References
- Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2018). Decoding Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/418831/article6-paris-agreement.pdf
- Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2006). Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 50–75. doi:10.1162/152638006775991911 doi: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50
- Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Climate governance beyond 2012: Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernization and civic environmentalism. In M. E. Pettenger (Ed.), The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses (pp. 123–148). Aldershot, Hampshire, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
- Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2016). The road to Paris: Contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 104(2), 1–19. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777
- Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York; Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
- Bodnar, P., Ott, C., Edwards, R., Hoch, S., McGlynn, E. F., & Wagner, G. (2018). Underwriting 1.5°C: Competitive approaches to financing accelerated climate change mitigation. Climate Policy, 18(3), 368–382. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1389687
- Carbon Market Watch. (2015). Paris outcomes: Carbon Market Watch Analysis of COP 21.
- Carbon Market Watch. (2016). Carbon markets in the post Paris World. Carbon Market Watch Briefing.
- Climate Action Tracker. (2017). CAT emissions gaps. Retrieved from https://climateactiontracker.org/global/cat-emissions-gaps
- Cormier, A., & Bellassen, V. (2013). The risks of CDM projects: How did only 30% of expected credits come through? Energy Policy, 54, 173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.016
- Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle (DEHSt). (2008). Leitfaden zur freiwilligen Kompensation von Treibhausgasemissionen. Berlin: German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency.
- Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle (DEHSt). (2017). Quick facts on Article 6 - Market mechanisms. Berlin: German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency.
- Dhanda, K. K., & Murphy, P. J. (2011). The new wild west is green: Carbon offset markets, transactions, and providers. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 37–49. doi: 10.5465/amp.2009.0110
- DNV GL. (2014). Carbon credit validation and verification. Retrieved from https://www.dnvgl.com/assurance/water-and-carbon/ccs-ceased.html
- Filzmoser, E., & Perlman, K. (2017). Visibility unlimited: Transparency of the new aviation carbon market. Carbon Market Watch Policy Brief. Retrieved from https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Policy-brief-1.pdf
- Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. doi: 10.1086/448181
- Foundation myclimate. (n/a). About myclimate. Retrieved from https://www.myclimate.org/fileadmin/myc/ueber-uns/downloads/myclimate_brochure_web.pdf
- Friends of the Earth (FOE). (2008). Trading in fake carbon credits: Problems with the clean development mechanism. Retrieved from https://foe.org/2008-10-trading-in-fake-carbon-credits-problems-with-the-cle
- Gold Standard Foundation. (2016). Announcing gold standard for the global goals. Retrieved from https://www.goldstandard.org/blog-item/announcing-gold-standard-global-goals
- Gold Standard Foundation. (2017). New standard launched to accelerate and measure progress toward the sustainable development goals and climate targets. Retrieved from https://www.goldstandard.org/blog-item/new-standard-launched-accelerate-and-measure-progress-toward-sustainable-development-goals
- Gold Standard Foundation. (2018). Future proofing the voluntary carbon markets – Double counting post-2020: A tool for assessing the exposure of projects to double counting.
- Green, J. F. (2013). Order out of Chaos: Public and private rules for managing carbon. Global Environmental Politics, 13(2), 1–25. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00164
- Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Hajer, M. (2005). Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 297–315). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hamilton, K., Bayon, R., Turner, G., & Higgins, D. (2007). Picking up steam: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2007. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.
- Hamilton, K., Sjardin, M., Peters-Stanley, M., & Marcello, T. (2010). Building bridges: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2010. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.
- Hamrick, K. (2017). Unlocking potential: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2017. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.
- Hamrick, K., & Goldstein, A. (2016). Raising ambition: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2016. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.
- Hermwille, L., & Kreibich, N. (2016). Identity crisis? Voluntary carbon crediting and the Paris Agreement. JIKO Policy Brief 02/2016. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
- Hickmann, T. (2016). Rethinking authority in global climate governance: How transnational climate initiatives relate to the international climate regime. Dissertation. New York, NY: Routledge.
- ICAO. (2017). Carbon offsetting and reduction scheme for international aviation (CORSIA). Retrieved from https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Pages/market-based-measures.aspx
- International Carbon Reduction & Offset Alliance (ICROA). (2017). Guidance report: Pathways to increased voluntary action by non-state actors.
- International Emissions Trading Association (IETA). (2016). Submission to SBSTA on Article 6 (2, 4, and 8) of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://www.ieta.org/resources/UNFCCC/IETA%20Article%206%20UNFCCC%20Submission_30Sept2016.pdf
- Keller, R. (2007). Diskursforschung: Eine Einführung für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden.
- Kollmuss, A. (2007). ‘Carbon offsets 101’. World Watch Magazine [online], 20 (4), 9–14. Retrieved from http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5134
- Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. Berlin: WWF Germany.
- Kreibich, N., & Obergassel, W. (2016). Carbon markets after Paris - How to account for the transfer of mitigation results? JIKO Policy Paper 01/2016. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
- La Hoz Theuer, S., Schneider, L., & Broekhoff, D. (2018). When less is more: Limits to international transfers under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1540341
- Lee, D.-H., Kim, D.-h., & Kim, S.-i. (2018). Characteristics of forest carbon credit transactions in the voluntary carbon market. Climate Policy. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1277682
- Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2013). Discursive agency: Towards an actor-centred analysis of political discourses. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP 2013); Panel 37: Actor-centered Approaches of Policy Change. 06-28-2013, Grenoble, France.
- Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2016). Divide and conquer—Discursive agency in the politics of illegal logging in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 36, 35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.006
- Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2017). Discursive agency: (Re-)conceptualizing actors and practices in the analysis of discursive policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 45(3), 510–534. doi: 10.1111/psj.12172
- Lovell, H. C. (2010). Governing the carbon offset market. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 353–362. doi: 10.1002/wcc.43
- Lovell, H. C., Bumpus, A., & Liverman, D. (2010). The rise of voluntary carbon offset standards: Self-regulation, legitimacy and multi-scalar governance. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1680054
- Michaelowa, A., Stronzik, M., Eckermann, F., & Hunt, A. (2003). Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms. Climate Policy, 3(3), 261–278. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2003.0332
- Nielsen, T. D. (2014). The role of discourses in governing forests to combat climate change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14(3), 265–280. doi: 10.1007/s10784-013-9223-4
- Olsen, K. H., Arens, C., & Mersmann, F. (2018). Learning from CDM SD tool experience for Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 18(4), 383–395. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1277686
- Peters-Stanley, M., & Gonzalez, G. (2014). Sharing the stage. State of the voluntary carbon markets 2014. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.
- Prag, A., Hood, C., & Barata, P. (2013). Made to measure: Options for emissions accounting under the UNFCCC. OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers, No. 2013/01. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5jzbb2tp8ptg-en
- Rittberger, V. (Ed.). (2002). Regime theory and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Schneider, L., Kollmuss, A., & Lazarus, M. (2014). Addressing the risk of double counting emission reductions under the UNFCCC. Working Paper 2014-02. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
- SGS. (2014). Withdrawal from the CDM Market. Retrieved from https://www.sgs.com/en/news/2014/06/withdrawal-from-the-cdm-market
- UNFCCC. (2014a). Kyoto protocol. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php
- UNFCCC. (2016a). The Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
- UNFCCC. (2016b). What is the CDM. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Retrieved from http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html
- United Nations (UN). (1998). Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/kpeng.pdf
- Verified Carbon Standard (VCS). (2017a). Announcing the development of the sustainable development verified impact standard. Retrieved from http://www.v-c-s.org/announcing-the-development-of-the-sustainable-development-verified-impact-standard/
- Verified Carbon Standard (VCS). (2017b). ICAO’s CORSIA and the case for the open source carbon market. Retrieved from http://www.v-c-s.org/icaos-corsia-and-the-case-for-the-open-sourced-carbon-market/
- Verles, M. (2017). Gold standard policy brief: A new paradigm for voluntary climate action: ‘Reduce within, finance beyond’.
- Winkel, G., & Leipold, S. (2016). Demolishing dikes: Multiple streams and policy discourse analysis. Reference as 2016d. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 108–129. doi: 10.1111/psj.12136
- World Bank. (2015). Overview of carbon offset programs: Similarities and differences. Partnership for market readiness. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/PMR%20Technical%20Note%206_Offsets_0.pdf
- World Bank. (2016). Carbon credits and additionality: Past, present, and future. PMR Technical Note 13. Washington, DC, Partnership for Market Readiness, World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/24295/K8835.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
- World Bank. (2017). Results-based climate finance in practice: Delivering climate finance for low-carbon development. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/26644/115053-WP-PUBLIC-111p-RBCFinPracticeFinalMay.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- World Resources Institute (WRI). (2013). Climate analysis indicators tool: WRI’s climate data explorer. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Retrieved from http://cait2.wri.org