Multi-level climate governance: examining impacts and interactions between national and sub-national emissions mitigation policy mixes in Canada

References

• Andonova, L. B., Hale, T. N., & Roger, C. B. (2017). National policy and transnational governance of climate change: Substitutes or complements? International Studies Quarterly, 61(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonioli, D., Borghesi, S., D’Amato, A., Gilli, M., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2014). Analysing the interactions of energy and climate policies in a broad policy ‘optimality’ framework: The Italian case study. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 11(3–4), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2014.962549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axsen, J., Plotz, P., & Wolinetz, M. (2020). Crafting strong, integrated policy mixes for deep CO2 mitigation in road transport. Nature Climate Change, 10(9), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0877-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becklumb, P. (2019). Federal and provincial jurisdiction to regulate environmental issues. Library of Parliament Background Paper, Publication No. 2013-86-E (Originally published 24 September 2013 revised 29 Oct 2019), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, C., Axsen, J., Kern, F., & McCollum, D. (2020). Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 135, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, S., Flachsland, C., & Marschinski, R. (2012). Credible commitment in carbon policy. Climate Policy, 12(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.582327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada, E. (2021a, July 12). Government of Canada confirms ambitious new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target [News releases]. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/news/2021/07/government-of-canada-confirms-ambitious-new-greenhouse-gas-emissions-reduction-target.html
   Google Scholar
• Canada, E. (2021b, July 12). The federal carbon pollution pricing benchmark. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it-will-work/carbon-pollution-pricing-federal-benchmark-information.html
   Google Scholar
• Corfee-Morlot, J., Kamal-Chaoui, L., Donovan, M. G., Cochran, I., Robert, A., & Teasdale, P. J. (2009). Cities, climate change and multilevel governance. OECD Environmental Working Papers, 14, 127.
   Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., Sawyer, D., & Stiebert, S. (2021). In search of prosperity: The role of oil in the future of Alberta and Canada. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/publications/search-prosperity-oil-alberta-canada
   Google Scholar
• Cullenward, D., & Victor, D. G. (2020). Making climate policy work. Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Making+Climate+Policy+Work-p-9781509541805
   Google Scholar
• del Rio, P. (2011). Interactions between climate and energy policies: The case of Spain. Climate Policy, 9(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Rio, P., & Howlett, M. P. (2013). Beyond the “Tinbergen Rule” in policy design: Matching tools and goals in policy portfolios (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2247238). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2247238
   Google Scholar
• del Río González, P. (2007). The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes. An overview of the literature. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(8), 1363–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9069-y
   Google Scholar
• Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2019). Canada’s fourth biennial report on climate change. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-emissions/fourth-biennial-report-climate-change.html
   Google Scholar
• Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2020). National inventory report: Greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada. Environment Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-emissions/sources-sinks-executive-summary-2020.html#toc4
   Google Scholar
• Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2021). Greenhouse gas sources and sinks 2021 (Submission the UNFCCC) [National Invenory Report]. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-emissions/sources-sinks-executive-summary-2021.html
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Hepburn, C., & Park, J. (2010). Combining multiple climate policy instruments: How not to do it. Climate Change Economics, 01(03), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007810000169
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Axsen, J., & Jaccard, M. (2017). Picking winners: Modelling the costs of technology-specific climate policy in the U.S. passenger vehicle sector. Ecological Economics, 137(C), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H. (2013). Climate change policy’s interactions with the tax system. Energy Economics, 40, S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., Jacobsen, M. R., & van Benthem, A. A. (2012). Unintended consequences from nested state and federal regulations: The case of the Pavley greenhouse-gas-per-mile limits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., & Stavins, R. N. (2011). Challenges from state-federal interactions in US climate change policy. American Economic Review, 101(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. (2016). Pan-Canadian framework on clean growth and climate change [Report on plans and priorities]. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/pan-canadian-framework/climate-change-plan.html
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. (2018). Perspectives on climate change action in Canada – A collaborative report from auditors general. Office of the Auditor General of Canada. https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_otp_201803_e_42883.html
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. (2021, March 17). NEB – Provincial and territorial energy profiles. https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/provincial-territorial-energy-profiles/provincial-territorial-energy-profiles-explore.html
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2016). “All hands on deck”: The Paris agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T. N., Chan, S., Hsu, A., Clapper, A., Elliott, C., Faria, P., Kuramochi, T., McDaniel, S., Morgado, M., Roelfsema, M., Santaella, M., Singh, N., Tout, I., Weber, C., Weinfurter, A., & Widerberg, O. (2021). Sub- and non-state climate action: A framework to assess progress, implementation and impact. Climate Policy, 21(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. (2023). Climate federalism in Canada. In A. Fenna, S. Jodoin, & J. Setzer (Eds.), Climate governance and federalism: A forum of federations comparative policy analysis. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S. P., Hughes, J. E., & Knittel, C. R. (2009). Greenhouse gas reductions under low carbon fuel standards? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1), 106–146. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.1.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15610059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Kim, J., & Weaver, P. (2006). Assessing instrument mixes through program- and agency-level data: Methodological issues in contemporary implementation research. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00189.x
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013a). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v1i2.95
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013b). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v1i2.95
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, A., Brandt, J., Widerberg, O., Chan, S., & Weinfurter, A. (2020). Exploring links between national climate strategies and non-state and subnational climate action in nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Climate Policy, 20(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1624252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Weinfurter, A., Xie, Y., Lütkermöller, K., Chan, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Drost, P., Faria, P., Gardiner, A., Gordon, D. J., Hale, T., Hultman, N. E., Moorhead, J., Reuvers, S., Setzer, J., Singh, N., … Widerberg, O. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0338-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, N. E., Clarke, L., Frisch, C., Kennedy, K., McJeon, H., Cyrs, T., Hansel, P., Bodnar, P., Manion, M., Edwards, M. R., Cui, R., Bowman, C., Lund, J., Westphal, M. I., Clapper, A., Jaeger, J., Sen, A., Lou, J., Saha, D., … O’Neill, J. (2020). Fusing subnational with national climate action is central to decarbonization: The case of the United States. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18903-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C: IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, M., Murphy, R., Zuehlke, B., & Braglewicz, M. (2019). Cities and greenhouse gas reduction: Policy makers or policy takers? Energy Policy, 134, 110875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenn, A., Azevedo, I. L., & Michalek, J. J. (2019). Alternative-fuel-vehicle policy interactions increase U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J. J., Tosun, J., Forster, J., & Boasson, E. L. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017). Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Hsu, A., Lui, S., Weinfurter, A., Chan, S., Hale, T., Clapper, A., Chang, A., & Höhne, N. (2020). Beyond national climate action: The impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 20(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1740150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, A. (2012). Belts and Suspenders: Interactions Among Climate Policy Regulations . In Don Fullerton & Catherine Wolfram (Eds.), The Design and Implementation of U.S. Climate Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226921983.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Lieu, J., Spyridaki, N. A., Alvarez-Tinoco, R., Van der Gaast, W., Tuerk, A., & Van Vliet, O. (2018). Evaluating consistency in environmental policy mixes through policy, stakeholder, and contextual interactions. Sustainability, 10(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Z., Axsen, J., & Kitt, S. (2020). Public support for supply-focused transport policies: Vehicle emissions, low-carbon fuels, and ZEV sales standards in Canada and California. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. A., Jurewitz, J. L., & Nelson, H. T. (2020). State leadership in U.S. climate change and energy policy: The California experience. The Journal of Environment & Development, 29(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496519887484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, L., Kuramochi, T., Iacobuta, G., den Elzen, M., Fekete, H., Weishaupt, M., van Soest, H. L., Roelfsema, M., Vivero-Serrano, G. D., Lui, S., Hans, F., Jose de Villafranca Casas, M., & Höhne, N. (2021). Twenty years of climate policy: G20 coverage and gaps. Climate Policy, 22(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., & McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Interactions between emission trading systems and other overlapping policy instruments (OECD Green Growth Papers No. 2011/02; OECD Green Growth Papers, Vol. 2011/02). OECD, Environment Directorate. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k97gk44c6vf-en
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B. G. (2008). States on steroids: The intergovernmental odyssey of American climate policy. Review of Policy Research, 25(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. (2010). How to eat an elephant: A bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10(6), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, E., Axsen, J., & Jaccard, M. (2017). Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. Ecological Economics, 137, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, E., Scott, W. A., & Jaccard, M. (2021). Designing flexible regulations to mitigate climate change: A cross-country comparative policy analysis. Energy Policy, 156, 112419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, N., & Wigle, R. (2018). An evaluation of policy options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector: The cost-effectiveness of regulations versus emissions pricing. Laurier Centre for Economic Research and Policy Analysis, LCERPA Working Paper NO. 2018-1, 55.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2017). Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosendahl, K. E. (2019). EU ETS and the waterbed effect. Nature Climate Change, 9(10), 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0579-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2019). Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes – An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy, 48(10), 103557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shobe, W. M., & Burtraw, D. (2012). Rethinking environmental federalism in a warming world. Climate Change Economics, 3(4), 1250018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007812500182
   Google Scholar
• Sijm, J. (2005). The interaction between the EU emissions trading scheme and national energy policies. Climate Policy, 5(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2005.9685542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somanathan, E., Sterner, T., Sugiyama, T., Chimanikire, D., Dubash, N. K., Essandoh-Yeddu, J., Fifita, S., Goulder, L. H., Jaffe, A., Labandeira, X., Managi, S., Mitchell, C., Montero, J. P., Teng, F., & Zylicz, T. (2014). National and sub-national policies and institutions. In Climate change 2014 mitigation of climate change: Working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of Canada. (2021, March 25). References re greenhouse gas pollution pricing act. Supreme Court of Canada. https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/cb/2021/38663-38781-39116-eng.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J., Castro, J., Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., Foramitti, J., Klein, F., Konc, T., & Savin, I. (2021). Designing an effective climate-policy mix: Accounting for instrument synergy. Climate Policy, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1907276
   Google Scholar
• van der Ven, H., Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2017). Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022). World Bank open data – CO2 emissions. The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/
   Google Scholar