The social acceptability of a personal carbon allowance: a discrete choice experiment in Belgium

References

• Blasch, J., & Farsi, M. (2014). Context effects and heterogeneity in voluntary carbon offsetting–a choice experiment in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2013.842938
   Google Scholar
• Blumenschein, K., Blomquist, G. C., Johannesson, M., Horn, N., & Freeman, P. (2008). Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment. The Economic Journal, 118(525), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothner, F. (2021). Personal carbon trading—lost in the policy primeval soup? Sustainability, 13(8), 4592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, A. L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A. M., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2010). Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1824–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, M. (2016). Personal carbon allowances: A revised model to alleviate distributional issues. Ecological Economics, 130, 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, S. B., & Lewis, A. (2010). Effects of personal carbon allowances on decision-making: Evidence from an experimental simulation. Climate Policy, 10(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition. (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices World Bank. www.carbonpricingleadership.org/report-of-the-highlevel-commission-on-carbon-prices
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, S., Maxey, L., & Hurth, V. (2014). Reconciling scientific reality with realpolitik: Moving beyond carbon pricing to TEQs–an integrated, economy-wide emissions cap. Carbon Management, 5(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2015.1021563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christis, M., Breemersch, K., Vercalsteren, A., & Dils, E. (2019). A detailed household carbon footprint analysis using expenditure accounts–Case of Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T. (2010). Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time? Energy Policy, 38(11), 6868–6876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T., & Parag, Y. (2010). An introduction to personal carbon trading. Climate Policy, 10(4), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuso Nerini, F., Fawcett, T., Parag, Y., & Ekins, P. (2021). Personal carbon allowances revisited. Nature Sustainability, 4(12), 1025–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Carbon Project. (2021). Supplemental data of Global Carbon Budget 2021 (Version 1.0) [Data set].
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., Broderick, J., Upham, P., Ceron, J. P., Dubois, G., Peeters, P., & Strasdas, W. (2007). Voluntary carbon offsetting schemes for aviation: Efficiency, credibility and sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost758.0
   Google Scholar
• Guivarch, C., & Rogelj, J. (2017). Carbon price variations in 2°C scenarios explored. Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, L. I., & Clapp, A. (2017). Applying personal carbon trading: A proposed ‘carbon, health and savings system’ for British Columbia, Canada. Climate Policy, 17(5), 616–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1152947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H., & Ahn, S. W. (2020). Youth mobilization to stop global climate change: Narratives and impact. Sustainability, 12(10), 4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwatt, H., Tight, M., Bristow, A. L., & Gühnemann, A. (2011). Personal carbon trading and fuel price increases in the transport sector: An exploratory study of public response in the UK. European Transport, 47(16), 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, A. D. (2019). Usage behaviour of a personal carbon monitoring system. Southern Cross University, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, D., Vita, G., Steen-Olsen, K., Stadler, K., Melo, P. C., Wood, R., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017). Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(5), 054013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6da9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., Löfgren, Å, & Stripple, J.. (2010). Attitudes to personal carbon allowances: political trust, fairness and ideology. Personal carbon trading, 10(4), 410–431.
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, B., Burghaus, K., Flachsland, C., Jakob, M., Koch, N., & Edenhofer, O. (2018). Shifting paradigms in carbon pricing. Intereconomics, 53(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-018-0735-6
   Google Scholar
• Kuokkanen, A., Sihvonen, M., Uusitalo, V., Huttunen, A., Ronkainen, T., & Kahiluoto, H. (2020). A proposal for a novel urban mobility policy: Personal carbon trade experiment in Lahti city. Utilities Policy, 62, 100997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévay, P. Z., Vanhille, J., Goedemé, T., & Verbist, G. (2021). The association between the carbon footprint and the socio-economic characteristics of Belgian households. Ecological Economics, 186, 107065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2019). Residents’ willingness and influencing factors on action personal carbon trading: A case study of metropolitan areas in Tianjin, China. Sustainability, 11(2), 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2010). The economics of personal carbon trading. Climate Policy, 10(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: A review of the literature. Climate Policy, 19(9), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision, 8(3), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek, E., Raux, C., & Engelmann, D. (2018). Personal carbon allowances: Can a budget label do the trick? Transport Policy, 69, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, R., Raffaelli, R., & Notaro, S. (2014). Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice experiment using respondents' own money. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., Capstick, S., & Poortinga, W. (2011). Policy attribute framing: A comparison between three policy instruments for personal emissions reduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(4), 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., & Fawcett, T. (2014). Personal carbon trading: A review of research evidence and real-world experience of a radical idea. Energy and Emission Control Technologies, 2, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.2147/EECT.S56173
   Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., & Strickland, D. (2010). Personal carbon trading: A radical policy option for reducing emissions from the domestic sector. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2011.539945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2017). EU-ETS Phase IV: Allowance prices, design choices and the market stability reserve. Climate Policy, 17(7), 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1360173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzey, J. C. V. (2003). Emission taxes and tradeable permits. A comparison of views on long-Run efficiency. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026393028473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raux, C., Croissant, Y., & Pons, D. (2015). Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 35, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., Zanoli, R., Bruschi, V., & Naspetti, S. (2013). Inferred and stated attribute nonattendance in food choice experiments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ščasný, M., Zvěřinová, I., Czajkowski, M., Kyselá, E., & Zagórska, K. (2017). Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: A discrete choice experiment. Climate Policy, 17(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1276326
   Google Scholar
• Sconfienza, U. M. (2021). Saving liberalism through meaningful choices. Restating the case for an individual carbon card. New Political Economy, 26(6), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, M., & Kratena, K. (2017). The carbon footprint of European households and income distribution. Ecological Economics, 136(June), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., & Baker, L. (2019). The whole systems energy injustice of four European low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., Wang, X., & Zaidi, S. H. A. (2019). What drives public willingness to participate in the voluntary personal carbon-trading scheme? A case study of Guangzhou pilot, China. Ecological Economics, 165, 106389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., Duan, M., & Deng, Z. (2021). Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to explain willingness towards voluntary carbon offsetting among Chinese consumers. Ecological Economics, 185, 107068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiery, B. W., Lange, S., Rogelj, J., Schleussner, C. F., Gudmundsson, L., Seneviratne, S. I., Andrijevic, M., Frieler, K., Emanuel, K., Geiger, T., Bresch, D., Zhao, F., Willner, S.N., Büchner, M., Volkholz, J., Bauer, N., Chang, J., Ciais, P., Dury, M., … Wada, Y. (2021). Intergenerational inequities in exposure to climate extremes. Science, 374(6564), 158–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thisted, E. V., & Thisted, R. V. (2020). The diffusion of carbon taxes and emission trading schemes: The emerging norm of carbon pricing. Environmental Politics, 29(5), 804–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1661155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E., & Weeks, M. (2005). Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space. In Scarpa R. & Alberini A. (Eds.), Application of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics (pp. 16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Uehleke, R., & Sturm, B. (2017). The influence of collective action on the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation in hypothetical and real situations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67(3), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). ‘Paris Agreement (All Language Versions) | UNFCCC’, 2015. https://unfccc.int/process/conferences/pastconferences/paris-climate-change-conference-november-2015/paris-agreement
   Google Scholar
• Verde, S. F., Acworth, W., Kardish, C., & Borghesi, S. (2020). Achieving Zero Emissions under a Cap-and-Trade System. Florence School of Regulation, European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wadud, Z., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2019). Personal carbon trading: Trade-off and complementarity between In-home and transport related emissions reduction. Ecological Economics, 156, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woerdman, E., & Bolderdijk, J. W. (2017). Emissions trading for households? A behavioral Law and economics perspective. European Journal of Law and Economics, 44(3), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9516-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022). Carbon Pricing Dashboard. Accessed April 23, 2022, from https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/map_data
   Google Scholar
• Zanni, A. M., Bristow, A. L., & Wardman, M. (2013). The potential behavioural effect of personal carbon trading: Results from an experimental survey. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2, 222–243.
   Google Scholar