190
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Regional economic impacts of the Los Angeles 100% renewable energy transition

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 660-675 | Received 23 May 2022, Accepted 20 Nov 2023, Published online: 11 Dec 2023

References

  • Barbose, G., Wiser, R., Heeter, J., Mai, T., Bird, L., Bolinger, M., Carpenter, A., Heath, G., Keyser, D., Macknick, J., Mills, A., & Millstein, D. (2016). A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of U.S. Renewable Portfolio Standards. Energy Policy, 96, 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.035
  • Breyer, C., Khalili, S., Bogdanov, D., Ram, M., Oyewo, A. S., Aghahosseini, A., Gulagi, A., Solomon, A. A., Keiner, D., Lopez, G., & Østergaard, P. A. (2022). On the history and future of 100% RenewableEnergy systems research. IEEE Access, 10, 78176–78218. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193402
  • Cochran, J., & Denholm, P. eds. (2021). The Los Angeles 100% renewable energy study. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-79444. https://maps.nrel.gov/la100/.
  • Coon, R. C., Hodur, N. M., Bangsund, D. A., & Lim, S. H. (2015). Contributions of renewable energy industries to the local economy in North Dakota. Great Plains Research, 25(1), 1–12. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/578432#info_wrap.
  • Cutler, H., & Shields, M. (2018). Estimating the economic impact of potential wholesale price increases in the platte river power authority service area. Platte River Power Authority.
  • Cutler, H., Shields, M., & Davies, S. (2018). Can state Tax policy increase economic activity and reduce inequality? Growth and Change, 49(1), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12216
  • DeShazo, J. R. (2017). Community choice aggregation, impacts to California's grid. University of California, Los Angeles luskin center for innovation. Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved 01-13-2023 from https://innovation.luskin.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The_Promises_and_Challenges_of_Community_Choice_Aggregation_in_CA.pdf.
  • DOE. (2023). U.S. Energy and Employment Jobs Report (USEER). Available at: https://www.energy.gov/policy/us-energy-employment-jobs-report-useer.
  • Furnaro, A., & Kay, K. (2021). Phasing out fossil fuel infrastructure in Los Angeles: Challenges for a just transition. University of California. https://www.ioes.ucla.edu/project/phasing-out-fossil-fuel-infrastructures-in-thecity-of-los-angeles-challenges-for-a-just-transition/.
  • Hannum, C., Cutler, H., Iverson, T., & Keyser, D. (2017). Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The case of Colorado. Energy and Policy, 102, 500–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.046
  • He, Y. X., Zhang, S. L., Yang, L. Y., Wang, Y. J., & Wang, J. (2010). Economic analysis of coal price–electricity price adjustment in China based on the CGE model. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6629–6637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.033
  • IMPLAN® Model. (2021). IMPLAN System (data and software), www.IMPLAN.com.
  • Jacobson, M. Z., Cameron, M. A., Hennessy, E. M., Petkov, I., Meyer, C. B., Gambhir, T. K., Maki, A. T., Pfleeger, K., Clonts, H., McEvoy, A. L., Miccioli, M. L., von Krauland, A.-K., Fang, R. W., & Delucchi, M. A. (2018). 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) All-sector energy roadmaps for 53 towns and cities in North America. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.031
  • Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Ingraffea, A. R., Howarth, R. W., Bazouin, G., Bridgeland, B., Burkart, K., Chang, M., Chowdhury, N., Cook, R., & Escher, G. (2014). A roadmap for repowering California for All purposes with wind, water, and sunlight. Energy, 73, 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.099
  • Jacobson, M. Z., von Krauland, A.-K., Burton, Z. F. M., Coughlin, S. J., Jaeggli, C., Nelli, D., Nelson, A. J. H., Shu, Y., Smith, M., Tan, C., Wood, C. D., & Wood, K. D. (2020). Transitioning All energy in 74 metropolitan areas, including 30 megacities, to 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight. Energies, 13(18), 4934. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184934
  • Jacobson, M. Z., von Krauland, A.-K., Coughlin, S. J., Palmer, F. C., & Smith, M. M. (2022). Zero Air pollution and zero carbon from All energy at Low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage. Renewable Energy, 184, 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.067
  • Jenniches, S. (2018). Assessing the regional economic impacts of renewable energy sources – A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.008
  • Jeon, H., Hartman, B., Cutler, H., Hill, R., Hu, Y., Lu, T., Shields, M., & Turner, D. (2022). Estimating the economic impacts of improved wind speed forecasts in the United States electricity sector. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 14(3), 036101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0081905
  • Kennedy, S. F., & Rosen, B. (2020). The rise of community choice aggregation and its implications for California’s energy transition: A preliminary assessment. Energy and Environment, 32(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X20927381
  • Keyser, D., Cutler, H., Rose, A., Wei, D., & Shields, M. (2021). Chapter 11: Economic impacts and jobs. In J. Cochran, & P. Denholm (Eds.), The Los Angeles 100% renewable energy study. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-79444-11.
  • Li, J. F., Wang, X., Zhang, Y. X., & Kou, Q. (2014). The economic impact of carbon pricing with regulated electricity prices in China-an application of a computable general equilibrium approach. Energy Policy, 75, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.021
  • Los Angeles Daily News. (2021). Council votes for 100% renewable LADWP energy by 2035, a decade sooner than planned. September 1, 2021. Available at: https://www.dailynews.com/2021/09/01/la-votes-for-100-renewable-energy-by-2035-a-decade-sooner-than-planned/.
  • Mamkhezri, J., Malczynski, L. A., & Chermak, J. M. (2021). Assessing the economic and environmental impacts of alternative renewable portfolio standards: Winners and losers. Energies, 14(11), 3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113319
  • Matsumoto, K. I., & Fujimori, S. (2019). CGE models in energy economics. Routledge Handbook of Energy Economics, 433-445.
  • McManamay, R. A., DeRolph, C. R., Surendran Nair, S., & Dumas-Allen, M. (2019). Spatially explicit land-energy-water future scenarios for cities: Guiding infrastructure transitions for urban sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 880–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.011
  • Miller, S., Wei, D., & Rose, A. (2010a). The macroeconomic impact of the Michigan climate action council climate action plan on the state’s economy. Report to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.
  • Miller, S., Wei, D., & Rose, A. (2010b). The macroeconomic impact of the Wisconsin clean energy jobs Act on the state’s economy. Report to Wisconsin Public Service Commission.
  • Muro, M., Tomer, A., Shivaram, R., & Kane, J. (2019). Advancing Inclusion through Clean Energy Jobs. Brookings Institution Research Report, Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/advancing-inclusion-through-clean-energy-jobs/.
  • National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). (2021). State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals. Retrieved from: https://www.ncsl.org/energy/2021-legislative-energy-trends.
  • Neito, P., Saavedra, O., & Oliveira, D. (2020). The effect of complementarity between solar, wind and tidal energy in isolated hybrid microgrids. Renewable Energy, 147(1), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.134
  • Nicholson, S., David, K., Marissa, W., Greg, A., & Garvin, H. (2021). Chapter 8: Greenhouse Gas emissions. In J. Cochran, & P. Denholm (Eds.), The Los Angeles 100% renewable energy study. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
  • NREL. (2021a). Resource Planning Model. https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/models-rpm.html.
  • NREL. (2021b). Distributed Generation Market Demand Model. https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/dgen/.
  • NREL. (2021c). JEDI: Jobs & Economic Development Impact Models. https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/jedi/.
  • O'Shaughnessy, E., Heeter, J., Gattaciecca, J., Sauer, J., Trumbull, K., & Chen, E. (2019). Empowered communities: The rise of community choice aggregation in the United States. Energy Policy, 132, 1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.07.001
  • Rose, A., & Wei, D. (2012). Macroeconomic impacts of the Florida energy and climate change action plan. Climate Policy, 12(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.579257
  • Rose, A., Wei, D., & Dormady, N. (2011). Regional macroeconomic assessment of the Pennsylvania climate action plan. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 3(4), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2011.01048.x
  • Rose, A., Wei, D., & Prager, F. (2012). Distributional impacts of greenhouse Gas emissions trading: Alternative allocation and recycling strategies in California. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(4), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00296.x
  • Shindell, D., & Smith, C. J. (2019). Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels. Nature, 573(7774), 408–411. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1554-z
  • Wei, D., & Rose, A. (2011). The macroeconomic impact of the New York climate action plan: A screening analysis. Report to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
  • Wei, D., & Rose, A. (2014). Macroeconomic impacts of the California global warming solutions Act on the southern California economy. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 3(2), 101–118.
  • Wiser, R., Mai, T., Millstein, D., Barbose, G., Bird, L., Heeter, J., Keyser, D., Krishnan, V., & Macknick, J. (2017). Assessing the costs and benefits of US renewable portfolio standards. Environmental Research Letters, 12(9), 094023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa87bd
  • Yin, J., Yan, Q., Lei, K., Baležentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Economic and efficiency analysis of China electricity market reform using computable general equilibrium model. Sustainability, 11(2), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020350

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.