The (de)situated subjective: a cognitive autoethnography of ‘the New York School’

References

• Academy of American Poets. n.d. “The Artists & Poets of the New York School.” Accessed April 18, 2021. https://poets.org/text/artists-poets-new-york-school.
   Google Scholar
• Anfam, D. (1990) 2015. Abstract Expressionism. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• ARTnews. 2019. “ARTnews.com.” https://www.artnews.com/about-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. (1969) 1994. The Poetics of Space. Translated by M. Jolas (Revised edition). Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., and T. C. Ormerod. 2000. “Putting Ethnography to Work: The Case for a Cognitive Ethnography of Design.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 (1): 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, Alfred H. Jr. 1958. “Introduction.” In The New American Painting, as Shown in Eight European Countries, 1958–1959. Exhibition catalogue, Tate Gallery: 9–13. London 1959. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/modern-american-art-at-tate/resources/new-american-painting.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1968) 1969. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, 217–251. New York: Schocken. see particularly pp. 218–223.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1999) 2005. Selected Writings, Volume 2, Part 2 1931–1934. Edited by M. W. Jennings, H. Eiland, and G. Smith; Translated by R. Livingstone. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson, William. 1963. “Bluhm Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 62 (3): 38–41, May, 50, 52.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson, William. 1964. “Michael Goldberg Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 62 (9): 42–45, January, 65–67.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T. n.d. “Information Management: A Proposal.” Accessed April 19, 2021. https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. E. 1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Lawrence. 1957. “Resnick Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 56, (8): 38–41, December, 65, 66.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Lawrence. 1960. “Elaine de Kooning Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 59, (8): 40–43, December, 61–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cazeaux, C. 2002. “Categories in Action: Sartre and the Theory-Practice Debate.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 2 (1–2): 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. K. 2018. “Guess, Check and Fix: A Phenomenology of Improvisation in ‘Neural’ Painting.” Digital Creativity 29 (1): 96–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clignet, R. 1985. The Structure of Artistic Revolutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Computer-Generated Pictures (Noll & Julesz) | Database of Digital Art”. n.d. Accessed August 11, 2021. http://dada.compart-bremen.de/item/exhibition/172.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., and A. L. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, P. 1993. Art and Embodiment: From Aesthetics to Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. [1934] 1958. Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn Books, G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, D. 1993. The Collages of Kurt Schwitters: Tradition and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1989. The Open Work. Translated by Anna Cancogni. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/autoethnography-overview/docview/870465772/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., and A. P. Bochner, eds. 1996. Composing Ethnography: Alternative Forms of Qualitative Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, Max. (1948) 2009. Max Ernst: Beyond Painting. New York, NY: Wittenborn, Schultz.
   Google Scholar
• Flusser, V. 1984. Towards a Philosophy of Photography. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. 2006. “The Source–Path–Goal Schema in the Autobiographical Journey Documentary.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 4 (3): 241–261.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, E. M. 1909. “The Machine Stops.” The Oxford and Cambridge Review 8 (Michaelmass term): 83–122.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. 2009. “Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by M. Aydede and P. Robbins, 35–53. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geisler, Cheryl. 2018. “Coding for Language Complexity: The Interplay Among Methodological Commitments, Tools, and Workflow in Writing Research.” Written Communication 35 (2): 215–249.
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. 1962. Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1976. The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• GitHub. n.d. “Artsy/the-Art-Genome-Project: Gene Names and Definitions.” Accessed August 5, 2021. https://github.com/artsy/the-art-genome-project/.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnough, Robert. 1951. “Pollock Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 50 (3): 38–41, May, 60, 61.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnough, Robert. 1952. “Kline Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 51 (8): 36–39, December, 63, 64.
   Google Scholar
• Halsall, F., J. Jansen, and T. O’Connor. 2006. “Editorial Introduction: Aesthetics and Its Objects—Challenges from Art and Experience.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 5 (3): 123–126.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1962) 1978. Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Thomas B. 1953. “de Kooning Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 52 (1): 30–32, March, 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, D. (1966) 2001. “Intermedia.” Leonardo 34 (1): 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, A. 2014. “A Cognitive Ethnographic Study of Improvisational Drawing by Eight Contemporary Artists.” (PhD Thesis) Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. [1987] 1990. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, S. K. 1953. Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Laverty, S. M. 2003. “Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (3): 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, A.-S. 2009. “Invisible Work: The Representation of Artistic Practice in Digital Visual Culture.” In Digital Visual Culture: Theory and Practice, edited by A. Bentkowska-Kafel, T. Cashen, and H. Gardiner, 33–45. Intellect Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. 1689. “What Determines the Will.” In An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 14th edition, bk. 2, ch. 21, sec. 29: 202. London: Printed for S. Birt et al. 1753. Accessed November 2, 2019. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433089905834&view=1up&seq=13.
   Google Scholar
• Maclagen, D. 2001. “Reframing Aesthetic Experience: Iconographic and Embodied Responses to Painting.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 1 (1): 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Medjesi-Jones, A. 2013. “Mediated Image.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 12 (1): 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by C. Smith. London: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Nanay, B. 2015. “Aesthetic Attention.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (5–6): 96–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall, Michael. 2011. What Is a Picture? Depiction, Realism, Abstraction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Barnett. 1965. “The New York School Question.” ARTnews 64(5): 55, 56, September.
   Google Scholar
• Noë, A. 2017. “Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature: A Précis.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1): 211–213.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, Frank. 1958. “Cavallon Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 57 (8): 42–45, December, 66.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, S. 2012. “Writing the Self into Research: Using Grounded Theory Analytic Strategies in Autoethnography.” Central Queensland University Journal contribution.
   Google Scholar
• Petitmengin, C. 2007. “Towards the Source of Thoughts: The Gestural and Transmodal Dimension of Lived Experience.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (3): 54–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitard, J. 2016. “Using Vignettes within Autoethnography to Explore Layers of Cross-Cultural Awareness as a Teacher.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 17 (1): Article 1.
   Google Scholar
• Pitard, J. 2019. “Autoethnography as a Phenomenological Tool: Connecting the Personal to the Cultural.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, edited by P. Liamputtong, 1829–1845. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Fairfield. 1953. “Tworkov Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 52 (3): 30–33, May, 72, 73.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, Stewart. 1965. “Reputations Made and in Making.” New York Times, April 18.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. 2020. “NVivo (released in March 2020).” https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. 1969. Mental Imagery. New York: Springer. pp. 43–126.
   Google Scholar
• Ruskin, J. 1857. The Elements of Drawing: In Three Letters to Beginners. London: Smith, Elder, & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sandino, L. 2007. “Relating Process: Accounts of Influence in the Life History Interview.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 6 (3): 191–199.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, Irving. 1957. “Mitchell Paints a Picture.” ARTnews 56 (6): 44–47, October, 69, 70.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, Irving. 1970. The Triumph of American Painting: A History of Abstract Expressionism. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1992) 2016. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1968. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man.” In Science, Perception and Reality, edited by W. Selllars, 1–40. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. 1978. “The Mental Image.” American Psychologist 33 (2): 125–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate. n.d. “New York school – Art Term.” Tate. Accessed April 15, 2021. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/n/new-york-school.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, Maurice. 1971. The New York School: Abstract Expressionism in the 40s and 50s. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. 2008. “Spatial Cognition: Embodied and Situated.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by M. Aydede and P. Robbins, 201–216. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. 2019. Mind in Motion: How Action Shapes Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Uricchio, W. 2009. “Moving Beyond the Artefact: Lessons from Participatory Culture.” In Digital Material, edited by M. van den Boomen, S. Lammes, A.-S. Lehmann, J. Raessens, and M. T. Schäfer, 135–146. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. 2016. Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B. A. 2004. “Observing the Mind.” In The Taboo of Subjectivity, edited by B. A. Wallace, 75–96. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, N. 2007. “Seeing What, How and Why: The ARTnews Series, 1953–58.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 6 (3): 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. 1987. Painting as an Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xenakis, I., and A. Arnellos. 2014. “Aesthetic Perception and Its Minimal Content: A Naturalistic Perspective.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yablonsky, L. 2005. “What Makes a Painting a Painting?” ARTnews.com, April 1. https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/what-makes-a-painting-a-painting-115/.
   Google Scholar