National laws for enhancing flood resilience in the context of climate change: potential and shortcomings

References

• Adger, W. N., Brown, I., & Surminski, S. (2018). Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy. The Royal Society Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aerts, J. C., Botzen, W. J., Clarke, K. C., Cutter, S. L., Hall, J. W., Merz, B., Michel-Kerjan, E., Mysiak, J., Surminski, S., & Kunreuther, H. (2018). Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nature Climate Change, 8(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, M., Priest, S., & Mees, H. (2016a). A framework for evaluating flood risk governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 64, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, M., Priest, S. J., Micou, P., Tapsell, S. M., Green, C. H., Parker, D. J., & Homewood, S. (2016b). Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England–enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements. Middlesex University.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. L. (1988). The evolution of the 1936 flood control act. Office of History, US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S., & Nachmany, M. (2017). Trends in climate change legislation. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bahadur, A. V., Ibrahim, M., & Tanner, T. (2010). The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters.
   Google Scholar
• Béné, C., Wood, R. G., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Working Papers, 2012, 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. A., Laurien, F., Czajkowski, J., Keating, A., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., & Montgomery, M. (2019). First insights from the flood resilience measurement tool: A large-scale community flood resilience analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanheira, M., Rihoux, B., & Bandelow, C. B. (2017). Sustainable governance indicators 2017: Belgium report, Universite Libre de Bruxelles Institutional Repository 2013/262877.
   Google Scholar
• Clarvis, M. H., Allan, A., & Hannah, D. M. (2014). Water, resilience and the law: From general concepts and governance design principles to actionable mechanisms. Environmental Science & Policy, 43, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. K. (2010). Stationarity is dead-long live transformation: Five principles for climate change adaptation law. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev, 34, 9. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1357766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crase, L., Connor, J., Michaels, S., & Cooper, B. (2020). Australian water policy reform: Lessons learned and potential transferability. Climate Policy, 20(5), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1752614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRED, & UNDRR. (2015). The human cost of natural disasters: A global perspective.
   Google Scholar
• De MoeL, H., Aerts, J. C., & Koomen, E. (2011). Development of flood exposure in the Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFID. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets.
   Google Scholar
• Dieperink, C., Hegger, D. T., Bakker, M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Green, C., & Driessen, P. (2016). Recurrent governance challenges in the implementation and alignment of flood risk management strategies: A review. Water Resources Management, 30(13), 4467–4481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorn-Hoekveld, W. V. (2017). Transboundary flood risk management: Compatibilities of the legal systems of flood risk management in the Netherlands, Flanders and France±A comparison. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 26, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesson, J., & Hey, E. (2013). Introduction: Where in law is social-ecological resilience? Ecology and Society, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05750-180325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P. (2019). Trends in the evolution of floodplain management in Australia: Risk assessment, precautionary and robust decision-making. Journal of Environmental Law, 31(2), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqz012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Agency, & defra. (2011). Understanding the risks, empowering communities, building resilience: The national flood and coastal erosion risk management strategy for England.
   Google Scholar
• Garmestani, A. S., & Allen, C. R. (2014). Social-ecological resilience and law. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., & Benson, M. H. (2013). Can law foster social-ecological resilience? Ecology and Society, 18(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05927-180237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilissen, H. K. (2015). The integration of the adaptation approach into EU and Dutch legislation on flood risk management. Journal of Water Law, 24, 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Goytia, S., Pettersson, M., Schellenberger, T., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J., & Priest, S. (2016). Dealing with change and uncertainty within the regulatory frameworks for flood defense infrastructure in selected European countries. Ecology and Society, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08908-210423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanger, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Surminski, S., Nenciu-Posner, C., Lorant, A., Ionescu, R., & Patt, A. (2018). Insurance, public assistance, and household flood risk reduction: A comparative study of Austria, England, and Romania. Risk Analysis, 38(4), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Albrecht, J. (2014). From flood protection to flood risk management: Condition-based and performance-based regulations in German water law. Journal of Environmental Law, 26(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/equ015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., Slavíková, L., & Mccarthy, S. (2019). Nature-based solutions in flood risk management. Nature-based flood risk management on private land. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heidrich, O., Reckien, D., Olazabal, M., Foley, A., Salvia, M., de Gregorio Hurtado, S., Orru, H., Flacke, J., Geneletti, D., Pietrapertosa, F., Hamann, J. J.-P., Tiwary, A., Feliu, E., & Dawson, R. J. (2016). National climate policies across Europe and their impacts on cities strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 168, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs Jr, G. J. (1997). Colorado water law: An historical overview. U. Denv. Water L. Rev, 1, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, W. (2002). Flood defence law. Shaw & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, W. (2017). Integrated water resources management and reform of flood risk management in England. Journal of Environmental Law, 29(2), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqx015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, W., & McGillivray, D. (2002). Water pollution and water quality law. European Environmental Law Review, 11.
   Google Scholar
• IFRC. (2019). Literature review on aligning climate change adaptation (CCA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR). Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• IFRC AND PMI. (2014). International Disaster Response Law (IDRL) in Indonesia: An analysis of the impact and implementation of Indonesia’s legal framework for international disaster assistance. Palang Merah Indonesia and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
   Google Scholar
• IFRC AND UNDP. (2014). Effective law and regulation for disaster risk reduction: A multi-country report. IFRC & UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1, 5° C. Special report. IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, B. (2018). Effective adaptation to rising flood risk. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04396-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keating, A., Campbell, K., Mechler, R., Michel-Kerjan, E., Mochizuki, J., Kunreuther, H., Bayer, J., Hanger, S., McCallum, I., See, L., Williges, K., Atreya, A., Botzen, W., Collier, B., Czajkowski, J., Hochrainer, S., & Egan, C. (2014). Operationalizing resilience against natural disaster risk: Opportunities, barriers, and a way forward. Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/11191/1/zurichfloodresiliencealliance_ResilienceWhitePaper_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keating, A., Campbell, K., Szoenyi, M., Mcquistan, C., Nash, D., & Burer, M. (2017). Development and testing of a community flood resilience measurement tool. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-77-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienzler, S., Pech, I., Kreibich, H., Müller, M., & Thieken, A. H. (2015). After the extreme flood in 2002: Changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(3), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-505-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulp, S. A., & Strauss, B. H. (2019). New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnan, S. (1995). Catastrophe insurance system in France. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 20(4), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.1995.42
   Google Scholar
• Magnuszewski, P., Jarzabe, L., Keating, A., Mechler, R., French, A., Laurien, F., Arestegui, M., Etienne, E., Ilieva, L., & Ferradas, P. (2019). The flood resilience systems framework: From concept to application. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management, 9(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.5595/idrim.2019.0348
   Google Scholar
• Mechler, R., & Hochrainer-Stigler, S. (2019). Generating multiple resilience dividends from managing unnatural disasters in Asia: Opportunities for measurement and policy. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series No. 601. http://doi.org/10.22617/WPS190573-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Crabbe, A., & Suykens, C. (2018). Belgian flood risk governance: Explaining the dynamics within a fragmented governance arrangement. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Suykens, C., Beyers, J.-C., Crabbé, A., Delvaux, B., & Deketelaere, K. (2016). Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Belgium: dealing with flood risks in an urbanised and institutionally complex country. STAR-FLOOD Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. (2010). Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: Are we reinventing the wheel? Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 22, 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., Byrnes, R., & Surminski, S. (2019). Policy brief National laws and policies on climate change adaptation: A global review. Grantham Research Institute on Climate change and the Environment, London School of Economics. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/National-laws-and-policies-on-climate-change-adaptation_A-globalreview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., Fankhauser, S., Setzer, J., & Averchenkova, A. (2017). Global trends in climate change legislation and litigation: 2017 update. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics. http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and-litigation-2017-update/.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, R. J., Hanson, S., Herweijer, C., Patmore, N., Hallegatte, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Château, J., & Muir-Wood, R. (2008). Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerability to climate extremes: Exposure estimates. OECD Environment Working Papers. No. 1. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/011766488208.
   Google Scholar
• Olazabal, M., Ruiz De Gopegui, M., Tompkins, E., Venner, K., & Smith, R. (2019). A cross-scale worldwide analysis of coastal adaptation planning. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osumgborogwu, I., & Chibo, C. (2017). Environmental laws in Nigeria and occurrence of some geohazards: A review. Asian Journal of Environment and Ecology, 2(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEE/2017/34045
   Google Scholar
• Peel, J., & Fisher, D. (2016). The role of international environmental law in disaster risk reduction. BRILL.
   Google Scholar
• Pettengel, C., Mcquistan, C., Szönyi, M., Keating, A., Laurien, F., Ianni, F., Etienne, E., Macclune, K., & Bold, R. (2019). Flood Resilience Measurement for Communities: Project set up, study set up, data collection, and grading. In Flood resilience measurement for communities (FRMC) (pp. 1–48). Flood Resilience Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• The Pitt Review Report. (2008). Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., De Gregorio-Hurtado, S., D’Alonzo, V., Foley, A., Simoes, S. G., Krkoška Lorencová, E., Orru, H., Orru, K., Wejs, A., Flacke, J., Olazabal, M., Geneletti, D., Feliu, E., Vasilie, S., Nador, C., … Dawson, R. (2018). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanze, J. (2017). Nature-based solutions in flood risk management: Buzzword or innovation? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 10(3), 281–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper, E. L. F., & Langston, L. (2015). A comparative overview of resilience measurement frameworks: Analysing indicators and approaches. Overseas Development Institute—Working Paper, 422, 205.
   Google Scholar
• Spray, C., Ball, T., & Rouillard, J. (2009). Bridging the water law, policy, science interface: Flood risk management in Scotland. Journal of Water Law, 20, 165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Stallworthy, M. (2006). Sustainability, coastal erosion and climate change: An environmental justice analysis. Journal of Environmental Law, 18(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eql017
   Google Scholar
• Surminski, S., & Szoenyi, M. (2019). Nature-based flood resilience: reaping the triple dividend from adaptation. In E. Berglof & T. Thiele (Eds.), From green to blue finance, integrating the ocean into the global climate finance architecture (pp. 22–23). LSE Institute of Global Affairs.https://www.lse.ac.uk/iga/assets/documents/global-policy-lab/From-Green-to-Blue-Finance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Surminski, S., & Tanner, T. (2016). Realising the ‘triple dividend of resilience’. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Surminski, S., & Thieken, A. H. (2017). Promoting flood risk reduction: The role of insurance in Germany and England. Earth's Future, 5(10), 979–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieken, A. H., Kienzler, S., Kreibich, H., Kuhlicke, C., Kunz, M., Mühr, B., Müller, M., Otto, A., Petrow, T., Pisi, S., & Schröter, K. (2016). Review of the flood risk management system in Germany after the major flood in 2013. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08547-210251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomalla, F., Downing, T., Spanger-Siegfried, E., Han, G., & Rockström, J. (2006). Reducing hazard vulnerability: Towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters, 30(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, J., Barnes, K., Boukraa, A., David, S., & Helme, N. (2018). Significant UK environmental law cases 2017/18. Journal of Environmental Law, 31(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqz014
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618
   Google Scholar
• Tingsanchali, T. (2012). Urban flood disaster management. Procedia Engineering, 32, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1233
   Google Scholar
• UNDRR. (2016). Terminology related to disaster risk reduction: updated technical non-paper.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijswick, M., Van Rijswick, H., & Havekes, H. J. (2012). European and Dutch water law. UWA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., Kaufmann, M., Mees, H., Schellenberger, T., Ganzevoort, W., Hegger, D., Larrue, C., & Matczak, P. (2017). Varieties of flood risk governance in Europe: How do countries respond to driving forces and what explains institutional change? Global Environmental Change, 44, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., Liefferink, D., & Crabbé, A. (2018). Stability and change in flood risk governance: On path dependencies and change agents. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar