Social impacts of climate change mitigation policies and their implications for inequality

References

• Alber, G., Cahoon, K., & Röhr, U. (2017). Gender and urban climate change policy. In S. Buckingham & V. Le Masson (Eds.), Understanding climate change through gender relations (pp. 64–86). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S. (2014). Social and environmental impact of the rare earth industries. Resources, 3, 123–134. doi: 10.3390/resources3010123
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2018, April 27). Meet the ex-miners who are now walking on water. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43864665
   Google Scholar
• Bee, B. (2017). Safeguarding gender in REDD+ reflecting on Mexico’s institutional (in)capacities. In S. Buckingham & V. Le Masson (Eds.), Understanding climate change through gender relations (pp. 190–204). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benes, K., Cheon, A., Urpelainen, J., & Yeang, J. (2015). Low oil prices: An opportunity for fuel subsidy reform. New York, NY: Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatta, B., Karna, A. K., Dev, O. P., & Springate-Bagniski, O. (2008). Participatory forest management in the Nepalese Tarai: Policy, practice and impacts. In O. Springate-Bagniski (Ed.), Forest, people and power: The political ecology of reform in South Asia (pp. 177–220). London: EarthScan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, P., Pradhanb, L., & Yadavb, G. (2010). Joint forest management in India: Experiences of two decades. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 469–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, S. (2013). Rural electrification through decentralised off-grid systems in developing countries, green energy and technology. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Borges da Silveira Bezerra, P., Ludovique Callegari, C., Ribas, A., Lucena, A. F. P., Portugal-Pereira, J., Koberle, A., … Schaeffer, R. (2017). The power of light: Socio-economic and environmental implications of a rural electrification program in Brazil. Environmental Research Letters, 12(9), 095004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., Craps, M., & Dewulf, A. (2017). Including indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: Addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power. Climatic Change, 140, 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buekers, J., Van Holderbeke, M., Bierkens, J., & Int Panis, L. (2014). Health and environmental benefits related to electric vehicle introduction in EU countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 33(2014), 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, W., Mu, Y., & Chen, J. (2014). Distributional employment impacts of renewable and new energy – A case study of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 1155–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., & Coenen, L. (2017, November). Transitioning beyond coal: Lessons from the structural renewal of Europe’s old industrial regions (CCEP Working Paper 1709). Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Carraro, C. (2016). Climate change: Scenarios, impacts, policy, and development opportunities [Supplemental material]. Agricultural Economics, 47, 149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernea, M. (2004, October 27–29). Social impacts and social risks in hydropower programs: Preemptive planning and counter-risk measures. Keynote address: Session on social aspects of hydropower development, United nations symposium on hydropower and sustainable development, Beijing, China. Retrieved from http://www.rlarrdc.org.in/images/Social%20Impacts%20and%20Social%20Risks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cernea, M. (2008). Compensation and benefit sharing: Why resettlement policies and practices must be reformed. Water Science and Engineering, 1(1), 89–120.
   Google Scholar
• Chiroleu-Assouline, M., & Fodha, M. (2014). From regressive pollution taxes to progressive environmental tax reforms. European Economic Review, 69, 126–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotula, L., Dyer, N., & Vermeulen, S. (2008). Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people’s access to land. London: FAO and IIED. Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/12551IIED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cust, J., Manley, D., & Cecchinato, G. (2017). Unburnable wealth of nations. Finance and Development, 54(1). Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2017/03/cust.htm
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective (IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/13, June 2015). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1513.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De la Rua, C., Lechon, Y., Østergård, H., Morandi, F., Wohlfahrt, J., Perrin, A., … Damman, S. (2015, June). Socio-economic effects of biomass supply chain: Case studies from Logist'EC project. Paper presented at the 23rd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition (EUBCE), Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2015, March). Delivering UK energy investment: Low carbon energy. London: HM Government. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/419024/DECC_LowCarbonEnergyReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• D’Silva, E., & Nagnath, B. (2002). Behroonguda: A rare success story in joint forest management. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(6), 551–557.
   Google Scholar
• Dubash, N., Raghunandan, D., Sant, G., & Sreenivas, A. (2013). Indian climate change policy: Exploring a co-benefits based approach. Economic & Political Weekly 2013, xlviiI(22), 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Duker, A. E. C., Tadesse, T. M., Soentoro, T., de Fraiture, C., & KemerinkSeyoum, J. S. (2018). The implications of ignoring smallholder agriculture in climate-financed forestry projects: Empirical evidence from two REDD+ pilot projects. Climate Policy. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1532389
   Google Scholar
• Ekener-Petersen, E., Höglun, J., & Finnveden, G. (2014). Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energy Policy, 73, 416–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins, P., & Lockwood, M. (2011). Tackling fuel poverty during the transition to a low-carbon economy. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/tackling-fuel-poverty-during-transition-low-carbon-economy
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, P., Pollitt, H., Barton, J., & Blobel, D. (2011). The implications for households of environmental tax reform (ETR) in Europe. Ecological Economics, 70, 2472–2485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENERGIA. (2010). Gender Mainstreaming in rural electrification programmes. The Hague: ENERGIA. Retrieved from https://genderinsite.net/sites/default/files/03.-GENDER_MAINSTREAMING_IN_RURAL_ELECTRIFICATION_PROGRAMMES1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Climate Foundation. (2014). Fuelling Europe’s Future: How auto innovation leads to EU jobs. Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from https://europeanclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/FEF_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Better regulation: guidelines and toolbox. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016, August). The macroeconomic and other benefits of energy efficiency. Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/final_report_v4_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). The macro-level and sectoral impacts of energy efficiency policies. Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/the_macrolevel_and_sectoral_impacts_of_energy_efficiency_policies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fecht, D., Fischer, P., Fortunato, L., Hoek, G., de Hoogh, K., Marra, M., … Hansell, A. (2015). Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands. Environmental Pollution, 198(2015), 201–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finley-Brook, M., & Thomas, C. (2010). From malignant neglect to extreme intervention: Treatment of displaced indigenous populations in two large hydro projects in Panama. Water Alternatives, 3(2), 269–290.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). State of the world‘s forests: Enhancing the socioeconomic benefits from forests. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3710e.pdf%20
   Google Scholar
• Fouquet, R., & Pearson, P. (2012). Past and prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Energy Policy, 50, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frondel, M., Sommera, S., & Vance, C. (2015). The burden of Germany’s energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects. Economic Analysis and Policy, 45, 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambhir, A., Green, F., & Pearson, P. (2018). Towards a just and equitable low-carbon energy transition (Grantham Institute Briefing Paper No. 26). London: Imperial College. Retrieved from https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/grantham-institute/public/publications/briefing-papers/26.-Towards-a-just-and-equitable-low-carbon-energy-transition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, B., & Barreto, M. (2016). At the cutting edge: Precarious work in Brazil’s Sugar and ethanol industry. In R. Lambert & A. Herod (Eds.), Neoliberal capitalism and precarious work: Ethnographies of accommodation and resistance (pp. 177–204). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Golev, A., Scott, M., Erskine, P., Ali, S., & Ballantyne, G. (2014). Rare earths supply chains: Current status, constraints and opportunities. Resources Policy, 41, 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, M. F., Tellez, A., & Silveira, S. (2015). Exploring the effect of subsidies on small-scale renewable energy solutions in the Brazilian Amazon. Renewable Energy, 83, 1200–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Echeverri, L. (2018). Climate and development: Enhancing impact through stronger linkages in the implementation of the Paris agreement and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 20160444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, R., & Stanley, O. (2013). More than money for conservation: Exploring social co-benefits from PES schemes. Land Use Policy, 31, 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, A., Denne, T., Howden-Chapman, P., Arnold, R., Telfar-Barnard, L., Preval, N., & Young, C. (2012, June). Cost benefit analysis of the warm up New Zealand: Heat smart program. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Economic Development. Retrieved from http://www.healthyhousing.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/NZIF_CBA_report-Final-Revised-0612.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grösche, P., & Schröder, C. (2014). On the redistributive effects of Germany’s feed-in tariff. Empirical Economics, 46, 1339–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajat, A., Hsia, C., & O’Neill, M. (2015). Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: A global review. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2(4), 440–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L., Fay, M., Kane, T., Narloch, U., … Vogt-Schilb, A. (2016). Shock waves: Managing the impacts of climate change on poverty: Climate change and development. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/22787
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte, S., & Rozenberg, J. (2017, April). Climate change through a poverty lens. Nature Climate Change, 7, 250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayer, S. (2017). Fossil fuel subsidies: In-depth analysis (Report number IP/A/ENVI 2016-18-REV, March 2017). Brussels: European Parliament Policy Department A for the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/595372/IPOL_IDA(2017)595372_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hess, C., & Fenrichb, E. (2017). Socio-environmental conflicts on hydropower: The São Luiz do Tapajós project in Brazil. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, J. (2012). Getting the measure of fuel poverty: Final report of the fuel poverty review (CASE Report, 72). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43153/
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2016). Oil and gas workforce Plan. London: HG Government. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/535039/bis-16-266-oil-and-gas-workforce-plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howden-Chapman, P., & Chapman, R. (2012). Health co-benefits from housing-related policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 414–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, C., Bolwig, S., Corbera, E., & Creutzig, F. (2014). Livelihood impacts of biofuel crop production: Implications for governance. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 54, 248–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMPACT. (2017). A just transition to a low-carbon economy: Implications for IMPACT and its members. Cork: IMPACT. Retrieved from https://www.iiea.com/ftp/Publications/2017/IMPACT%20JustTransition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change contribution of working group III to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation. (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. Geneva: International Labour Organisation. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_emp/—emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_432859.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation. (2018). World employment social Outlook: Greening with jobs. Geneva: International Labour Organisation. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/documents/publication/wcms_628654.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2016). Renewable energy benefits: Measuring the economics. Abu Dhabi: IRENA. Retrieved from http://www.irena.org/publications/2016/Jan/Renewable-Energy-Benefits-Measuring-the-Economics
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2018). Renewable energy and jobs – Annual review 2018. Abu Dhabi: IRENA. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/publications/2018/May/Renewable-Energy-and-Jobs-Annual-Review-2018
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., & Steckel, C. (2014). How climate change mitigation could harm development in poor countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 161–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, G. (2016). Transport, poverty alleviation and the principles of social justice. Shanghai: Partnership on Sustainable Low Carbon Transport (SLoCaT). Retrieved from http://slocat.net/sites/default/files/u10/slocat-istep-literature_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jindal, R., Kerr, J., & Carter, S. (2012). Reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the N’hambita community carbon project in Mozambique. World Development, 40(10), 2123–2135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just Transition Centre. (2017). Just transition: A report for OECD. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/environment/cc/g20-climate/collapsecontents/Just-Transition-Centre-report-just-transition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khatun, K., Gross-Camp, N., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Ball, S., & Massao, G. (2015). When participatory forest management makes money: Insights from Tanzania on governance, benefit sharing, and implications for REDD+. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47, 2097–2112.
   Google Scholar
• Klinsky, S., Roberts, T., Huq, S., Okereke, C., Newell, P., Dauvergne, P., … Bauer, S. (2016). Editorial: Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Global Environmental Change, 44, 170–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinsky, S., & Winkler, H. (2018). Building equity in: Strategies for integrating equity into modelling for a 1.5°C world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 20180115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalska, I. J. (2015). Challenges for long-term industry restructuring in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin: What has polish coalmining achieved and failed from a twenty-year perspective? Resources Policy, 44, 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahimer, A., Alghoul, M., Yousif, F., Razykov, T., Amin, N., & Sopian, K. (2013). Research and development aspects on decentralized electrification options for rural household. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24(2013), 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, A. M., Dokken, T., Duchelle, A. E., Atmadja, S., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Cronkleton, P., … Selaya, G. (2015). The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: Lessons for future engagement. International Forestry Review, 17(1), 43–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2011). Social sustainability of the Brazilian bioethanol: Power relations in a centre-periphery perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(6), 2425–2434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerer, L., & Scudder, T. (1999). Health impacts of large dams. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19, 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövin, I., & Bamsey, H. (2017, August 8). Gender remains one of climate change’s great inequalities. Climate Home News. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/08/31/gender-remains-one-climate-changes-great-inequalities/
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., & Pangbourne, K. (2014). Assessing the equity of carbon mitigation policies for transport in Scotland. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2(2), 70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Marcu, A., & Vangenechten, D. (2018). Managing a sustainable transition to a low-carbon society: The socio-economic impacts of mitigation policies. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). Retrieved from https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/climate_and_energy_-_managing_a_sustainable_transition_to_a_low-carbon_society_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marino, E., & Ribot, J. (2012). Special issue introduction: Adding insult to injury: Climate change and the inequities of climate intervention. Global Environmental Change, 22, 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. (1998). Oxford dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massari, S., & Ruberti, M. (2013). Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies. Resources Policy, 38, 36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazorra, J., Lumbreras, J., Fernández, L., & de la Sota, C. (2017). Gender, climate change and energy access in developing countries. In S. Buckingham & V. Le Masson (Eds.), Understanding climate change through gender relations (pp. 123–140). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercure, J.-F., Pollitt, H., Vinuales, J., Edwards, N., Holden, P. B., Chewpreecha, U., … Knobloch, F. (2018). Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nature Climate Change, 8(2018), 588–593.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, A., Allen, M., & Sha, F. (2018). Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C – can humanity rise to the challenge? Climate Policy, 18(3), 275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Fuglestvedt, J., Friedlingstein, P., Rogelj, J., Grubb, M., Matthews, D., … Allen, M. (2017). Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C’. Nature Geoscience, 10, 741–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W., Vine, D., & Amin, Z. (2017). Energy efficiency of housing for older citizens: Does it matter? Energy Policy, 101(2017), 216–224.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, M. A. F. D., Oliveira, F. C. R., & Diaz-Chavez, R. A. (2015). Socio-economic impacts of Brazilian sugarcane industry. Environmental Development, 16, 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggah, R. (2015). The invisible displaced: A unified conceptualization of population displacement in Brazil. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(2), 222–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naab, F., Nunbogu, A., Diniye, R., & Dongzagla, A. (2016). Resettlement and livelihood sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of bui hydro-power dam project, Ghana. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(5), 1780–1788.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhantumbo, I., & Camargo, M. (2015). REDD+ for profit or for good? Review of private sector and NGO experience in REDD+ projects. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED. Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17570IIED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.keepeek.com//Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/employment/in-it-together-why-less-inequality-benefits-all_9789264235120-en#page1
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, B., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T., … van Vuuren, D. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122(3), 387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish, D., Singh, H., Molina, L., & Madronich, S. (2011). Air quality progress in North American megacities: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 45(39), 7015–7025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskett, L., Huberman, D., Bowen-Jones, E., Edwards, G., & Brown, J. (2008). Making REDD work for the poor (Report prepared for the poverty environment partnership, London, UK). London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/3451.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K., & Brown, J. (2011). Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: Learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(2), 216–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrini, M. A., Vieira Rocha, J., & Brown, C. (2017). Mismatches between mill-cultivated sugarcane and smallholding farming in Brazil: Environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Journal of Rural Studies, 50(2017), 218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, K., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science & Medicine, 128(2015), 316–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, G., Vadali, M., Kvale, D., & Ellickson, K. (2015). Traffic, air pollution, minority and socio-economic status: Addressing inequities in exposure and risk. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 5355–5372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Castillo, A., Castellanos, E., & Galloway McLean, K. (2017). Indigenous peoples, local communities and climate change mitigation. Climatic Change, 140, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos Pinto, P. (2013). Why inequalities matter. In R. Genevey, R. Pachauri, & L. Tubiana (Eds.), Reducing inequalities: A sustainable development challenge. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI). Retrieved from http://www.histecon.magd.cam.ac.uk/inequality/Chapitre%201%20-%20Pedro%20Ramos%20Pinto.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rao, N., van Ruijven, B., Riahi, K., & Bosetti, V. (2017). Improving poverty and inequality modelling in climate research. Nature Climate Change, 7, 857–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckien, D., Lwasa, S., Satterthwaite, D., McEvoy, D., Creutzig, F., Montgomery, M., … Khan, I. (2018). Equity, environmental justice, and urban climate change. In C. Rosenzweig, W. Solecki, P. Romero-Lankao, S. Mehrotra, S. Dhakal, & S. Ali Ibrahim (Eds.), Climate change and cities: Second assessment report of the urban climate change research network (pp. 173–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. G., & Varghese, J. (2007). Gender representation on Canadian forest sector advisory committees. The Forestry Chronicle, 83(4), 515–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. (2017). Renewables 2017: Global Status Report. Retrieved from http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/17-8399_GSR_2017_Full_Report_0621_Opt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T. W. (2012). Institutional determinants of success among forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 40(3), 542–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rio, P., & Burguillo, M. (2008). Assessing the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability: Towards a theoretical framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(5), 1325–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, B., Holland, M., & Naughton-Treves, L. (2014). Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Global Environmental Change, 29, 281–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, E., Albers, H., Lokina, R., & Meshack, C. (2016). Allocating group-level payments for ecosystem services: Experiences from a REDD+ pilot in Tanzania. Resources, 5(4), 43. doi: 10.3390/resources5040043
   Google Scholar
• Rosenow, J., Platt, R., & Flanagan, B. (2013). Fuel poverty and energy efficiency obligations – a critical assessment of the supplier obligation in the UK. Energy Policy, 62, 1194–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchelli, S. (2016). Social, economic, and environmental impacts of biomass and biofuel supply chains. In J. Holm-Nielsen & E. Augustine (Eds.), Biomass supply chains for bioenergy and biorefining (pp. 191–213). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, A. S., Torres, E. A., & Khalid, R. A. (2015). Renewable energy generation for the rural electrification of isolated communities in the Amazon Region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapkota, A., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Wang, J. (2014). Role of renewable energy technologies in rural communities’ adaptation to climate change in Nepal. Renewable Energy, 68, 793–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoaiba, A., & Ariaratnam, S. (2016). A study of socioeconomic impacts of renewable energy projects in Afghanistan. Procedia Engineering, 145, 995–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Sills, E., Atmadja, S., de Sassi, C., Duchelle, A., Kweka, D., Pradnja Resosudarmo, I. A., & Sunderlin, W. (2014). REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Retrieved from http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/books/BCIFOR1403.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D’Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., … Tiwari, G. (2014). Transport. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, J. C. Minx, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, & T. Zwickel (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change: Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 599–670). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2010). From healthy homes to health equity. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 16(Suppl. 5), S3–S4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E. A., … Tubiello, F. (2014). Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, J. C. Minx, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, & T. Zwickel (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. (2017). Reviewing, reforming, and rethinking global energy subsidies: Towards a political economy research agenda. Ecological Economics, 135, 150–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, T., Pierfederici, R., Waisman, H., & Colombier, M. (2015). Beyond the numbers: Understanding the transformation induced by INDCs (MILES Project Consortium Study N°05/15). Paris: IDDRI. Retrieved from http://www.iddri.org/Publications/Collections/Analyses/MILES
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel Online. (2010, March 5). Culture of steel: Germany’s Ruhr Valley looks back to its future. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/culture-of-steel-germany-s-ruhr-valley-looks-back-to-its-future-a-681791-2.html
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2016, February 14). Current climate models are grossly misleading. Nature, 530, 407–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2015). The great divide. London: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, L., Dougill, A., Mkwambisi, D., Dyer, J., Kalaba, F., & Mngoli, M. (2012a). Challenges and opportunities for carbon management in Malawi and Zambia. Carbon Management, 3(2), 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (2015). A review of industrial restructuring in the Ruhr Valley and relevant points for China. Washington, DC: Institute for Industrial Productivity. Retrieved from www.iipnetwork.org/Industrial%20Restructuring%20in%20the%20Ruhr%20Valley.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Investor Group on Climate Change. (2017, October). Coal, carbon and the community: Investing in a just transition. Sydney: The Investor Group on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://igcc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Coal-Carbon-and-Community_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Marmot Review. (2010). Fair society, healthy lives: Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: Institute of Health Equity. Retrieved from http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review/fair-society-healthy-lives-full-report-pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Marmot Review Team. (2011). The health impacts of cold homes and fuel poverty. London: Friends of the Earth & The Marmot Review Team. Retrieved from https://friendsoftheearth.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/cold_homes_health.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2017). The growing role of minerals and metals for a low carbon future. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/207371500386458722/The-Growing-Role-of-Minerals-and-Metals-for-a-Low-Carbon-Future
   Google Scholar
• UITP – International Association of Public Transport. (2013, January). Public transport: Creating green jobs and stimulating inclusive growth (A UITP Position Paper). Brussels: UITP. Retrieved from http://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/cck-focus-papers-files/fp_green_jobs-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris agreement (1/CP.21). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2015). Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/RES/70/1). New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Arena, D., Tirado Herrero, S., & Butcher, A. (2010). Employment impacts of a large-scale deep building energy Retrofit programme in Hungary. Budapest: Central European University and European Climate Foundation. Retrieved from http://zbr.kormany.hu/download/8/82/00000/Study%20Deep%20Building%20Energy%20Retrofit%20Prog.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., Dubash, N., & Lecocq, F. (2014). Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 549–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valer, L. R., Mocelin, A., Zilles, R., Moura, E., & Nascimento, A. C. S. (2014). Assessment of socioeconomic impacts of access to electricity in Brazilian Amazon: Case study in two communities in Mamirauá Reserve. Energy for Sustainable Development, 20, 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Horst, D., & Vermeylen, S. (2011). Spatial scale and social impacts of biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 2435–2443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vona, F. (2019). Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: Why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it. Climate Policy, 19(4), 524–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stechow, C., McCollum, D., Riahi, K., Minx, J., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D., … Edenhofer, O. (2015). Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: A synthesis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, S., Rasanathan, K., & Campbell-Lendrum, D. (2009). Natural and unnatural synergies: Climate change policy and health equity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(87), 799–801. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/10/09-067116/en/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, Q., Hubacek, K., Feng, K., Wei, Y.-M., & Liang, Q.-M. (2016). Distributional effects of carbon taxation. Applied Energy, 184, 1123–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenwei, K., Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Zhao, B., Wang, S., & Hao, J. (2017). Assessing the future vehicle fleet electrification: The impacts on regional and Urban Air quality. Environmental Science and Technology, 51(2), 1007–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westholm, L. (2016). Fruits from the forest and the fields: Forest conservation policies and intersecting social inequalities in Burkina Faso’s REDD+ Program. International Forestry Review, 18(4), 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willand, N., Ridley, I., & Maller, C. (2015). Towards explaining the health impacts of residential energy efficiency interventions: A realist review. Part 1: Pathways. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsemius, H., Jongman, B., Veldkamp, T., Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., & Ward, P. (2018). Disaster risk, climate change, and poverty: Assessing the global exposure of poor people to floods and droughts. Environment and Development Economics, 23(3), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work, C. (2017). Forest Islands and Castaway communities: REDD+ and forest restoration in Prey Lang forest. Forests, 8(2), 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011). Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation: Transport sector. Geneva: World Health organisation. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70913/9789241502917_eng.pdf;jsessionid=D0F814B2EE44EC9AA633278B8781B131?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2014). Unlocking new opportunities: Jobs in green and healthy transport. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/unlocking-new-opportunities-jobs-in-green-and-healthy-transport
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Yaqoot, M., Diwan, P., & Kandpal, T. (2016). Review of barriers to the dissemination of decentralized renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 477–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar