Exploratory diagramming and diagram theory: Greimas, Peirce and Châtelet

References

• Aristotle. 2001. The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by Richard McKeon. New York: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, Alain. 2009. Pocket Pantheon: Figures of Postwar Philosophy. Translated by David Macey. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, John B., and Michael Marrinan. 2010. The Culture of Diagram. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, Susan. 1995. “Envisaging Capital: Political Economy on Display.” Critical Inquiry 2 (Winter): 434–467.
   Google Scholar
• Châtelet, Gilles. 2000. Figuring Space: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics. Translated by Robert Shore and Muriel Zagha. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, Scott. 2012. 100 Diagrams That Changed the World: From the Earliest Cave Paintings to the Innovation of the IPod. London: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 2005. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Martin. 1958. Logic Machines and Diagrams. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Greimas, A. J., and Francois Rastier. 1969. “The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints.” Yale French Studies 41: 86–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric. 2019. “The Greimas Square.” Appendix A in Allegory and Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric. 2002. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenning, Dean. 2015. “Thinking Through Art: The Social Body Mind Map.” In Learning to Teach Art and Design in the Secondary School (3rd ed.), edited by Nicholas Addison and Lesley Burgess, 56–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knoespel, Kenneth. 2001. “Diagrams as Piloting Devices in the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze.” Théorie, Literature, Ensignement 19: 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, Rosalind. 1979. “Sculpture in the Expanded Field.” October 8: 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1986. “Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.” In Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, Vol. 6, edited by H. Kuklick, 1–40. Atlanta: Jai Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, Arthur. 1969. Diagrams: A Visual Survey of Graphs, Maps, Charts and Diagrams for the Graphic Designer. London: Studio Vista.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles S. 1992. “On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation.” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1: 1867–1893, edited by Nathan Houser and Christian J. W. Kloesel, 225–228. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles S. 1998. “Sundry Logical Conceptions.” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 2: 1893–1913, edited by the Peirce Edition Project, 267–288. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles S. 1906. “Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism.” The Monist 16: 492–546. http://archive.org/details/jstor-27899680.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. 1974. The Republic. Translated with an Introduction by Desmond Lee. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Don Davis. 1973. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Rovelli, Carlo. 2015. Seven Brief Lessons on Physics. Translated by Simon Carnell and Erica Segre. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Stjernfelt, F. 2000. “Diagrams as Centerpiece of a Peircean Epistemology.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36 (3): 357–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taussig, Michael T. 2011. I Swear I Saw This: Drawings in Fieldwork Notebooks, Namely My Own. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, Harry. 2019. “The Weapons of Our Adversaries.” Third Text 33 (3): 337–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellcome Collection. 2016. Animal, Vegetable, Mineral: Organising Nature: A Picture Album. London: Wellcome Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. T. 2007. “Faraday Versus Maxwell.” In Consciousness, Physics and the Holographic Paradigm. Accessed 11 January 2021. http://www.tyler.net/hermital/book/holoprt4-4.htm#T4.27.
   Google Scholar