Decarbonizing contending industries: policy design and the EU’s CBAM

References

• Abnett, K. (2021, June 22). Analysis: EU industry hands Brussels headache over carbon border levy. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Abnett, K., & Twidale, S. (2021, May 17). Britain’s carbon market with missing EU link. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, C. (2021, July 17). Beijing opens market on carbon emissions to reduce pollution. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Canfin, P. (2022, June 3). A entendre certaines grande entreprises, l’action climatique, c’est bien … surtout pour les autres. Le Monde.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, E. (2021, July 21). UK considers import taxes to combat ‘carbon leakage’ but wants global deal. Sky News.
   Google Scholar
• Cornago, E., & Lowe, S. (2021, July 5). Avoiding the pitfalls of an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. Centre for European Reform Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, M. (2021, June 10). Europe's carbon border tax plan looms over global trade. The Wall Street Journal, A.16. Print edition (June 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• European Aluminium. (2020). Position on the inception impact assessment roadmap for an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. Feedback reference F510279. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12228-EU-Green-Deal-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-/F510279_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. COM/2021/564 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0564
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2022). CBAM: Commission proposal / Council general approach / Position of the EP. 2021/0214(COD). https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13063-2022-INIT/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2021, March). Report towards a WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (2020/2043(INI)). A9-0019/2021, Amendments AM-002-004. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0019-AM-002-004_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2022a). Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and Regulation (EU) 2015/757 (COM(2021)0551 – C9-0318/2021–2021/0211(COD)). A9-0162/2022. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0162_EN.html
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2022b). Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 22 June 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (COM(2021)0564 – C9—0328/2021–2021/0214(COD)). P9_TA(2022)0248. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0248_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2023). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). 2021/0214(COD). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/ENVI/AG/2023/02-09/Formal_Consolidated_CBAM_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. (1988). Sectoral conflict and foreign economic policy, 1914-1940. International Organization, 42(1), 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830000713X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, T., Biot, E., Voituriez, T., Kelly, L., Cosbey, A., & Keane, J. (2021, June 25). What can climate vulnerable countries expect from the CBAM? Institute for European Environmental Policy Briefing Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M. (2011). International climate finance from border carbon cost levelling. Climate Policy, 11(3), 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.582285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, Y., & Schlesinger, J. M. (2021, November 3). Carbon tariffs gain momentum; new proposals could reshape industries but also raise the risk of trade disputes. Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, N. (2021, July 12). Aluminium sector wants out of Brussels’ carbon plan. The Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Interfax Ukraine. (2021, June 8). EU to take special approach in applying CBAM to Ukraine – trade representative.
   Google Scholar
• Korsunskaya, D., & Marrow, A. (2021, September 23). Russia considering own carbon tax as EU prepares one – Vedomosti. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M. B. (2019). The EU emissions trading system and renewable energy policies: Friends or Foes in the European policy mix? Politics and Governance, 7(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2020). Political conflict and climate policy: The European emissions trading system as a Trojan Horse for the low-carbon transition? Climate Policy, 20(9), 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1763901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markkanen, S., Viñuales, J., Pollitt, H., Lee-Makiyama, H., Kiss-Dobronyi, B., & Vaishnav, A. (2021). On the borderline: The EU CBAM and its place in the world of trade. Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2005). Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy, 33(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00238-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. (2015). Oppose, support, or hedge? Distributional effects, regulatory pressure, and business strategy in environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pismennaya, E., & Fedorinova, Y. (2021, December 21). Russia aims to make carbon-tax system that EU will recognize. Bloomberg Green.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Shum, R. Y. (2019). Heliopolitics: The international political economy of solar supply chains. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spasic, V. (2021, April 30). Turkey wasting no time preparing for Europe’s carbon border tax. Balkan Green Energy News. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/turkey-wasting-no-time-preparing-for-europes-carbon-border-tax/
   Google Scholar
• Stoerk, T., Dudek, D. J., & Yang, J. (2019). China’s national carbon emissions trading scheme: Lessons from the pilot emission trading schemes, academic literature, and known policy details. Climate Policy, 19(4), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1568959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamma, P., & Oroschakoff, K. (2021, March 10). Parliament’s stance on carbon border levy foreshadows slugfest. Politico.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Taplin, N. (2021, July 20). China’s carbon trading is up and running but it is a mixed bag. Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2021). A green and level field; European industry (August 7, 54, US). https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A670782629/AONE?u=brockport&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=dbcd6368
   Google Scholar
• Weise, Z. (2021, November 6). EU’s looming carbon tax nudged Turkey toward Paris climate accord, envoy says. Politico.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Weise, Z. (2022a, June 8). EU Parliament clash delays key climate legislation. Politico.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Weise, Z. (2022b, June 9). The lobbying war over cutting EU emissions. Politico.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J. (2009). EU energy-intensive industries and emission trading: Losers becoming winners? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(5), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.516
   Google Scholar