References
- Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1601
- Averchenkova, A. (2019). Legislating for a low carbon and climate resilient transition: learning from international experiences. Elcano Policy Paper 3/2019 – 11/3/2019. Retrieved December 5, 2020, from http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/130a3d55-dd9f-4ce1-ac04-a3caf5910edf/Policy-Paper-2019-Legislating-low-carbon-climate-resilient-transition.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=130a3d55-dd9f-4ce1-ac04-a3caf5910edf
- Averchenkova, A., & Guzman, S. (2018). Mexico’s General Law on Climate Change: Key achievements and challenges ahead. Retrieved June 10, 2019, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Policy_report_Mexico’s-General-Law-on-Climate-Change-Key-achievements-and-challenges-ahead-29pp_AverchenkovaGuzman-1.pdf
- Benson, D., & Lorenzoni, I. (2014). Examining the scope for national lesson-drawing on climate governance. The Political Quarterly, 85(2), 202–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12080
- Cabrero, E. (2010). Gobierno y política local en México: luces y sombras de las reformas descentralizadoras. Política y Sociedad, 47(3), 165–186.
- Candel, J. J., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
- Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
- Christensen, T., Lægreid, O. M., & Lægreid, P. (2019). Administrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter? Policy and Society, 38(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1584147
- Comisión Intersecretarial de Cambio Climático (CICC). (2015). Reglamento Interno de la Comisión Intersecretarial de Cambio Climático.
- Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2012). Ley General de Cambio Climático.
- Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2019). Resultados y recomendaciones de la evaluación estratégica del avance subnacional de la Política Nacional de Cambio Climático.
- Dupont, C. (2016). Climate policy integration into EU energy policy: Progress and prospects. Routledge.
- Edwards, G., & Roberts, J. (2013). A fragmented continent. Latin America and the global politics of climate change. MIT Press.
- Ibarrarán, E., Boyd, R., & Moreno, L. (2011). Costly commitments: Climate change policy in Mexico. Latin American Policy, 2(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-7373.2011.00040.x
- Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC). (2018). Evaluación Estratégica del Avance Subnacional de la Política Nacional de Cambio Climático.
- Jacob, K., & Volkery, A. (2004). Institutions and instruments for government self-regulation: Environmental policy integration in a cross-country perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1387698042000305211
- Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The coordination of the European Union: Exploring the capacities of networked governance. Oxford University Press.
- Liefferink, D., & Wurzel, R. K. (2017). Leadership and pioneership. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change. Policentricity in action (pp. 135–151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.009
- Mejía, A., & Rebolledo, L. (2016). El acuerdo de parís. Barreras para la implementación de la política nacional de cambio climático en el ámbito subnacional mexicano. In Rueda, J., Gay, C., & Quintana, F. (Coords), 21 Visiones de la COP21. El acuerdo de Paris: Retos y áreas de oportunidad para su implementación en méxico (pp. 173–186). PINCC-UNAM.
- Muñoz, N., Azuz, I. & Le Bail, M. (2016). Política nacional de adaptación ante el acuerdo de Paris. In Rueda, J., Gay, C., & Quintana, F. (Coords.), 21 Visiones de la COP21. El acuerdo de París: retos y áreas de oportunidad para su implementación en México (pp. 173–186). PINCC-UNAM.
- Octaviano, C., Paltsev, S., & Gurgel, A. C. (2016). Climate change policy in Brazil and Mexico: Results from the MIT EPPA model. Energy Economics, 56, 600–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.007
- Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102
- Pulver, S. (2009). Climate change politics in Mexico. In H. Selin & S. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing climates un North American politics. Institutions, policymaking and multilevel governance (pp. 25–46). MIT Press.
- Schout, A., & Jordan, A. (2008). Administrative instruments. In A. Jordan & A. Lenschow (Eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the Environment for sustainability (pp. 49–69). Edward Elgar.
- Schreurs, M. A., & Tiberghien, Y. (2007). Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 19–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.19
- Solorio, I., Carrillo, A., & Guzmán, I. (2020). La arquitectura institucional de la política climática de México: un análisis desde el enfoque de integración de políticas. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 51, 191–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484903e.2020.51.77182
- Sosa-Rodriguez, F. S. (2014). From federal to city mitigation and adaptation: Climate change policy in Mexico City. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(7), 969–996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9455-1
- Torres Ramírez, B. (2019). La participación de México en la convención marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el cambio climático. Foro Internacional, 59(3-4), 1179–1219. https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v59i3-4.2656
- Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
- Tosun, J., & Solorio, I. (2011). Exploring the Energy-Environment Relationship in the EU: Perspectives and Challenges for Theorizing and Empirical Analysis. 15(Special Mini-Issue 1), Article 7 http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2011-007a.htm
- Villamizar, A. (2016). Gobernanza e instituciones para el cambio climático en México. In J. Rueda, C. Gay, & F. Quintana (Coords), 21 Visiones de la COP21. El acuerdo de París: retos y áreas de oportunidad para su implementación en México (pp. 173–186). PINCC-UNAM.
- von Lüpke, H., & Well, M. (2020). Analyzing climate and energy policy integration: The case of the Mexican energy transition. Climate Policy, 20(7), 832–845. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1648236
- Wurzel, R. K., Connelly, J., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.). (2017). The European Union in international climate change politics: Still taking a lead? Routledge.
- Wurzel, R. K., Liefferink, D., & Torney, D. (2019). Pioneers, leaders and followers in multilevel and polycentric climate governance. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1522033