When less is more: limits to international transfers under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement

References

• AOSIS. (2017, November). Submission of views on the content of article 6.2 guidance and article 6.4 rules, modalities and procedures, presented by the Republic of the Maldives on behalf of the alliance of small Island states. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionPortal/Documents/167_344_131542508049675849-AOSIS Submission on Art 6.2 and 6.4.Nov.2017.cleandocx.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arab Group. (2017, October 18). Submission by Saudi Arabia on behalf of the Arab group on articles 6.2 and 6.4 of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionPortal/Documents/102_344_131528208729884421-Arab Group Submission on Articles 6.2 and 6.4 of the Paris Agreement by KSA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boehringer, C. (2000). Cooling down hot air: A global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto carbon abatement strategies. Energy Policy, 28(11), 779–789. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00060-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehringer, C., Moslener, U., & Sturm, B. (2007). Hot air for sale: A quantitative assessment of Russia’s near-term climate policy options. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(4), 545–572. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9089-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, U. S., & Svendsen, G. T. (2002). Hot air in Kyoto, cold air in The Hague—the failure of global climate negotiations. Energy Policy, 30(13), 1191–1199. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil. (2014, November 1–13). Submission by Brazil on ADP elements. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/Lists/OSPSubmissionUpload/73_99_130602104651393682-BRAZILADPElements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. (2016). Views of Brazil on the guidance referred to in article 6, paragraph 2, of the Paris Agreement. Submission in response to SBSTA 44 invitation. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/Submissions/Lists/OSPSubmissionUpload/525_262_131198656223045434-BRAZIL-Article6.2final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brazil. (2017, March). Views of Brazil on the guidance referred to in article 6, paragraph 2, of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/Submissions/Lists/OSPSubmissionUpload/525_317_131354419477778493-BRAZIL - Article 6.2. SBSTA46 May 2017. FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cames, M., Harthan, R., Füssler, J., Lazarus, M., Lee, C., Erickson, P., & Spalding-Fecher, R. (2017). How additional is the clean development mechanism? Analysis of the application of current tools and proposed alternatives. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/docs/clean_dev_mechanism_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CAT. (2015). Tracking (I)NDCs: Assessment of mitigation contributions to the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from http://climateactiontracker.org/countries.html
   Google Scholar
• CAT. (2017). Tracking (I)NDCs: Assessment of mitigation contributions to the Paris Agreement (2017). Climate Action Tracker.http://climateactiontracker.org/countries.html.
   Google Scholar
• CAT. (2018). Rating countries. Retrieved from http://climateactiontracker.org/countries.html
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Gütschow, J., Vieweg, M., Macey, K., & Schaeffer, M. (2013). Impact of the Doha outcome on surplus emission allowances and their effect on developed country emissions. Climatic Change, 120(4), 845–857. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0841-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Elzen, M., Admiraal, A., Roelfsema, M., van Soest, H., Hof, A. F., & Forsell, N. (2016). Contribution of the G20 economies to the global impact of the Paris Agreement climate proposals. Climatic Change, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1700-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Elzen, M., & de Moor, A. P. G. (2002). Analyzing the kyoto protocol under the marrakesh accords: Economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness. Ecological Economics, 43(2–3), 141–158. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00181-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Elzen, M., Roelfsema, M., & Slingerland, S. (2009). Too hot to handle? The emission surplus in the Copenhagen negotiations. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1984.tb00498.x
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, P., Lazarus, M., & Spalding-Fecher, R. (2014). Net climate change mitigation of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy, 72, 146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillenwater, M. (2012). What is additionality? Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://ghginstitute.org/research/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, … J. C. Minx, Eds.), Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., Schneider, L., & Zhezherin, V. (2015). Has joint implementation reduced GHG emissions? Lessons learned for the design of carbon market mechanisms (Working paper No. 2015-07). Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI). Retrieved from http://www.sei-international.org/publications?pid=2803
   Google Scholar
• LMDC. (2017, April). Submission of the like minded developing countries - LMDC - on the article 6.2 & 6.4 & 6.8–6.9 of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionPortal/Documents/713_317_131364934648087255-LMDC Submission on the Article 6 of the Paris Agreement - SBSTA 46.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meinshausen, M., & Alexander, R. (2016). NDC & INDC factsheets. Australian-German Climate and Energy College. Retrieved from http://www.climate-energy-college.net/indc-factsheets
   Google Scholar
• Paltsev, S. V. (2000, October). The Kyoto Protocol: “Hot air” for Russia? (Working Paper No. 00-9). Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/economics/papers/papers00/wp00-9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ranson, M., & Stavins, R. N. (2016). Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: Learning from experience. Climate Policy, 16(3), 284–300, doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.997658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., Fricko, O., Meinshausen, M., Krey, V., Zilliacus, J. J. J., & Riahi, K. (2017). Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. Nature Communications, 8, 15748. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, L. (2009). Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: Practical experiences and lessons learned. Climate Policy, 9( January 2013), 242–254. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, L., Füssler, J., Kohli, A., Graichen, J., Healy, S., Cames, M., … Cook, V. (2017). Robust accounting of international transfers under article 6 of the Paris Agreement. German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt). Retrieved from https://www.dehst.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/projektmechanismen/Robust_accounting_paris_agreement_discussion_paper_28092017.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, L., Füssler, J., La Hoz Theuer, S., Kohli, A., Graichen, J., Healy, S., … Broekhoff, D. (2017). Environmental integrity under article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Discussion Paper, German Federal Environment Agency (UBA). Retrieved from https://www.dehst.de/SharedDocs/downloads/EN/project-mechanisms/Discussion-Paper_Environmental_integrity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, L., & La Hoz Theuer, S. (2018). Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuerk, A., Fazekas, D., Schreiber, H., Frieden, D., & Wolf, C. (2013). Green investment schemes: The AAU market between 2008 and 2012. Discussion paper, Climate Strategies. Retrieved from http://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/cs-gis-discussion-paper-formatted-final-rev2a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (n.d.). Glossary of climate change acronyms and terms. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-convention/glossary-of-climate-change-acronyms-and-terms
   Google Scholar
• USDA-ERS. (2017). Projected real gross domestic product (GDP) and growth rates of GDP for baseline countries/regions (in Billions of 2010 Dollars) 2010–2030. United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS). Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-macroeconomic-data-set.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Venezuela. (2017, March). Submission by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. Views on article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionPortal/Documents/53_317_131344865972446736-Art6-Venezuela.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Victor, N. (1998). The Kyoto Protocol carbon bubble : Implications for Russia, Ukraine and emission trading. IIASA Interim Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Retrieved from http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/5558/1/IR-98-094.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. G., Nakićenović, N., & Victor, N. (2001). The Kyoto Protocol emission allocations: Windfall surpluses for Russia and Ukraine. Climatic Change, 49(3), 263–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1010768306975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRI. (2017). CAIT Climate Data Explorer - Historical Emissions Data. World Resources Institute (WRI). http://www.wri.org/resources/datasets/cait-historical-emissions-data-countries-us-states-unfccc.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, F., & Depledge, J. (2004). The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511494659
   Google Scholar