Plot structure over character and drama: a new aesthetics for art research

References

• Adorno, T. 1970. Aesthetic Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1984a. “Poetics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle: Volume Two, edited by J. Barnes, 2316–2340. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1984b. “Politics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle: Volume Two, edited by J. Barnes, 1986–2129. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Askin, R., P. J. Ennis, A. Hägler, and P. Schweighauser, eds. 2014. Speculation V: Aesthetics in the 21st Century. New York: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bågander, L. 2015. “BODY(DRESS?)SPACE(ROOM?) an Exploration of Dress at the Intersection Between Body and Arranged Space Through Movement”. Master thesis. Borås: Swedish School of Textiles.
   Google Scholar
• Baghramian, M., and J. Carter 2016. “Relativism” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 ed.), edited by E. Zalta. Accessed May 22, 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/relativism/.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T., and E. Eisener. 2011. Arts Based Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarten, A. 2007. Ästhetik. Hamburg: Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M. 1966. Aesthetics: From Classical Greek to the Present: A Short History. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1968. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, M. 2002. “The Role of the Artifact in Art and Design Research.” International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology 10 (2): 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H. 2010. “The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research.” In Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by M. Biggs and H. Karlson, 44–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H. 2012. The Conflict of the Faculties – Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Presses du reel.
   Google Scholar
• Bricmont, J., and A. Sokal. 1998. Intellectual Impostures. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, S. 1992. “Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin’s Artwork Essay Reconsidered.” October, 62 (1): 3–41. doi: 10.2307/778700
   Google Scholar
• Danto, A. 2013. What Art Is. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2004. Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What Is Philosophy? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. 2004. On Beauty. London: Secker & Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• Eklöf, A. 2014. “Expression of Tape: Using Action Fashion to Construct Outdoor Wear.” Master thesis. Borås: Swedish School of Textiles.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. 2014. Artists with PhDs: On the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art. Washington, DC: New Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, P. 2014. “18th Century German Aesthetics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Zalta. Accessed September 10, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/aesthetics-18th-german/.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2002. Tool-being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Peru: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, F. 2007. Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology – Form and World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, A. 2015. “Bodydressed.” Bachelor thesis. Borås: Swedish School of Textiles.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, F. 2004. In Praise of Blandness: Proceeding from Chinese Thought and Aesthetics. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, B. 2011. “On Aesthetics, Aisthetics and Sensation – Reading Baumgarten with Leibniz with Deleuze.” Esthetica. Tijdschrift voor Kunst en Filosofie. Accessed October 10, 2015. http://estheticatijdschrift.nl/files/2014/09/1-Esthetica-Onaestheticsaistheticsandsensation---readingBaumgartenwithLeibnizwithDeleuze-2011-10-17.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. ed. 1998. Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Vols. 1 and 4. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korvenmaa, P., ed. 1999. Useful and Critical: The Position of Research in Design. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2009. Method Meets Art: Arts-based Research Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, D., and B. Gaut, eds. 2001. The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. 1953. “Art and Aesthetic in Aristotle.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12 (2): 228–231. doi: 10.2307/426876
   Google Scholar
• Nordberg, J. 2014. “The Act of Molding Exploring the Expressive Potential in Moulding of Archetypal Garments.” Master thesis. Borås: Swedish School of Textiles.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. 1997. “The Republic” in Plato: Complete Works, by Plato. Cambridge: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, C. 2014. “Aristotle.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Zalta. Accessed December 15, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/aristotle/.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstoy, L. 1995. What Is Art? London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Zangwill, N. 2001. The Metaphysics of Beauty. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar