The EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: implications on Brazilian energy intensive industries

References

• Antimiani, A., Costantini, V., Martini, C., Salvatici, L., & Tommasino, M. C. (2013). Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage. Energy Economics, 36, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d'après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción). Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund, 159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bajzik, J., Havranek, T., Irsova, Z., & Schwarz, J. (2020). Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias. Journal of International Economics, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellora, C., & Fontagné, L. (2022). EU in search of a WTO-compatible carbon border adjustment mechanism. Available at SSRN 4168049.
   Google Scholar
• BEN. (2022). Balanço Energético Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, A., & Vielle, M. (2008). GEMINI-E3, a general equilibrium model of international–national interactions between economy, energy and the environment. Computational Management Science, 5(3), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-007-0047-y
   Google Scholar
• Boden, T. A., Marland, G., & Andres, R. J. (2009). Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon dioxide information analysis center, Oak Ridge national laboratory, US department of energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Garcia-Muros, X., Cazcarro, I., & Arto, I. (2017). The efficiency cost of protective measures in climate policy. Energy Policy, 104, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Schneider, J., & Asane-Otoo, E. (2021). Trade in carbon and carbon tariffs. Environmental and Resource Economics, 78(4), 669–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00548-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branger, F., & Quirion, P. (2014). Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies. Ecological Economics, 99, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, J. C., & Rivers, N. (2017). The impacts of unilateral climate policy on competitiveness: evidence from computable general equilibrium models. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 24–42. http://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clora, F., Yu, W., & Corong, E. (2023). Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses: Aggregate and within-coalition results. Energy Policy, 174, 113454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 3–22. http://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadush, U. (2021). The EU’s carbon border Tax is likely to do more harm than good. Policy Brief, 21, 21.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, A. L. R., & Volpato, V. (2022). The role of the European Union in the Brazilian foreign policy: An analysis of the Brazil-European union strategic partnership. Revista Sul-Americana de Ciência Política, 8(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.15210/rsulacp.v8i1.21382
   Google Scholar
• DDP (2021). Policy lessons on deep decarbonization in large emerging economies. Deep decarbonization pathways (DDP) initiative-IDDRI. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• den Elzen, M. G. J., Dafnomilis, I., Forsell, N., Fragkos, P., Fragkiadakis, K., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Nascimento, L., Roelfsema, M., van Soest, H., & Sperling, F. (2022). Updated nationally determined contributions collectively raise ambition levels but need strengthening further to keep Paris goals within reach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 27(5), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-022-10008-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., & Marian, A. (2021). Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2021). A WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2021 towards a WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (2020/2043(INI)).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2022). EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: Implications for climate and competitiveness. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/698889/EPRS_BRI(2022)698889_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2018). Brazil-EU international trade in goods statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=BrazilEU__international_trade_in_goods_statistics#Most_traded_goods:_aircraft_and_associated_equipment.
   Google Scholar
• Favero, A., Sohngen, B., Huang, Y., & Jin, Y. (2018). Global cost estimates of forest climate mitigation with albedo: a new integrative policy approach. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 125002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeaa2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., Luck, P., Obstfeld, M., & Russ, K. N. (2018). In search of the Armington elasticity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feijó, F. T., & Kuik, O. (2018). Brazilian competitiveness of energy-intensive and trade-exposed industrial sectors vis-à-vis the adoption of border carbon adjustments by the EU: an approach using the GTAP-EP model. In Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 44th Brazilian Economics Meeting] (No. 100). ANPEC-Associaà § ã o Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduaà § ã o em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, S., & Giles, C. (2021). OECD seeks global plan for carbon prices to avoid trade wars. Financial Times, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Fouré, J., Guimbard, H., & Monjon, S. (2016). Border carbon adjustment and trade retaliation: What would be the cost for the European Union? Energy Economics, 54, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O’Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Peters, G. P., … Zaehle, S. (2019). Global carbon budget 2019. Earth System Science Data, 11(4), 1783–1838. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyson, C. L., & Jeffery, M. L. (2019). Ambiguity in the land use component of mitigation contributions toward the Paris Agreement goals. Earth's Future, 7(8), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaffa, R., Cunha, B. S., Cruz, T., Bezerra, P., Lucena, A. F., & Gurgel, A. C. (2021). Distributional effects of carbon pricing in Brazil under the Paris Agreement. Energy Economics, 101, 105396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grottera, C., Naspolini, G. F., La Rovere, E. L., Schmitz Gonçalves, D. N., Nogueira, T. d. F., Hebeda, O., Dubeux, C. B. S., Goes, G. V., Moreira, M. M. R., Mota da Cruz, G., Gesteira, C. J. M., Wills, W., Castro, G. M., D'Agosto, M. d. A., Le Treut, G., da Cunha, S. H. F., & Lefèvre, J. (2022). Energy policy implications of carbon pricing scenarios for the Brazilian NDC implementation. Energy Policy, 160, 112664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebeda, O., Guimarães, B. S., Cretton-Souza, G., La Rovere, E. L., & Pereira, A. O. (2023). Pathways for deep decarbonization of the Brazilian iron and steel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 401, 136675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D., Hepburn, C., & Ruta, G. (2012). Trade, climate change, and the political game theory of border carbon adjustments. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(2), 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keramidas, K., Fosse, F., Diaz Rincon, A., Dowling, P., Garaffa, R., Ordonez, J., … Weitzel, M. (2022). Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2022: Energy trade in a decarbonised world (No. JRC131864). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
