Acting Strategically During Change: A Process and Dwelling World-view Approach

References

• Balogun, J., Bartunek, J. M., & Do, B. (2015). Senior managers’ sense making and responses to strategic change. Organization Science, 26(4), 960–979. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1573–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojovic, N., Sabatier, V., & Coblence, E. (2020). Becoming through doing: How experimental spaces enable organizational identity work. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019864673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D., & Toyoki, S. (2013). Identity work and legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(7), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruskin, S. (2019). A drifting phenomenon: organizational change failure in a becoming view. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(6), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2018-0310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. A., Floyd, S. W., Laamanen, T., Mantere, S., Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2018). Strategy processes and practices: Dialogues and intersections. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• By, R. T., Hughes, M., & Ford, J. (2016). Change leadership: Oxymoron and myths. Journal of Change Management, 16(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2016.1137425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• By, R. T., Kuipers, B., & Procter, S. (2018). Understanding teams in order to understand organizational change: The OTIC model of organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1433742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, R., & Holt, R. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27(5), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, R., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, R., & MacKay, B. (2007). Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations, 60(1), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, R., & Rasche, A. (2015). Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: Building and dwelling worldviews. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 44–57). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Carter, C., Kornberger, M., & Schweitzer, J. (2011). Strategy. Theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Metz, N. (2021). Organisational identity and legitimacy dynamics during a strategic change process: A case study at a South African Business School [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa]. UnisaETD: Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://hdl.handle.net/10500/28201.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground: Phronesis and techne in modern philosophy and Aristotle. University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, R., & Mcguire, J. (2005). Legitimating Agencies in the Face of Selection: The Case of AACSB. Organisation Studies, 26(2), 165–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floersch, J., Longhofer, J. L., Kranke, D., & Townsend, L. (2010). Integrating thematic, grounded theory and narrative analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 9(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010362330
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can success again. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Fabbri, T. (2002). Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(6), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210449532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Nag, R., & Corley, K. G. (2012). Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching major organisational change. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(4), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492612447229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Patvardhan, S. D. (2012). Identity as process and flow. In M. Schultz, S. Maguire, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Constructing identity in and around organisations (pp. 50–62). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.762225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sense making and influence. Organisation Science, 5(3), 363–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (2022). Reflections: How studying organizational change lost its way. Journal of Change Management, 22(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2022.2030980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280. http://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013481016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerno, S. J., & Mace, S. L. (2010). Communities of practice: Beyond teams. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310365341
   Google Scholar
• Kouamé, S., & Langley, A. (2018). Relating microprocesses to macro-outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunisch, S., Bartunek, J. M., Mueller, J., & Huy, Q. N. (2017). Time in strategic change research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 1005–1064. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007079965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (2010). Introducing perspectives on process organisation studies. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sensemaking and organising (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielson, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009). Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer Junior, V., Pascuci, L. M., & Meyer, B. (2018). Strategies in universities: Tensions between macro intentions and micro actions. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(2), 163–177. http://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018160081
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Birks, M., & Hoare, K. J. (2014). Grounded theory. In J. Mills & M. Birks (Eds.), Qualitative methodology: Practical guide (pp. 107–121). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pederson, J. S., & Dobbin, F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimation. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205284798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713. doi:10.2307/3069411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prester, J., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Schlagwein, D. (2019, December 15–18). Becoming a digital nomad: Identity emergence in the flow of practice. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2019). Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/future_of_work/future_work/5/.
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2008). Organisational change. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organisational behaviour (pp. 602–620). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ravasi, D., Tripsas, M., & Langley, A. (2017). Call for papers: Special issue of strategic organisation exploring the strategy-identity nexus. Strategic Organisation, 15(1), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017692490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahaym, A. (2013). Born with a silver spoon of legitimacy but struggling for identity? The paradox of emerging spin-offs in a new sector. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2210–2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, M., & Hernes, T. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, D., Ohlson, T., & Whittington, R. (2021). Restless practices as drivers of purposive institutional change, On Practice and Institution: Theorizing the Interface. Research in the Sociology of Organisations, 70, 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Sorsa, V., & Vaara, E. (2020). How can pluralistic organizations proceed with strategic change? A processual account of rhetorical contestation, convergence, and partial agreement in a Nordic city organization. Organization Science, 31(4), 839–864. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spee, P., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2017). Agreeing on what? creating joint accounts of strategic change. Organization Science, 28(1), 152–176. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. (2003). Trance, Transparency and Transformation: The impact of external quality monitoring on higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), 151–159. http://doi.org/10.1080/13538320308158
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamboukou, M. (2015). Sewing, fighting and writing: Radical practices in work, politics and culture. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to management knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan-Berry, K. S., & Somerville, K. A. (2010). Linking change drivers and the organizational change process: A review and synthesis. Journal of Change Management, 10(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697011003795651
   Google Scholar