Linking solar geoengineering and emissions reductions: strategically resolving an international climate change policy dilemma

References

• Aggarwal, V. K. (1998). Reconciling multiple institutions: Bargaining, linkages, and nesting. In V. K. Aggarwal (Ed.), Institutional designs for a complex world: Bargaining, linkages, and nesting (pp. 1–31). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501733123-004.
   Google Scholar
• Arvedlund, E. E. (2004, May 22). Europe backs Russian entry into W.T.O. The New York Times, C1.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz, C. (2016). Can we have It both ways? On potential trade-offs between mitigation and solar radiation management. Environmental Values, 25(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14497392134847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachram, H. (2004). Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: The new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1045575042000287299
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, B. (2011). The limitations of geoengineering governance in a world of uncertainty. Stanford Journal of Law, Science, and Policy, 4(1), 15–36. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/the-limitations-of-geoengineering-governance-in-a-world-ofuncertainty/
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N. (2012). International paternalism and humanitarian governance. Global Constitutionalism, 1(3), 485–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381712000135
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, J. (2019). Geoengineering, the Anthropocene and the end of nature. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benedick, R. E. (1998). Ozone diplomacy: New directions in safeguarding the planet. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, G. (2012). The case for climate engineering research: An analysis of the “arm the future” argument. Climatic Change, 111(2), 473–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0207-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, N., & Moore, N. (2014). Disclosure-based governance for climate engineering research. CIGI Papers, 50. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no.50.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. (2006). Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabre, A., & Wagner, G. (2020). Availability of risky geoengineering can make an ambitious climate mitigation agreement more likely. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0492-6
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., Nakicenovic, N., Le Quere, C., Raupach, M. R., Sharifi, A., Smith, P., & Yamagata, Y. (2014). Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 850–853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1980). Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics, 32(3), 357–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2010109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2005). Trading human rights: How preferential trade agreements influence government repression. International Organization, 59(3), 593–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, B. (2012). The world that would have been: Moral hazard arguments against geoengineering. In C. J. Preston (Ed.), Engineering the climate: The ethics of solar radiation management (pp. 113–132). Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J. (2018). Stratospheric aerosol injection research and existential risk. Futures, 102, 63–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honegger, M., Burns, W., & Morrow, D. R. (2021). Is carbon dioxide removal ‘mitigation of climate change’? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, Online Before Print, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12401
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, & National Academy of Engineering. (1992). Policy implications of greenhouse warming: Mitigation, adaptation, and the science base. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/1605.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, & B. Zhou (Ed.), Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinnah, S. (2011). Climate change bandwagoning: The impacts of strategic linkages on regime design, maintenance, and death. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, S., & Shogren, J. F. (2000). Linking adaptation and mitigation in climate change policy. Climatic Change, 45(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005688900676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, D. W. (2000). Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 245–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.245
   Google Scholar
• Kravitz, B., Caldeira, K., Boucher, O., Robock, A., Rasch, P. J., Alterskjaer, K., Karam, D. B., Cole, J. N. S., Curry, C. L., Haywood, J. M., Irvine, P. J., Ji, D., Jones, A., Kristjánsson, J. E., Lunt, D. J., Moore, J. C., Niemeier, U., Schmidt, H., Schulz, M., … Yoon, J.-H. (2013). Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(15), 8320–8332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. G., & Crutzen, P. J. (2017). Was breaking the taboo on research on climate engineering via albedo modification a moral hazard, or a moral imperative? Earth’s Future, 5(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeds, B. A., & Savun, B. (2007). Terminating alliances: Why do states abrogate agreements? The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00612.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. (2013). Does geoengineering present a moral hazard? Ecology Law Quarterly, 40(3), 673–712. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38JP1J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockley, A., & Coffman, D. (2016). Distinguishing morale hazard from moral hazard in geoengineering. Environmental Law Review, 18(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452916659830
   Google Scholar
• MacCracken, M. (2006). Geoengineering: Worthy of cautious evaluation? Climatic Change, 77(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9130-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi, G. (2016). Issue linkage. In K. Bagwell, & R. W. Staiger (Eds.), Handbook of commercial policy (Vol. 1B, pp. 513–564). Elsevier / North-Holland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.017.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, D. (2016). Mitigation deterrence and the ‘moral hazard’. Earth’s Future, 4(12), 596–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, D. P., Tyfield, D. P., Willis, R., Szerszynski, B., & Markusson, N. O. (2019). Beyond ‘net-zero’: A case for separate targets for emissions reduction and negative emissions. Frontiers in Climate, 1(article 4), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2019.00004
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. R. (2014). Ethical aspects of the mitigation obstruction argument against climate engineering research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2031), article 20140062. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0062
   Google Scholar
• Morton, O. (2015). The planet remade: How geoengineering could change the world. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). Reflecting sunlight: Recommendations for solar geoengineering research and research governance. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/25762
   Google Scholar
• Oye, K. A. (1993). Economic discrimination and political exchange: World political economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A., Horton, J. B., & Keith, D. W. (2018). Stopping solar geoengineering through technical means: A preliminary assessment of counter-geoengineering. Earth’s Future, 6(8), 1058–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parson, E. A. (2003). Protecting the ozone layer: Science and strategy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parson, E. A. (2014). Climate engineering in global climate governance: Implications for participation and linkage. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102513000496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitschas, C. (1995). GATT/WTO rules for border tax adjustment and the proposed European directive introducing a tax on carbon dioxide emissions and energy. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 24(3), 479–500. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/gjicl/vol24/iss3/4/
   Google Scholar
• Poast, P. (2012). Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945. International Organization, 66(2), 277–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. A., Artaxo, P., Asrat, A., & Parker, A. (2018). Developing countries must lead on solar geoengineering research. Nature, 556(7699), 22–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-03917-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., Heyward, C., Kruger, T., Pidgeon, N., Redgwell, C., & Savulescu, J. (2013). The Oxford principles. Climatic Change, 121(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. (2015). A critical examination of the climate engineering moral hazard and risk compensation concern. The Anthropocene Review, 2(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614554304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. L. (2019). The governance of solar geoengineering: Managing climate change in the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676790
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, K. L., Moreno-Cruz, J. B., & Caldeira, K. (2013). Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1), article 014021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014021
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. H. (1996). Geoengineering: Could—or should—we do it? Climatic Change, 33(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebenius, J. K. (1983). Negotiation arithmetic: Adding and subtracting issues and parties. International Organization, 37(2), 281–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003438X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J., Caldeira, K., Haigh, J., Keith, D., Launder, B., Mace, G., MacKerron, G., Pyle, J., Rayner, S., Redgwell, C., & Watson, A. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. (2020). The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 114004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba7e7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Emissions Gap Report 2020. UNEP. https://www.unenvironment.org/emissions-gap-report-2020
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, G., & Merk, C. (2018). The hazard of environmental morality. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/24/the-hazard-of-environmental-morality/
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. H. (2015). Border tax adjustment: Legal perspective. Climatic Change, 133(3), 407–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1414-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil, G.. (forthcoming). Global climate governance in 3D: Mainstreaming geoengineering within a unified framework. University of Pittsburgh Law Review. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3788661
   Google Scholar