   Google Scholar
• Köberle, A. C., Rochedo, P. R., Lucena, A. F., Szklo, A., & Schaeffer, R. (2020). Brazil’s emission trajectories in a well-below 2°C world: the role of disruptive technologies versus land-based mitigation in an already low-emission energy system. Climatic Change, 162(4), 1823–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02856-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rovere, E. L. (2017). Low-carbon development pathways in Brazil and ‘Climate Clubs’. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), e439. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., & Zhang, A. (2012). Will carbon motivated border tax adjustments function as a threat? Energy Policy, 47, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B., & Zhao, H. (2023). Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Evidence from China's futures market. Energy Policy, 177, 113573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magacho, G., Espagne, E., & Godin, A. (2023). Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries. Climate Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattoo, A., Subramanian, A., Van Der Mensbrugghe, D., & He, J. (2009). Reconciling climate change and trade policy. Center for Global Development Working Paper, 189.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, A. (2021). Brazil warns EU about discrimination in carbon tax plan. Valor International Business. November 2021. https://valorinternational.globo.com/business/news/2021/11/21/brazil-warns-eu-about-discrimination-in-carbon-tax-plan.ghtml.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, A., & Murakawa, F. (2021). Brazil’s steel more vulnerable to EU carbon tax. Valor International Business, Geneva, July 2021. https://valorinternational.globo.com/economy/news/2021/07/14/brazils-steel-more-vulnerable-to-eu-carbon-tax.ghtml.
   Google Scholar
• Moz-Christofoletti, M. A., & Pereda, P. C. (2021). Winners and losers: the distributional impacts of a carbon tax in Brazil. Ecological Economics, 183, 106945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overland, I., & Sabyrbekov, R. (2022). Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism? Energy Policy, 169, 113175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paroussos, L., Fragkos, P., Capros, P., & Fragkiadakis, K. (2015). Assessment of carbon leakage through the industry channel: the EU perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdana, S., & Tyers, R. (2020). Global climate change mitigation: strategic incentives. The Energy Journal, 41(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.3.sper
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2022). Making the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. Energy Policy, 170, 113245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2023). Carbon border adjustment mechanism in the transition to net-zero emissions: collective implementation and distributional impacts. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, S., Xu, Z., & Yang, Z. (2022). China's carbon allowance allocation strategy under the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: An integrated non-parametric cost frontier approach. Science of The Total Environment, 831, 154908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhl, K. J. (2008). The international elasticity puzzle. http://users.econ.umn.edu/~tkehoe/classesNew/Ruhl.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandrin, P., & Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2019). The EU seen from Brazil: Images and perceptions. Shaping the EU global strategy: Partners and perceptions, 27–54.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, L., Lucena, A. F., & Garaffa, R. (2019). Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry. Climate Policy, 19(9), 1102–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1627180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sognnaes, I., Gambhir, A., van de Ven, D.-J., Nikas, A., Anger-Kraavi, A., Bui, H., Campagnolo, L., Delpiazzo, E., Doukas, H., Giarola, S., Grant, N., Hawkes, A., Köberle, A. C., Kolpakov, A., Mittal, S., Moreno, J., Perdana, S., Rogelj, J., Vielle, M., & Peters, G. P. (2021). A multi-model analysis of long-term emissions and warming implications of current mitigation efforts. Nature Climate Change, 11(12), 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01206-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonter, L. J., Herrera, D., Barrett, D. J., Galford, G. L., Moran, C. J., & Soares-Filho, B. S. (2017). Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1013. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• South African Government. (2021). Joint statement issued at the conclusion of the 30th BASIC ministerial meeting on climate change hosted by India on 8th April 2021. https://www.gov.za/nr/speeches/joint-statementissued-conclusion-30th-basic-ministerial-meeting-climate-change-hosted.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2022). Brazil: Federal republic of Brazil intended nationally determined contribution - second revision. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/Updated%20-%20First%20NDC%20-%20%20FINAL%20-%20PDF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Venzke, I., & Vidigal, G. (2022). Are trade measures to tackle the climate crisis the End of differentiated responsibilities? The case of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper. 2022-02.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, A. J., von Randow, C., Rosan, T. M., Tejada, G., & Castro, A. A. (2022). Understanding the role of land-use emissions in achieving the Brazilian Nationally Determined Contribution to mitigate climate change. Climate Resilience and Sustainability, 1(1), e31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.31
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2017). The World Bank Data: Latin America and Caribbean. http://data.worldbank.org/region/latin-america-and-caribbean; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute. (2017). CAIT climate data explorer: historical emission. http://cait.wri.org/; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, K. M. (2003). Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? Journal of Political Economy, 111(1), 52–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/344805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2010). The US proposed carbon tariffs, WTO scrutiny and China’s responses. International Economics and Economic Policy, 7(2-3), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0166-8
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2022). Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy, 162, 112802. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar