Mirror, mirror: towards ‘something like’ a value system for art research by way of critique and dialogic art

References

• Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee. 186. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle. 2007. “Foucault's ‘What is An Author’: Towards a Critical Discourse of Practice as Research.” In Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, edited by Estelle Barrett and Barbara Bolt, 135–146. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. [1967] 1981. “The Death of the Author.” In Theories of Authorship, edited by John Caughie, 208–213. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Michelle, Howard Gadlin, and Samantha Levine-Finley. Collaboration and Team Science: A Field Guide – September 2010. N.P.: National Institute of Health. www.teamscience.nih.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, Michael. 2006. “Necessary, Unnecessary and Sufficient Conditions.” Paper presented at Wonderground, International Conference of Design Research Society, Lisbon, November 1–4. www.iade.pt/drs2006/wonderground/proceedings/fullpapers/DRS2006_0294.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, Michael, and Daniela Büchler. 2011. “Communities, Values, Conventions and Actions.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by Michael Biggs and Henrik Karlsson, 82–98. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall, Caroyln, Maria Boletsi, Itay Sapir, and Peiter Verstraete. 2009. “Introduction.” In Inside Knowledge: (Un)Doing Ways of Knowing in the Humanities, edited by Carolyn Birdsall, Maria Boletsi, Itay Sapir, and Peiter Verstraete, 1–13. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Claire. 2007. “The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents.” In Right About Now: Art and Theory Since the 1990s, edited by Margriet Schavemaker and Mischa Rakier, 58–68. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, Henk. 2006. “The Debate on Research in the Arts.” In Sensuous Knowledge: Focus on Artistic Research and Development 2. Bergen: National Academy of the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, Henk. 2011. “The Production of Knowledge in Art Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by Michael Biggs and Henrik Karlsson, 44–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradfield, Marsha. 2013. “Utterance and Authorship in Dialogic Art: Or An Account of Barcamp in Response to the Question: What is Dialogic Art?.” Ph.D. diss., Chelsea College of Arts, University of the Arts London.
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, Fiona. 2000 ‘A Proper Anxiety? Practice-based PhDs and Academic Unease’. Working Papers in Art and Design 1. www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf.../WPIAAD_vol1_candlin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Critical Practice Research Cluster. Accessed January 2, 2016. www.criticalpracticechelsea.org.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Business Innovation and Skills, ‘Policy Paper 2010 to 2015 Government Policy: Public Understanding of Science and Engineering', Accessed May 8, 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-public-understanding-of-science-and-engineering/2010-to-2015-government-policy-public-understanding-of-science-and-engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Duchamp, Marcel. 1959. “The Creative Act.” In Marcel Duchamp, edited by Robert Lebel, 77–78. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. [1969] 1981. “What is An Author?” In Theories of Authorship, edited by John Caughie, 282–291. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. [1969] 1992. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Mary Anne. 2009. “Situational fiction.” Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 2 (2): 151–158. doi: 10.1386/jwcp.2.2.151/1
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, Christopher. 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Paper Series 1(1). London: Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Paul, and Gina Dolan. 2015. “Originality and the PhD: What is it and How Can it Demonstrated?” Nurse Researcher 22 (6): 11–15. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.6.11.e1335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of the Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3). (Autumn, 1988): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, Graham. 2002. Tool Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Peru, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 2011. “Embodied Knowing Through Art.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by Michael Biggs and Henrik Karlsson, 141–151. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kälvemark, Torsen. 2011. “University Politics and Practice-based Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by Michael Biggs and Henrik Karlsson, 3–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, Grant. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, Maria. 2007. “The Collaborative Turn.” In Taking the Matter into Common Hands: Contemporary Art and Collaborative Practices, edited by Joanna Billing, Maria Lind and Lars Nilsson, 15–31. London: Black Dog.
   Google Scholar
• Mallison, Constance. “ The Anxiety of Originality – September 2 2012,” Times Quotidian. www.timesquotidian.com/2012/09/02/the-anxiety-of-originality/.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga. 2011. “Forward”. In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by Michael Biggs and Henrik Karlsson, xvii–xxvi. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Precarious Workers Brigade. Accessed January 2, 2016. www.precariousworkersbrigade.tumblr.com .
   Google Scholar
• Research Assessment Exercise. 2005. RAE 2008 Guidance on Submissions. www.rae.ac.uk/pub/2005/03/rae0305.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Research Excellence Framework. 2012. REF 02.2011 Assessment Framework Guidance Submissions (Appendix C). www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/assessmentframeworkandguidanceonsubmissions/GOS%20including%20addendum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scrivener, Stephen. 2002. “The Art Object does not Embody a Form of Knowledge.” Working Papers in Art and Design 2. www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/12311/WPIAAD_vol2_scrivener.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. 2011. Doctoral Degree Characteristics – September 2011. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education: n.p. www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Doctoral_Characteristics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. 2015. Characteristic Statement: Doctoral Degrees – September 2015. Glouster: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Doctoral-Degree-Characteristics-15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, Jeff. 2003. “‘Marks of Indifference’: Aspects of Photography in, or as, Conceptual Art (1995).” In The Last Picture Show: Artists Using Photography, 1960–1982, edited by Douglas Fogle, 32–44. Minneapolis, MN: Walker Art Centre.
   Google Scholar