A contemporary pedagogy of drawing

References

• Bahn, P. G. 2010. Prehistoric Rock Art: Polemics and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biederman, I. 1987. “Recognition-by-components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding.” Psychological Review 94 (2): 115–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettell, R. 1999. Modern Art 1851–1929. Capitalism and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, J. 2010. “Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education. An Independent Review of Higher Education Funding & Student Finance.” https://www.independent.gov.uk/browne-report
   Google Scholar
• Carney, M. 2020. “From Moral to Market Sentiments.” BBC Reith Lectures 2020. Accessed December 2 2020. https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2020/Reith_2020_Lecture_1_transcript.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, R., C. McManus, N. Brunswick, Q. Rankin, and H. Riley. 2015. “Scratching the Surface: Practice, Personality, Approaches to Learning, and the Acquisition of High-Level Representational Drawing Ability..” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9 (4): 451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, R., I. C. McManus, N. Brunswick, Q. Rankin, H. Riley, and R. Kanai. 2014. “Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain: A Voxel-based Morphometry Analysis of Observational Drawing.” NeuroImage 96: 167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childe, V. G. [1942] 1964. What Happened in History. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Chorpening, K., and R. Fortnum. 2020. A Companion to Contemporary Drawing. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, E. 2020. “Where Did Writing Begin?” British Library. Accessed August 19 2020. https://www.bl.uk/history-of-writing/articles/where-did-writing-begin
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. 2017. “Visual Rhetoric and Semiotic.” In Oxford Research Encyclopaedias, Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, I. 2020. “Marks, Pictures and Art: Their Contribution to Revolutions in Communication.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 27: 745–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, E. 2016. “Mark-making as a Human Behavior.” In Darwin’s Bridge: Uniting the Humanities and Sciences, edited by J. Carroll, D. P. McAdams, and E. O. Wilson, 101–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fava, M. 2020. “A Decline in Drawing Ability?” International Journal of Art & Design Education 39 (2): 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, J. R. 1937. The Tongues of Men. London: Watts & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1980. “Foreword: A Prefatory Essay on the Perception of Surfaces Versus the Perception of Markings on a Surface.” In The Perception of Pictures. Vol.1, edited by M. A. Hagen, xi–xviii. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• GLAD. 2019. “Call for Proposals, 22nd Annual Conference of the Group for Learning in Art and Design (GLAD).” Manchester, December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. 2004. Theories of Visual Perception. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, G. 1997. Philosophy of the Arts. An Introduction to Aesthetics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, M. A. 1986. Varieties of Realism. Geometries of Representational Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2019. “The Influence of Marxism.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K. Halliday, edited by J. J. Webster, 94–100. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, J. 1992. “The First Pictures: Perceptual Foundations of Paleolithic Art.” Perception 21 (3): 389–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, W. F. 1986. Critique of Commodity Aesthetics. Appearance, Sexuality and Advertising in Capitalist Society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Helvenston, P. A. 2014. “Comments on the Paper “Are Altered States of Consciousness Detrimental, Useful or Helpful for the Origins of Symbolic Cognition? A Response to Hodgson and Lewis Williams”, by T Froese, A Woodward and T Ikegami.” Adaptive Behavior 22 (4): 277–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helvenston, P. A. 2015. “Psilocybin-containing Mushrooms, Upper Palaeolithic Rock Art and the Neuropsychological Model.” Rock Art Research 32 (1): 84–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshilwood, C. S., F. d’Errico, K. L. van Niekerk, L. Dayet, A. Queffelec, and L. Pollarolo. 2018. “An Abstract Drawing from the 73,000-Year-old Levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa.” Nature 562: 115–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D., and P. B. Pettitt. 2018. “The Origins of Iconic Depictions: A Falsifiable Model Derived from the Visual Science of Palaeolithic Cave Art and World Rock Art.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 28 (4): 591–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, N. 2016. “Six into One: The Contradictory Art School Curriculum and How it Came About.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 35 (1): 107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. 1956/1987. “Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances.” In Roman Jakobson: Language in Literature, edited by K. Pomorska and S. Rudy, 95–114. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. 1958/1960. “Closing Statement at the Conference on Style in Language: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, edited by T. A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenning, D. 2019. “Art World Strategies: Neoliberalism and the Politics of Professional Practice in Fine Art Education.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 18 (2): 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kneese, A. 1988. “The Economics of Natural Resources.” Population and Development Review 14: 281–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestler, A. 1975. The Act of Creation. London: Picador Edition. Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., and J. Ostrofsky. 2019. “Expertise in Drawing.” In Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, edited by K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, and A. M. Williams, 576–596. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Williams, J. D. 2002. The Mind in the Cave, Consciousness and the Origins of Art. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Williams, J. D., T. A. Dowson, P. G. Bahn, R. G. Bednarik, J. Clegg, M. Consens, W. Davis, et al. 1988. “The Signs of All Times: Entoptic Phenomena in Upper Palaeolithic Art [and Comments and Reply].” Current Anthropology 29 (2): 201–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, P., P. Letschka, T. Ainsworth, and I. Haq. 2018. “Drawing Pedagogies in Higher Education: The Learning Impact of a Collaborative Cross-disciplinary Drawing Course.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 37 (2): 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. 2011. Discourse, Figure. Translated A. Hudek and M. Lydon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Maisuria, A. 2014. “The Neoliberalisation Policy Agenda and its Consequences for Education in England: A Focus on Resistance Now and Possibilities for the Future.” Policy Futures in Education 12 (2): 286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Maisuria, A., and M. Cole. 2017. “The Neoliberalization of Higher Education in England: An Alternative is Possible.” Policy Futures in Education 15 (5): 602–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malafouris, L. 2021. “Mark Making and Human Becoming.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 28: 95–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manghani, S. 2020. “Drawing Desires.” In A Companion to Contemporary Drawing, edited by K. Chorpening and R. Fortnum, 325–341. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, M. 2014. “Superior Pattern Processing is the Essence of the Evolved Human Brain.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, P. 2005. Drawing Distinctions. The Varieties of Graphic Expression. Cornell: Ithaca.
   Google Scholar
• McGettigan, A. 2015. “The Treasury View of HE: Variable Human Capital Investment.” Political Economy Research Centre (PERC) Paper No. 6. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C., R. Chamberlain, P.-W. Loo, Q. Rankin, H. Riley, and N. Brunswick. 2010. “Art Students Who Cannot Draw: Exploring the Relations Between Drawing Ability, Visual Memory, Accuracy of Copying, and Dyslexia.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4 (1): 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 2008. “Visual Literacy or Literary Visualcy?” In Visual Literacy, edited by J. Elkins, 11–29. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimore, T. 2003. Dyslexia and Learning Style. A Practitioner’s Handbook. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Nist, S. L., and K. Kirby. 1986. “Teaching Comprehension and Study Strategies Through Modeling and Thinking Aloud.” Reading Research and Instruction 25 (4): 254–264.
   Google Scholar
• Nist, S. L., and D. L. Mealey. 1991. “Teacher Directed Comprehension Strategies.” In Teaching Reading and Study Strategies at the College Level, edited by R. F. Flippo and D. C. Caverly, 42–85. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• OFSTED. 2011. “Making a Mark: Art, Craft & Design Education.” Accessed June 16 2021 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/413334/Making_a_mark_-_art_craft_and_design_education_2008-11_-_high_resolution.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ostrofsky, J., and A. Kozbelt. 2012. “A Multi-Stage Attention Hypothesis of Drawing Ability.” In Thinking Through Drawing: Practice Into Knowledge, edited by A. Kantrowitz, A. Brew, and M. Fava, 61–66. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. 2005. “Pushing Out the Boundaries: Designing a Systemic-functional Model for non-European Visual Arts.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 1 (1): 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. 2011. The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. 2019. “Halliday’s Three Functions and Their Interaction in the Interpretation of Painting and Music.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K. Halliday, edited by J. J. Webster, 396–385. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C. 2020. “Through a Glass Darkly: The Teaching and Assessment of Drawing Skills in the UK Post-16 Art & Design Curriculum.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 39 (2): 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petherbridge, D. 2010. The Primacy of Drawing. Histories and Theories of Practice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petherbridge, D. 2019. “The Drawing Experiment at the Royal College of Art 1995-2001.” In The International Encyclopedia of Art and Design Education, edited by Richard Hickman, 1–20. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Qvarnström, L. 2019. “Drawing Activities as Pedagogical Method in Art History.” Konsthistorisk Tidskrift/Journal of Art History 88 (2): 80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, Q., and H. Riley. 2021. Observational Drawing for Students with Dyslexia: Strategies, Tips and Inspiration. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, Q., H. Riley, N. Brunswick, I. C. McManus, and R. Chamberlain. 2017. “Talking the Line: Inclusive Strategies for the Teaching of Drawing.” Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice 2 (2): 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2001. “The Intelligence of Seeing: An Inquiry into the Relationships between Perception Theory, Communication Theory, and the Practice and Teaching of Drawing.” PhD thesis, University of Wales. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.507928
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2002. “Firing Practice: Drawing as Empowerment.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 1 (3): 150–161.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2007. “Beyond the Horizon: Future Directions for the Teaching of Visual Arts Practice.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 6 (1): 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2008. “Drawing: Towards an Intelligence of Seeing.” In Writing On Drawing, Essays on Drawing Practice and Research, edited by S. Garner, 153–167. Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2014. “Analysing Pictures: A Systemic-functional Semiotic Model for Drawing.” In Multimodal Epistemologies. Towards an Integrated Framework, edited by A. Maiorani and C. Christie, 83–93. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2017. “Drawing as Driver of Creativity: Nurturing an Intelligence of Seeing in Art Students.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 36 (3): 273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2019. “Drawing as Language: The Systemic-Functional Semiotic Argument.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 18 (2): 132–144.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, H. 2021. “The Case for the Primacy of Visualcy Within a Neoliberal Artschool Curriculum.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 20 (2): 133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakiro, M., P. Pettitt, and R. Ontañon-Peredo. 2020. “Upper Palaeolithic Installation Art: Topography, Distortion, Animation and Participation in the Production and Experience of Cantabrian Cave Art.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30 (4): 665–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, M. H., D. T. Campbell, and M. J. Herskovit. 1966. The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, S. 2021. The Value of Drawing Instruction in the Visual Arts and Across Curricula: Historical and Philosophical Arguments for Drawing in the Digital Age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spark, M. 1961. The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, D. S. 2009. Cave Paintings and the Human Spirit: The Origin of Creativity and Belief. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Willats, J. 1997. Art & Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, J. 2018. What Happened to the Art Schools? London: Politeia.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., and M. Orrom. 1954. Preface to Film. London: Film Drama Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, R. W. 1974. The Intelligence of Feeling. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, R. W. 1995. Art & Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. 1998. “Why Drawing is Interesting”. Tracey. www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/sota/tracey/journal/dab/1998/wollheim.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. P. W., and M. A. Rau. 2019. “How Students Learn Content in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Through Drawing Activities.” Educational Psychology Review 31 (1): 87–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidel, D. W. 2016. Neuropsychology of Art. Neurological, Cognitive and Evolutionary Perspectives. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidel, D. W. 2020. “Imagination, Symbolic Cognition, and Human Evolution: The Early Arts Facilitated Group Survival.” In Evolutionary Perspectives on Imaginative Culture, edited by J. Carroll, M. Clasen, and E. Jonsson, 71–89. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar