Implementing New Practice: The Roles of Translation, Progression and Reflection

References

• Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (2001). Empowerment: The emperor’s new clothes. In J. Henry (Ed.), Creative management (pp. 195–202). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubry, M., & Lenfle, S. (2012). Projectification: Midler's footprint in the project management field. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 680–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211268997
   Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., Hope Hailey, V., & Gustafsson, S. (2015). Exploring strategic change. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1573–1601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Resolving the tension between theories E and O of change. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 1–34). Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benders, J., Nijholt, J., & Heusinkveld, S. (2007). Using print media indicators in management fashion research. Quality & Quantity, 41(6), 815–829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9027-5
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, I., Gunnarson, S., & Räisänen, C. (2013). Decoupling and standardization in the projectification of a company. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291053
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S., Gibson, J., McBride, A., & Munros Team. (2020). Opportunities for, and implications of, skill mix changes in health care pathways: Pay, productivity and practice variations in a need-based planning framework. Social Science & Medicine, 250, 112863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børve, H., & Kvande, E. (2012). The Nordic model in a global company situated in Norway. Challenging institutional orders? Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2(4), 117–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v2i4.2307
   Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in translation: The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 939–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D., Fitzgerald, L., Ketley, D., Gollop, R., Jones, J. L., Lamont, S. S., Neath, A., & Whitby, E. (2005). No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00111.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnes, B., & Jackson, P. (2011). Success and failure in organizational change: An exploration of the role of values. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), 133–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2010.524655
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., & Lee, B. (2017). Understanding translation work: The evolving interpretation of a trade union idea. Organization Studies, 38, 1085–1106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616670435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: Pyramids or anthills? Organization Studies, 30, 423–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609102282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (Eds.). (1996). Translating organizational change. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (2005). Translation is a vehicle, imitation its motor, and fashion sits at the wheel. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy (pp. 7–12). Liber and Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, N., Müllern, T., Andersson, T., Gadolin, C., Tengblad, S., & Ujvari, S. (2016). Involvement drivers: A study of nurses and physicians in improvement work. Quality Management in Healthcare, 25(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exworthy, M., Gabe, J., Jones, I. R., & Smith, G. (2019). Professional autonomy and surveillance: The case of public reporting in cardiac surgery. Sociology of Health and Illness, 41(6), 1040–1055. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Alles, M. D. L. L., & Llamas-Sánchez, R. (2008). The neo-institutional analysis of change in public services. Journal of Change Management, 8(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010801937416
   Google Scholar
• Finne, H., Levin, M., & Nilssen, T. (1995). Trailing research: A model for useful program evaluation. Evaluation, 1(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909500100102
   Google Scholar
• Fred, M. (2015). Projectification in Swedish municipalities. A case of porous organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 19, 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Fred, M. (2019). Local government projectification in practice – a multiple institutional logic perspective. Local Government Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–55). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. North Eastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gondo, M. B., & Amis, J. M. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiette, A., & Vandenbempt, K. (2017). Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, B. (2007). Work organization and ‘the Scandinavian model’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 28(4), 650–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X07082218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In R. Sanders & K. Fitch (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–146). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T., Hendrup, H., & Schäffner, B. (2015). Sensing the momentum: A process view of change in a multinational corporation. Journal of Change Management, 15(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2015.1018304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, R. (1996). Dignity in the workplace under participative management: Alienation and freedom revisited. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 719–738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2096450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, s1277–s1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (11th ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2010). Employee-driven innovation: Extending the license to foster innovation. Management Decision, 48, 65–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011014463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73, 59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, P., & Currie, G. (2012). Eclipsing adaptation: The translation of the US MBA model in China. Management Learning, 43(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611426533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamertz, K., & Heugens, P. M. (2009). Institutional translation through spectatorship: Collective consumption and editing of symbolic organizational texts by firms and their audiences. Organization Studies, 30(11), 1249–1279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609337935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method. Mess in social science research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leppitt, N. (2006). Challenging the code of change: Part 1. Praxis does not make perfect. Journal of Change Management, 6(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010600683104
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Liguori, M. (2012). The supremacy of the sequence: Key elements and dimensions in the process of change. Organization Studies, 33(4), 507–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillrank, P. (1995). The transfer of management innovations from Japan. Organization Studies, 16(6), 971–989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren, K., & Poulsen, B. (2013). Project management in the Danish central government. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 17, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen, S., & Tingvold, L. (2015). Utvikling av lokalmedisinske sentra (LMS) som interkommunal idéhandteringsprosess. Nordiske Organisasjons-Studier, 17, 62–82.
   Google Scholar
• Maholtra, N., & Hinings, C. R. (2015). Unpacking continuity and change as a process of organizational transformation. Long Range Planning, 48(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: An outline of normalization process theory. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509103208
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. B., & Stensaker, I. G. (2006). Developing capacity for change. Journal of Change Management, 6(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010600693731
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T., & Lancaster, Z. (2006). Translating management ideas. Organization Studies, 27(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605057667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, F., & Whittle, A. (2011). Translating management ideas: A discursive devices analysis. Organization Studies, 32(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., Mathiassen, L., & Newell, S. (2014). Theorization and translation in information technology institutionalization: Evidence from Danish home care. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, S., Hovmark, S., & Zika-Viktorsson, A. (2004). Perceived time pressure and social processes in project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 463–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Øhrn, H. I., & Torvbråten, H. (2015). Arbeidstidsplanlegging. Arbeidsplan og turnusordninger. Kommuneforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, O. E., & Lindøe, P. (2004). Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(4), 371–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øygarden, O., & Mikkelsen, A. (2020). Readiness for change and good translations. Journal of Change Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1720775
   Google Scholar
• Pipan, T., & Czarniawska, B. (2010). How to construct an actor-network: Management accounting from idea to practice. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(3), 243–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. A. (2001). Public reflection as the basis of learning. Management Learning, 32(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507601321002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner: Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organisational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–92). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (2002). Carriers, flows and sources of management knowledge. In K. Sahlin-Andersson & L. Engwall (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources (pp. 3–32). Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Söderholm, A. (2002). The Scandinavian school of project studies. In K. Sahlin-Andersson & A. Söderholm (Eds.), Beyond project management. New perspectives on the temporary – permanent dilemma (pp. 11–24). Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1366–1386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebode, D., Jeanrenaud, S., & Bessant, J. (2012). Managing innovation for sustainability. R & D Management, 42(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. E. (2002). Implementing organizational change: Correlates of success and failure. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15, 67–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2002.tb00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Snell-Hornby, M. (2006). The turns of translation studies: New paradigms or shifting viewpoints? John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stace, D. A., & Dunphy, D. C., (1991). Beyond traditional paternalistic and developmental approaches to organizational change and human resource strategies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2, 263–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199100000068
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2013). Introduction. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 1–8). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., & Strang, D. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of management ideas. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G., & Jensen, R. (2006). Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 937–957. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. J. (2016). Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organization Science, 27(2), 304–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teulier, R., & Rouleau, L. (2013). Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 308–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2013.822674
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, F. J., Ferguson, J. E., & Groenewegen, P. (2016). Speedy delivery versus long-term objectives: How time pressure affects coordination between temporary projects and permanent organizations. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 661–673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2000). Emergent change as a universal in organizations. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 223–242). Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westrup, U. (2013). Internal entrepreneurship in the public sector: The challenges of integrating innovative project into the regular organization. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 16, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A., & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). Translation theory ‘translated’: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 236–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A., & Sataøen, H. L. (2014). Trapped in conformity? Translating reputation management into practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(2), 242–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar