Data-driven robust mean-CVaR portfolio selection under distribution ambiguity

References

• Alizadeh, F. and Goldfarb, D. , Second-order cone programming. Math. Program. , 2003, 95 , 3–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artzner, P. , Delbaen, F. , Eber, J.M. and Heath, D. , Coherent measures of risk. Math. Financ. , 1999, 9 , 203–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal, A. , Den Hertog, D. , Waegenaere, A.D. , Melenberg, B. and Rennen, G. , Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Manage. Sci. , 2013, 59 , 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsimas, D. , Gupta, V. and Kallus, N. , Robust sample average approximation. Math. Program. , 2016, 3 , 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsimas, D. , Gupta, V. and Kallus, N. , Data-driven robust optimization. Math. Program. , 2017. doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1125-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calafiore, G.C. and El Ghaoui, L. , On distributionally robust chance-constrained linear programs. J. Optimiz. Theory. App. , 2006, 130 , 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, H.H. , Wang, T. and Zhang, H.H. , Model uncertainty, limited market participation, and asset prices. Rev. Financ. Stud. , 2005, 18 , 1219–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceria, S. and Stubbs, R.A. , Incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection: Robust portfolio construction. J. Asset. Mgmt. , 2006, 7 , 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. , He, S. and Zhang, S. , Tight bounds for some risk measures, with applications to robust portfolio selection. Oper. Res. , 2011, 59 , 847–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delage, E. and Ye, Y. , Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. , 2010, 58 , 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V. , Martin-Utrera, A. and Nogales, F.J. , Size matters: Optimal calibration of shrinkage estimators for portfolio selection. J. Bank. Finance. , 2013, 37 , 3018–3034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V. and Nogales, F.J. , Portfolio selection with robust estimation. Oper. Res. , 2009, 57 , 560–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. and Gong, G. , A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross validation. Am. Stat. , 1979, 37 , 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, D. , Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. , 1961, 75 (4), 643–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, L.G. , A paradox for the smooth ambiguity model of preference. Econometrica , 2010, 78 , 2085–2099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahani, P.M. and Kuhn, D. , Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Program. , 2017. doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1172-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, G. and Correia-da-Silva, J. , A closed-form solution for options with ambiguity about stochastic volatility. Rev. Derivatives Res. , 2014, 17 , 125–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlappi, L. , Uppal, R. and Wang, T. , Portfolio selection with parameter and model uncertainty: A multi-prior approach. Rev. Financ. Stud. , 2007, 20 , 41–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghirardato, P. , Maccheroni, F. and Marinacci, M. , Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory. , 2004, 118 (2), 133–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. , Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. , 1989, 18 , 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotoh, J. , Shinozaki, K. and Takeda, A. , Robust portfolio techniques for mitigating the fragility of CVaR minimization and generalization to coherent risk measures. Quant. Finance , 2013, 13 , 1621–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmich, M. and Kassberger, S. , Efficient and robust portfolio optimization in the multivariate generalized hyperbolic framework. Quant. Finance , 2011, 11 , 1503–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, D. , Zhu, S. , Fabozzi, F.J. and Fukushima, M. , Portfolio selection under distributional uncertainty: A relative robust CVaR approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. , 2010, 203 , 185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izhakian, Y. , Expected utility with uncertain probabilities theory. J. Math. Econ. , 2017, 69 , 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM ILOG CPLEX 12 , 1-Parameters Reference Manual [online], 2009. Available online at: http://www.ilog.com (accessed 23 October 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, R. and Guan, Y. , Data-driven chance constrained stochastic program. Math. Program. , 2016, 158 (1–2), 291–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanoff, P. , Marinacci, M. and Mukerji, S. , A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica. , 2005, 73 , 1849–1892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanoff, P. , Marinacci, M. and Mukerji, S. , On the smooth ambiguity model: A reply. Econometrica. , 2012, 80 , 1303–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.H. , Kim, W.C. and Fabozzi, F.J. , Recent developments in robust portfolios with a worst-case approach. J. Optimiz. Theory. App. , 2014, 161 , 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F.H. , Risk, Uncertainty and Profit , 1921 (Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Lim, A.E. , Shanthikumar, J.G. and Vahn, G.Y. , Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Coherent but fragile. Oper. Res. Lett. , 2011, 39 , 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi, S. and Zenios, S.A. , Equivalence of robust VaR and CVaR optimization. Working Paper, The Wharton Financial Institutions Center WP, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. , Zhao, Q. and Qu, J. , Robust portfolio optimization with a generalized expected utility model under ambiguity. Ann. Financ , 2008, 4 (4), 431–444.
   Google Scholar
• Maillet, B. , Tokpavi, S. and Vaucher, B. , Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. , 2015, 244 , 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan, K. , Pachamanova, D. and Sim, M. , Constructing risk measures from uncertainty sets. Oper. Res. , 2009, 57 , 1129–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan, K. , Sim, M. and Uichanco, J. , Tractable robust expected utility and risk models for portfolio optimization. Math. Financ. , 2010, 20 , 695–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paç, A.B. and Pinar, M.Ç. , Robust portfolio choice with CVaR and VaR under distribution and mean return ambiguity. TOP , 2014, 22 , 875–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perchet, R. , Xiao, L. , Carvalho, R.L.D. , and Heckel, T. Insights into robust portfolio optimization: Decomposing robust portfolios into mean-variance and risk-based portfolios. Working Paper, Columbia University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Politis, D.N. and Romano, J.P. , The stationary bootstrap. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. , 1994, 89 , 1303–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. , Robust mean-covariance solutions for stochastic optimization. Oper. Res. , 2007, 55 , 98–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaranta, A.G. and Zaffaroni, A. , Robust optimization of conditional value at risk and portfolio selection. J. Bank. Finance. , 2008, 32 , 2046–2056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockafellar, R.T. and Uryasev, S. , Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk. , 2000, 2 , 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, A.A.P. , The out-of-sample performance of robust portfolio optimization. Brazilian. Rev. Financ. , 2010, 8 , 141–166.
   Google Scholar
• Salahi, M. , Mehrdoust, F. and Piri, F. , CVaR robust mean-CVaR portfolio optimization. Appl. Math. , 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/570950.
   Google Scholar
• Scarf, H. , Arrow, K.J. and Karlin, S. , A min-max solution of an inventory problem. Stud. Math. Theory Inventory Prod. , 1958, 10 , 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. , On duality theory of conic linear problems. In Semi-infinite Programming: Recent Advances , edited by M.A. Goberna and M.A. López , pp. 135–165, 2001 (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht).
   Google Scholar
• Tütüncü, R.H. and Koenig, M. , Robust asset allocation. Ann. Oper. Res. , 2004, 132 , 157–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ui, T. , The ambiguity premium vs the risk premium under limited market participation. Rev. Financ. , 2011, 15 , 245–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. , Glynn, P. and Ye, Y. , Likelihood robust optimization for data-driven newsvendor problems. Comput. Manage. Sci. , 2016, 13 , 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozabal, D. , Robustifying convex risk measures for linear portfolios: A nonparametric approach. Oper. Res. , 2014, 62 , 1302–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y. and Valdez, E. , A Black Litterman asset allocation model under elliptical distributions. Quant. Finance , 2015, 15 , 509–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, H. , Li, Z. and Lai, Y. , Mean-CVaR portfolio selection: A non-parametric estimation framework. Comput. Oper. Res. , 2013, 40 , 1014–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, S.C.P. , Yang, H. and Yuen, F.L. , Optimal asset allocation: Risk and information uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. , 2016, 251 , 554–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, K. , Parpas, P. and Rustem, B. , Robust portfolio optimization: a conic programming approach. Comput. Optim. Appl. , 2012, 52 , 463–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S. and Fukushima, M. , Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. , 2009, 57 , 1155–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S. , Ji, X.D. and Li, D. , A robust set-valued scenario approach for handling modeling risk in portfolio optimization. J. Comput. Financ. , 2015, 19 , 11–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zymler, S. , Rustem, B. and Kuhn, D. , Robust portfolio optimization with derivative insurance guarantees. Eur. J. Oper. Res. , 2011, 210 , 410–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar