html
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2013). ISO 14065:2013, Greenhouse gases -- Requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/60168.html
   Google Scholar
• International Sustainability & Carbon Certification (ISCC). (2018). Certification scopes, Website, downloaded 12 July. https://www.iscc-system.org/process/certification-scopes/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, IGES, Japan. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013 - The physical science basis, Working Group I Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change, Ch.11 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU), Working Group III contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. D., Ciais, P., Davis, S. J., Friedlingstein, P., Gasser, T., Peters, G. P., … Wiltshire, A. (2016), Simulating the earth system response to negative emissions, Environmental Research Letters, 11(September), 095012. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095012
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, J. (2015). Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: A review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40(September), 401–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.012
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, T. (2017). Conflicts over carbon capture and storage in international climate governance. Energy Policy, 100(January), 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.059
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, A., Kuriakose, J., Sharmina, M., & Anderson, K. (2018). What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris agreement for big emitting nations. Climate Policy, 18(6), 690–714. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1346498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Dowell, N., & Fajardy, M. (2017). Inefficient power generation as an optimal route to negative emissions via BECCS. Environmental Research Letters, 12(April), doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa67a5
   Google Scholar
• Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., & Maitland, G. C. (2017). The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7(April), 243–249. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE3231
   Google Scholar
• Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., & Rehdanz, K. (2018). Do climate engineering experts display moral-hazard behaviour? Climate Policy, 37, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1494534
   Google Scholar
• Muratori, M., Calvin, K., Wise, M., Kyle, P., & Edmonds, J. (2016). Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Environmental Research Letters, 11(August), 095004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095004
   Google Scholar
• Muri, H. (2018). The role of large—scale BECCS in the pursuit of the 1.5° C target: An earth system model perspective. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narita, D., & Klepper, G. (2016). Economic incentives for carbon dioxide storage under uncertainty: A real options analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 53(October), 18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.021
   Google Scholar
• OECD/IEA. (2015). Storing CO2 through enhanced oil recovery – Combining EOR with CO2 storage (EOR+) for profit. Insights Series. https://www.iea.org/publications/insights/insightpublications/Storing_CO2_through_Enhanced_Oil_Recovery.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD/IEA. (2016). 20 years of carbon capture and storage – accelerating future deployment. Paris: Author. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/20YearsofCarbonCaptureandStorage_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD/IEA. (2017). Technology roadmap – delivering sustainable bioenergy. Paris: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Pawar, R. J., Bromhal, G. S., Carey, J. W., Foxall, W., Korre, A., Ringrose, P. S., … White, J. A. (2015). Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40(Special issue), 292–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P., & Geden, O. (2017). Catalyzing a political shift from low to negative carbon. Nature Climate Change, 7(August), 619–621. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3369
   Google Scholar
• Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1996). Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science, 271(5250), 785–788. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5250.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner, D. M. (2016). Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects. Nature Energy, 1(January), 15011. doi: 10.1038/NENERGY.2015.11
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. (2018). Governing experimental responses – negative emissions technologies and solar climate engineering. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 285–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V., & Riahi, K. (2015). Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 519–527. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015). The cost of CO2 capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40(Special issue), 378–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. L., Johnson, N., McCoy, S. T., Turner, P. A., & Mach, K. J. (2018). Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 4875–4880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719695115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. L., & Kammen, D. M. (2016). A commercialization strategy for carbon-negative energy. Nature Energy, 1(January), 15002. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2015.2
   Google Scholar
• Searchinger, T. D. (2010). Biofuels and the need for additional carbon. Environmental Research Letters, 5(June), 024007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024007
   Google Scholar
• Searchinger, T. D., Hamburg, S. P., Melillo, J., Chameides, W., Havlik, P., Kammen, D. M., … Tilman, G. D. (2009). Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science, 326(5952), 527–528. doi: 10.1126/science.1178797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheperd, J., Caldeira, K., Haigh, J., Keith, D., Launder, B., Mace, G., … Watson, A. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., … Yongsung, C. (2016). Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change, 6(December), 42–50. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2870
   Google Scholar
• Soltanian, M. R., & Dai, Z. (2017). Geologic CO2 sequestration: Progress and challenges. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 3(3), 221–223. doi: 10.1007/s40948-017-0066-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speed, R. (2017). DRAX biomass, Winchester action on climate change. Winchester University. http://www.winacc.org.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/2017_Drax%20Biomass_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D., Siegel, L., & Rooney-Varga, J. N. (2018). Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy. Environmental Research Letters, 13(1), doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. J., & Haszeldine, R. S. (2015). Can producing oil store carbon? Greenhouse gas footprint of CO2EOR, offshore north Sea. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(9), 5788–5795. doi: 10.1021/es504600q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokarska, K. B., & Zickfeld, K. (2015). The effectiveness of net negative carbon dioxide emissions in reversing anthropogenic climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 10(September), 094013. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094013
   Google Scholar
• Torvanger, A., Grimstad, A. A., Lindeberg, E., Rive, N., Rypdal, K., Bieltvedt Skeie, R., … Tollefsen, P. (2012). Quality of geological CO2 storage to avoid jeopardizing climate targets. Climatic Change, 114(2), 245–260. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0447-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torvanger, A., & Meadowcroft, J. (2011). The political economy of technology support: Making decisions about CCS and low carbon energy technologies. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 303–312. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torvanger, A., Shrivastava, M. K., Pandey, N., & Tørnblad, S. H. (2013). A two-track clean development mechanism to improve incentives for sustainable development and offset production. Climate Policy, 13(4), 471–489. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.781446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2017). The emissions gap report 2017, A UN Environment synthesis report. Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/22070/EGR_2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Ussiri, D. A., & Lal, R. (2017). Carbon capture and storage in geologic formations. In Carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation and adaptation (pp. 497–545). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, A. (2018, May 21). Drax power station to lead fresh carbon capture trial. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/21/drax-power-station-to-lead-fresh-carbon-capture-trial
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Kern, F., Gross, M., Gross, R., Heptonstall, P., Jones, F., … Arapostathis, S. (2012). Carbon capture and storage – Realizing the potential?, UKERC - UK Energy Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Zakkour, P., Cook, C., & French-Brooks, J. (2014). Biomass and CCS-guidance for accounting for negative emissions, Report No. 5, IEAGHG, Cheltenham. Retrieved from http://www.ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2014-05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zakkour, P., Kemper, J., & Dixon, T. (2014). Incentivizing and accounting for negative emission technologies. Energy Procedia, 63(December), 6824–6833. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.716
   Google Scholar