New sources of military change – armed forces as normal organizations

References

• Adamsky, D., 2010. The culture of military innovation: the impact of cultural factors on the revolution in military affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adamsky, D. and Bjerga, K.I., eds., 2012. Contemporary military innovation. Between anticipation and adaptation. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D., 1994. Political institutions and military change: lessons from peripheral wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D., 2004. The privatization of security and change in the control of force. International studies perspectives, 5 (2), 153–157.10.1111/insp.2004.5.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D., 2005. The market for force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490866
   Google Scholar
• Bacevich, A.J., 1986. The pentomic area: the US army between Korea and Vietnam. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, T.P.M., 2004. The Pentagon’s new map: war and peace in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S., 2002. The new way of war? Foreign Affairs, May/June.
   Google Scholar
• Bradin, J.W., 1994. From hot air to hellfire: the history of army attack aviation. Novato, CA: Presidio Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., 2012. Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji journal of political science and economics, 1 (1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., 2001. New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E.A., 2001. The unequal dialogue. The theory and reality of civil-military relations and the use of force. In: P.D. Feaver and R.H. Kohn, eds. Soldiers and civilians: the civil-military gap and American national security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 429–458.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E.A., 2010. Change and transformation in military affairs. Journal of strategic studies, 27 (3), 395–407.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, S. and Terriff, T., 2000. Critical reflections on security and change. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Egnell, R., 2006. Explaining US and British performance in complex expeditionary operations: the civil-military dimension. The journal of strategic studies, 29 (6), 1041–1075.10.1080/01402390601016717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell, R., 2009. Complex peace operations and civil-military relations: winning the peace. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., 1996. Figuring out fighting organizations: the new organizational analysis in strategic studies. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 19, 122–356.10.1080/01402399608437629
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., 1998. Culture and military power. The review of international studies, 24, 407–416.10.1017/S0260210598004070
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., 2002. Contructivist security studies: portrait of a research program. International studies review, 4, 49–72.10.1111/misr.2002.4.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. and Rynning, S., 2010. NATO’s transformation gaps: transatlantic differences and the war in Afghanistan. Journal of strategic studies, 33 (5), 673–699.10.1080/01402390.2010.498247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. and Terriff, T., eds., 2002. The sources of military change: culture, politics and technology. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, P.D. and Kohn, R.H., eds., 2001. Soldiers and civilians. The civil military gap and American national security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1961. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, E. and Eliason, L., eds., 2003. The diffusion of military technology and ideas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, A., 2006. The future of military innovation studies. Journal of strategic studies, 29 (5), 905–934.10.1080/01402390600901067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruening, G., 2001. Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International public management journal, 4 (1), 1–25.10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, R., 2008. RMA og transformasjon. En historisk-kritisk analyse av to sentrale begreper i nyere vestlig forsvarspolitikk [RMA and transformation. An historical-critical analysis of two central concepts in recent Western defence policy]. Oslo: Oslo Files on Defence and Security, 05.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, R., 2012. Blitzkrieg, the RMA and defense intellectuals. In: D. Adamsky and K.I. Bjerga, eds. Contemporary military innovation: between anticipation and adaptation. London: Routledge, 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, V., Pollitt, C., and van Thiel, S., 2007. Introduction. In: C. Pollitt, S. Van Thiel and V. Homburg, eds. New public management in Europe. Adaptation and alternatives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–9.10.1057/9780230625365
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M.C., 2010. The diffusion of military power: causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835102
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S., 1957. The soldier and the state: the theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S., 1965. Power, expertise, and the military profession. In: W. Posvar, ed. American Defense Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M., 1960. The professional soldier: a social and political portrait. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J., 1996. The culture of national security. Norms and identity in world politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, E., 1997. Imagining war: French and British military doctrine between the wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, K., 2013 [1965]. Military organizations. In: J.G. March, ed. Handbook of organizations. London: Routledge, 20 ed., 838–878.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., ed., 2013 [1965]. Handbook of organizations (Vol. 20). Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, S.L., 1997. Unconventional warfare: rebuilding US special operations forces. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, A., 1986. The new mercenaries. London: Corgi Books.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, W. and Millett, A.R., eds., 1996. Military innovation in the interwar period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. and Snider, D.M., eds., 2009. American civil-military relations. The soldier and the state in a New Era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2013. The European union and military force: governance and strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G., 1996. The future of governing: four emerging models. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G., 2011a. Public management reform. A comparative analysis: new public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G., 2011b. Public management reform: a comparative analysis. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., van Thiel, S., and Homburg, V., eds., 2007. New public management in Europe. Adaptation and alternatives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B., 1984. The sources of military doctrine. France, Britain and Germany between the world wars. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S.P., 1988. New ways of war: understanding military innovation. International security, 13 (1), 134–168.10.2307/2538898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S.P., 1991. Winning the next war: innovation and the modern military. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roxborough, I., 2000. Organizationl innovation: lessons from military organizations. Sociological forum, 15 (2), 367–372.10.1023/A:1007533911128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, D., 1998. Private armies and military intervention. IISS, Adelphi Paper 316.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P.W., 2003. Corporate warriors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., 2007. The utility of force: the art of war in the modern world. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Soeters, J., van Fenema, P.C. and Beeres, R., eds., 2010. Managing military organizations. Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., 2012. The limited capacity of management to rescue UK defence policy: a review and a word of caution. International affairs, 88 (2), 223–242.10.1111/inta.2012.88.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisk, K.M., 1993. Engaging the enemy: organization theory and soviet military innovation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400820931
   Google Scholar