Who believes in green growth? Strategic framing and technology leadership in the UNFCCC negotiations

References

• Bagozzi, B. E. (2015). The multifaceted nature of global climate change negotiations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(4), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9211-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, S., & Weiler, F. (2015). A political economy of positions in climate change negotiations: Economic, structural, domestic, and strategic explanations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9198-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019). Varieties of policy feedback research: Looking backward, moving forward. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., & Jones, K. (2019). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2009). Treating words as data with error: Uncertainty in text statements of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, E., Kelsey, N., & Meckling, J. (2016). The political economy of decarbonization: A research agenda. Brooklyn Law Review, 82(2), 605–643.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2010). The art and craft of international environmental law. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, A., & Hepburn, C. (2014). Green growth: An assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., & Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – a synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., & Chu, L. (2022). Decoupling the double jeopardy of climate risk and fiscal risk: A perspective of infrastructure investment. Climate Risk Management, 37, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippa, M., Giuzzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Solazzo, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Olivier, J. G. J., & Vignati, E. (2020). Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries – 2020 report. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Wallbott, L. (2012). Beyond soft balancing: Small states and coalition-building in the ICC and climate negotiations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.710580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, H.-M., Liang, Q.-M., Liu, L.-J., & Anadon, L. D. (2017). Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: A review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environmental Research Letters, 12(12), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa98d2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depledge, J., & Yamin, F. (2009). The global climate-change regime: A defence. In D. Helm & C. Hepburn (Eds.), The economics and politics of climate change (pp. 433–453). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, R. S. (2016). The Paris Agreement on climate change: Behind closed doors. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dray, S., & Josse, J. (2015). Principal component analysis with missing values: A comparative survey of methods. Plant Ecology, 216(5), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0406-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, D., & Wagner, L. (2021). The role of issues in negotiation: Framing, linking, and ordering. Negotiation Journal, 37(2), 249–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., & Schäfer, L. (2021). Global Climate Risk Index 2021: Who suffers most extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2019 and 2000-2019, Germanwatch Nord-Süd Initiative eV.
   Google Scholar
• Eicke, L., & Weko, S. (2022). Does green growth foster green policies? Value chain upgrading and feedback mechanisms on renewable energy policies. Energy Policy, 165, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M. (2013). Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 902–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (2011). Explaining national environmental performance: Approaches, evidence, and implications. Policy Sciences, 44(4), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9140-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (2018). A good life on a finite earth: The political economy of green growth. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraccascia, L., Giannoccaro, I., & Albino, V. (2018). Green product development: What does the country product space imply? Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. A. (2006). On the so-called ‘huber sandwich estimator’ and ‘robust standard errors’. The American Statistician, 60(4), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese, F. (2014). States’ interests at international climate negotiations: New measures of bargaining positions. Environmental Politics, 23(4), 610–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.904068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese, F. (2019). Sectors, pollution, and trade: How industrial interests shape domestic positions on global climate agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese, F. (2020). Weak states at global climate negotiations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genovese, F., Mcalexander, R. J., & Urpelainen, J. (2022). Institutional roots of international alliances: Party groupings and position similarity at global climate negotiations. The Review of International Organizations, 18(2), 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., Bazilian, M., Bradshaw, M., & Westphal, K. (2019). Model and manage the changing geopolitics of energy. Nature, 569(7754), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01312-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., Eicke, L., & Weko, S. (2020). The global energy transition and the global south. The geopolitics of the global energy transition. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Helgenberger, S., Gürtler, K., Borbonus, S., Okunlola, A., & Jänicke, M. (2017). Mobilizing the co-benefits of climate change mitigation: Building new alliances – seizing opportunities – raising climate ambitions in the new energy world of renewables. Cobenefits Impulse (Policy Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D., & Hepburn, C. (2009). The economics and politics of climate change. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C., Pfeiffer, A., & Teytelboym, A. (2018). Green growth. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, M. S. Gertler, & D. Wójcik (Eds.), The New Oxford Handbook of economic geography (pp. 749–769). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, K. (2020). Political economies of energy transition: Wind and solar power in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2020). Clean energy innovation. IEA.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. [H. O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama (Eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6/wg2/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FullReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2013). Green growth. In R. Falkner (Ed.), The handbook of global climate and environmental policy (pp. 194–214). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, V. (2021). Soft law in a hard shell’: India, international rulemaking and the International Solar Alliance. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102520000400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., Alfredsson, E., & Westling, N. (2020). Climate policy co-benefits: A review. Climate Policy, 20(3), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1724070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. (2016). The UN, energy and the sustainable development goals. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy, 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Khor, M. (2011). Risks and uses of the green economy concept in the context of sustainable development, poverty and equity. South Center.
   Google Scholar
• Klöck, C., Castro, P., Weiler, F., & Blaxekjær, LØ. (2020). Coalitions in the climate change negotiations, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Heichel, S., & Arndt, D. (2012). Really a front-runner, really a straggler? Of environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union and beyond – a quantitative policy perspective. Energy Policy, 48, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuik, O., Branger, F., & Quirion, P. (2019). Competitive advantage in the renewable energy industry: Evidence from a gravity model. Renewable Energy, 131, 472–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., Macneil, R., & Paterson, M. (2017). The political economy of decarbonisation: From green energy ‘race’ to green ‘division of labour’. New Political Economy, 22(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1240669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(02|2), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., & Garry, J. (2000). Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. C., Yuan, Z., Lee, C. C., & Chang, Y. F. (2022). The impact of renewable energy technology innovation on energy poverty: Does climate risk matter? Energy Economics, 116, 106427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Shapiro, J., Tagliapietra, S., & Wolff, G. B. (2021). The geopolitics of the European green deal. Bruegel Policy Contribution.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., Economy, E. C., O'Neil, S., & Segal, A. (2010). Globalizing the energy revolution – How to really win the clean-energy race. Foreign Affairs, 89(6), 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., Arts, B., Kamstra, J., & Ooijevaar, J. (2009). Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: A quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760902983283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovo, S., Bezabih, M., & Singer, G. (2015). Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment/Global Green Growth Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, T., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). Managing tradeoffs in green industrial policies: The role of renewable energy policy design. World Development, 122, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer, J. P., & Gupta, J. (2016). The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealy, P., & Teytelboym, A. (2020). Economic complexity and the green economy. Research Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. (2018). The developmental state in global regulation: Economic change and climate policy. European Journal of International Relations, 24(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117700966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. (2021). Making industrial policy work for decarbonization. Global Environmental Politics, 21(4), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., & Allan, B. B. (2020). The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0739-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., & Hughes, L. (2018). Global interdependence in clean energy transitions. Business and Politics, 20(4), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2018.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., & Zysman, J. (2015). Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science, 349(6253), 1170–1171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., Lipscy, P. Y., Finnegan, J. J., & Metz, F. (2022). Why nations lead or lag in energy transitions. Science, 378(6615), 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adc9973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., Sterner, T., & Wagner, G. (2017). Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy, 2(12), 918–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midttun, A., Coulter, P., Gadzekpo, A., & Wang, J. (2015). Comparing media framings of climate change in developed, rapid growth and developing countries: Findings from Norway, China and Ghana. Energy & Environment, 26(8), 1271–1292. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.8.1271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm, J. (2017). Renewable futures and industrial legacies: Wind and solar sectors in China, Germany, and the United States. Business and Politics, 19, 68–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2016.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm, J., & Steinfeld, E. S. (2014). Scale-up nation: China’s specialization in innovative manufacturing. World Development, 54, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerlove, M. (2005). Essays in panel data econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordensvard, J., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018). Innovation core, innovation semi-periphery and technology transfer: The case of wind energy patents. Energy Policy, 120, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2008). A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyangchak, N. (2022). Emerging green industry toward net-zero economy: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Tänzler, D. (2007). Climate policy in the EU: International regimes and policy diffusion. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Europe and global climate change: Politics, foreign policy and regional cooperation (pp. 255–279). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Environment database technology development. Indicator name: Development of environment-related technologies, % inventions worldwide. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PAT_DEV
   Google Scholar
• Overland, I., Bazilian, M., Uulu, T. I., Vakulchuk, R., & Westphal, K. (2019). The GeGaLo index: Geopolitical gains and losses after energy transition. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahle, M., Burtraw, D., Flachsland, C., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., Meckling, J., Edenhofer, O., & Zysman, J. (2018). Sequencing to ratchet up climate policy stringency. Nature Climate Change, 8(10), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0287-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauw, W., Castro, P., Pickering, J., & Bhasin, S. (2019). Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: foothold for equity or Achilles heel? Climate Policy, 20(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1635874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. B. (2009). Agenda-setting and climate change. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903157115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quitzow, R., & Thielges, S. (2020). The German energy transition as soft power. Review of International Political Economy, 29(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1813190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., Roser, M., & Rosado, P. (2020). Energy. OurWorldInData.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, N., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). Explaining advocacy coalition change with policy feedback. Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), 1109–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs, M. A. (2012). Breaking the impasse in the international climate negotiations: The potential of green technologies. Energy Policy, 48, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shidore, S., & Busby, J. W. (2019). One more try: The International Solar Alliance and India’s search for geopolitical influence. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Book.
   Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, J. (2017). Limiting costs or correcting market failures? Finance ministries and frame alignment in UN climate finance negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9348-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. The stern review. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterner, T., & Damon, M. (2011). Green growth in the post-Copenhagen climate. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7165–7173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, J., & Toman, M. (2010). ‘Green stimulus’, economic recovery, and long-term sustainable development. Policy Research Working Paper. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers. United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCAP. (2006). Green growth at a glance: The way forward for Asia and the Pacific. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2021). Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. Synthesis report by the Secretariat. Retrieved October 18 2022 from https://unfccc.int/documents/306848
   Google Scholar
• Van Ginkel, J. R., Linting, M., Rippe, R. C., & Van der Voort, A. (2020). Rebutting existing misconceptions about multiple imputation as a method for handling missing data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler, J. (2018). Energy, climate change, and global governance: The 2015 Paris Agreement in perspective. In D. J. Davidson & M. Gross (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of energy and society (pp. 15–40). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, F. (2012). Determinants of bargaining success in the climate change negotiations. Climate Policy, 12(5), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.691225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2021). World development indicators. Indicators used: GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$) (NY.GDP.PCAP.KD) Population growth (annual %)(SP.POP.GROW) Fuel exports (% of merchandise exports)(TX.VAL.FUEL.ZS.UN). http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012). Lexicoder sentiment dictionary. McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Shi, H.-L. (2014). From burden-sharing to opportunity-sharing: Unlocking the climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 14(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.857979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zysman, J., & Huberty, M. (2013). Can green sustain growth? From the religion to the reality of sustainable prosperity. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar