Artist-led building: farming organic knowing

References

• Abram, S. 2011. Culture and Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, T. 1987. John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience and Nature: The Horizons of Feeling. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, F. 2015. “Preserving and Politicising the Alternative Space.” Oxford Art Journal 38 (3): 448–451. doi: 10.1093/oxartj/kcv026
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, F., and A. Tobin. 2017. “Collaboration is Not an Alternative: Artists Working Together in London and New York, 1974–1981.” In Collaboration and its (dis)contents: Art, Architecture, and Photography Since 1950, edited by A. M. Brown and M. M. Fisher, 158–178. London: Courtauld Books Online.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 2008. Art Worlds. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, D. 2010. “Weberian Lessons: Art, Pedagogy and Managerialism.” In Curating and the Educational Turn, edited by P. O’Neill and M. Wilson, 47–60. London: Open Editions/DeAppel.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, A. 1992. “Art, Ideology, and Everyday Space: Subversive Tendencies from Dada to Postmodernism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10: 69–86. doi: 10.1068/d100069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du Reel.
   Google Scholar
• Condorelli, C. 2013. “Too Close to See: Notes on Friendship, a Conversation with Johan Frederik Hartle.” In Self-Organized, edited by S. Hebert and A. S. Karlsen, 62–73. London: Open Editions/Hordaland Art Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, J. 2015. “Working Together: Tracing the Making of Public Art as Part of Regeneration Practice.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 24 (2): 76–96. doi: 10.3167/ajec.2015.240206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, J. 2018. “Island Making: Planning Artistic Collaboration.” Landscape Research 43 (2): 211–221. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1291922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, J., and M. Gkartzios. 2016. “Getting to Know the Island: Artistic Experiments in Rural Community Development.” Journal of Rural Studies 43: 134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuffari, E. 2011. “Habits of Transformation.” Hypatia 26 (3): 535–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01186.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Perigree.
   Google Scholar
• Elmis, L. 2013. “What Happened, Happened.” In Self-Organized, edited by S. Hebert and A. S. Karlsen, 82–91. London: Open Editions/Hordaland Art Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. 2018. “Revisiting Feminist Matters in the Post-Linguistic Turn: John Dewey, New Materialisms, and Contemporary Feminist Thought.” In New Feminist Perspectives on Embodiment, edited by C. Fischer and L. Dolezal, 83–102. Exeter: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harbers, H. 2010. “Animal Farm Love Stories About Care and Economy.” In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics Homes and Farms, edited by A. Mol, I. Moser, and J. Pols, 141–170. London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert, S., and S. Karlsen A. 2013. Self-Organized. London: Open Editions/Hordaland Art Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2016. “On Human Correspondence.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23: 9–27. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.12541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. 1995. At Home in the World. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, M. J. 2018. Dewey for Artists. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, C. 2013. “The Evolution of Social Sculpture in the United States: Joseph Beuys and the Work of Suzanne Lacy and Rick Lowe.” Public Art Dialogue 3 (2): 144–167. doi: 10.1080/21502552.2013.818430
   Google Scholar
• Laister, J. 2018. “Learning From Greverus: Pathways Towards Another Aesthetic in Anthropology.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 27 (1): 7–12. doi: 10.3167/ajec.2018.270103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. “The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative.” In Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by S. Woolgar, 155–176. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. 1998. “The Spaces of Actor-Network Theory.” Geoforum 29 (4): 357–374. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., and L. Tate. 2017. Actor Networks of Planning: Exploring the Influence of Actor Network Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, B., and G. Sholette. 2007. Collectivism After Modernism: The Art of Social Imagination After 1945. London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. 2001. Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism and Feminism. Indianapolis: Indianapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2009. The Making of a Building: A Pragmatist Approach to Architecture. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar