Peer effects in professional analysts’ choice of their portfolio of companies

References

• Ali, U. and Hirshleifer, D., Shared analyst coverage: Unifying momentum spillover effects. J. Financ. Econ., 2020, 136(3), 649–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar, A., Econometrics of network formation. In The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks, edited by Y. Bramoullé, A. Galeotti and B. Rogers, 2016 (Oxford University Press: Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Frazzini, A. and Malloy, C., The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. J. Polit. Econ., 2008, 116(5), 951–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, K. and Lux, T., Network formation in the interbank money market: An application of the actor-oriented model. Soc. Networks, 2017, 48, 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracassi, C. and Tate, G., External networking and internal firm governance. J. Finance, 2012, 67, 153–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualdi, S., Cimini, G., Primicerio, K., Di Clemente, R. and Challet, D., Statistically validated network of portfolio overlaps and systemic risk. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6(1), 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gygax, A., Hazledine, M. and Martin, J. S., Are directors really irrelevant to capital structure choice? Working Paper, University of Melbourne, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, J. F., Lee, J. and Suntheim, F., Social networks in the global banking sector. J. Account. Econ., 2018, 65(2–3), 237–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Vodenska, I., Havlin, S. and Stanley, H. E., Cascading failures in bi-partite graphs: Model for systemic risk propagation. Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, P., Analysts’ forecasts and brokerage-firm trading. Account. Rev., 2004, 79, 125–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, J. and Edling, C., Modelling the evolution of a bipartite network—Peer referral in interlocking directorates. Soc. Networks, 2012, 34(3), 309–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, J. H. and Snijders, T. A., Bayesian inference for dynamic social network data. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 2007, 137(12),3930–3938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazega, E., Mounier, L., Snijders, T. and Tubaro, P., Norms, status and the dynamics of advice networks: A case study. Soc. Networks, 2012, 34(3), 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Ma, P. and Wang, C. C. The search for peer firms: When do crowds provide wisdom? Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, (15-032), 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., Koskinen, J. and Robins, G., Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, 2013 (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• McNichols, M. and O’Brien, P., Self-selection and analyst coverage. J. Account. Res., 1997, 35, 167–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milaković, M., Alfarano, S. and Lux, T., The small core of the German corporate board network. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2010, 16(2), 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, R., Implications of herding behavior for earnings estimation, risk assessment, and stock returns. Financ. Anal. J., 1996, 52(4), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Phua, K., Tham, M. and Wei, C., Do security analysts learn from their colleagues? Manuscript, Nanyang Technological University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A., Boda, Z., Vörös, A. and Preciado, P., Manual for RSiena. University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College, 1, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, G. and Alexander, M., Small worlds among interlocking directors: Network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2004, 10(1), 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. R., Light, J. M., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D. and Martin, C. L., Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children. Soc. Networks, 2010, 32(1), 61–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfstein, D. and Stein, J., Herd behavior and investment. Am. Econ. Rev., 1990, 80(3), 465–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. J. Math. Sociol., 1996, 21(1–2), 149–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociol. Methodol., 2001, 31(1), 361–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. and Baerveldt, C., A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. J. Math. Sociol., 2003, 27(2–3), 123–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., Koskinen, J. and Schweinberger, M., Maximum likelihood estimation for social network dynamics. Ann. Appl. Stat., 2010a, 4(2), 567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., Lomi, A. and Torló, V. J., A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice. Soc. Networks, 2013, 35(2), 265–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., Van de Bunt, G. G. and Steglich, C. E., Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc. Networks, 2010b, 32(1), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steglich, C., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J. and Moore, L., Actor-based analysis of peer influence in a stop smoking in schools trial (ASSIST). Soc. Networks, 2012, 34(3), 359–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueman, B., Analyst forecasts and herding behavior. Rev. Financ. Stud., 1994, 7(1), 97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar