Paradoxes of Norway’s energy transition: controversies and justice

References

• Afewerki, S., & Karlsen, A. (2021). Policy mixes for just sustainable development in regions specialised in carbon-intensive industries: The case of two Norwegian petro- maritime regions. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2273–2292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anker, P. (2018). A pioneer country? A history of Norwegian climate politics. Climatic Change, 151(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1653-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aune, F. R., Cappelen, Å, & Mæland, S. (2020). Konsekvenser av redusert petroleumsvirksomhet. Makroøkonomiske effekter av politiske tiltak for å redusere norsk produksjon av olje og gass. SSB Report 2020/38. Online – URL: https://www.ssb.no/nasjonalregnskap-og-konjunkturer/artikler-og-publikasjoner/_attachment/435324?_ts = 17563963dc0
   Google Scholar
• Aune, M. (2007). Energy comes home. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5457–5465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aune, M., Ryghaug, M., & Godbolt, ÅL. (2011, June 6-11). Comfort, consciousness and costs—transitions in Norwegian energy culture 1991–2010. Proceedings of the energy efficiency first: The foundation of a Low-carbon society, ECEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Aune, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (2007). Mellom klima og komfort – utfordringer for en bærekraftig energiutvikling. Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ballo, I. F. (2015). Imagining energy futures: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the future smart grid in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, G., & Lahn, B. (2020). From oil as welfare to oil as risk? Norwegian petroleum resource governance and climate policy. Climate Policy, 20(8), 997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1692774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., & Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, R., Cunha, M. P., Schad, J., & Smith, W. K. (2021). The value of interdisciplinary research to advance paradox in organisation theory. In R. Bednarek, M. P. Cunha, J. Schad, & W. K. Smith (Eds.), Interdisciplinary dialogues on organizational paradox: Learning from belief and science (pp. 3–28). Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blazquez, J., Fuentes-Bracamontes, R., Bollino, C. A., & Nezamuddin, N. (2018). The renewable energy policy Paradox. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasch, T. V., Hungnes, H., & Strøm, B. (2018). Ringvirkninger av petroleumsnæringen i norsk Økonomi. Basert på endelige nasjonalregnskapstall for 2015. SSB Report 2018/18. Online – URL: https://www.ssb.no/nasjonalregnskap-og-konjunkturer/artikler-og-publikasjoner/_attachment/352126?_ts = 163cf7b62c0
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, C., Savadogo, O., Baptiste, P., Bouchard, M. A., Gendron, C., & Merveille, N. (2021). The three paradoxes of the energy transition - assessing sustainability of large-scale solar photovoltaic through multi-level and multi-scalar perspective in Rwanda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bye, R., & Solli, J. (2007). Vindkraft i Norge: Fra ulønnsom til miljøfiendtlig teknologi? In M. Aune, & K. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Mellom klima og komfort – utfordringer for en bærekraftig energiutvikling (pp. 105–123). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. F. (2018). Petroleum in the barents region: Local impacts and dreams at sea. In A. Szolucha (Ed.), Energy impacts and contested futures (pp. 37–52). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. F. (2019). Making Resource Futures: Petroleum and Performance by the Norwegian Barents Sea. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. F., & Dannevig, H. (2023). Planning for whose benefit? Procedural (in)justice in Norwegian Arctic industry projects. In C. Wood-Donnelly, & J. Ohlsson (Eds.), Arctic justice: Environment, society and governance. Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., Batel, S., Aas, O., Sovacool, B., Labelle, M. C., & Ruud, A. (2017). A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage. Energy Policy, 107, 27–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2016). National identities, international roles, and the legitimation of climate leadership: Germany and Norway compared. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1076278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen, O. A. (2009). The development of the Norwegian petroleum innovation system: A historical overview. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & B. Verspagen (Eds.), Innovation, path dependency, and policy. The Norwegian case (pp. 179–208). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Equinor.com. (2022). Investeringsbeslutning for Wisting-prosjektet utsettes. [Investment decision for the Wisting project postponed]. Online – URL: https://www.equinor.com/no/nyheter/20221110-investeringsbeslutning-wisting-prosjektet-utsettes (accessed November 16, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund (COM/2020/22 final). European Commission, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri = CELEX:52020PC0022
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, I. H. (2022). Wind power development in Finnmark. A study of the participation processes with the reindeer herders. Utmark, 2022(1), 88–94. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995488.
   Google Scholar
• Frøya Municipality. (2022). Fakta - Dette har skjedd - Frøya vindkraftverk 2002 - d.d. Online – URL: https://www.froya.kommune.no/tjenester/naring/froya-vindkraftverk/ (accessed July 10, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Gough, J. (2004). The relevance of The limits of capital to contemporary spatial economics: For an anti-capitalist geography. Antipode, 36(3), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gran, B., Ibenholt, K., Røtnes, R., & Tofteng, M. (2017). 100 000 klimajobber. Report by Samfunnsøkonomisk Analyse, Report 63-2017. ISBN: 978-82-93320-76-0.
   Google Scholar
• Green, F., & Gambhir, A. (2020). Transitional assistance policies for just, equitable and smooth low-carbon transitions: Who, what and how? Climate Policy, 20(8), 902–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1657379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. H., Inderberg, T. H. J., & Jevnaker, T. (2021). Is political steering gone with the wind? Administrative power and wind energy licensing practices in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3587-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halonen, M., Persson, Å, Sepponen, S., Siebert, C. K., Bröckl, M., Vaahtera, A., Quinn, S., Trimmer, C., & Isokangas, A. (2017). Sustainable development action – the Nordic Way: Implementation of the global 2030 agenda for sustainable development in Nordic cooperation. Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Hans, F., Kuramochi, T., Woollands, S., Höhne, N., Olhoff, A., & Rocha Romero, J. (2022). Unpacking the green recovery spending: An assessment of seized and missed opportunities for a low-carbon recovery globally, in the EU and in the Nordic countries. TemaNord 2022:529. Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. H. (2013). New renewable energy and the Norwegian policy triangle. In G. Rusten, K. Potthoff, & L. Sangolt (Eds.), Norway: Nature, industry and society (pp. 139–156). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. H., & Steen, M. (2015). Offshore oil and gas firms’ involvement in offshore wind: Technological frames and undercurrents. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, J., Kasa, S., & Wicken, O. (2011). Energirikdommens paradokser. Innovasjon som klimapolitikk og næringsutvikling. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hazrati, M., & Heffron, R. J. (2021). Conceptualising restorative justice in the energy transition: Changing the perspectives of fossil fuels. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffron, R. J., & McCauley, D. (2017). The concept of energy justice across the disciplines. Energy Policy, 105, 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide, K. M., Holmøy, E., Solli, I. F., & Strøm, B. (2006). A welfare state funded by nature and OPEC: A guided tour on Norway’s path from an exceptionally impressive to an exceptionally strained fiscal position. Discussion Papers No. 464. Statistics Norway, Oslo. Online – URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/180669 (Accessed June 30, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, S. (2016). Out of sight, out of mind? Controversy over offshore wind energy in Norway's news media. Science as Culture, 25(4), 449–472. http://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1183609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, T., & Hernes, H. K. (2011). Snøhvit - Eventyr i Sameland?. In S. Jentoft, J.-I. Nergård, and K. A. Røvik (Eds.), Hvor går Nord-Norge? Tidsbilder fra en landsdel i forandring (pp. 189–201). Orkana Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, E., & Kasa, S. (2014). Climate policy constraints and NGO entrepreneurship: The story of Norway’s leadership in REDD + financing. Center for Global Development Working Paper, (389). https://www.cgdev.org/publication/climate-policy-constraints-and-ngo-entrepreneurship-story-norways-leadership-redd
   Google Scholar
• Hoicka, C. E., Lowitzsch, J., Brisbois, M. C., Kumar, A., & Ramirez Camargo, L. (2021). Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities. Energy Policy, 156, 112435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoicka, C. E., Lowitzsch, J., Brisbois, M. C., Kumar, A., & Ramirez Camargo, L. (2022). Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities. Energy Policy, 156, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, P., Tveiterås, K., Finstad, B. P., & Henriksen, E. (2013). Lys i Husan? Fisk Og Petroleum Som Modernitetsbærere i Nord. In S. Jentoft (Ed.), Hvor går Nord-Norge? Bind 3. Politiske tidslinjer (pp. 361–372). Orkana Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Houeland, C., Jordhus-Lier, D. C., & Angell, F. H. (2021). Solidarity tested: The case of the Norwegian confederation of trade unions (LO-Norway) and its contradictory climate change policies. Area, 53(3), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungnes, H., Kolsrud, D., Nitter-Hauge, J., Blix Prestmo, J., & Strøm, B. (2016). Ringvirkninger av petroleumsnæringen i norsk økonomi. Basert på endelige nasjonalregnskapstall for 2013. SSB Report 2016/17. Online – URL: https://www.ssb.no/nasjonalregnskap-og-konjunkturer/artikler-og-publikasjoner/_attachment/265990?_ts = 154c344f930
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2021). Net zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. IEA, Paris. Online – URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2022). Norway 2022: Energy Policy Review. IEA, Paris. Online – URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/norway-2022 (Accessed 30.06.2022)
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., Theisen, O. M., & Flåm, K. H. (2020). What influences windpower decisions? A statistical analysis of licensing in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T. H. J., Rognstad, H., Saglie, I.-L., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2019). Who influences windpower licensing decisions in Norway? Formal requirements and informal practices. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2018). Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy, 117, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, A. (2022). Politikk for en rettferdig grønn omstilling i olje- og gassavhengige regioner. FME NTRANS Report 01/2022. https://www.ntnu.no/documents/1284688443/1285504199/GrC3B8nn + omstilling + og + regional + politikk + NTRANS + rapport_endelig.pdf/1a63f4d0-a984-5eeb-7dae-d045721009dd?t = 1642756796080
   Google Scholar
• Klæboe, R., & Sundfør, H. B. (2016). Windmill noise annoyance, visual aesthetics, and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsnes, M., & Throndsen, W. (2021). Smart energy prosumers in Norway: Critical reflections on implications for participation and everyday life. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. (2013). Sense and sustainability: The paradoxes that sustain. World Futures, 69(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2012.762199
   Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen, B. (2014). ‘Securing’ geography: Framings, logics and strategies in the Norwegian high north. In R. C. Powell, & K. Dodds (Eds.), Polar geopolitics? Knowledges, resources and legal regimes (pp. 131–148). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen, B., & Dale, B. (2014). Post petroleum security in Lofoten: How identity matters. Arctic Review, 5(2), 201–226. https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/1046.
   Google Scholar
• Le Billon, P., & Kristoffersen, B. (2020). Just cuts for fossil fuels? Supply-side carbon constraints and energy transition. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1072–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18816702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, B., Dunphy, N. P., & Sanvicente, E. (2019). Community acceptability and the energy transition: A citizens’ perspective. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0218-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loe, J. S. P., & Kelman, I. (2016). Arctic petroleum’s community impacts: Local perceptions from hammerfest, Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 16, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, B. (2022a). Revitalising varieties of capitalism for sustainability transitions research: Review, critique and way forward. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 162, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, B. (2022b). Coal, green growth and crises: Exploring three European union policy responses to regional energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 93, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitie, T., Andersen, A. D., Hanson, J., Normann, H. E., & Thune, T. M. (2018). Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector’s influence on offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitie, T., Normann, H. E., Thune, T. M., & Gonzalez, J. S. (2019). The green flings: Norwegian oil and gas industry’s engagement in offshore wind power. Energy Policy, 127, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. (1998). Sustainability is not enough. Environment and Urbanization, 10(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789801000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercure, J.-F., Pollitt, H., Viñuales, J. E., Edwards, N. R., Holden, P. B., Chewpreecha, U., Salas, P., Sognnaes, I., Lam, A., & Knobloch, F. (2018). Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, K., Ferrer, D., & van Lente, H. (2017). What is sustainable technology? In K. Mulder, D. Ferrer, & H. van Lente (Eds.), What is sustainable technology?: Perceptions, paradoxes and possibilities (pp. 1–8). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muttitt, G., & Kartha, S. (2020). Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: Principles for a managed phase out. Climate Policy, 20(8), 1024–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1763900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R. (2002). Innovation systems and ‘inertia’in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in. Research Policy, 31(5), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00148-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, H. E. (2015). The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 15, 180–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, H. E., & Tellmann, S. M. (2021). Trade unions’ interpretation of a just transition in a fossil fuel economy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, S. (2021). Green colonialism in the Nordic context: Exploring Southern Saami representations of wind energy development. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwaytoday.info. (2016). For the first time in twenty years. Online - URL: https://norwaytoday.info/finance/first-time-twenty-years/ (Accessed March 10, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• NVE. (2019, April 1). FORSLAG TIL NASJONAL RAMME FOR VINDKRAFT. Report nr. 12 by Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat (NVE), Online. http://publikasjoner.nve.no/rapport/2019/rapport2019_12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NVE,. (2022). Vindkraftdata, Online – URL: https://www.nve.no/energi/energisystem/vindkraft/vindkraftdata/ (Accessed March 13, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, B., & Murdock, E. (2021). Are We Building Back Better? Evidence from 2020 and Pathways for Inclusive Green Recovery Spending. Online – URL: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/35281/AWBBB.pdf (Accessed July 5, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P., & Sharma, A. (2021). Knowledge politics, vulnerability and recognition-based justice: Public participation in renewable energy transitions in India. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroleum Directorate. (2020). 3 - Uoppdagede ressurser. Online – URL: https://www.npd.no/fakta/publikasjoner/rapporter/ressursrapporter/ressursrapport-2020/uoppdagede-ressurser/ (Accessed March 14, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Piggot, G., Verkuijl, C., van Asselt, H., & Lazarus, M. (2020). Curbing fossil fuel supply to achieve climate goals. Climate Policy, 20(8), 881–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1804315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauter, A. R. K. K. (2022). Elite energy transitions: Leaders and experts promoting renewable energy futures in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 88, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regjeringen. (2021a). Klimaendringer og norsk klimapolitikk. Online – URL: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/klima-og-miljo/innsiktsartikler-klima-miljo/klimaendringer-og-norsk-klimapolitikk/id2636812/ (Accessed March 13, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Regjeringen. (2021b). A European Green Deal: Norwegian Perspectives and Contributions. Online – URL: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/38453d5f5f5d42779aaa3059b200a25f/a-european-green-deal-norwegian-perspectives-and-contributions-20.04.2021.pdf (Accessed June 27, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Regjeringen. (2022a). Increased energy cooperation between the EU and Norway. Press release. Online – URL: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/-me-har-hatt-eit-godt-og-konstruktivt-mote-der-me-blei-samde-om-a-forsterke-det-nare-energisamarbeidet-mellom-noreg-og-eu.-russlands-invasjon-av-ukraina-har-gjort-at-det-er-behov/id2920673/ (Accessed June 27, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Regjeringen. (2022b). Ambitious offshore wind initiative. Press release. Online – URL: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/ambitious-offshore-wind-power-initiative/id2912297/ (Accessed July 5, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Rosendal, K., Skjærseth, J. B., & Andresen, S. (2019). Knowledge-based management of protected areas and hydropower: The case of Norway. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09447-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, J. (2014). The vicissitudes of energy and climate policy in Stockholm: Politics, materiality and transition. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1449–1470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rygg, B. J. (2012). Wind power—An assault on local landscapes or an opportunity for modernization? Energy Policy, 48, 167–175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryggvik, H. (2009). Til siste dråpe. Om oljens politiske økonomi. Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Saglie, I. L., Inderberg, T. H., & Rognstad, H. (2020). What shapes municipalities’ perceptions of fairness in windpower developments? Local Environment, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1712342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Kanger, L. (2018). Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilisation and directionality. Research Policy, 47(6), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skar, C., Jaehnert, S., Tomasgard, A., Midthun, K., & Fodstad, M. (2018). Norway’s role as a flexibility provider in a renewable Europe. A position paper prepared by FME CenSES. CenSES Centre for Sustainable Energy Studies. URL: https://www.ntnu.edu/documents/1276062818/1283878281/Norway%E2%80%99s + role + as + a + flexibility + provider + in + a + renewable + Europe.pdf/2f19ac80-856d-0303-db44-65899f4e5ae8?t = 1627381815955
   Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T. M. (2014). Back to the futures: Retrospecting the prospects of smart grid technology. Futures, 63, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T. M., & Ryghaug, M. (2020). Temporal echoes and cross-geography policy effects: Multiple levels of transition governance and the electric vehicle breakthrough. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 232–240. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solli, J. (2007). Bærekraftige kalkyler? Utviklingen av økonomiske argumenter om vindkraft. In M. Aune, & K. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Mellom klima og komfort – utfordringer for en bærekraftig energiutvikling (pp. 125–142). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Søraa, R. A., Anfinsen, M., Foulds, C., Korsnes, M., Lagesen, V., Robison, R., & Ryghaug, M. (2020). Diversifying diversity: Inclusive engagement, intersectionality, and gender identity in a European social sciences and humanities energy research project. Energy Research and Social Science, 62, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., Cantoni, R., Lee, D., Brisbois, M. C., Walnum, H. J., Dale, R. F., Rygg, B. J., Korsnes, M., & Goswami, A. (2022). Conflicted transitions: Exploring the actors, tactics, and outcomes of social opposition against energy infrastructure. Global Environmental Change, 73, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSB. (2021). Over 150 000 jobber i oljebransjen. Online – URL: https://www.ssb.no/arbeid-og-lonn/sysselsetting/artikler/over-150-000-jobber-i-oljebransjen (Accessed March 14, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supreme Court. (2020). Supreme Court judgment 22 December 2020, HR-2020-2472-P.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court. (2021). Licences for wind power development on Fosen ruled invalid as the construction violates Sami reindeer herders’ right to enjoy their own culture. Online – URL: https://www.domstol.no/en/enkelt-domstol/supremecourt/rulings/2021/supreme-court-civil-cases/hr-2021-1975-s/ (accessed March 14, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Swennenhuis, F., Mabon, L., Flach, T. A., & de Coninck, H. (2020). What role for CCS in delivering just transitions? An evaluation in the north Sea region. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 94, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., Chitra, A., Harald, D., Houeland, C., & Jordhus-Lier, D. (2021). Norwegian Oil and Gas transition: Building bridges towards a carbon neutral future. University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Tamnes, R. (1997). Oljealder. 1965-1995, Norsk utenrikspolitikks historie. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Thygesen, J., & Leknes, E. (2010). Kampen Om Goliat. En Casestudie Av Avisenes Og Politikernes Vinklinger Av Goliat-Saken. In P. Arbo, & B. Hersoug (Eds.), Oljevirksomhetens Inntog i Nord (pp. 195–216). Gyldendal akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Totland, A. (2021). Vindmøllekampen - historia om eit folkeopprør. Samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Tu.no. (2022). Regjeringen vil beholde både vindkraft og reindrift på Fosen, online – url: https://www.tu.no/artikler/regjeringen-vil-beholde-bade-vindkraft-og-reindrift-pa-fosen/521037 (Accessed 18.09.22)
   Google Scholar
• Tvinnereim, E., & Ivarsflaten, E. (2016). Fossil fuels, employment, and support for climate policies. Energy Policy, 96, 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2021). Theme Report on Enabling SDGs through Inclusive, Just Energy Transitions: Towards the Achievement of SDG 7 and Net-Zero Emissions. Online – URL: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021-twg_3-b-062321.pdf (Accessed June 30, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Van der Byl, C., Slawinski, N., & Hahn, T. (2020). Responsible management of sustainability tensions: A paradoxical approach to grand challenges. In O. Laasch, R. Suddaby, & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), Research handbook of responsible management (pp. 438–452). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos Oliveira, R. (2018). Back to the future: The potential of intergenerational justice for the achievement of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 10(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasstrøm, M., & Lysgård, H. K. (2021). What shapes Norwegian wind power policy? Analysing the constructing forces of policymaking and emerging questions of energy justice. Energy Research and Social Science, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogd, H. (2001). Social dilemmas and the communicative planning paradox. Town Planning Review, 72(1), 77–95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40111826 https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2001.72.1.77
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E., & Jickling, B. (2002). “Sustainability” in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210434688
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R., & van der Heijden, J. (2019). Avoidance of conflicts and trade-offs: A challenge for the policy integration of the united nations sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ytterstad, A. (2015). Broen Til framtiden. Gyldendal akademisk.
   Google Scholar