A coordination failure between EU climate policies exemplified by the North Sea energy island

References

• Bayer, P., & Aklin, M. (2020). The European union emissions trading system reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8804–8812. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918128117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Kruse-Andersen, P. (2020). Endogenizing the cap in a cap-and-trade system: Assessing the agreement on EU ETS phase 4. Environ Resource Econ, 77(4), 781–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00518-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. R., Kruse-Andersen, P., & Stewart, L. (2023). Carbon leakage in a small open economy: The importance of international climate policies. Energy Economics, 117, 106447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlén, B., Dahlqvist, A., Mandell, S., & Marklund, P. (2019). EU ETS emissions under the cancellation mechanism – effects of national measures. Energy Policy, 129, 816–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Energy Agency (2021). Analyseforudsætninger til energinet. Retrieved June 28, 2022, https://ens.dk/en.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Energy Agency (2022a). Global afrapportering. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://ens.dk/en.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Energy Agency (2022b). Klimastatus og – fremskrivning 2021 (KF22): Ramses modellen. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://ens.dk/en.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities (2018). Energiaftale. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://en.kefm.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities (2020). Klimaaftale for energi og industri mv. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://en.kefm.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities (2021). Verdens første energiø etableres 80 km ude i Nordsøen. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://en.kefm.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Finance (2021). Aftale mellem regeringen og Socialistisk Folkeparti, Radikale Venstre, Enhedslisten, Alternativet og Kristendemokraterne om: Finansloven for 2022 (December 6, 2021). Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://en.fm.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., Nachtigall, D., & Venmans, F. (2023). The joint impact of the European union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, Article 102758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energinet (2017). Tre TSO'er underskriver aftale om North Sea Wind Hub. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://en.energinet.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• EU (2023). Directive (EU) 2023/959 of the European parliament and of the council of 10 may 2023 amending directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the union and decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment. Official Journal of the European Union, L 130, 134.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018). A clean planet for all: A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020). Stepping up Europe's 2030 climate ambition: Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021). European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2023). Offshore renewable energy. Retrieved January 30, 2023. https://energy.ec.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Fell, H. (2016). Comparing policies to confront permit over-allocation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 80, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlagh, R., Heijmans, R., & Rosendahl, K. (2021). An endogenous emissions cap produces a Green Paradox. Economic Policy, 36(107), 485–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiab011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2021). Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), Article 043004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarke, J., & Perino, G. (2017). Do renewable energy policies reduce carbon emissions? On caps and inter-industry leakage. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 84, 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse-Andersen, P. K., & Sørensen, P. B. (2022). Optimal carbon taxation in EU frontrunner countries: Coordinating with the EU ETS and addressing leakage. Climate Policy, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2145259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North Sea Energy Island (2022). Ørsted + ATP will work with GlobalConnect to make the North Sea Energy Island a digital hub. Retrieved June 28, 2022. https://northseaenergyisland.dk/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio, S., Tietjen, O., Pahle, M., Pietzcker, R., & Edenhofer, O. (2021). Reviewing the Market Stability Reserve in light of more ambitious EU ETS emission targets. Energy Policy, 158, Article 112530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahle, M., Günther, C., Osorio, S., & Quemin, S. (2023). The Emerging Endgame: The EU ETS on the road towards climate neutrality. working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Perino, G. (2018). New EU ETS phase 4 rules temporarily puncture waterbed. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0120-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perino, G., Ritz, R. A., & Van Benthem, A. (2022). Overlapping climate policies. NBER Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2016). Procrastinate reform: The impact of the market stability reserve on the EU ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 80, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2017). EU-ETS phase IV: allowance prices, design choices and the market stability reserve. Climate Policy, 17(7), 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1360173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quemin, S., & Trotignon, R. (2019). Intertemporal emissions trading and market design: An application to the EU ETS. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper 316.
   Google Scholar
• Richstein, J. C., Chappin, É. J., & de Vries, L. J. (2015). The market (in-) stability reserve for eu carbon emission trading: Why it might fail and how to improve it. Utilities Policy, 35, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbye, F., & Sørensen, P. (2019). National climate policies and the European emissions trading system towards a more efficient European carbon market. Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2019, 63–101.
   Google Scholar
• Silbye, F., & Sørensen, P. (2023). National climate targets under ambitious EU climate policy. Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2023, 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sinn, H.-W. (2008). Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(4), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Government (2022). Danmark kan mere II. Retrieved September 17, 2023. https://en.fm.dk/.
   Google Scholar
• Tosatto, A., Beseler, X. M., Østergaard, J., Pinson, P., & Chatzivasileiadis, S. (2022). North Sea energy Islands: Impact on national markets and grids. Energy Policy, 167, Article 112907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar