Idealism, pragmatism, and the power of compromise in the negotiation of New Zealand’s Zero Carbon Act

References

• Ainge Roy, E. (2019). Ardern says New Zealand on ‘right side of history’ as MPs pass zero-carbon bill. Accessed 28 Dec, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/07/ardern-says-new-zealand-on-right-side-of-history-as-mps-pass-zero-carbon-bill
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. (2018). Submission: Zero carbon bill discussion document, ministry for the environment.
   Google Scholar
• Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S., & Finnegan, J. J. (2020). The impact of strategic climate legislation: Evidence from expert interviews on the UK climate change Act. Climate Policy, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1819190
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., & Wilson, G. A. (2009). Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: Technocentrism, ecocentrism and the carbon economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(10), 2324–2341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a40342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Katapally, T. R. (2018). Shaping policy change in population health: Policy entrepreneurs, ideas, and institutions. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(5), 369–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., Kornprobst, M., & Reh, C. (2012). Introduction: Meeting in the middle. Government and Opposition, 47(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing: From Metaphor to analytic tool. Strategies for social inquiry. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, D., & Lorenzoni, I. (2014). Examining the scope for national lesson-drawing on climate governance. The Political Quaterly, 85(2), 202–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, G., & Terry, S. (2010). The carbon challenge: New Zealand’s emissions trading scheme. Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boasson, E. L., & Huitema, D. (2017). Climate governance entrepreneurship: Emerging findings and a new research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1343–1361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417730713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BusinessNZ. (2018). Our climate your say: Discussion document response.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2019). Minute of decision: Climate change response (emissions trading reform) amendment bill: Inclusion of agricultural emissions Provision. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Legislation/minute-of-decision-climate-change-response-emissions-trading-reform-amendment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cain, M., Lynch, J., Allen, M. R., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Frame, D. J., & Macey, A. H. (2019). Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants. Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0086-4
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Galanti, T. (2020). From policy entrepreneurs to policy entrepreneurship: Actors and actions in public policy innovation. Policy & Politics, 00(00), 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15906842137162
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., & Childs, M. (2018). Friends of the Earth as a policy entrepreneur: ‘The Big Ask’ campaign for a UK climate change Act. Environmental Politics, 27(6), 994–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1368151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., & Jacobs, M. (2014). Explaining radical policy change: The case of climate change and energy policy under the British labour government 2006-10. Public Administration, 92(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. (2013). Climate discourse complexes, national climate regimes and Australian climate policy. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, H. (2019). NZ First slows climate change law, Stuff.co.nz, https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/110159557/nz-first-slows-climate-change-law?rm=a
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. H., & Rosin, C. (2014). Absolving the sins of emission: The politics of regulating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 391–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, G., & Papoutsaki, E. (2017). Youth-led activism and political engagement in New Zealand: A survey of Generation Zero. Communication Research and Practice, 3(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1228994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, E., Parsons, M., & Fisher, K. (2018). Technically political: The post-politics(?) of the New Zealand emissions trading scheme. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 97(August), 253–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.023
   Google Scholar
• Fitch-Roy, O., Fairbrass, J., & Benson, D. (2020). Ideas, coalitions and compromise: Reinterpreting EU-ETS lobbying through discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1567573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Fonterra. (2018). Submission on the zero carbon bill. Foneterra Cooperative Group Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Generation Zero. (2014). The big ask: One key step for real climate action.
   Google Scholar
• Generation Zero. (2017a). International case studies and lessons for New Zealand. A Zero carbon Act research paper (April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Generation Zero. (2017b). ZERO CARBON ACT NZ: Summary paper.
   Google Scholar
• Generation Zero. (2018a). Generation Zero celebrates Zero carbon Act announcement.
   Google Scholar
• Generation Zero. (2018b). Zero carbon bill consultation: Submission.
   Google Scholar
• Generation Zero. (2020). Purpose.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, R. (2016). Unravelling the United Kingdom’s climate policy consensus: The power of ideas, discourse and institutions. Global Environmental Change, 40, 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillard, R., & Lock, K. (2017). Blowing policy bubbles: Rethinking emissions targets and low-carbon energy policies in the U.K.. Journal of Environmental Policy &; Planning, 19(6), 638–653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1266931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, K. (2018). Cross-party collaboration on climate policy: The experience of GLOBE-NZ. Policy Quarterly, 14(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v14i1.4759
   Google Scholar
• Greater Wellington Regional Council. (2018). Zero carbon Bill consultation response: Submission by greater Wellington regional council.
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., & Bailey, I. (2019). Changing the record: Narrative policy analysis and the politics of emissions trading in New Zealand. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(6), 409–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., Bailey, I., & Harmer, N. (2017). Designing New Zealand’s emissions trading scheme. Global Environmental Politics, 17(3), 31–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labour. (2017). Real action on climate change, https://www.labour.org.nz/climatechange
   Google Scholar
• Leining, C. (2017). Improving Emission Pricing in New Zealand: a briefing for GLOBE-NZ, Wellington. https://www.parliament.nz/media/4448/improving-emission-pricing-in-nz-leining.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leining, C., Kerr, S., & Bruce-Brand, B. (2020). The New Zealand emissions trading scheme: Critical review and future outlook for three design innovations. Climate Policy, 20(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1699773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2013). The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK climate change Act. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1339–1348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., & Benson, D. (2014). Radical institutional change in environmental governance: Explaining the origins of the UK climate change Act 2008 through discursive and streams perspectives. Global Environmental Change, 29, 10–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, S. C. (2005). Principled compromise and the abortion controversy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33(4), 317–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00035.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, S. C. (2011). Moral compromise, civic friendship, and political reconciliation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14(5), 581–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.617120
   Google Scholar
• Mclaren, L. (2019). Youth Climate Group Excited their Climate Law Brought to Life. Stuff. Retrieved August 22, 2020 from https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/112558335/youth-climate-group-excited-their-climate-law-brought-to-life
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. (2018a). Our climate your say: Discussion document on the zero carbon bill.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. (2018b). Zero carbon bill consultation: Summary of submissions.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. (2019a). Climate change response (emissions trading Reform) Amendment bill: Inclusion of agricultural emissions provisions. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Climate%20Change/climate_change_response_%28emissions_trading_reform%29_amendment_bill_-_inclusion_of_agricultural_emissions_provisions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. (2019b). Final policy decisions for action on agricultural emissions. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Climate%20Change/final-policy-decisions-action-agricultural-emissions-minutes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment/Ministry for Primary Industries. (2019). Reducing emissions from the agricultural sector: Regulatory impact assessment. Ministry for the Environment. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Legislation/RIS/ria-reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-agricultural-sector.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., Fankhauser, S., Kingsmill, N., Landesman, T., Roppongi, H., Schleifer, P., Setzer, J., Sharman, A., Singleton, C. S., Sundaresan, J., & Townshend, T. (2017). Climate Change Legislation in Maldives: An excerpt from the 2015 global climate legislation studay a review of climate change legislation in 99 countries. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, GLOBE International.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, S. L. (2020). ‘Anything Westminster can do we can do better’: The Scottish climate change act and placing a sub-state nation on the international stage. Environmental Politics, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1846957
   Google Scholar
• Nash, S. L., & Steurer, R. (2019). Taking stock of climate change acts in Europe: Living policy processes or symbolic gestures? Climate Policy, 19(8), 1052–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1623164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Farm Forestry Association. (2018). Our climate your say: Consultation on the zero carbon bill.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. (2017). Special debate – GLOBE-NZ – report. House of Representatives Hansard. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20170413_20170413_12
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. (2019a). Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill: First Reading. House of Representatives Hansard. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20190521_20190521_12
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. (2019b). Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill: Second Reading. House of Representatives Hansard. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20191105_20191105_12
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. (2019c). Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill: Third Reading. House of Representatives Hansard. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20191107_20191107_16/tab/relateddocuments
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. (2019d). Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill: In Committee. House of Representatives Hansard. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20191106_20191106_16
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. (2019e). Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Reform) Amendment Bill: First Reading. House of Representatives, Hansard https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20191105_20191105_16
   Google Scholar
• Noronha, S. (2013). Climate change and generation zero: Analysing the 50 / 50 campaign : A communication for social change approach.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science (4th ed.). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, J. L., & Chambers, L. (2014). Reflections and outlook for the New Zealand ETS: Must uncertain times mean uncertain measures? Policy Quarterly, 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v10i2.4485
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K., & Laing, T. (2017). Policy stability in climate governance: The case of the United Kingdom. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(6), 575–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J., & Cashore, B. (2019). Stability and climate policy? Harnessing insights on path dependence, policy feedback, and transition pathways. Energy Research and Social Science, 50(March 2018), 168–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. (2013). Consensus, compromise, justice and legitimacy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(4), 557–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.810393
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2002). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(01), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Theorizing ideas and discourse in political science: Intersubjectivity, neo-institutionalisms, and the power of ideas. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Business Council. (2018). Consultation on the Zero carbon Bill: Sustainable business Council submission to the Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Torney, D. (2017). If at first you don’t succeed: The development of climate change legislation in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2017.1299134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney, D. (2019). Climate laws in small European states: Symbolic legislation and limits of diffusion in Ireland and Finland. Environmental Politics, 28(6), 1124–1144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1625159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivid Economics. (2017). Net zero in New Zealand: Scenarios to achieve Domestic Emissions Neutrality in the Second Half of the Century. https://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Net-Zero-in-New-Zealand-Summary-Report-Vivid-Economics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wannan, O. (2020). Emissions trading reform Bill passes, hard work ahead. https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/121842073/emissions-trading-reform-bill-passes-hard-work-ahead
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, D. (2013). On the possibility of principled moral compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.810392
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, D. (2017). Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(5), 636–655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1328093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood Processors and Manufacturers Association. (2018). Our climate your say: Consultation on the zero carbon Bill. WPMA.
   Google Scholar
• WWF New Zealand. (2018a). Zero Carbon Act campaigners welcome Environment Commissioner’s endorsement. Retrieved August 22, 2020 from https://www.wwf.org.nz/?15642/zcawelcomepce
   Google Scholar
• WWF New Zealand. (2018b). Submission on the zero carbon bill. WWF.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Designs and methods (5th ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. (2017). Towards a 2050 Pathway for New Zealand: A discussion paper for GLOBE-NZ. https://www.parliament.nz/media/4449/towards-a-2050-pathway-for-new-zealand-young.pdf
   Google Scholar