Narratives in REDD+ benefit sharing: examining evidence within and beyond the forest sector

References

• Angelsen, A. (2017). REDD+ as result-based aid: General lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway. Review of Development Economics, 21(2), 237–264. doi: 10.1111/rode.12271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D., & Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (2009). Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
   Google Scholar
• Arwida, S., Maharani, C., Basnett, B. S., & Yang, A. L. (2017). Gender relevant considerations for developing REDD+ indicators: Lessons learnt for Indonesia (Info Brief 173). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Arwida, S., Mardiah, S., & Luttrell, C. (2015). Lessons for REDD+ benefit-sharing mechanisms from anti-corruption measures in Indonesia (Info Brief 120). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Assembe-Mvondo, S., Brockhaus, M., & Lescuyer, G. (2013). Assessment of the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of benefit-sharing schemes under large-scale agriculture: Lessons from land fees in Cameroon. The European Journal of Development Research, 25(4), 641–656. doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2013.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assembe-Mvondo, S., Wong, G., Loft, L., & Tjajadi, J. (2015). Comparative assessment of forest revenue redistribution mechanisms in Cameroon: Lessons for REDD+ benefit sharing (Working Paper 190). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Atela, J. O., Minang, P. A., Quinn, C. H., & Duguma, L. A. (2015). Implementing REDD+ at the local level: Assessing the key enablers for credible mitigation and sustainable livelihood outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 238–249. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bee, B. A., & Sijapati Basnett, B. (2017). Engendering social and environmental safeguards in REDD+: lessons from feminist and development research. Third World Quarterly, 38(4), 787–804. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1191342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N., & Kuczynski, P. P. (2015). Look to the forests: How performance payments can slow climate change. Working group on performance-based payments to reduce tropical deforestation. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., & Angelsen, A. (2012). Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework. In Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices (pp. 15–30). Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Carmenta, R. (2014). REDD+ policy networks: Exploring actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 1–32. doi: 10.5751/ES-06799-190401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Mardiah, S. (2014). Governing the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Sehring, J., Di Gregorio, M., Assembe-Mvondo, S., Babon, A., … Zida, M. (2016). REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: A qualitative comparative analysis. Climate Policy, 17(6), 708–730. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1169392
   Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., Wong, G., Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Pham, T. T., Duchelle, A., … Di Gregorio, M. (2014). Operationalizing safeguards in national REDD+ benefit-sharing systems: Lessons on effectiveness, efficiency and equity (REDD+ Safeguard Brief 2). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Cameroon ER-PIN. (2016). Forest carbon partnership fund emissions reductions program idea note (ER-IN) final. Retrieved from http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/cameroon
   Google Scholar
• Cerutti, P. O., Lescuyer, G., Tsanga, R., Kassa, S. N., Mapangou, P. R., Mendoula, E. E., … Yembe, R. Y. (2014). Social impacts of the forest stewardship council certification: An assessment in the Congo Basin (Occasional Paper 103). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P., Guillaumont, P., Guillaumont, S., & Gunning, J. W. (1997). Redesigning conditionality. World Development, 25(9), 1399–1407. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00053-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., & Schroeder, H. (2017). REDD+ crossroads post Paris: Politics, lessons and interplays. Forests, 8, 508. doi: 10.3390/f8120508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Cronin, T., Muharrom, E., Mardiah, S., & Santoso, L. (2015). Deadlock or transformational change? Exploring public discourse on REDD+ across seven countries. Global Environmental Politics, 15(4), 63–84. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchelle, A. E., & Jagger, P. (2014). Operationalizing REDD+ safeguards: Challenges and opportunities (Safeguards Brief 1). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Duchelle, A. E., Seymour, F., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A., Larson, A. M., Moeliono, M., … Martius, C. (2018). REDD+: Lessons from national and subnational implementation. Ending tropical deforestation series. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, T., & Corbera, E. (2016). Incentivizing REDD+: How developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit-sharing. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstater, M., Nakhooda, S., & Watson, C. (2013). The effectiveness of climate finance: A review of the Amazon Fund. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gebara, F., Muccillo, L., May, P., Vitel, C., Loft, L., & Santos, A. (2014). Lessons from local environmental funds for REDD+ benefit sharing with indigenous people in Brazil (Info Brief 98). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, J. C., Loft, L., & Pham, T. T. (2019). How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam’s payments for forest environmental services program. Ecological Economics, 160, 205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7, 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hein, J., Guarin, A., Frommé, E., & Pauw, P. (2018). Deforestation and the Paris climate agreement: An assessment of REDD+ in the national climate action plans. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemerink-Seyoum, J. S., Tadesse, T. M., Mersha, W. K., Duker, A. E. C., & De Fraiture, C. (2018). Sharing benefits or fueling conflicts? The elusive quest for organizational blue-prints in climate financed forestry projects in Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 53, 265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowler, L., Tovar, J., Ravikumar, A., & Larson, A. (2014). The legitimacy of multilevel governance structures for benefit sharing REDD+ and other low emissions options in Peru (Info Brief 101). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, A. M., Dokken, T., Duchelle, A., Atmadja, S., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Cronkleton, P., … Selaya, G. (2015). The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: Lessons for future engagement. International Forestry Review, 17(1), 43–65. doi: 10.1505/146554815814725031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, D. N., Loft, L., Tjajadi, J. S., Pham, T. T., & Wong, G. Y. (2016). Being equitable is not always fair: An assessment of PFES implementation in Dien Bien, Vietnam (Working Paper 205). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., & Fairhead, J. (2002). Changing perspectives on forests: Science/policy processes in wider society. IDS Bulletin, 33, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft, L., Gebara, M. F., & Wong, G. Y. (2016). The experience of ecological fiscal transfers: Lessons for REDD+ benefit sharing (Occasional Paper 154). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Loft, L., Le, D. N., Pham, T. T., Yang, A. L., Tjajadi, J. S., & Wong, G. Y. (2017). Whose equity matters? National to local equity perceptions in Vietnam’s payments for forest ecosystem services scheme. Ecological Economics, 135, 164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft, L., Pham, T. T., & Luttrell, C. (2014). Lesson from payments for ecosystem services for REDD+ benefit-sharing mechanism (Info Brief 68). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Loft, L., Ravikumar, A., Gebara, M., Pham, T. T., Resosudarmo, I. A. D., Assembe-Mvondo, S., … Andersson, K. (2015). Taking stock of carbon rights in REDD+ candidate countries: Concept meets reality. Forests, 6(4), 1031–1060. doi: 10.3390/f6041031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, C., & Betteridge, B. (2017). Lessons for multi-level REDD+ benefit sharing from revenue distribution in extractive resource sectors (oil, gas and mining) (Occasional Paper 166). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Luttrell, C., & Fripp, E. (2015). Lessons from voluntary partnership agreements for REDD+ benefit sharing (Occasional Paper 134). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M., Kweka, D., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A., & Sunderlin, W. (2013). Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 52–70. doi: 10.5751/ES-05834-180452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. L., Levin, K., & Cashore, B. (2011). Building the forest-climate bandwagon: REDD+ and the logic of problem amelioration. Global Environmental Politics, 11, 85–103. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013). Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R., & Muhajir, M. (2015). Searching for justice: Rights vs ‘benefits’ in Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park, Indonesia. Conservation and Society, 13(4), 370–381. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.179886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R., Ravikumar, A., & Larson, A. (2015). Benefit sharing in context: A comparative analysis of 10 land-use change case studies in Indonesia (Infobrief 118). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R., Sanders, A. J., Larson, A. M., & Ravikumar, A. (2016). Analyzing multilevel governance in Indonesia: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of landuse change in Central and West Kalimantan (Working Paper 202). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Nawir, A., Paudel, N., Wong, G., & Luttrell, C. (2015). Thinking about REDD+ benefit sharing mechanism (BSM): Lessons from community forestry (CF) in Nepal and Indonesia (Infobrief 112). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, E. (2015). Performance-based aid: Why it will probably not meet its promises. Development Policy Review, 33, 313–323. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskett, L. (2011). Benefit sharing in REDD+: Exploring the implications for poor and vulnerable people. Washington, DC: World Bank and REDD-net.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. T., Brockhaus, M., Wong, G., Le, N. D., Tjajadi, J., Loft, L., … Assembe-Mvondo, S. (2013). Approaches to benefit sharing: A preliminary comparative analysis of 13 REDD+ countries (Working Paper 108). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. T., Mai, Y. H., Moeliono, M., & Brockhaus, M. (2016). Women’s participation in REDD+ national decision-making in Vietnam. International Forestry Review, 18(3), 334–344. doi: 10.1505/146554816819501691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, T. T., Moeliono, M., Brockhaus, M., Le, D. N., & Katila, P. (2017). REDD+ and green growth: Synergies or discord in Vietnam and Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 19(Suppl. 1), 56–68. doi: 10.1505/146554817822407385
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. T., Moeliono, M., Brockhaus, M., Le, N. D., Wong, G., & Le, T. (2014). Local preferences and strategies for effective, efficient, and equitable distribution of PES revenues in Vietnam: Lessons for REDD+. Human Ecology, 42(6), 885–899. doi: 10.1007/s10745-014-9703-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, T. T., Wong, G. Y., Le, N. D., & Brockhaus, M. (2016). The distribution of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) in Vietnam: Research evidence to inform payment guidelines (Occasional Paper 163). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Salvini, G., Herold, M., De Sy, V., Kissinger, G., Brockhaus, M., & Skutsch, M. (2014). How countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: Implications for monitoring systems. Environmental Research Letters, 9(7), 074004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savedoff, W. (2016). How the green climate fund could promote REDD+ through a cash on delivery instrument: Issues and options (Policy Paper no 72). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, F., & Busch, J. (2016). Why forests? Why now? The science, economics and politics of tropical forests and climate change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sills, E. O., Atmadja, S. S., de Sassi, C., Duchelle, A. E., Kweka, D. L., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., & Sunderlin, W. D. (2014). REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe. Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Skutsch, M., Torres, A. B., & Fuentes, J. C. C. (2017). Policy for pro-poor distribution of REDD+ benefits in Mexico: How the legal and technical challenges are being addressed. Forest Policy and Economics, 75, 58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skutsch, M., & Turnhout, E. (2018). How REDD+ is performing communities. Forests, 9(10), 638–654. doi: 10.3390/f9100638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, G. M., & Anandi, C. A. M. (2017). Shifting cultivation, contentious land change and forest governance: The politics of swidden in East Kalimantan. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(5), 1066–1087. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1243531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjajadi, J., Yang, A., Naito, D., & Arwida, S. (2015). Lessons from environmental and social sustainability certification standards for equitable REDD+ benefit-sharing mechanisms (Infobrief 119). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Gupta, A., Weatherley-Singh, J., Vijge, M. J., De Koning, J., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., … Lederer, M. (2017). Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: Between evolving expectations and current practice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), e425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Hoff, R., Rajão, R., & Leroy, P. (2018). Clashing interpretations of REDD+ “results” in the Amazon Fund. Climatic Change, 150(3-4), 433–445. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2288-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijge, M. J., Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Muharrom, E. (2016). Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries. Global Environmental Change, 39, 57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., McDermott, C., Vijge, M. J., & Cashore, B. (2012). Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 646–653. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., & McNeill, D. (2012). Performance indicators and REDD+ implementation. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. V. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD (pp. 233–246). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, L., & Arora-Jonsson, S. (2018). What room for politics and change in global climate governance? Addressing gender in co-benefits and safeguards. Environmental Politics, 27(5), 917–938. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1479115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G. (2014). The experience of conditional cash transfers: Lessons for REDD+ benefit sharing (Infobrief 97). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Carmenta, R., Duchelle, A., Leonard, S., … Wunder, S. (2016). Results-based payments for REDD+: Lessons on finance, performance, and non-carbon benefits. Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G. Y., Loft, L., Brockhaus, M., Yang, A. L., Pham, T. T., Assembe-Mvondo, S., & Luttrell, C. (2017). An assessment framework for benefit sharing mechanisms to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation within a forest policy mix. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(5), 436–452. doi: 10.1002/eet.1771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. (2009). Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? In Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options (pp. 213–224). Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, A., Nguyen, D. T., Vu, T. P., Le Quang, T., Pham, T. T., Larson, A. M., & Ravikumar, A. (2016). Analyzing multilevel governance in Vietnam: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of land-use change and benefit sharing in Nghe An and Dien Bien provinces (Working Paper 218). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, A., Wong, G., & Loft, L. (2015). What can REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms learn from the European rural development policy? (Infobrief 126). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar