1,383
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Policy Analysis

Power in climate change policy-making process in South Asia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 104-116 | Received 13 Feb 2022, Accepted 11 Oct 2023, Published online: 26 Oct 2023

References

  • Adnan, M. S. G., Haque, A., & Hall, J. W. (2019). Have coastal embankments reduced flooding in Bangladesh? Science of the Total Environment, 682, 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.048
  • Ayers, J. (2011). Resolving the adaptation paradox: Exploring the potential for deliberative adaptation policy-making in Bangladesh. Global Environmental Politics, 11(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00043
  • Barua, A., Vij, S., & Zulfiqur Rahman, M. (2018). Powering or sharing water in the Brahmaputra River basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(5), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1403892
  • Bhave, A. G., Conway, D., Dessai, S., & Stainforth, D. A. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for robust decision making approaches to support climate change adaptation in the developing world. Climate Risk Management, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.09.004
  • Biesbroek, G. R., Swart, R. J., Carter, T. R., Cowan, C., Henrichs, T., Mela, H., Morecroft, M. D., & Rey, D. (2010). Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 440–450.
  • Bizikova, L., Pintér, L., & Tubiello, N. (2015). Normative scenario approach: A vehicle to connect adaptation planning and development needs in developing countries. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7), 1433–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0705-x
  • Brzoska, M. (2009). The securitization of climate change and the power of conceptions of security. Security Peace, 27(3), 137–145.
  • Buurman, J., & Babovic, V. (2016). Adaptation pathways and real options analysis: An approach to deep uncertainty in climate change adaptation policies. Policy and Society, 35(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.05.002
  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). A new framework for analysis. Security: A new framework for analysis. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586187
  • Byers, E., Gidden, M., Leclère, D., Balkovic, J., Burek, P., Ebi, K., … Johnson, N. (2018). Global exposure and vulnerability to multi-sector development and climate change hotspots. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5), 055012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf45
  • Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
  • Colloff, M. J., Martín-López, B., Lavorel, S., Locatelli, B., Gorddard, R., Longaretti, P. Y., … Murphy, H. T. (2017). An integrative research framework for enabling transformative adaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 68, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.007
  • Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
  • Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & Van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708100356
  • Dhakal, S. P., & Mahmood, M. N. (2014). International aid and cyclone shelters in Bangladesh: Adaptation or maladaptation? Contemporary South Asia, 22(3), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2014.931356
  • Dubash, N. K. (2013). The politics of climate change in India: Narratives of equity and cobenefits. WIRES Climate Change, 4(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.210
  • Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J., & Eakin, H. (2015). Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
  • Fuchs, D., & Glaab, K. (2011). Material power and normative conflict in global and local agrifood governance: The lessons of ‘Golden Rice’ in India. Food Policy, 36(6), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.013
  • Giddens, A. (2015). The politics of climate change. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14290856538163
  • Government of India. (2015). India’s intended nationally determined contribution: Working towards climate justice. Government of India.
  • GPCL. (2015). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy of Gujarat power corporation limited. Gujarat Power Corporation Limited, Government of Gujarat.
  • Haines, A., Kovats, R. S., Campbell-Lendrum, D., & Corvalán, C. (2006). Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health, 120(7), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002
  • Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press
  • Hayward, C., & Lukes, S. (2008). Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue. Journal of Power, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943364
  • Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797
  • Huda, M. S. (2017). Envisioning the future of cooperation on common rivers in South Asia: A cooperative security approach by Bangladesh and India to the Tipaimukh Dam. Water International, 42(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1236232
  • Im, E. S., Pal, J. S., & Eltahir, E. A. (2017). Deadly heat waves projected in the densely populated agricultural regions of South Asia. Science Advances, 3(8), e1603322. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603322
  • Ingold, K. (2011). Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x
  • IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & L. A. Meyer, eds.). IPCC, 151 pp.
  • IPCC. (2022). Summary for policymakers. In H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 3–33). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.001
  • Ishtiaque, A., Eakin, H., Vij, S., Chhetri, N., Rahman, F., & Huq, S. (2021). Multilevel governance in climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: Structure, processes, and power dynamics. Regional Environmental Change, 21(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01802-1
  • Ishtiaque, A., Sangwan, N., & Yu, D. J. (2017). Robust-yet-fragile nature of partly engineered social-ecological systems: A case study of coastal Bangladesh. Ecology and Society, 22(3), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09186-220305
  • Jonnalagadda, I., Stock, R., & Misquitta, K. (2021). Titling as a contested process: Conditional land rights and subaltern citizenship in South India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13002
  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). The 11 shift toward network governance. Theory and Practice of Public Sector Reform, 27, 158. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714141-11
  • Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., & Aurenhammer, H. (2014). Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012
  • Mathur, K. (2008). From government to governance: A Brief survey of the Indian experience. NBT India.
  • Mazhar, N., Nawaz, M., Mirza, A. I., & Khan, K. (2015). Socio-political impacts of meteorological droughts and their spatial patterns in Pakistan. South Asian Studies, 30(1), 149.
  • Mehta, L., Srivastava, S., Movik, S., Adam, H. N., D’Souza, R., Parthasarathy, D., … Ohte, N. (2021). Transformation as praxis: Responding to climate change uncertainties in marginal environments in South Asia. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.002
  • Mirumachi, N. (2015). Transboundary water politics in the developing world. Routledge.
  • Mishra, A., Appadurai, A. N., Choudhury, D., Regmi, B. R., Kelkar, U., Alam, M., … Fu, C. (2019). Adaptation to climate change in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: Stronger action urgently needed. In The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment (pp. 457–490). Springer.
  • Nagoda, S. (2015). New discourses but same old development approaches? Climate change adaptation policies, chronic food insecurity and development interventions in northwestern Nepal. Global Environmental Change, 35, 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.014
  • Nightingale, A. J. (2017). Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: Struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 84, 11–20.
  • Ojha, H. R., Ghimire, S., Pain, A., Nightingale, A., Khatri, D. B., & Dhungana, H. (2016). Policy without politics: Technocratic control of climate change adaptation policy making in Nepal. Climate Policy, 16(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775
  • Orsini, A. (2013). Multi-forum non-state actors: Navigating the regime complexes for forestry and genetic resources. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00182
  • Pasha, M., Ali, A., & Waheed, A. (2015). Sindh drought 2014—Pakistan: Was it a natural or a man-made disaster. American International Journal of Social Science Research, 1(1), 16–20.
  • Peters, K., & Mayhew, L. (2016). The securitization of climate change: A developmental perspective. In The securitization of foreign aid (pp. 212–236). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rasul, G. (2016). Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia. Environmental Development, 18, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.12.001
  • Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy, 9(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832235
  • Stock, R. (2021a). Deus ex mitigata: Denaturalizing the discursive power of Solar India. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space.
  • Stock, R. (2021b). Illuminant intersections: Injustice and inequality through electricity and water infrastructures at the Gujarat Solar Park in India. Energy Research & Social Science, 82, 102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102309
  • Stock, R. (2021c). Bright as night: Illuminating the antinomies of ‘gender positive’ solar development. World Development, 138, 105196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105196
  • Stock, R. (2022). Triggering resistance: Contesting the injustices of solar park development in India. Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102464.
  • Stock, R., & Birkenholtz, T. (2020). Photons vs. firewood: Female (dis)empowerment by solar power. Gender, Place & Culture.
  • Stock, R., & Birkenholtz, T. (2021). The sun and the scythe: Energy dispossessions and the agrarian question of labor in solar parks. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(5), 984–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1683002
  • Stock, R., Vij, S., & Ishtiaque, A. (2020). Powering and puzzling: Climate change adaptation policies in Bangladesh and India. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
  • Susskind, L., & Islam, S. (2012). Water diplomacy: Creating value and building trust in transboundary water negotiations. Science & Diplomacy, 1(3), 1–7.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 69, 253–274.
  • Tanner, T., & Allouche, J. (2011). Towards a new political economy of climate change and development. IDS Bulletin, 42(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00217.x
  • Tschakert, P., Das, P. J., Pradhan, N. S., Machado, M., Lamadrid, A., Buragohain, M., & Hazarika, M. A. (2016). Micropolitics in collective learning spaces for adaptive decision making. Global Environmental Change, 40, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.004
  • van der Steen, M., Chin-A-Fat, N., Vink, M., & van Twist, M. (2016). Puzzling, powering and perpetuating: Long-term decision-making by the Dutch Delta Committee. Futures, 76, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.01.001
  • Vij, S. (2019). Power interplay between actors in climate change adaptation policy-making in South Asia [Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University].
  • Vij, S., Biesbroek, R., Groot, A., Termeer, K., & Parajuli, B. P. (2019). Power interplay between actors: Using material and ideational resources to shape local adaptation plans of action (LAPAs) in Nepal. Climate Policy, 19(5), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1534723
  • Vij, S., Moors, E., Ahmad, B., Arfanuzzaman, M., Bhadwal, S., Biesbroek, R., … Saeed, B. A. (2017). Climate adaptation approaches and key policy characteristics: Cases from South Asia. Environmental Science & Policy, 78, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.007
  • Vij, S., Warner, J. F., Biesbroek, R., & Groot, A. (2020). Non-decisions are also decisions: Power interplay between Bangladesh and India over the Brahmaputra River. Water International, 45(4), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1554767
  • Vink, M. (2015). Navigating frames: A study of the interplay between meaning and power in policy deliberations over adaptation to climate change [Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University and Research].
  • Warner, J., & Boas, I. (2019). Securitization of climate change: How invoking global dangers for instrumental ends can backfire. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(8), 1471–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419834018
  • Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x
  • Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Smith, M. S., Park, S. E., Eakin, H. C., Van Garderen, E. A., & Campbell, B. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change, 28, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
  • Yenneti, K., & Day, R. (2015). Procedural (in)justice in the implementation of solar energy: The case of Charanaka solar park, Gujarat, India. Energy Policy, 86, 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.019
  • Zia, A., Hussain, M., & Hameed, K. (2017). Pakistan. In M. H. Glantz (editor) El Nino Ready Nations and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). A Report for US-AID and NOAA. Available for download at https://elninoreadynations.com/el-nino-ready-nations-enrns-and-disaster-risk-reduction-drr-report-executive-summary-2017/.
  • Zia, A., Hussain, M., & Hameed, K. (2022). Pakistan: Pakistan and the 2015–2016 El Niño Event. In El Niño ready nations and disaster risk reduction: 19 countries in perspective (pp. 63–73). Springer International Publishing.