A computational definition of financial randomness

References

• Aucamp, D.C., On the extensive number of plays to achieve superior performance with the geometric mean strategy. Manage. Sci., 1993, 39(9), 1163–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H., Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Manage. Sci., 1999, 45, 364–381.
   Google Scholar
• Bernoulli, D., Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Papers in the Imperical Academy of Sciences in Petersburg, 5:175–192, 1738. ; Translated and republished in Econometrica in 1954, “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk”, 22(1): 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Boolos, G., Burgess, J.P. and Jeffrey, R.C., Computability and Logic, 2007 (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• Bouchaud, J.P., Gefen, Y., Potters, M. and Wyart, M., Fluctuations and response in financial markets: The subtle nature of random price changes. Quant. Finance, 2004, 4(2), 176–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boynton, W. and Oppenheimer, H.R., Anomalies in stock market pricing: Problems in return measurements. J. Bus., 2006, 79(5), 2617–2632.
   Google Scholar
• Brandouy, O., Delahaye, J.-P. and Ma, L., Algorithmic complexity of financial time series. Technical report, University of Lille 1, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Caginalp, G. and Laurent, H., The predictive power of price patterns. Appl. Math. Financ., 1998, 5, 181–206.
   Google Scholar
• Chaitin, G.J., On the length of programs for computing finite binary sequences: Statistical considerations. J. ACM, 1969, 16, 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, M.M., A thesis on the growth optimal portfolio and the theory of arbitrage pricing and portfolio selection. PhD Thesis, University of Southern Denmark, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Church, A., An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. AM. J. Math., 1936, 58(2), 345–363.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, T.M., Universal portfolios. Math. Financ., 1991, 1(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, T.M. and Ordentlich, E., Universal portfolios with side information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1996, 42, 348–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer, G. and Freund, Y., Automated trading with boosting and expert weighting. Quant. Finance, 2010, 10(4), 401–420.
   Google Scholar
• De Bondt, W.F.M. and Thaler, R., Does the stock market overreact? J. Financ., 1985, 40(3), 793–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, R.G. and Hirschfeldt, D.R., Randomness and Complexity. Theory and Applications of Computability, 2010 (Springer: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Dunis, C.L., Laws, J. and Nam, P. (Eds.), Applied Quantitative Methods for Trading and Investment (The Wiley Finance Series), 2003 (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Duran, A. and Caginalp, G., Overreaction diamonds: Precursors and aftershocks for significant price changes. Quant. Finance, 2007, 7(3), 321–342.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, A. and Bommarito, M.J., A profitable trading and risk management strategy despite transaction cost. Quant. Finance, 2011, 11(6), 829–848.
   Google Scholar
• Fabozzi, F., Focardi, S. and Jonas, C., On the challenges in quantitative equity management. Quant. Finance, 2008, 8(7), 649–665.
   Google Scholar
• Fagiuoli, E., Stella, F. and Ventura, A., Constant rebalanced portfolios and side-information. Quant. Finance, 2007, 7(2), 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E., Efficient capital markets : A review of theory and empirical work. J. Financ., 1970, 25, 383–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. and French, K., Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financ. Econ., 1993, 33(1), 3–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, J.O., International Financial Markets, 3rd ed., 1996 (Prentice Hall: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Hasanhodzic, J., Lo, A.W. and Viola, E., A computational view of market efficiency. Quant. Finance, 2011, 11(7), 1043–1050.
   Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S., Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance, 1993, 48(1), 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S., Profitability of momentum strategies: An evaluation of alternative explanations. J. Financ., 2001, 56(2), 699–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandhani, A.E. and Lo, A.W., What happened to the quants on August 2007. J. Invest. Manage., 2007, 5, 29–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Tech. Journal, 1956, 35(4), 917–926.
   Google Scholar
• Korajczyk, R.A. and Sadka, R., Are momentum profits robust to trading costs? J. Financ., 2004, 59(3), 1039–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J.A., Peel, D.A. and Raeburn, E.J., Some empirical evidence on the time-series properties of four uk asset prices. Economica, 1996, 63(251), 405–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, L., On a concrete method of assigning complexity measures. Dokl. Akad. nauk SSSR, 1977, 18(3), 727–731.
   Google Scholar
• Lévy, P., Théorie de l’Addition des Variables Aléatoires, 1937 (Gautier-Villars: Paris).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, H.R. and Papadimitriou, C.H., Elements of the Theory of Computation, 1998 (Prentice-Hall: Upper Sadle River, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A.W., The adaptive markets hypothesis. J. Portfolio Manage., 2004, 30, 15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Löf, P., The definition of random sequences. Inform. Control, 1966, 9, 602–619.
   Google Scholar
• Nies, A., Computability and Randomness, 2009 (Oxford University Press: Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Pour-El, M.B. and Richards, J.I., Computability in Analysis and Physics, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, 1989 (Springer Verlag: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Primbs, J. and Yamada, Y., A new computational tool for analysing dynamic hedging under transaction costs. Quant. Finance, 2008, 8(4), 405–413.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S.A., Adding risks: Samuelson’s fallacy of large numbers revisited. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 1999, 34(03), 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A., Risk and Uncertainty : A Fallacy of Large Numbers, 1963 (Scientia: Cambridge, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Sarantis, N., Nonlinearities, cyclical behaviour and predictability in stock markets: International evidence. Inter. J. Forecasting, 2001, 17(3), 459–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnorr, C.P., A unified approach to the definition of a random sequence. Math. Syst. Theory, 1971, 5, 246–258.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, G. and Vovk, V., Probability and Finance: It’s Only a Game!, Wiley series in probability and statistics: Financial engineering section, 2001 (J. Wiley & Sons: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Shen, P., Market timing strategies that worked. J. Portfolio Manage., 2003, 29, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiryaev, A., Xu, Z. and Zhou, X.Y., Thou shalt buy and hold. Quant. Finance, 2008, 8(8), 765–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay, R.S., Analysis of Financial Time Series, 2nd ed., 2005 (Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Turing, A., On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Proc. London Math. Soc., 1936, 42, 230–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väth, M., Nonstandard analysis, 2007 (Birkhäuser: Bassel).
   Google Scholar
• Velupillai, K., Computable Economics (The Arne Ryde Memorial Lectures), 2000 (Oxford University Press: USA).
   Google Scholar
• Ville, J., Étude critique de la notion de collectif, Monographies des probabilités, 1939 (Gauthier-Villars).
   Google Scholar
• Zenil, H. and Delahaye, J.-P., An algorithmic information theoretic approach to the behaviour of financial markets. J. Econ. Surv., 2011, 25(3), 431–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar