References
- Alcamo, J. (Ed.). (2008). Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis. Elsevier.
- Aykut, S. C. (2019). Reassembling energy policy. Models, forecasts and policy change in Germany and France. Science and Technology Studies, 32(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.65324
- Bataille, C., Waisman, H., Colombier, M., Segafredo, L., Williams, J., & Jotzo, F. (2016). The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(S1), S7–S26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005
- Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2009). Integrated assessment of energy policies: Decomposing top-down and bottomup. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 1648–1661.
- Brazil. Presidência da República. (2009). Lei n° 12.187 que institui a Política Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima – PNMC.
- Callon, M. (1986). Some elements in a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). Routledge.
- Clarke, L., Jiang, K., & Akimoto, M. (2014). Assessing transformation pathways. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madrugada, & Y. Sokona (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 413–510). Cambridge University Press.
- Cointe, B., Cassen, C., & Nadaï, A. (2019). Organising policy-relevant knowledge for climate action: Integrated assessment modelling, the IPCC, and the emergence of a collective expertise on socioeconomic emission scenarios. Science and Technology Studies, 32(4), 36–57.
- Da Silva, A. L., & Visentini, P. (2010). Brazil and the economic, political, and environmental multilateralism: The Lula years (2003–2010). Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 53(spe), 54–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000300004
- DeCarolis, J. F., Babaee, S., Li, B., & Kanungo, S. (2016). Modelling to generate alternatives with an energy system optimization model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79, 300–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.019
- DeCarolis, J. F., Jaramillo, P., Johnson, J. X., McCollum, D. L., Trutnevyte, E., Daniels, D. C., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Leveraging open-source tools for collaborative macro-energy system modeling efforts. Joule, 4(12), 2523–2526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.002
- Delzeit, R., Beach, R., Bibas, R., & Britz, W. (2020). Linking global CGE models with sectoral models to generate baseline scenarios: Approaches, opportunities and pitfalls. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 5(1), 162–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.050105AF
- Duke, R., & Hansel, P. (2018). Developing the U.S. midcentury strategy for deep decarbonization under the Paris agreement. Case study. WRI Long Term Strategies Project. World Resources Institute. Retrieved December 11, 2020. www.longtermstrategies.org/ developing-the-us-mid century-strategy, last consultation
- Hourcade, J. C., Jaccard, M., Bataille, C., & Ghersi, F. (2006). Hybrid modeling: New answers to old challenges. The Energy Journal, 27(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI2-1
- Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture et Society, 27(2–3), 233–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497
- Kane, L., & Boule, K. (2018). ‘This was different’: Transferring climate mitigation knowledge practices south to south with the MAPS programme. Climate Policy, 18(9), 1177–1188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1421520
- Karlsson, M. (2021). Sweden’s climate act – Its origin and emergence. Climate Policy, 21(9), 1132–1145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1922339
- Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Bosetti, V., Capros, P., van Vuuren, D., Weyant, J., & Edenhofer, O. (2015). The AMPERE intermodel comparison on the economics of climate stabilization. Special section. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 1–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.012
- La Rovere, E., Wills, W., Grottera, C., Dubeux, C., & Gesteira, C. (2018). Economic and social implications of low-emission development pathways in Brazil. Carbon Management, 9(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1507413
- Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Lefevre, J. (2016). Hybridization challenges in energy-economy integrated models and representation of the low carbon transition: an application to the Brazilian case. PhD Thesis. AgroParisTech, Paris, France. Retrieved May 28, 2021. https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02923571
- Lemos, M. C., Arnott, J. C., Ardoin, N. M., & Baja, K. (2018). To co-produce or not to co-produce. Nature Sustainability, 1(12), 7222–7224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0
- Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2006). A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Management Science, 52(4), 514–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472
- Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2003). Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. Rand Pardee Center.
- Lepault, F., & Lecocq, F. (2021). Mapping forward-looking mitigation studies at country level. Environmental Research Letters, 16(8), 8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0ac8
- Levin, K., Rich, D., Ross, K., Fransen, T., & Elliott, C. (2020). Designing and communicating net-zero targets. WRI working paper. World Resources Institute. www.wri.org/design-net-zero
- Lövbrand, E. (2011). Co-producing European climate science and policy: A cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 38(3), 225–236.
- Mathy, S., Criqui, P., Knoop, K., Fischedick, M., & Samadi, S. (2016). Uncertainty management and the dynamic adjustment of deep decarbonization pathways. Climate Policy, 16S1(Suppl. 1), 47–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1179618
- Mathy, S., Fink, M., & Bibas, R. (2015). Rethinking the role of scenarios: Participatory scripting of low-carbon scenarios for France. Energy Policy, 77, 176–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.002
- Merrick, J. H., & Weyant, J. P. (2019). On choosing the resolution of normative models. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(2), 511–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.017
- Morgan, M. S., & Morrison, M. (Eds.). (1999). Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press.
- Pereira, A., Wills, W., Grottera, C., & Weiss, M. (2014). Brazilian mitigation scenarios beyond 2020: Modelling and methodologies. MAPS Working paper. http://www.mapsprogramme.org/wp-content/uploads/Wills-etal-Brazilian_mitigation_scenarios.pdf
- Pindyck, R. (2017). The use and misuse of models for climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew012
- Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
- Ravetz, J. (2004). The post-normal science of precaution. Futures, 36(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00160-5
- Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35(8), 839–856. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00039-9
- Robinson, J., Burch, S., Talwar, S., O'Shea, M., & Walsh, M. (2011). Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 756–768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.006
- Ross, K., & Fransen, T. (2017). Early insights on long-term climate strategies. World Resources Institute. http://www.wri.org/publication/early-insights
- SOU 2016:21. Ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk för Sverige Delbetänkande av Miljömålsberedningen. SOU 2016:21, Swedish Government Official Reports Series (SOU), Stockholm.
- SOU 2016:47. En klimat- och luftvårdsstrategi för Sverige. SOU 2016:47. Swedish Government Official Reports Series (SOU), Stockholm.
- Swart, R. J., Raskin, P., & Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: Sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.002
- Sweden Environmental Agency. (2012). Underlag till en färdplan för ett Sverige utan klimatutsläpp 2050 (Basis for a roadmap for a Sweden without climate emissions 2050).
- Swedish Ministry of the Environment and Energy. (2017). The Swedish climate policy framework.
- Trutnevyte, E. (2016). Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? Energy, 106, 182–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.038
- Van't Klooster, S. A., & van Asselt, M. B. (2006). Practising the scenario-axes technique. Futures, 38(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.04.019
- Viola, E. (2013). Brazilian climate policy since 2005: Continuity, change and prospective, CEPS working paper No. 373. CEPS. Retrieved May 28, 2021. http://aei.pitt.edu/40230/1/WD_373_Viola_Brazilian_Climate_Policy.pdf
- Walker, G., & Day, R. (2012). Fuel poverty as injustice: Integrating distribution, recognition and procedure in the struggle for affordable warmth. Energy Policy, 49, 69–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.044
- Weyant, J., & Kriegler, E. (2014). Preface and introduction to EMF 27. Climatic, 123, 345–352.
- Wynne, B. (1984). The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA energy study. Policy Sciences, 17(3), 277–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138709