Innovation and Change from A Multi-level Paradoxical Perspective in a Highly Formalized Organization

References

• Abrantes, A. C. M., Passos, A. M., Cunha, M. P. e., & Silva, S. A. da. (2023). Looking at team improvised adaptation through a paradoxical lens: The role of team plasticity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59(1), 88–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863211037441
   Google Scholar
• Adler, U., & Brietenacher, M. (2019). Production, organization and technological change: The German clothing industry in international competition. In Rethinking global production (pp. 131–155). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A. B., & Cheng, Z. (2018). The role of change content, context, process, and leadership in understanding employees’ commitment to change: The case of public organizations in Kurdistan region of Iraq. Public Personnel Management, 47(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017753645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Harazneh, Y. M., & Sila, I. (2021). The impact of E-HRM usage on HRM effectiveness. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(2), 118–147. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.2021030107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M. (2021). Imitation or innovation: To what extent do exploitative learning and exploratory learning foster imitation strategy and innovation strategy for sustained competitive advantage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, G. (2020). Qualitative research. In Handbook for research students in the social sciences (pp. 177–189). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alshwayat, D., Elrehail, H., Shehadeh, E., Alsalhi, N., Shamout, M. D., & Rehman, S. U. (2023). An exploratory examination of the barriers to innovation and change as perceived by senior management. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Alshwayat, D., MacVaugh, J. A., & Akbar, H. (2021). A multi-level perspective on trust, collaboration and knowledge sharing cultures in a highly formalized organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2220–2244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2020-0354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2019). Technological revolution, sustainability, and development in Africa: Overview, emerging issues, and challenges. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Hinson, R. E. (2019). Contextual influences on new technology ventures: A study of domestic firms in Ghana. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarantou, V., Kazakopoulou, S., Chatzoudes, D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2018). Resistance to change: An empirical investigation of its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 426–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2017-0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. W., Lervik-Olsen, L., Snyder, H., Van Riel, A. C., Sweeney, J. C., & Van Vaerenbergh, Y. (2018). Business model innovation and value-creation: The triadic way. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2018-0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anfinsen, M. (2021). Between stability and change: Tensions in the Norwegian electric mobility transition. Social Studies of Science, 51(6), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211022842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anning-Dorson, T., & Nyamekye, M. B. (2020). Be flexible: Turning innovativeness into a competitive advantage in hospitality firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(2), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Anwar, S. (2016). A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1127744. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, T., Chreim, S., & Grudniewicz, A. (2020). Examining health care providers’ and middle-level managers’ readiness for change: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4897-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., & Tapanainen, T. (2020). Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barras, R. (1986). Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy, 15(4), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batistič, S., Černe, M., & Vogel, B. (2017). Just how multi-level is leadership research? A document co-citation analysis 1980–2013 on leadership constructs and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, M., & Simpson, A. V. (2021). The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 252–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledow, R., Frese, M., Erez, M., Anderson, N., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocken, N. M., & Geradts, T. H. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition. Currency/Doubleday: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. (2020). Paradoxes of professionalism: Rethinking civil-military relations in the United States. International Security, 44(4), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buick, F., Blackman, D., & Johnson, S. (2018). Enabling middle managers as change agents: Why organisational support needs to change. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 1–18). Ballinger Publishing Co/Harper & Row Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-98020-001
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnall, C. (2018). Managing change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: Influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centauri, F., Mazzocato, P., Villa, S., & Marsilio, M. (2018). System-wide lean implementation in health care: A multiple case study. Health Services Management Research, 31(2), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484818768226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, S., & Rubery, J. (2019). Why Do established practices deinstitutionalize? An actor-centred approach. British Journal of Management, 30(3), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Dartington, T. (2004). The vanishing organisation: organisational containment in a networked world. In C. Huffington, & D. Armstrong (Eds.), Working below the surface (pp. 127–150). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, M. P., & Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dameron, S., & Torset, C. (2014). The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: Towards a paradox lens on strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, R. (2021). Circular economy and paradox theory: A business model perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFillipi, R., Grabher, G., & Jones, C. (2007). Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, S. (2017). The safety anarchist: Relying on human expertise and innovation, reducing bureaucracy and compliance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrow, S. R., Smith, W. K., & Posner, M. A. (2011). Managing the grading paradox: Leveraging the power of choice in the classroom. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.10.2.zqr261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2011). Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation. Journal of Knowledge management, 15(6), 890–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153. https://doi.org/10.2307/256994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey, R., Altay, N., & Blome, C. (2019). Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2676-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T. (2019). Reflections: Return paradox to the wild? Paradox interventions and their implications. Journal of Change Management, 19(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1552505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2019). An integrative methodology for organizational oppositions: Aligning grounded theory and discourse analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 917–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118776771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Pellicelli, A. C. (2020). “Openness” of public governments in smart cities: Removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(4), 1259–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00651-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2003). Entrepreneurship, creativity, and regional economic growth. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610134.003
   Google Scholar
• Fountaine, T., McCarthy, B., & Saleh, T. (2019). Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard Business Review, 97(4), 62–73. https://hbr.org/2019/07/building-the-ai-powered-organization
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G. (2012). PERSPECTIVE—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (2015). Formal measures in informal management: Can a balanced scorecard change a culture? American Economic Review, 105(5), 447–451. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., Dunlop, P. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2019). Managing formalization to increase global team effectiveness and meaningfulness of work in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(6), 1021–1052. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00226-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerde, S., & Alvesson, M. (2020). Sandwiched: Exploring role and identity of middle managers in the genuine middle. Human Relations, 73(1), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Holcomb, M., & Bozkurt, S. (2019). Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience: A multidisciplinary literature review. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-10-2017-0259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of Psychology, 147(5), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.710663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J., & Moodysson, J. (2019). Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy, 48(4), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groysberg, B., Lee, J., Price, J., & Cheng, J. (2018). The leader’s guide to corporate culture. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgin, D. S., Glynn, M. A., & Rockwell, D. (2018). Organizational actorhood and the management of paradox: A visual analysis. Organization Studies, 39(5-6), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618765008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg, J., & Johansson, G. (2020). The importance of local context in multidivisional organizations: Prospective sensemaking in an ambiguous change process guided by an envisioned future.
   Google Scholar
• Halofsky, J. E., Andrews-Key, S. A., Edwards, J. E., Johnston, M. H., Nelson, H. W., Peterson, D. L., … Williamson, T. B. (2018). Adapting forest management to climate change: The state of science and applications in Canada and the United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 421, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, C. B. (1994). The age of paradox. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, B. (2019). Confronting the crisis of confidence in management studies: Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad example. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(2), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau, Y. S., Kim, B., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. G. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, P., Kraus, J., Babel, F., Walch, M., Rukzio, E., & Baumann, M. (2018, September). How to design valid simulator studies for investigating user experience in automated driving: review and hands-on considerations. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 105–117).
   Google Scholar
• Holbeche, L. (2018). The agile organization: How to build an engaged, innovative and resilient business. Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge management, 14(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Thoroughgood, C. N., Myer, A. T., & Ligon, G. S. (2011). Paradoxes of leading innovative endeavors: Summary, solutions, and future directions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illanes, P., Lund, S., Mourshed, M., Rutherford, S., & Tyreman, M. (2018). Retraining and reskilling workers in the age of automation. McKinsey Global Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jakšič, M., & Marinč, M. (2019). Relationship banking and information technology: The role of artificial intelligence and FinTech. Risk Management, 21(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-018-0039-y
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2020). Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J., Loewenstein, J., & Yan, J. (2017). Culture, conditions and paradoxical frames. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Königstorfer, F., & Thalmann, S. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence in commercial banks – A research agenda for behavioral finance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard business press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. (2020). New perspectives on business model innovations in emerging markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(5), 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00713-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapan, M. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning hands-on: Apply modern RL methods, with deep Q-networks, value iteration, policy gradients, TRPO, AlphaGo Zero and more. Packt Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C., Shiue, Y. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2016). Examining the impacts of organizational culture and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process improvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Roh, T. (2020). Proactive divestiture and business innovation: R&D input and output performance. Sustainability, 12(9), 3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/259204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., & Dehler, G. E. (2000). Learning through paradox: A pedagogical strategy for exploring contradictions and complexity. Journal of Management Education, 24(6), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290002400604
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314522322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Brown, D. A., & Sutton, N. C. (2019). Control and empowerment as an organising paradox: Implications for management control systems. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(2), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2017-3223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, S., Sassetti, S., & Cavaliere, V. (2019). Linking employees’ affective commitment and knowledge sharing for an increased customer orientation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(11), 4293–4312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2018-0261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamédio, D. F., Cunha, M. P. e., & Meyer, Jr, V. (2022). Strategic improvisation: An introductory conceptual framework. Cross-Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2021-0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maon, F., Vanhamme, J., De Roeck, K., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2019). The dark side of stakeholder reactions to corporate social responsibility: Tensions and micro-level undesirable outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashahadi, F., Ahmad, N. H., & Mohamad, O. (2016). Market orientation and innovation ambidexterity: A synthesized model for internationally operated herbal-based small and medium enterprises (HbSMEs). Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30105-8
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. E., Li, C., & Schotter, A. P. (2020). Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 538–576. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00318-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moliterno, T. P., & Mahony, D. M. (2011). Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management, 37(2), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310371692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneva, J. M., & Hernández-Pajares, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility performance and sustainability reporting in SMEs: An analysis of owner-managers perceptions. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 10(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2018.095268
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. (2015). Formal and informal practices of knowledge sharing between project teams and enacted cultural characteristics. Project Management Journal, 46(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In F. J. Yammarino, & F. Dan- sereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: Volume IV (pp. 11–74). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Muthinja, M. M., & Chipeta, C. (2018). What drives financial innovations in Kenya’s commercial banks? An empirical study on firm and macro-level drivers of branchless banking. Journal of African Business, 19(3), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2017.1405705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadiv, R., & Kuna, S. (2020). Diversity management as navigation through organizational paradoxes. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 39(4), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-12-2018-0236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, G., & Suresh, D. N. (2018). Challenges of creating sustainable agri-retail supply chains. IIMB Management Review, 30(3), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi, M. M., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International Business Review, 27(3), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasution, H. N., Mavondo, F. T., Matanda, M. J., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2011). Entrepreneurship: Its relationship with market orientation and learning orientation and as antecedents to innovation and customer value. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomaguchi, K., & Milkie, M. A. (2020). Parenthood and well-being: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Buchanan, D. A. (2017). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach. McGraw-Hill Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Perlow, L. A., & Repenning, N. P. (2009). The dynamics of silencing conflict. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2018). A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgorodnichenko, N., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2020). The role of HRM in developing sustainable organizations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remneland Wikhamn, B. (2020). Open innovation change agents in large firms: How open innovation is enacted in paradoxical settings. R&D Management, 50(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salam, M. A. (2017). The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between technology, trust and operational performance: An empirical investigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2015-0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu, S., & Kulik, C. T. (2019). Shaping and being shaped: How organizational structure and managerial discretion co-evolve in new managerial roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(3), 619–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218778018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarı, S. A., Bilek, G., & Çelik, E. (2018). Test anxiety and self-esteem in senior high school students: A cross-sectional study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 72(2), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2017.1389986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, J., & Smith, W. K. (2019). Addressing grand challenges’ paradoxes: Leadership skills to manage inconsistencies. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(4), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2016). Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: Antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge management, 20(6), 1199–1224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2016-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., Leung, T. Y., Kingshott, R. P., Davcik, N. S., & Cardinali, S. (2020). Managing uncertainty during a global pandemic: An international business perspective. Journal of Business Research, 116, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, J., & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: Some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 3003–3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., Erez, W., Jarvenpaa, M., Lewis, S., & & Tracey, M. W. (2017). Adding complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change: Introduction to organization studies special issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617693560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiber, A., & Alänge, S. (2013). A corporate system for continuous innovation: The case of Google Inc. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061311324566
   Google Scholar
• Tian, M., Deng, P., Zhang, Y., & Salmador, M. P. (2018). How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review. Management Decision, 56(5), 1088–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Innovation management challenges: From fads to fundamentals. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(05), 1840007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618400078
   Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Trott, P. (2008). Innovation management and new product development. Pearson education.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bommel, K. (2018). Managing tensions in sustainable business models: Exploring instrumental and integrative strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Rest, J. P., Roper, A., & Wang, X. L. (2018). Why is a change of company pricing policy so hard to implement? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venus, M., Stam, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Visions of change as visions of continuity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlie, B. (2019). Bearing worlds: Learning to live-with climate change. Environmental Education Research, 25(5), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1637823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. A., Putnam, L. L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Siegel, D. (2019). The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Vu, T., Freeman, S., & Donohue, R. (2021). Becoming competent expatriate managers: Embracing paradoxes in international management. Human Resource Management Review, 100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100851
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiblen, S., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Connecting ‘talent’ meanings and multi-level context: A discursive approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), 474–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1629988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, Jr, D. E., & Williams, C. K. (2020). Recent advances and opportunities for improving critical realism-based case study research in IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(1), 50–89. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F. X. (2017). Effects of restaurant satisfaction and knowledge sharing motivation on eWOM intentions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 41(1), 93–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348013515918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, A., & Wells, R. (2018). Barriers for implementation of successful change to prevent musculoskeletal disorders and how to systematically address them. Applied Ergonomics, 73, 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., Wang, Y., Li, T., & Lin, C. (2022). Do top management teams’ expectations and support drive management innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Journal of Business Research, 142, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. A., Men, L. R., & Ferguson, M. A. (2019). Bridging transformational leadership, transparent communication, and employee openness to change: The mediating role of trust. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar