References
- Azarafshar, R., & Vermeulen, W. N. (2020). Electric vehicle incentive policies in Canadian provinces. Energy Economics, 91, 104902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104902
- Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, 169–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002
- Clinton, B., Brown, A., Davidson, C., & Steinberg, D.. (2015). Impact of Direct Financial Incentives in the Emerging Battery Electric Vehicle Market: A Preliminary Analysis . Conference: DOE internal leadership meeting, United States, Feb 2015. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1215060
- Ekaterina, R., John, A., & Mark, J. (2017). Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. Ecological Economics, 137, 88–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027
- Figenbaum, E., & Kolbenstvedt, M. (2016). Learning from Norwegian battery electric and plug-in hybrid vehicle users. Institute of Transport Economics (TØI).
- Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J. (1992). Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: The case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569201100202
- Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., Peters, T. J., & Coast, J. (2007). Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. Journal of Health Economics, 26(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
- Gong, S., Ardeshiri, A., & Hossein Rashidi, T. H. (2020). Impact of government incentives on the market penetration of electric vehicles in Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, Article 102353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102353
- Greene, D. L., Park, S., & Liu, C. (2014). Analyzing the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S. Futures, 58, 34–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.07.003
- Hardman, S., Chandan, A., Tal, G., & Turrentine, T. (2017). The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles – A review of the evidence. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1100–1111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.255
- Hardman, S., & Tal, G. (2016). Exploring the decision to adopt a high-end battery electric vehicle: Role of financial and nonfinancial motivations. Transportation Research Record, 2572(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3141/2572-03
- Helveston, J. P., Feit, E., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., Liu, Y., & Michalek, J. (2015). Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 73, 96–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.002
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2013). Global Land Transport Infrastructure Requirements, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/global-land-transport-infrastructure-requirements
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2020a). Data and statistics-CO2 emissions. Retrieved 12/8/2020, from https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/?country=WORLD&fuel=CO2%20emissions&indicator=CO2%20emissions%20by%20sector
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2020b). Global EV outlook 2020: Entering the decade of electric vehicles? Retrieved 12/8/2020, from https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020
- Jenn, A., Springel, K., & Gopal, A. R. (2018). Effectiveness of electric vehicle incentives in the United States. Energy Policy, 119, 349–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.065
- Kong, D., Xia, Q., Xue, Y., & Zhao, X. (2020). Effects of multiple policies on electric vehicle diffusion under subsidy policy abolishment in China: A multi-actor perspective. Applied Energy, 266, article 114887. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114887
- Larson, P. D., Viáfara, J., Parsons, R. V., & Elias, A. (2014). Consumer attitudes about electric cars: Pricing analysis and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 299–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.002
- Li, J., Jiao, J., & Tang, Y. (2019). An evolutionary analysis on the effect of government policies on electric vehicle diffusion in complex network. Energy Policy, 129, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.070. (Compared with consumer purchase subsidies, production subsidies for manufacturers have stronger effects on EV diffusion. Neither the tax and subsidy policies nor the FV license plate restriction and EV purchase subsidy policies can realize full diffusion of EVs).
- Li, L., Guo, S., Cai, H., Wang, J., Zhang, J., & Ni, Y. (2020). Can China’s BEV market sustain without government subsidies?: An explanation using cues utilization theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, Article 122589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122589
- Li, L., Wang, J., Ó Gallachóir, B., Cai, H., & Zhang, J. (2019). Energy-intensive manufacturing sectors in China: Policy priorities for achieving climate mitigation and energy conservation targets. Climate Policy, 19(5), 598–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1546162
- Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., Yang, T., Geng, J., & Yang, M. (2018). Effects of personal carbon trading on the decision to adopt battery electric vehicles: Analysis based on a choice experiment in Jiangsu, China. Applied Energy, 209, 478–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.119
- Louviere, J. J., & Islam, T. (2008). A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales, and best-worst scaling. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 903–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.11.010
- McCollum, D. L., Wilson, C., Bevione, M., Carrara, S., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Emmerling, J., Guivarch, C., Karkatsoulis, P., Keppo, I., Krey, V., Lin, Z., Broin, E. Ó., Paroussos, L., Pettifor, H., Ramea, K., Riahi, K., Sano, F., Rodriguez, B. S., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2018). Interaction of consumer preferences and climate policies in the global transition to low-carbon vehicles. Nature Energy, 3(8), 664–673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0195-z
- Melton, N., Axsen, J., & Moawad, B. (2020). Which plug-in electric vehicle policies are best? A multi-criteria evaluation framework applied to Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 64, 101411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101411
- Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’sS Republic of China (MIITC). (2020). Notice on Improving the Financial Subsidy Policy for the Promotion and Application of New Energy Vehicles. http://www.miit.gov.cn/n1146290/n1146402/c7883101/content.html
- Noel, L., Papu Carrone, A., Jensen, A. F., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment. Energy Economics, 78, 525–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.014
- Ó Broin, E., & Guivarch, C. (2017). Transport infrastructure costs in low-carbon pathways. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55, 389–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.002
- Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
- Sheldon, T. L., & DeShazo, J. R. (2017). How does the presence of HOV lanes affect plug-in electric vehicle adoption in California? A generalized propensity score approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 146–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.002
- Sheldon, T. L., & Dua, R. (2020). Effectiveness of China’s plug-in electric vehicle subsidy. Energy Economics, 88, article 104773. (A vehicle choice model is estimated using a large, random survey sample of new vehicle purchases in China. The results of the estimation are used to predict PEV (plug-in electric vehicle) sales if subsidies were eliminated. The analysis includes the make, model, and segment of the new vehicle, as well as the vehicle's price, fuel consumption, transmission type, engine size, and drive system. Three additional vehicle characteristics, curb weight, fuel tank capacity, and electric range, are considered, and a gasoline price of $0.70 per liter and electricity price of $0.09 per kWh are assumed). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104773
- Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043
- Silvia, C., & Krause, R. M. (2016). Assessing the impact of policy interventions on the adoption of plug-in electric vehicles: An agent-based model. Energy Policy, 96, 105–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.039. (The hybrid policy alternative was found to be the most successful in terms of encouraging BEV adoption. This policy increases the visibility and familiarity of the BEV technology in the community and may help to disprove the notion that BEVs are not a viable alternative to gasoline-powered vehicles).
- Smith, B., Olaru, D., Jabeen, F., & Greaves, S. (2017). Electric vehicles adoption: Environmental enthusiast bias in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 290–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.008
- Song, Y., Li, G., Wang, Q., Meng, X., & Wang, H. (2020). Scenario analysis on subsidy policies for the uptake of electric vehicles industry in china. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, Article 104927. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104927
- Soto, J. R., Adams, D. C., & Escobedo, F. J. (2016). Landowner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: Application of best-worst choice modeling in Florida, USA. Forest Policy and Economics, 63, 35–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.004
- Soto, J. R., Escobedo, F. J., Khachatryan, H., & Adams, D. C. (2018). Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: Examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosystem Services, 29, 31–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.009
- Statharas, S., Moysoglou, Y., Siskos, P., Zazias, G., & Capros, P. (2019). Factors influencing electric vehicle penetration in the EU by 2030: A model-based policy assessment. Energies, 12(14), article 2739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142739
- Struben, J., & Sterman, J. D. (2008). Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicles and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(6), 1070–1097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/b33022t
- Sykes, M., & Axsen, J. (2017). No free ride to zero-emissions: Simulating a region's need to implement its own zero-emissions vehicle (ZEV) mandate to achieve 2050 GHG targets. Energy Policy, 110, 447–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.031
- Tal, G., & Nicholas, M. (2016). Exploring the impact of the federal tax credit on the plug-in vehicle market. Transportation Research Record, 2572(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3141/2572-11
- Vergis, S., & Chen, B. (2015). Comparison of plug-in electric vehicle adoption in the United States: A state by state approach. Research in Transportation Economics, 52, 56–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.003
- Wang, N., Tang, L., & Pan, H. (2017). Effectiveness of policy incentives on electric vehicle acceptance in China: A discrete choice analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 210–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.009
- Wang, N., Tang, L., & Pan, H. (2019). A global comparison and assessment of incentive policy on electric vehicle promotion. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 597–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.024
- Wang, N., Tang, L., Zhang, W., & Guo, J. (2019). How to face the challenges caused by the abolishment of subsidies for electric vehicles in China? Energy, 166, 359–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.006
- Wesseling, J. H., Farla, J. C. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). Exploring car manufacturers’ responses to technology-forcing regulation: The case of California’s ZEV mandate. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 87–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.001
- Wesseling, J. H., Farla, J. C. M., Sperling, D., & Hekkert, M. P. (2014). Car manufacturers’ changing political strategies on the ZEV mandate. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 33, 196–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.06.006
- Zhang, X., & Bai, X. (2017). Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010–2020 in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 24–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.211
- Zhao, S., Zhao, F., & Liu, Z. (2017). Current status, barriers, and development strategy of the new energy vehicle industry in China. In the 6th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), Cambridge (pp. 96–100).
- Zhu, L., Wang, P., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Indirect network effects in China’s electric vehicle diffusion under phasing out subsidies. Applied Energy, 251, article 113350. (With the phasing out of EV subsidies, it is proposed that the government shift the purchasing subsidy to the charging infrastructure subsidy. The subsidy strategy derived from the proposed model outperforms the other possible solutions in terms of social welfare maximization). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113350
- Zhuge, C., Wei, B., Dong, C., Shao, C., & Shan, Y. (2019). Exploring the future electric vehicle market and its impacts with an agent-based spatial integrated framework: A case study of Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 710–737. (The so-called ‘neighbor effects’ appear to influence the uptake of BEVs, based on spatial analyses of the residential locations of BEV owners). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.262
- Zhuge, C., Wei, B., Shao, C., Shan, Y., & Dong, C. (2020). The role of the license plate lottery policy in the adoption of electric vehicles: A case study of Beijing. Energy Policy, 139, 111328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111328