Unpacking collaboration: non-human agency in the ebb and flow of practice-based visual art research

References

• Aceti, L. 2012. Uncontainable. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, Leonardo/ISAST.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E., and B. Bolt, eds. 2007. Practice as Research Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1964. Rhetoric of the Image in the Responsibility of Forms: Critical Essays on Music, Art and Representation. Translated by Richard Howard, 1985. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Howard. 1974. “Art as Collective Action.” American Sociological Review 39 (6): 767–776. doi: 10.2307/2094151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogost, Ian. 2012. ‘Alien Phenomenology’ or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, B. 2006. Materializing Pedagogies. Working Papers in Art and Design, Vol. 4. Accessed 12 January 2016. http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol4/bbfull.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Translated by S. Pleasance and F. Woods. Dijon Quetigny: Les Presses du Reel.
   Google Scholar
• Cahnmann-Taylor, M., and R. Siegesmund, eds. 2008. Arts-based Research in Education: Foundations for Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, edited by J. Law, 196–233. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1999. “Actor–network Theory: The Market Test.” In Actor–network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 180–195. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P. 2004. Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne: Melbourne University.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Stith Bennett. 1971. “An Exploratory Model of Play.” American Anthropologist 73 (1): 45–58. doi: 10.1525/aa.1971.73.1.02a00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cypher, Mark. 2011. “Trans-action; An Actor–network Approach to Interactivity in the Visual Arts.” PhD diss., University of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• DeNora, T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, George. 1974. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., and R. Edwards. 2012. Researching Education through Actor–network Theory. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1998. Essential Works of Foucault (1954–84). Vol. 2. Aesthetics, Method & Epistemology. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. 1997. “Baroque and Rock: Music, Mediators and Musical Taste.” Poetics 24 (6): 415–435.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, Antoine, and Line Grenier. 2000. Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time. ISA Research Council, Stella QUAH, Arnaud SALES. The International Handbook of Sociology, New-York: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Chicago, IL: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 2005. “Material Anchors for Conceptual Blends.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1555–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knappett, C., and L. Malafouris. 2008. Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentrical Approach. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1994. “Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by B. Wiebe and J. Law, 225–258. Chicago, IL: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1998. “How to Be Iconophilic in Art, Science, and Religion!” In Picturing Science Producing Art, edited by Carrie Jones and Peter Galison, 418–440. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. The Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–network-theory. New York: Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, K., and L. Holdridge, eds. 2006. Thinking through Art: Reflections on Art as Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M., and S. Routarinne, eds. 2006. The Art of Research: Practice in Research of Art and Design. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris, Lambros. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. 2002. Reflexivity, the Self and Positioning. Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. 1998. “The Spaces of Actor–Network Theory.” Geoforum 29 (4): 357–374. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, R. 2011. “Actor–network Theory as a Reflexive Tool: (Inter)personal Relations and Relationships in the Research Process.” Area 43 (3): 336–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. 2009. Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2009. Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture: An Ethnography of Design. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zell, Michael. 2011. “Rembrandt’s Gifts: A Case Study of Actor–network-theory.” Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art 3: 3–11. doi: 10.5092/jhna.2011.3.2.2
   Google Scholar