Understanding pledge and review: learning from analogies to the Paris Agreement review mechanisms

References

• Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement. (2018). Ministerial consultations on modalities, procedures and guidelines under the Paris Agreement with a focus on transparency Online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Presidency textual proposal_MPGs transparency_12122018 0907.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E. (2014). The crucial role of policy surveillance in international climate policy. Climatic Change, 126, 279–292 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1238-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper J, W., Linnér, B.-O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S., & Dannenberg, A. (2016). An experimental investigation into ‘pledge and review’ in climate negotiations. Climatic Change, 138(1-2), 339–351 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1711-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, G., Stavins, R., & Ji, Z. (2018). International climate change policy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ, 10, 335–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climate Action Tracker. (2020). Global update: Paris Agreement Turning Point | Climate Action Tracker Online: https://climateactiontracker.org/publications/global-update-paris-agreement-turning-point/.
   Google Scholar
• Doelle, M. (2016). Reviewing implementation & compliance under the Paris climate agreement: Preliminary thoughts on process design for articles 13-15. SSRN Electron. J, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2762821
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Kamil, N., Ching, A., & Bernaz, N. (2021). Performing accountability: Face-to-face account-giving in multilateral climate transparency processes. Climate Policy, 21(5), 616–634 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1855098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., van Asselt, H., & Asselt, H. v. (2019). Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability? Regulation & Governance, 13(1), 18–34 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutner, T., & Thompson, A. (2010). The politics of IO performance: A framework. Rev. Int. Organ, 5, 227–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9096-zT
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2016). “All hands on deck”: The Paris Agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2017). UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS DOES INTERNATIONAL REVIEW ALTER NATIONAL POLICY? REFINING CONCEPTS AND BUILDING THEORY.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2020). Catalytic cooperation. Global Environmental Politics, 20(4), 73–98 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhne, N., Fekete, H., den Elzen, M. G., Hof, A. F., & Kuramochi, T. (2018). Assessing the ambition of post-2020 climate targets: A comprehensive framework. Climate Policy, 18(4), 425–441 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1294046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Standards Department. (2019). Handbook of procedures relating to international Conventions and Recommendations (Geneva) Online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—normes/documents/publication/wcms_697949.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Groff, M., Tamás, P. A., Dahl, A. L., Harder, M., Hassall, G., Groff, M., Tamás, P. A., & Dahl, A. L. (2018). Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability. Climate Policy, 18(5), 593–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, L. (2016). Framework for the future? Exploring the possibility of majority voting in the climate negotiations. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ, 757–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9294-5
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., & Victor, D. (2015). After the failure of topdown mandates: The role of experimental governance in climate change policy. In S. Barrett, C. Carraro, & J. de Melo (VOXEU) (Eds.), Towards a workable and effective climate regime (pp. 201–213).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Oppenheimer, M. (2016). Paris: Beyond the climate dead End through pledge and review? Polit. Gov, 4, 142–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i3.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575 Online: www.nature.com/natureclimatechange. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Mfitumukiza, D., & Huq, S. (2020). Capacity building for implementation of nationally determined contributions under the Paris agreement. Climate Policy, 20(4), 499–510 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1675577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M, R., Timmons Roberts, J., Huq, S., Hoffmeister, V., & Robinson, S.-A.. (2018). Capacity Building and Transparency under Paris. In The Paris Framework for Climate Change Capacity Building (pp. 203–222).
   Google Scholar
• Kornek, U., Flachsland, C., Kardish, C., Levi, S., & Edenhofer, O. (2020). What is important for achieving 2 °C? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation. Environmental Research Letters, 15(2), 024005 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, S., & Valdés, R. (2012). The Trade Policy Review mechanism. In M. Daunton, A. Narlikar, & R. M. Stern (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization (pp. 1–28). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, B. (2018). International Law obligations arising in relation to nationally determined contributions. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, B. (2019). Transparency under the Paris rulebook: Is the transparency framework truly enhanced? Climate Law, 9(1-2), 40–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00901004
   Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, Axel. (2015). Opportunities for and Alternatives to Global Climate Regimes Post-Kyoto. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 395–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkoreit, M., & Haapala, K. (2019). The global stocktake: Design lessons for a new review and ambition mechanism in the international climate regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(1), 89–106 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9425-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minx, J. C., Callaghan, M., Lamb, W. F., Garard, J., & Edenhofer, O. (2017). Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 252–259 Online: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1462901117305464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (1997). Montreal Protocol: 10 years after. Environmental Policy and the Law, 27(6), 432–440.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (2020a). OHCHR | Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Working Methods Online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/cedaw/pages/cedawindex.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (2020b). OHCHR | Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Working Methods Online: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CERD/Pages/WorkingMethods.aspx#B.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (2020c). OHCHR | Human Rights Committee Working methods Online: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CCPR/Pages/WorkingMethods.aspx#n10.
   Google Scholar
• Pauw W, P., Klein R, J. T., Mbeva, K., & Dzebo, A. (2018). Beyond headline mitigation numbers: We need more transparent and comparable NDCs to achieve the Paris Agreement on climate change. Climatic Change, 147(1-2), 23–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2122-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Center on Global Climate Change. (2010). MRV : A Survey of Reporting and Review in Multilateral Regimes Post-2012 Policy Br.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, J., McGee, J. S., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., & Wenta, J. (2019). Global Climate governance between hard and soft Law: Can the Paris agreement’s ‘crème brûlée’ approach enhance ecological reflexivity? Journal of Environmental Law, 31(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig, D., Haselip, J. A., & Bakhtiari, F. (2018). The mismatch between the in-country determinants of technology transfer, and the scope of technology transfer initiatives under the United Nations framework Convention on climate change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(5), 659–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9405-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiser, K., Kornek, U., Flachsland, C., & Lamb W, F. (2020). Is the Paris Agreement effective? A systematic map of the evidence. Environ. Res. Lett, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab865c.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani, L. (2016). Ambition and differentiation in the Paris agreement. International and Comparative Law Quaterly, 65(2), 493–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589316000130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani, L., & Bodansky, D. (2019). The Paris Rulebook: Balancing Prescriptiveness with Discretion. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(4), 1023–1040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redondo E, D. (2008). The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council: An assessment of the first session. Chinese Journal of International Law, 7(3), 721–734 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmn029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs N, M. (2020). The Paris Agreement in the 2020s: Breakdown or breakup? Ecol. Law Quaterly, 46(3), 865–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38H708140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Széll, P. (1998). Protecting the ozone layer. Prot. Ozone Layer, 91–98 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5585-8_13
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2018). The emissions Gap report 2018. United Nations Environment Program.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015a). Decision 1/CP.21: Adoption of the Paris Agreement vol FCCC/CP/20 Online: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015b). Decision 1/CP.21. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015c). Paris agreement. United Nations Online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018). The Katowice Texts Online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Katowice text%2C 14 Dec2018_1015AM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2019). Wanted: Expert Reviewers to Enable Transparency of Climate Action | UNFCCC Online: https://unfccc.int/news/wanted-expert-reviewers-to-enable-transparency-of-climate-action.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2020a). Committee to facilitate implementation and promote compliance referred to in Article 15, paragraph 2 of the Paris Agreement (PAICC) | UNFCCC Online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/bodies/constituted-bodies/committee-to-facilitate-implementation-and-promote-compliance-referred-to-in-article-15-paragraph-2.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2020b). Paris Agreement - Status of Ratification | UNFCCC Online: https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/status-of-ratification.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2021). Nationally Determined Contributions Under the Paris Agreement: Synthesis Report by the Secretariat FCCC/PA/CMA/2021/8.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2022). NDC Registry Online: https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/NDCStaging/Pages/Home.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Council. (2020). Basic facts about the UPR Online: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/BasicFacts.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• UNOHCHR. (2012). The United Nations Human Rights Treaty system. United Nations https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet30Rev1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weikmans, R., Asselt, H. V., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement and their (un)likely impact on strengthening the ambition of nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Climate Policy, 20(4), 511–526 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weikmans, R., & Gupta, A. (2021). Assessing state compliance with multilateral climate transparency requirements: ‘transparency adherence indices’ and their research and policy implications. Climate Policy, 21(5), 635–651 Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1895705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Trade Organisation. (1994). WTO | legal texts - Marrakesh Agreement Online: https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/29-tprm_e.htm#tprm_a.
   Google Scholar